Ferric carboxymaltose for iron-deficiency anemia secondary to gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Journal
- European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology (Q2)
- Published
- 22 July 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Yuqing Yang, Huiting Hou, Jing Wu, Liu Han, Deliang Liu, Xiaojun Li, et al.
- PMID
- 42485125
- DOI
- 10.1097/MEG.0000000000003251
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Hepatology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in treating iron-deficiency anemia secondary to gastrointestinal bleeding. A comprehensive search across multiple databases identified randomized controlled trials comparing FCM with other iron formulations. A total of 13 publications, reporting 16 trials and involving 1939 patients, were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated that FCM led to significantly greater improvements in key anemia parameters compared to alternative iron therapies, including a higher hemoglobin response rate [risk ratio = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.34], increased serum ferritin levels (mean difference = 293.52, 95% CI: 168.76-418.27), and greater transferrin saturation (mean difference = 9.71, 95% CI: 5.19-14.22). The overall incidence of drug-related adverse events was comparable between groups (risk ratio = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.51-1.34); however, FCM was associated with a substantially increased risk of hypophosphatemia (risk ratio = 21.00, 95% CI: 8.90-49.56). Notably, subgroup analysis confirmed that this therapeutic advantage remained consistent across both acute and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding settings. In conclusion, FCM is effective in correcting anemia in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding-related iron deficiency, despite a well documented risk of hypophosphatemia. Further research is warranted to optimize dosing strategies and identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit from FCM therapy.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.