Skip to main content

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure and Continuous Albuterol for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations: A Randomized Clinical Trial

In brief

Early BPAP fails to cut albuterol use in moderate pediatric asthma

In a double-blind trial of 66 children with moderate asthma attacks, 4 hours of bilevel positive airway pressure reduced continuous albuterol time by only half an hour on average, a difference that was not statistically or clinically significant. The study stopped early for futility, indicating BPAP offers no clear benefit in this setting and prompting calls for research in more severe cases.

Journal
JAMA network open (Q1)
Published
3 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Patrick T Wilson, Melisa Tanverdi, John T Brinton, Lilliam Ambroggio, Stanley J Szefler
PMID
42646841
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.30627

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (top studies of the week, 30 August 2026): BPAP plus continuous albuterol versus sham in pediatric asthma exacerbations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: A substantial knowledge gap remains in understanding the specific role bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) in the emergency department (ED) for acute pediatric asthma exacerbations. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the early application of BPAP in the ED for acute pediatric asthma exacerbations reduces duration of critical care management time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled children between 5 and 17 years of age presenting to a single-center, quaternary, referral pediatric ED with an acute asthma exacerbation, a pediatric respiratory assessment measure of at least 4 (moderate severity), and prescribed continuous albuterol therapy between June 1, 2023, and May 31, 2025. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to either the intervention arm (BPAP) or control arm (sham BPAP, which delivers minimal pressure) for 4 hours. Neither the health care practitioners nor participants were aware of study arm allocation. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was duration of continuous albuterol therapy. A sequential design with a planned interim analysis for futility and superiority was used, and a t test compared mean duration of continuous β-agonist therapy under an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Sixty-six study participants (median [IQR] age, 10.2 [6.8-13.2] years; 35 [53.0%] male; 1 [1.5%] American Indian or Alaskan, 1 [1.5%] Asian, 21 [31.8%] Black or African American, 21 [31.8%] White, and 22 [33.3%] other race) were included in the primary analysis, with a mean (SD) pediatric respiratory assessment measure of 5.2 (1.9), indicating moderate disease. At the 50% interim analysis, participants in the BPAP study arm received a mean (SD) of 8.3 (8.5) hours of continuous albuterol vs 8.7 (10.0) hours in the control group (mean difference, -0.5 hours; 95% CI, -5.0 to 4.1 hours; P = .84). The study was stopped due to meeting a priori bounds for futility at the 50% interim analysis. No deaths, invasive mechanical ventilation, air leak syndrome, or aspiration pneumonia were observed in either study arm. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial of early initiation of BPAP in the ED, no clinically significant decrease in the duration of continuous β-agonist therapy in pediatric patients presenting with moderate asthma exacerbations was observed. Additional open-label studies in a more severe asthma cohort are required to better inform clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05848115.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.