Comparison of the Risk of Acute Anterior Uveitis Flare Between Adalimumab and Subcutaneous Infliximab in Patients with Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis and Prior Acute Anterior Uveitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Why clinicians should know about it

• Picked for Rheumatology (paper of the day, 30 August 2026): No significant AAU flare risk difference between ADA and IFX‑SC

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute anterior uveitis (AAU) is the most common extra-musculoskeletal manifestation of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) and is an important consideration when selecting biological therapy. Although adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab are commonly used in patients with r-axSpA and AAU, direct comparative evidence, particularly between ADA and subcutaneous infliximab (IFX-SC), remains limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the risk of AAU flare between ADA and IFX-SC in patients with r-axSpA and a history of AAU. METHODS: This multicenter, head-to-head, randomized, open-label trial enrolled patients with r-axSpA and a documented AAU event within the preceding 2 years. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ADA (40 mg every 2 weeks) or IFX-SC (intravenous 5 mg/kg induction followed by subcutaneous 120 mg every 2 weeks) and were followed for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was AAU flare occurrence. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Secondary endpoints included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), r-axSpA disease activity and functional indices, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were randomized (ADA, n = 28; IFX-SC, n = 28). During follow-up, one AAU flare episode occurred in each group. The adjusted HR of IFX-SC (vs ADA) for an AAU flare was 0.496 (95% confidence interval 0.025-9.768, p = 0.645). No significant differences in secondary endpoints were observed between groups (right BCVA, p = 0.622; left BCVA, p = 0.306; Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score, p = 0.293; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, p = 0.262; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, p = 0.307). Adverse events were similar in frequency and severity, with no new safety signals identified. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences in AAU flare risk or secondary ocular and rheumatologic outcomes were observed between ADA and IFX-SC over 48 weeks in patients with r-axSpA and prior AAU. These findings suggest that IFX-SC may represent a potential alternative to ADA for AAU flare prevention as well as disease activity control in this population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea; KCT0007239.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.