A single-arm phase II trial of UGT1A1 genotype-guided high-dose irinotecan rechallenge in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
- Journal
- Frontiers in oncology (Q2)
- Published
- 22 July 2026
- Study design
- Non-randomized / quasi-experimental trial
- Evidence level
- Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
- Authors
- Hana Kim, Joohyun Hong, Sun-Young Kong, Moon Ki Choi
- PMID
- 42558275
- DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2026.1907944
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Genetics (clinical) (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for optimal third- or later-line treatment options for refractory or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This phase II study investigated whether high-dose irinotecan rechallenge based on UGT1A1 genotype improves the 12-week disease control rate (12w DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety in refractory mCRC patients. METHODS: Patients who had previously received more than two lines of chemotherapy, including 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and had shown either a partial response or durable response for more than 24 weeks to irinotecan were included. Patients without the defective allele of UGT1A1 (UGT1A1 *1/*1) and one defective allele (UGT1A1 *1/*6, *1/*28) were treated with intravenous irinotecan at doses of 300 mg/m2 and 250 mg/m2, respectively, every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients was enrolled between October 2020 and March 2023. The primary endpoint, 12w DCR was 40.6% (13 of 32 patients). The ORR was 15.6% (5 of 32). The median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 13.3) and the median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 3.3). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 19 patients (59.4%). Dose reduction due to adverse events occurred in 9 patients (50.0%) in UGT1A1 wild-type group and 4 patients (28.6%) in the heterozygous group. CONCLUSION: High-dose irinotecan rechallenge guided by UGT1A1 genotype was feasible and showed meaningful disease control in third-line or later settings for mCRC patients previously responsive to irinotecan.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.