Skip to main content

Effectiveness and Safety of Budesonide/Formoterol in Asthma: A Systematic Review

Journal
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) (Q2)
Published
26 June 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Nam Xuan Vo, Huong Lai Pham, Han Tue Ho, Khoi Quoc Chung, Tien Thuy Bui
PMID
42450874
DOI
10.3390/healthcare14131864

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Asthma's preventable burden is heavily driven by severe exacerbations (SE). Replacing standalone short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs), which risk reducing patient tolerance, with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combinations optimizes care through maintenance, reliever, and maintenance-and-reliever therapy (MART). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of Budesonide/Formoterol (B/F). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) through May 15, 2026. Bias was assessed via the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2 (RoB 2) and the Risk ff Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) version 2.0. Primary outcomes (time to first SE, annual SE rate) were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, yielding hazard ratios (HRs) and rate ratios (RRs). Results: We included 19 studies (15 RCTs, 4 non-RCTs) comprising 104,600 patients (primarily aged ≥12 years with mild-to-severe asthma). Most RCTs had a low risk of bias, whereas the non-RCTs had a high risk of bias. B/F MART significantly delayed the first SE and reduced annual rates versus Budesonide + SABA (HR = 0.57; RR = 0.55), B/F + SABA (HR = 0.62; RR = 0.58), and Fluticasone/Salmeterol + SABA (HR = 0.75; RR = 0.72). As-needed B/F reduced first SE hazard and annual rates versus SABA alone (HR = 0.43; RR = 0.42). Compared with Budesonide + SABA, it delayed the first SE (HR = 0.85) but showed non-significant rate reductions (RR = 0.90). Adverse events were balanced between groups over 12-52 weeks. Conclusions: B/F MART demonstrates high efficacy in mitigating the risk of the first SE. However, limited trial data leave the evidence for maintenance or reliever regimens controversial. Across all regimens, B/F is well-tolerated within 6 to 12 months.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.