Skip to main content

Effects of Evolocumab on Mortality Outcomes in Patients Without Previous Myocardial Infarction or Stroke: A Prespecified Analysis of the VESALIUS-CV Randomized Clinical Trial

In brief

Evolocumab cuts death by one fifth in high-risk patients without prior heart attack

In the VESALIUS-CV trial of 12,257 adults with atherosclerosis or high-risk diabetes and no previous myocardial infarction or stroke, evolocumab lowered all-cause mortality from 9.7% to 7.9% over a median 4.6 years-a 20% relative reduction. Benefit was seen for cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths, likely driven by fewer non-fatal heart attacks and strokes. Further data are needed on long-term safety and cost-effectiveness.

Journal
Circulation (Q1)
Published
31 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Robert P Giugliano, Erin A Bohula, Andrea Bellavia, Gaetano M De Ferrari, A Leiter, Jose C Nicolau, et al.
PMID
42670293
DOI
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.082436

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evolocumab, a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9) inhibitor, significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in patients without previous myocardial infarction or stroke in the VESALIUS-CV trial (Effect of Evolocumab in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk without Prior Myocardial Infarction or Stroke). However, mortality results have yet to be fully characterized. METHODS: VESALIUS-CV was a double-blind study of 12 257 patients (median age, 66 years [interquartile range, 60-71]; 43% women) with qualifying atherosclerosis or high-risk diabetes without previous myocardial infarction or stroke, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ≥90 mg/dL (or non-high-density lipoprotein-C ≥120 mg/dL or apolipoprotein B ≥80 mg/dL) who were randomized to evolocumab or placebo. Prespecified mortality outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, subtypes of death (including cardiovascular [CV] and non-CV), and timing of events. Non-CV mortality was further investigated using multistate modeling to assess the contribution of prevention of nonfatal CV events (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and ischemia-driven arterial revascularization) to non-CV mortality. RESULTS: Over a median of 4.6 years (interquartile range, 4.0-5.2), 973 (7.9%) patients died: 351 (36%) of CV causes, 497 (51%) of non-CV causes, and 125 (13%) of undetermined cause. All-cause mortality rates were 20% lower with evolocumab compared with placebo: 434 deaths (5-year Kaplan-Meier rate of 7.9%) with evolocumab versus 539 deaths (9.7%) with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.70-0.91; P=0.0005). There was consistency of benefit for CV death (156 deaths [2.8%] versus 195 [3.6%]; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98), non-CV death (229 [4.2%] versus 268 [5.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01), and deaths of undetermined cause (49 [1.1%] versus 76 [1.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92). Results were consistent regardless of age, sex, region, race, qualifying atherosclerosis or high-risk diabetes, baseline low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, or background lipid therapy. Postrandomization nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and ischemia-driven arterial revascularization were associated with increased risk of subsequent non-CV death within the next 4 years, with the majority occurring during the first year after the event. Multistate modeling suggested the observations regarding non-CV death with evolocumab was largely (78%; bootstrap interquartile range, 71-92%) driven by the prevention of antecedent nonfatal CV events. CONCLUSIONS: These results support using evolocumab to improve survival in high-risk patients who have not experienced a previous myocardial infarction or stroke, including those with high-risk diabetes without qualifying atherosclerosis with low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ≥ 90 mg/dl (or non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ≥ 120 mg/dl or apolipoprotein B ≥ 80 mg/dl). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03872401.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.