Skip to main content

Inhibition of Salt-Inducible Kinases 2 and 3 reduces inflammatory signature in Psoriasis

Journal
The Journal of investigative dermatology (Q1)
Published
18 August 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Anna Caroline Pilz, Eva Briem, Maikel Colli, Christina Hillig, Stephanie Lavazais, Michael P Menden, et al.
PMID
42612789
DOI
10.1016/j.jid.2026.07.033

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Dermatology (paper of the day, 21 August 2026): Inhibition of SIK2/3 reduces inflammatory signature in psoriasis

Abstract

Psoriasis is a highly prevalent inflammatory skin disease for which good systemic therapeutic agents are available. However, there still is a great need for new treatment options, especially oral ones. Salt-inducible kinases (SIKs) are emerging as new druggable targets in immune diseases and the SIK2/SIK3 inhibitor GLPG3970 recently proved to efficiently reduce psoriasis lesions in a phase Ib trial. This study assesses molecular events underlying beneficial effects of SIK2/SIK3 inhibition via GLPG3970 in psoriasis. Using spatial transcriptomics and single cell sequencing, abundant expression of SIK2 and SIK3, but not of SIK1, was observed in psoriatic skin. In vitro, GLPG3970 reduced psoriasis marker cytokines and chemokines (TNF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL8, CXCL10) in peripheral mononuclear cells, T cells and fibroblasts, but not in keratinocytes. Bulk RNA sequencing of lesional psoriasis biopsies treated ex vivo with GLPG3970 and of biopsies received from responders vs. placebo-treated patients of the clinical trial showed downregulation of inflammatory pathways with suppression of IL1B, CXCL1, CXCL8, CEBPB, CD177, and CLEC5A in both settings. In summary, this study suggests that specific inhibition of SIK2/SIK3 reduces acute phase immunity and neutrophil recruitment in psoriasis.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.