Skip to main content

Low-Concentration Atropine (0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%) for Myopia Progression in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal
Journal of clinical medicine (Q1)
Published
14 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Qi Wan, Qiong Wang, Ran Wei, Li Chen, Ke Ma
PMID
42513418
DOI
10.3390/jcm15145504

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Objective: Myopia has reached epidemic proportions globally, with approximately 50% of the world population projected to be affected by 2050. Low-concentration atropine eye drops (0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%) have emerged as a primary intervention for myopia control. Several meta-analyses on this topic have been published; however, none have included the most recent trials nor separately analyzed premyopia prevention outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of these concentrations for myopia progression control and premyopia prevention. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from database inception through April 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 0.01%, 0.025%, or 0.05% atropine with placebo or no treatment in children were included. Studies were screened using PICOS criteria (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study design). Meta-analysis was performed using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were conducted by concentration, follow-up duration, and population (myopia progression vs. premyopia prevention). Results: Of 18 full-text articles assessed, 8 RCTs (n = 1756) met all PICOS criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis. For myopia progression, 0.01% atropine demonstrated significant efficacy at 1 year (pooled MD = +0.291 D, 95% CI: 0.199 to 0.384; p < 0.0001; I2 = 29.1%) and at 2 years (pooled MD = +0.174 D, 95% CI: 0.056 to 0.291; p = 0.0038; I2 = 0%). The 0.05% concentration showed the largest effect (pooled MD = +0.520 D, 95% CI: 0.409 to 0.630; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). Clinically, a 0.25 D difference over 1-2 years may translate to approximately 0.50 D cumulative benefit over a typical 5-year treatment course, potentially reducing the risk of high myopia. For premyopia prevention, a narrative synthesis was performed due to extreme heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 99.2%). All concentrations showed an excellent safety profile with no serious adverse events. Conclusions: Low-concentration atropine is effective for myopia progression control at all three concentrations, with a concentration-dependent gradient (0.05% > 0.025% > 0.01%). The 0.01% concentration offers a reasonable balance of efficacy and tolerability. Further independent validation of the 0.05% concentration is warranted. The premyopia prevention indication requires additional well-designed RCTs.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.