Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of baxdrostat add-on in uncontrolled and resistant hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE certainty-of-evidence assessment

Journal
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology (Q2)
Published
22 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Mahmoud Elsayed, Yousr Ahmed, Abdelrahman M Elettreby, Mohammed A Elbahloul, Mohamed A Alsaied, Nada Mutiq Alshahrani, et al.
PMID
42484857
DOI
10.1007/s00210-026-05660-8

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Nephrology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).

Abstract

Uncontrolled and resistant hypertension continues to be a significant contributor to cardiovascular and renal risk. Baxdrostat is a selective aldosterone synthase inhibitor which has demonstrated a potential blood pressure-lowering effect in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a systematic literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane from their inception to March 2026. The continuous outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs), and dichotomous outcomes as relative risks (RRs), both with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In four RCTs involving 1481 participants, baxdrostat reduced mean sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly more than placebo (MD =  - 8.93 mmHg and MD =  - 3.79 mmHg, respectively), with no heterogeneity. Benefits were observed with both 1 mg and 2 mg daily doses. Baxdrostat was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events overall (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.43), higher serum potassium levels (MD = 0.47 mmol per liter), and greater risks of hyperkalemia (RR = 8.64; 95% CI, 3.56 to 20.98) and potassium levels of more than 6 mmol per liter (RR = 6.06; 95% CI, 1.66 to 22.17), whereas serious adverse events were not significantly increased. In patients having uncontrolled or resistant hypertension, baxdrostat reduced sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to placebo. These results are based on a few RCTs, and the increased risk of hyperkalemia warrants caution. Further studies are required to provide enlightenment on long-term safety and general clinical benefit.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.