Skip to main content

HPS-4/TIMI 65/ORION-4: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial assessing the effects of inclisiran on clinical outcomes among people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Trial design, recruitment, and baseline characteristics

In brief

ORION-4 enrolls 16,124 patients with atherosclerotic disease to test inclisiran

The double-blind ORION-4 trial randomized 16,124 adults (average age 70, 30% women) across the US and UK, most on statins, to receive inclisiran injections every six months versus placebo. Designed to detect about a 25% drop in major cardiovascular events over a median five-year follow-up, the study will report safety and efficacy results in early 2027.

Journal
American heart journal (Q1)
Published
7 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
M Mafham, M Zayed, R Collins, M Sabatine, J Armitage, D Brittain, et al.
PMID
42567431
DOI
10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107546

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread statin use, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Monoclonal antibodies targeting circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) substantially reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and cardiovascular events. However, the requirement for self-administration every 2-4 weeks may limit adherence to treatment. Inclisiran, a first-in-class small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) therapy targeting hepatic PCSK9 production, has several potential advantages over the anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, principally longer duration of action. To date, however, the efficacy and safety of inclisiran have not been proven in a cardiovascular outcomes trial. METHODS: The ORION-4 study is the first large-scale clinical outcomes trial of an siRNA therapy, aiming to assess the efficacy and safety of inclisiran among participants with pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The primary assessment is an intention-to-treat comparison of the effect of inclisiran sodium 300 mg (equivalent to 284 mg inclisiran), given by subcutaneous injection at randomization, at approximately 3 months and then approximately every 6 months thereafter, on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of coronary death, myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal ischaemic stroke, or urgent coronary revascularization. Participants will be followed until the median time since randomization is at least 5 years and at least 1700 participants have a recorded adjudicated MACE. With a planned sample size of ∼15,000 participants, ORION-4 was designed to have >99% power to detect a relative reduction in the primary outcome of about one quarter, while also providing an opportunity to assess efficacy in different subgroups as well as on secondary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2023 a total of 16,124 participants were randomized in the UK and the US. The mean (SD) age was 70 (8.1) years and 30% were female. At baseline, 78% had a history of coronary heart disease, 22% of ischaemic stroke, 15% of revascularization for peripheral arterial disease, and 23% had diabetes mellitus. 85% were on statin therapy (53% high intensity statin, 29% moderate and 3% low intensity statins). Overall, baseline mean (SD) LDL-C was 96 (32) mg/dL, and was similar among participants on high- and moderate/low-intensity statin regimens (87 (27) mg/dL and 93 (26) mg/dL respectively), with higher levels in those receiving no statin therapy (133 (33) mg/dL). Follow-up will complete during 2026 and results will be available in early 2027. INTERPRETATION: Inclisiran potentially offers a scalable lipid-lowering treatment, either alone or in combination with other agents. ORION-4 will evaluate the clinical efficacy of inclisiran, and provide a robust assessment of the safety of prolonged use of an siRNA therapeutic.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.