Development and characterization of a novel TDP-43 positron emission tomography tracer: [18F]JNJ-TDP43-1
- Journal
- Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association (Q1)
- Published
- 1 July 2026
- Study design
- Unclassified
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Chunfang A Xia, Mani Salarian, Christopher J Gartshore, Antonella Scaglione, Thomas Hayes, Shuanglong Liu, et al.
- PMID
- 42471754
- DOI
- 10.1002/alz.71675
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Epidemiology (paper of the day, 20 July 2026): Novel TDP‑43 PET tracer development
- Picked for Pathology and Forensic Medicine (paper of the day, 20 July 2026).
- Picked for Pharmacology (medical) (paper of the day, 20 July 2026).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are associated with TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) pathology. A positron emission tomography (PET) tracer targeting TDP-43 aggregates could improve early diagnosis and guide treatment development for TDP-43-related conditions. METHODS: Specific binding was evaluated using fluorescent labeling of compound, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and autoradiography (ARG). Brain PET imaging in rats, nonhuman primate (NHP), and a disease mouse model was performed to characterize tracer pharmacokinetics and in vivo target binding. RESULTS: JNJ-TDP43-1 exhibited high binding affinity for pathological TDP-43 (Kd = 7.1 nM) and remarkable selectivity over other proteinopathies. PET imaging demonstrated robust brain uptake and rapid washout in rodents and NHP. In vivo target engagement was confirmed in an AAV-hTDP43 disease model. DISCUSSION: [18F]JNJ-TDP43-1 is a promising PET ligand for early diagnosis and evaluating therapies in TDP-43-related diseases.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.