Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Cisplatin-Eligible Bladder Cancer
In brief
Perioperative enfortumab-vedotin plus pembrolizumab more than doubles complete response rate in muscle-invasive bladder cancer
In a phase-3 trial of 808 cisplatin-eligible patients, 55.8% achieved pathological complete response with enfortumab-vedotin/pembrolizumab versus 32.5% with standard cisplatin-gemcitabine, while 2-year event-free survival rose from 66% to 79% and overall survival from 81% to 87%. The regimen also raised grade 3-plus toxicity, so benefits must be weighed against higher side-effect risk.
- Journal
- The New England journal of medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 23 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Matthew D Galsky, Begoña P Valderrama, Marco Maruzzo, Albert Font, Tudor Ciuleanu, Jonathan Chatzkel, et al.
- PMID
- 42485627
- DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa2601486
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Oncology and Radiation Oncology (top studies of the week, 27 July 2026): Phase III RCT, enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab vs cisplatin‑gemcitabine in
- Picked for Geriatrics and Gerontology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
- Picked for Pathology and Forensic Medicine (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
- Picked for Surgery (paper of the day, 23 July 2026).
- Picked for Urology (paper of the day, 23 July 2026): Enfortumab‑vedotin + pembrolizumab superior to cisplatin‑gemcitabine
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is a standard therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant (perioperative) enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab as compared with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in persons with this cancer are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial involving adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection (cystectomy). Participants were assigned to receive neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab (4 cycles; enfortumab vedotin [1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight on days 1 and 8] and pembrolizumab [200 mg on day 1] every 3 weeks), cystectomy, and 5 cycles of enfortumab vedotin and 13 cycles of pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy or to receive neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine (4 cycles; cisplatin [70 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 1] plus gemcitabine [1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8] every 3 weeks) and cystectomy. The primary end point was event-free survival; key secondary end points were overall survival and pathological complete response. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 405 participants were assigned to receive enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab and 403 to receive cisplatin-gemcitabine. The median time from randomization to the data-cutoff date was 33.6 months (range, 22.5 to 53.6). A total of 86.7% of the participants in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 89.6% of those in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group underwent cystectomy. At 2 years, estimated event-free survival was 79.4% with enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab and 66.2% with cisplatin-gemcitabine (hazard ratio for an event or death, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.70; P<0.001); estimated overall survival was 86.9% and 81.3%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; two-sided P = 0.006). A pathological complete response occurred in 55.8% and 32.5% of the participants (P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause was 75.7% with enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab and 67.2% with cisplatin-gemcitabine. CONCLUSIONS: Among participants with muscle-invasive bladder cancer eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, perioperative enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab led to significantly better event-free and overall survival outcomes and a significantly higher incidence of pathological complete response than neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine, but with more adverse events of grade 3 or higher. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme and others; KEYNOTE-B15/EV-304 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04700124.).
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.