Skip to main content

Efficacy of pharmacologic therapies for reducing bronchopulmonary dysplasia and mortality in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis

Journal
BMC pediatrics (Q2)
Published
28 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Runjia Zhao, Wei Guo
PMID
42642729
DOI
10.1186/s12887-026-07408-y

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a major complication of prematurity and is associated with substantial respiratory morbidity, impaired growth, and increased mortality in severe cases. Pharmacologic prevention strategies have been evaluated in randomized trials, but their comparative effects remain uncertain. AIM: This network meta-analysis aimed to summarize the comparative evidence for pharmacologic interventions evaluated for reducing BPD incidence and pre-discharge mortality in preterm infants. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pharmacological therapies for BPD prevention, with a search cutoff of September 1, 2025. Data analysis was conducted using R 4.2.3 software. The primary outcome was BPD incidence, and the secondary outcome was pre-discharge mortality. BPD definitions and assessment timepoints were extracted from individual studies and interpreted considering variation across NIH 2001, NIH 2018, Shennan, or study-specific criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-six randomized controlled trials involving 11,414 preterm infants were included in the systematic review. Of these, 24 trials contributed to the BPD incidence network, and 19 trials contributed to the pre-discharge mortality network. Several interventions showed comparative signals for lower odds of BPD incidence or pre-discharge mortality when compared with placebo; however, the strength and precision of these signals varied across comparisons. In the BPD incidence network, some estimates excluded the null, but several comparisons were informed partly by indirect evidence or sparsely connected nodes. In the pre-discharge mortality network, favorable estimates were less certain because mortality events were sparse and several 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were wide. The certainty of evidence was moderate for BPD incidence and low for pre-discharge mortality. SUCRA rankings were therefore interpreted only as probabilistic summaries within the network and not as evidence of clinical superiority. CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis identified several comparative signals for pharmacologic prevention of BPD and reduction of pre-discharge mortality in preterm infants. However, these findings are constrained by low-to-moderate certainty of evidence, indirect comparisons, sparse network nodes, and imprecision in several estimates. The results should therefore be interpreted as evidence-mapping and hypothesis-generating rather than as treatment recommendations. Future studies should prioritize direct head-to-head comparisons, phenotype- or severity-specific analyses, and long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.