Sutetinib for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase IIb Trial
In brief
Sutetinib produces a 71% response rate in uncommon EGFR-mutated NSCLC
In a phase IIb trial of 96 evaluable patients, sutetinib achieved an objective response in about seven out of ten participants and disease control in nine out of ten, with median progression-free survival of roughly 14 months. Grade three or higher side effects occurred in 42% of patients, most commonly diarrhea, but only 4% stopped treatment.
- Journal
- Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (Q1)
- Published
- 24 August 2026
- Study design
- Non-randomized / quasi-experimental trial
- Evidence level
- Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
- Authors
- Fengying Wu, Wei Zhang, Yanqiu Zhao, Yan Yu, Jian Fang, Sen Han, et al.
- PMID
- 42637134
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtho.2026.104165
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Oncology and Radiation Oncology (paper of the day, 28 August 2026): Phase IIb trial of sutetinib in NSCLC with uncommon EGFR
Abstract
PURPOSE: Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations account for ∼10% of EGFR-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and show heterogeneous sensitivity to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with limited prospective evidence to inform first-line therapy. Sutetinib is an irreversible EGFR-TKI. We assessed the safety and antitumor efficacy of sutetinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase IIb trial, adults with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR G719X, S768I, L861Q, or predefined compound mutations and no prior EGFR-TKI therapy were enrolled. Patients received sutetinib 80 mg orally once daily in 28-day cycles until radiographic progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who received at least one dose of treatment and evaluable for efficacy analysis were included in the primary analysis, and all patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the safety analysis. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), as assessed by the independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: From December 9, 2021, to May 5, 2024, 99 patients were enrolled (efficacy-evaluable, n=96; safety, n=99). As of data cut-off in October, 2024, the median follow-up was 16.6 months. The IRC-confirmed ORR was 70.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.7-79.7) and the DCR was 90.6% (95% CI, 82.9-95.6). Median DoR was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-15.7) and median PFS was 13.7 months (95% CI, 10.9-16.4). Median OS was not reached (95% CI, 22.2-not reached). ORR was numerically higher in patients with compound versus solitary uncommon EGFR mutations (84.4% vs 64.1%), with median PFS of 13.8 versus 11.0 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 97.0% (96/99) of patients, and grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 42.4% (42/99). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were diarrhea (28.3% [28/99]), hypokalemia (8.1% [8/99]), and increased gamma-glutamyl transferase (5.1% [5/99]). TRAEs led to dose reduction in 34.3% (34/99) and treatment discontinuation in 4.0% (4/99). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Sutetinib met the prespecified primary endpoint and demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in advanced NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, and L861Q). These findings support sutetinib as a potential treatment option for this molecularly heterogeneous population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05168566.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.