Skip to main content

Once-weekly somapacitan enhances linear growth in girls with Turner syndrome: a randomized controlled phase 3 study

Journal
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism (Q1)
Published
1 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Nelly Mauras, Claudia Boettcher, Michael Højby, Kamil Soltysik, Alexander A L Jorge, Kenichi Kashimada, et al.
PMID
42538806
DOI
10.1210/clinem/dgag309

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

CONTEXT: Daily GH injections promote growth in girls with Turner syndrome (TS), but treatment burden is considerable. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate 52-week efficacy and safety of once-weekly somapacitan, a long-acting GH, in girls with TS. DESIGN: REAL8 (NCT05330325) is a randomized, open-labelled, active-comparator, phase 3 basket study with a 52-week main phase and a 104-week extension. SETTING: The study was conducted at 49 clinics in 18 countries worldwide. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 105 treatment-naïve, prepubertal girls with TS (aged 2.5-10 years), were randomized and exposed. No participants discontinued trial product due to adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were assigned 2:1 to somapacitan, 0.24 mg/kg/week, or daily GH 0.050 mg/kg/day, administered subcutaneously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 52. RESULTS: Non-inferiority for once-weekly somapacitan vs. daily GH for the primary endpoint, HV at week 52, was confirmed. At week 52, mean observed HV was 9.0 (1.6) vs. 9.5 (2.2) cm/year for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively (ETD = -0.8 [-1.57; -0.11]95%CI). IGF-I SD score (SDS) increased in both groups. At week 52, mean (SD) IGF-I SDS was +1.71 (1.38) vs. + 1.95 (1.11) for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively. Safety profiles were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly somapacitan showed non-inferiority and is comparable to daily GH after 52 weeks of treatment in enhancing linear growth while maintaining IGF-I concentrations within a similar range in treatment-naïve girls with TS. Similar safety profiles and tolerability were observed for both groups.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.