Skip to main content

Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Single-Center, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

In brief

Stellate ganglion block lowers fibromyalgia impact score by 30 points in a week

In a sham-controlled trial of 60 patients on stable duloxetine, ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block reduced the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised score by roughly 30 points at one week and 23 points at one month, with pain scores dropping over three points. The intervention was safe but the study's single-center design and possible unblinding mean larger trials are needed.

Journal
Pain research & management (Q1)
Published
1 January 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Yagmur Can Dadakci
PMID
42530408
DOI
10.1155/prm/4146674

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Rheumatology (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026): Ultrasound‑guided stellate ganglion block improves fibromyalgia outcomes
  • Picked for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026).
  • Picked for Neurosurgery (paper of the day, 31 July 2026).

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance. Many patients remain symptomatic despite guideline-concordant pharmacologic therapy. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) modulates sympathetic activity and may provide an adjunctive option for fibromyalgia-related pain. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled trial, adults fulfilling the 2016 American College of Rheumatology criteria and receiving stable duloxetine 60 mg/day were randomized 1:1 to ultrasound-guided SGB or a sham procedure. Two procedures were performed 1 week apart. The primary endpoint was change in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) total score from baseline to 1 week. Secondary endpoints included FIQR change at 1 month, pain intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and FIQR responder rates (≥ 30% and ≥ 50% improvement). Primary analyses were per-protocol (n = 60), with modified intention-to-treat (mITT, n = 60) and last observation carried forward (LOCF, n = 68) sensitivity analyses. ANCOVA was adjusted for baseline FIQR. RESULTS: Of 108 screened patients, 68 were randomized (SGB n = 33; control n = 35); 60 (30 per group) completed all assessments. Baseline FIQR was 87.7 ± 7.1 in the SGB group and 82.0 ± 11.3 in controls. At 1 week, FIQR decreased to 53.4 ± 19.0 with SGB versus 77.2 ± 16.3 with control; at 1 month, FIQR was 63.1 ± 20.3 versus 80.2 ± 10.7, respectively. ANCOVA-adjusted between-group differences in FIQR change favored SGB by -29.9 points (95% CI -37.9 to -21.9; p < 0.001) at 1 week and -22.9 points (95% CI -30.1 to -15.7; p < 0.001) at 1 month. NRS pain reductions were also significantly greater with SGB at both time points (adjusted difference -3.1 points, 95% CI -4.1 to -2.0, p < 0.001 at 1 week; -2.6 points, 95% CI -3.6 to -1.6, p < 0.001 at 1 month). No serious complications occurred; adverse events were transient and mild. CONCLUSION: In treatment-resistant fibromyalgia patients receiving stable duloxetine, ultrasound-guided SGB produced clinically meaningful short-term improvements in fibromyalgia impact and pain with an acceptable safety profile. However, the large effect sizes should be interpreted cautiously given potential unblinding and placebo effects. Larger, multicenter trials with longer follow-up, objective outcome measures, and formal blinding assessment are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07343128.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.