Clesrovimab in Infants at Increased Risk For Severe Disease During 2 RSV Seasons: A Randomized Clinical Trial
In brief
Clesrovimab prevents RSV lower respiratory disease at same 3% rate as palivizumab
In a phase 3 trial of 997 high-risk infants, a single 105 mg dose of clesrovimab showed adverse-event rates and RSV-associated medically attended lower respiratory infection (about 3% of infants) comparable to monthly palivizumab. An open-label 210 mg dose in the second season was also well tolerated, with a 7% infection rate, supporting its use for children who remain at risk into a second RSV season.
- Journal
- JAMA pediatrics (Q1)
- Published
- 20 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Heather J Zar, Louis J Bont, Paolo Manzoni, Flor M Muñoz, Octavio Ramilo, Po-Yen Chen, et al.
- PMID
- 42475081
- DOI
- 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.2760
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Neonatology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026): Recent Neonatology research from a high-quartile journal.
- Picked for Infectious Diseases (paper of the day, 21 July 2026).
- Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (paper of the day, 21 July 2026): RCT of RSV monoclonal in infants
- Picked for Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (paper of the day, 21 July 2026).
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Clesrovimab is a long-acting monoclonal antibody approved for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease in neonates and infants who are born during or entering their first RSV season; data concerning clesrovimab from a second RSV season among children who remain at risk for severe disease are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of clesrovimab (105 mg) vs palivizumab in RSV season 1 in infants at increased risk for severe RSV disease. Key secondary objectives include describing the safety of 210 mg of clesrovimab in RSV season 2 in children who remain at increased risk for severe RSV disease, clesrovimab pharmacokinetics, and the incidence of RSV-associated disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: SMART (MK-1654-007) was a randomized, partially masked, palivizumab-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial, conducted at 110 sites in 27 countries and territories between November 30, 2021, and November 20, 2025. The population constituted palivizumab-eligible infants, including those with prematurity, chronic lung disease of prematurity, or hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: Participants, randomized 1:1 and stratified by region and condition, received clesrovimab (105 mg) on day 1 followed by placebo on day 28 or monthly palivizumab (15 mg/kg) up to 5 doses (1 dose per month). Eligible infants received open-label clesrovimab (210 mg) before their second RSV season. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the observed proportions of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs) after clesrovimab or palivizumab in season 1. RESULTS: Overall, 997 infants (500 [50.2%] male; median age, 2.6 [range, 0.0-12.0] months) received clesrovimab, 105 mg (n = 498) or palivizumab (n = 499) in season 1; 276 received clesrovimab, 210 mg open-label in season 2. In season 1, the proportions of participants experiencing AEs were comparable between treatment groups. In season 2, clesrovimab, 210 mg was well tolerated. Incidence rates of RSV-associated medically attended lower respiratory infection (MALRI) were comparable between clesrovimab and palivizumab (3.2% [95% CI, 1.8%-5.2%] and 3.4% [95% CI, 2.0%-5.6%], respectively) through day 150 in season 1; total RSV-associated MALRI incidence through day 180 after a 210-mg dose in season 2 was 7.3% (95% CI, 4.4%-11.4%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, clesrovimab was well tolerated in infants at increased risk for severe RSV disease through 2 RSV seasons. These findings support the use of clesrovimab in children who remain at risk for severe RSV disease in their second RSV season. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04938830.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.