Skip to main content

PD-1hiCXCR5-CD4+T Peripheral Helper Cells Were Enriched and Potentially Predicted Clinical Response to Etanercept Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Journal
MedComm (Q1)
Published
30 July 2026
Study design
Prospective / inception cohort
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
Authors
Haojie Xu, Wanki Ho, Lulu Cao, Dongdong Fu, Yun Li, Feng Sun, et al.
PMID
42534265
DOI
10.1002/mco2.70876

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a challenging autoimmune disease with variable treatment responses to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors. This study investigates the clinical significance of PD-1hiCXCR5-CD4+T peripheral helper (Tph) cells in RA and their potential utility as biomarkers for predicting etanercept (ETN) therapy response. We enrolled 58 RA patients, 12 age- and sex-matched osteoarthritis patients, and 15 healthy controls, with Tph cells quantified by flow cytometry. Among 25 RA patients with inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs receiving ETN therapy, treatment outcomes were stratified by ACR20 response criteria. Tph cell frequency was significantly elevated in RA patients and correlated positively with multiple disease activity indicators. At baseline, ETN nonresponders exhibited higher Tph proportions than responders (13.23 ± 2.60% vs. 10.82 ± 3.08%, p = 0.0467). Following ETN treatment, responders demonstrated significant Tph reduction (10.82% decreased to 7.97%, p = 0.0105), paralleling serum IL‑21 dynamics. In an exploratory analysis, baseline Tph levels showed an association with ETN response. These findings suggest that circulating Tph cells may serve as a candidate biomarker for RA disease activity and therapeutic response monitoring, warranting further validation in larger prospective cohorts.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.