Efficacy of a Simplified Diagnostic-Therapeutic Strategy Based on the Prostate-Pelvic Syndrome Theory Versus NIH Conventional Classification‑Based Protocol for Type III Prostatitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
In brief
PPS-guided therapy lifts response to 80% versus 62% with NIH protocol
In men under 40 with type III prostatitis, a simplified prostate-pelvic syndrome diagnostic approach achieved symptom improvement in about 80% of patients, compared with 62% using the traditional NIH classification. The benefit was driven mainly by better quality-of-life scores, while pain and voiding changes were similar. Further work is needed to isolate the impact of the streamlined diagnostic pathway.
- Journal
- The Prostate (Q1)
- Published
- 31 August 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Xiaoma Zhang, Li Xiao, Lei Zhou, Zhen Zhang, Chen Zhang, Hexi Du
- PMID
- 42671151
- DOI
- 10.1002/pros.70236
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Urology (top studies of the week, 6 September 2026): Simplified diagnostic‑therapeutic strategy for type III prostatitis RCT
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of a simplified diagnostic and individualized comprehensive treatment strategy based on the "prostate-pelvic syndrome (PPS)" theory versus the traditional National Institutes of Health (NIH) conventional classification-based protocol for type III prostatitis in men under 40 years. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 222 patients (18-39 years) with type III prostatitis were randomly assigned to individualized comprehensive therapy guided by simplified PPS-based diagnosis (n = 112) or traditional NIH conventional classification-based therapy (n = 110) for 6 weeks. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence with allocation concealment via sealed opaque envelopes. The primary endpoint was the change in the NIH-chronic prostatitis symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total score and the response rate (≥ 6-point decrease). Secondary endpoints included changes in prostate volume (PV), NIH-CPSI subdomain scores, and the proportion of patients with sexual dysfunction (SD). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors influencing treatment response. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients completed follow-up (108 PPS and 104 NIH). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, the median decrease in NIH-CPSI total score was significantly greater in the PPS group than in the NIH group (p = 0.003), and the response rate was higher (79.6% versus 61.5%, p = 0.004). The intergroup difference was primarily driven by the quality-of-life domain (p = 0.003), while pain and voiding domain changes did not differ significantly between groups. Multivariate analysis identified PPS-based treatment [odds ratio (OR) = 2.227, 95% onfidence intervals (CI): 1.143-4.337] and baseline factors, including SD (OR = 0.334, 95% CI: 0.165-0.673), sedentariness (OR = 3.554, 95% CI: 1.652-7.642), and PV ≥ 20 mL (OR = 4.850, 95% CI: 1.870-12.575), as independent predictors of response. CONCLUSION: In men under 40 years with type III prostatitis, individualized comprehensive therapy guided by simplified PPS-based diagnosis was associated with greater symptom improvement-particularly in quality of life-compared with the traditional NIH conventional classification-based protocol. The findings suggest that a comprehensive, symptom-directed treatment strategy may outperform a more restricted classification-based regimen, though the contribution of the simplified diagnostic pathway-eliminating lower urinary tract pathogen localization and invasive expressed prostatic secretion testing-per se requires further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MR-34-24-035332; https://www.medicalresearch.org.cn.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.