Efficacy of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Young Children With Severe Early Childhood Caries: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Journal
- JAMA pediatrics (Q1)
- Published
- 27 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Margherita Fontana, Amr Moursi, Carlos Gonzalez-Cabezas, Divya Khera, Steven M Levy, George J Eckert, et al.
- PMID
- 42507437
- DOI
- 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.2567
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (paper of the day, 28 July 2026): Silver diamine fluoride efficacy for severe early childhood caries
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Dental caries is a highly prevalent yet preventable disease affecting more than 40% of US children, with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) leading to serious health and economic consequences. This randomized clinical trial addresses critical evidence gaps by evaluating 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) effectiveness for caries arrest in young US children with S-ECC to inform US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory approval. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of 38% SDF vs placebo for arresting active cavitated dentin caries lesions in the primary dentition of US children with S-ECC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase III, multisite, randomized, blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 2 parallel arms had a data collection period from October 2018 through April 2023. Analyses were completed in 2024. Three sites recruited from and treated children in a variety of settings: medical and dental clinics, and Head Start and city/state-subsidized preschool programs. Enrolled participants included 830 generally healthy children aged 12 to 71 months with S-ECC and active cavitated lesions. INTERVENTION: Children were randomized to receive either 38% SDF or placebo, applied at baseline and at 6 months. Clinical examinations were conducted at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 8 months. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of arrested lesions at 6 months after 1 application. Secondary outcomes included arrest efficacy at 3 months and after 2 applications (8 months), and pain at or before 6 months and 8 months. RESULTS: Of 830 enrolled children, 584 (70%) completed the study. Of those lost to follow-up (approximately 30%), 81 (9.8%) were lost due to COVID-19. Participants included 428 females (52%) and 402 males (48%) and were aged 1 to 6 years with high caries experience (mean [SD] decayed, missing, and filled teeth [dmft] (International Caries Detection and Assessment System ≥1), 11.36 [4.56]; range, 1-23). In intent-to-treat analyses, SDF arrested 57.5%, 54.0%, and 50.2% of lesions at 3 months, 6 months, and 8 months, respectively, vs placebo (18.8%, 22.5%, 17.4%, respectively). Differences (99.9% CI) in arrest rates were 38.7% (28.7%-48.6%), 31.5% (21.5%-41.6%), and 32.8% (22.3%-43.2%). There were no differences in pain. Averse events (AEs) were reported by 196 (47.3%) participants in the SDF group and 180 (43.3%) in the placebo group. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity; 4 AEs (0.6%) were severe. Treatment-related AEs were similar between the 2 groups (SDF = 22.9%; placebo = 22.2%), as were discontinuation rates due to AEs (7.5% for both groups). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, 38% SDF was significantly more effective than placebo for arresting dentin caries lesions in primary teeth in young children with S-ECC, providing a noninvasive treatment for young high-risk children and supporting its consideration for FDA drug approval. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03649659.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.