In vitro maturation for infertility in polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review of treatment protocols and outcomes
- Journal
- Fertility and sterility (Q1)
- Published
- 12 August 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Lan N Vuong, Toan D Pham, Ho L Le, Tuong M Ho
- PMID
- 42586493
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.07.032
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Neonatology (top studies of the week, 16 August 2026): In‑vitro maturation review, unrelated to neonatology
Abstract
In vitro maturation (IVM) involves the retrieval of immature oocytes from unstimulated or minimally primed antral follicles, with maturation completed in culture. Women with polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS), the condition previously known as polycystic ovary syndrome, are the prototypical candidates for oocyte IVM because it largely avoids ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Several IVM protocols are in clinical use, differing in priming (human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], or none) and culture system (standard versus biphasic capacitation [CAPA-IVM]). We systematically reviewed published data relating to the use of the above IVM protocols in women with PMOS that were identified by literature searching (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane). All IVM protocols essentially eliminated OHSS. Oocyte maturation, number of usable embryos and the live birth rate varied by priming strategy, culture system and embryo transfer policy. Maturation rates were ≈50% with standard IVM and 60-70% with the hCG-primed or biphasic protocols, and live birth rate after a single retrieval was ≈20-48%. CAPA-IVM was associated with the highest maturation and embryo yield, and a randomized trial reported that a fully hormone-free CAPA-IVM protocol is feasible. Obstetric, neonatal, epigenetic and child-neurodevelopmental outcomes, now reported up to age 5-7 years, are reassuring. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded statistical pooling of data, and the evidence remains dominated by single-center cohorts, with few randomized trials. This article summarizes protocol-specific outcomes, identifies determinants of success, and defines priorities for standardizing IVM and generating higher-quality evidence for the use of IVM in PMOS.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.