Antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
In brief
DOAC with one antiplatelet halves major bleeding compared with VKA plus DAPT
In a pooled analysis of six trials involving over 10,000 atrial-fibrillation patients undergoing PCI, a direct oral anticoagulant combined with a single P2Y12 inhibitor cut TIMI major bleeding risk by roughly 50% versus traditional vitamin K antagonist plus dual antiplatelet therapy, without raising overall death, heart-attack or stroke rates.
- Journal
- European heart journal (Q1)
- Published
- 30 August 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Mauro Chiarito, Roxana Mehran, Michael C Gibson, Christopher P Cannon, Renato D Lopes, Samantha Sartori, et al.
- PMID
- 42669062
- DOI
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehag740
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (top studies of the week, 6 September 2026): Antithrombotic therapy after PCI in AF: IPD network meta‑analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Randomized trials demonstrated that in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and a P2Y12 inhibitor reduce bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with no increase in ischemic risk; however, important gaps in knowledge remain, limiting certainty and generalizability of these findings. METHODS: In this patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating antithrombotic strategies in patients with AF undergoing PCI, Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by trial, were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (HR, 95%CI). The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and TIMI major bleeding, respectively. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251130025). RESULTS: Six trials (10,634 patients) comparing DOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor (4,083), VKA plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, 1,247), VKA plus DAPT (3,715), and DOAC plus DAPT (1,589) were included. The transition from DAPT to SAPT was recommended at 1 (1-3) and 3 (1-7) days in the DOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor and VKA plus SAPT groups, respectively. At 1 year, the risk of the primary efficacy outcome did not differ across the antithrombotic strategies (reference group: VKA plus DAPT; DOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor: HR 1.16, 95%CI 0.97-1.41; VKA plus SAPT: 1.14, 0.85-1.54, DOAC plus DAPT: 0.99, 0.75-1.30), without any statistically significant interaction between treatment effects and all prespecified subgroups, including age, sex, bleeding risk, and thrombotic risk. However, 14-day landmark analysis showed an increased risk of myocardial infarction and definite/probable stent thrombosis in patients receiving DOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor or VKA plus SAPT in the early phase after PCI. DOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor reduced the risk of the primary safety outcome compared with VKA plus DAPT (0.48, 0.38- 0.65) and VKA plus SAPT (0.62, 0.40-0.97); only a borderline reduction was observed compared to DOAC plus DAPT (0.66, 0.44-1.01). DOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor reduced intracranial hemorrhage compared with VKA plus DAPT (0.21, 0.07-0.64). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF undergoing PCI, the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke did not significantly differ according to whether patients received a DOAC or VKA, whereas a modest increase in risk with single compared with dual antiplatelet therapy cannot be excluded, given the higher risk of early coronary events. DOACs compared with VKAs reduced the risk of bleeding across all severity grades, including intracranial hemorrhage, whereas omission of a second antiplatelet agent reduced the risk of TIMI major or minor bleeding.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.