Skip to main content

Intranasal esketamine plus oral antidepressant for treatment-resistant depression: acute induction and maintenance relapse-prevention outcomes in a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal
Frontiers in psychiatry (Q1)
Published
3 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Jingqiang Xie, Chunying Pu, Mingyue Sun
PMID
42490943
DOI
10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1774549

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a major clinical challenge. Intranasal esketamine, used adjunctively with an oral antidepressant, has been evaluated in randomized trials, but uncertainty persists regarding the magnitude and consistency of benefit, durability, and key harms. This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials comparing intranasal esketamine plus an oral antidepressant versus placebo nasal spray plus the same oral antidepressant in TRD. Acute induction (≈4 weeks) and maintenance randomized-withdrawal phases were analyzed separately. Depression outcomes were assessed primarily using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and functional outcomes using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using RoB 2.0. Random-effects models pooled mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes, and hazard ratios (HR) for relapse prevention. Certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. From 1,518 records, nine reports representing six unique RCTs (1,836 participants) were included. Four acute induction RCTs (n=937) showed greater symptom reduction at day 28 with esketamine (MADRS MD -2.99, 95% CI -5.10 to -0.89; I²=48.5%). Rapid improvement was evident by day 2 (MD -3.25, 95% CI -4.65 to -1.85). Esketamine increased day-28 response (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.20-1.74) and remission (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.20-1.92), corresponding to approximately +154 responders and +106 remitters per 1,000 patients, respectively, based on pooled control risks. Functioning improved (SDS MD -1.70, 95% CI -2.61 to -0.79). Two maintenance randomized-withdrawal RCTs (n=899) demonstrated reduced relapse risk with continued esketamine (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42-0.62; I²=0%). In acute induction, esketamine increased any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.25-1.50) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.35-5.29), with notable increases in dissociation (RR 7.33, 95% CI 4.49-11.98) and blood pressure increased events (RR 3.96, 95% CI 2.24-7.01). Maintenance TEAE rates were similar between groups (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.17). Intranasal esketamine plus an oral antidepressant provides rapid, modest acute improvement and reduces relapse risk during maintenance among stabilized responders/remitters, but increases acute adverse events, supporting use within supervised care and individualized benefit-risk assessment.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.