Combined Limbal Epithelial and Stromal Cell Transplant for Aniridia-Related Keratopathy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial
In brief
Engineered limbal-stromal graft lowers ocular surface score by three points
In a single-arm trial of nine adults with advanced aniridia-related keratopathy, transplantation of a collagen scaffold containing allogeneic limbal epithelial cells and stromal keratocytes improved the ocular surface score from 9.4 to 5.9 at three months and 6.7 at twelve months, while untreated fellow eyes showed no change. Visual acuity modestly improved but the study was small and uncontrolled, so larger trials are needed to confirm safety and functional benefit.
- Journal
- JAMA ophthalmology (Q1)
- Published
- 23 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Abigail Eve Kaye, Louise Morgan, Radhika Shah, Amanda J Vernon, Andrew Embleton-Thirsk, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, et al.
- PMID
- 42490097
- DOI
- 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.2701
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Transplantation (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Advanced aniridia-related keratopathy (ARK) is a progressive ocular surface disorder associated with limbal stem cell deficiency and limited effective treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of Real Architecture for 3D Tissues-Ocular Surface (RAFT-OS), a tissue-engineered collagen scaffold incorporating allogeneic limbal epithelial stem cells and stromal keratocytes, in adults with advanced ARK. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-arm, open-label nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary referral center in London, United Kingdom. Adults with congenital aniridia and advanced ARK underwent RAFT-OS transplant. Untreated fellow eyes served as natural history comparators. Recruitment occurred between February 2022 and April 2024, with final study completion in April 2025. Follow-up was 12 months. Data analysis was performed from May 2025 through February 2026. INTERVENTION: Surgical transplant of a good manufacturing practice-manufactured RAFT-OS construct. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end points were safety and ocular surface normalization at 3 and 12 months, assessed using the Ocular Surface Score (OSS). Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, via Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] acuity charts) and patient-reported outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire [VFQ-25], 36-Item Short Form Survey [RAND-36]). RESULTS: Nine participants were included (3 female [33%]; mean [SD] age, 50.6 [11.6] years). One early serious adverse event prompted amendment of the manufacturing protocol; no further major RAFT-OS-related safety events occurred. Two participants developed persistent epithelial defects. In treated eyes, mean (SD) OSS was 9.4 (1.9) at baseline, 5.9 (2.4) at 3 months (mean difference from baseline, -3.6; 95% CI, -5.6 to -1.6), and 6.7 (2.4) at 12 months (mean difference, -2.8; 95% CI, -4.5 to -1.0). In untreated fellow eyes, mean (SD) OSS was 8.4 (2.7) at baseline, 8.4 (2.4) at 3 months (mean difference, 0; 95% CI, -2.5 to 2.5), and 8.0 (2.5) at 12 months (mean difference, -0.4; 95% CI, -2.4 to 1.5). Mean (SD) treated eye BCVA was 2.23 (0.16) logMAR (Snellen equivalent, <20/1600) at baseline and 1.77 (0.67) logMAR (20/1280) at 12 months (mean difference, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.97 to 0.04). Mean (SD) fellow eye BCVA was 1.47 (0.71) logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/640) at baseline and 1.44 (0.75) logMAR (20/640) at 12 months (mean difference, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.37). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this 9-participant nonrandomized clinical trial, RAFT-OS transplant was feasible and associated with early ocular surface improvement, partly sustained through 12 months, without substantial safety concerns. Additional controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to define safety and clinical effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05044598.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.