On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •Understand that aortic dissection involves the longitudinal separation of the aortic wall layers, typically initiated by an intimal tear or primary medial hemorrhage that creates a false lumen separate from the true lumen.
- •Classify the condition using the Stanford system: Type A involves the ascending aorta (regardless of the tear site) and requires emergent surgery, while Type B is distal to the left subclavian artery and is primarily managed medically unless complications arise.
- •Recognize the temporal phases of the disease: Hyperacute (within 24 hours), Acute (1–14 days), Subacute (15–90 days), and Chronic (beyond 90 days), noting that the acute phase carries the highest risk of spontaneous rupture.
- •Identify key risk factors, most notably chronic (associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk), bicuspid aortic valve, and genetic connective tissue disorders such as or Loeys-Dietz syndrome.
- •Be aware of the "AAS spectrum" which includes classic dissection, (IMH)—bleeding within the wall without a visible tear—and (PAU), which can progress to full dissection.
- •Note the emerging association with pharmacological triggers, specifically fluoroquinolones, which may induce collagen degradation and increase the risk of aortic events within 30 days of exposure.
Evaluation
- •Suspect aortic dissection in any patient presenting with sudden-onset, "tearing," "ripping," or "stabbing" chest or back pain that is maximal at its inception.
- •Ask about pain migration, as the movement of pain from the chest to the back or abdomen often tracks the distal propagation of the dissection flap.
- •Measure blood pressure in both arms simultaneously; a systolic blood pressure differential >20 mmHg is a classic sign of brachiocephalic or subclavian artery involvement.
- •Perform a thorough four-limb pulse exam to identify pulse deficits, which occur when the false lumen compresses the true lumen or the flap occludes branch vessels.
- •Auscultate for a new diastolic decrescendo murmur at the right sternal border, indicating acute due to aortic root dilation or leaflet prolapse.
- •Screen for neurological deficits, including hemiparesis or altered mental status (carotid involvement) and paraplegia (spinal cord ischemia from intercostal artery involvement).
- •Utilize the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) to categorize patients into low, intermediate, or high clinical suspicion based on predisposing factors and exam findings.
- •Order a D-dimer test for patients with low clinical suspicion (ADD-RS ≤ 1); a value <500 ng/mL has a high negative predictive value and can effectively rule out the diagnosis.
- •Obtain a 12-lead ECG to rule out primary , but remain vigilant as 10-20% of Type A dissections involve the coronary ostia (usually the RCA), causing ST-elevation.
- •Order (CTA) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis as the gold standard diagnostic test, providing nearly 99% sensitivity and specificity.
- •Perform bedside Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) in unstable patients to rapidly screen for pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, or severe aortic root dilation.
- •Consider Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) in the operating room or for patients with contraindications to CT contrast to visualize the intimal flap and valve function.
Management
- •Initiate "anti-impulse therapy" immediately upon suspicion to reduce the rate of ventricular contraction (dP/dt) and systemic wall stress.
- •Administer intravenous beta-blockers as first-line therapy; use Esmolol (500 mcg/kg bolus, then 50–200 mcg/kg/min) or Labetalol (20 mg IV bolus every 10 minutes) to achieve a target heart rate of ≤60 bpm.
- •Ensure heart rate is controlled before adding vasodilators to prevent reflex tachycardia, which can accelerate dissection propagation.
- •Target a systolic blood pressure between 100 and 120 mmHg; if BP remains elevated after beta-blockade, add Nitroprusside (0.25–10 mcg/kg/min) or Nicardipine (5–15 mg/hr).
- •Consult Cardiac Surgery emergently for all Stanford Type A dissections; these are surgical emergencies requiring replacement of the ascending aorta to prevent tamponade or rupture.
- •Transfer patients with Type A dissection to high-volume aortic centers, ideally using a "Direct-to-OR" protocol to bypass emergency department delays.
- •Manage uncomplicated Stanford Type B dissections in an ICU setting with aggressive medical therapy (BP and HR control) and serial imaging.
- •Perform (TEVAR) for "complicated" Type B dissections, defined by malperfusion, rupture, refractory pain, or rapid aortic expansion.
- •Prioritize endovascular reperfusion (stenting) in stable patients with malperfusion syndrome (e.g., mesenteric ischemia) before proceeding to open aortic repair.
- •Avoid the administration of thrombolytics or anticoagulants until dissection is definitively ruled out, as these agents can be fatal if a dissection is present.
- •Monitor for acute kidney injury (AKI) and maintain adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP) to ensure spinal cord and visceral perfusion.
- •Implement long-term blood pressure control with a target of <120/80 mmHg using beta-blockers as the backbone of therapy to reduce the risk of late aneurysmal expansion.
- •Refer patients under age 60 for genetic counseling and screening of first-degree relatives to identify familial thoracic aortic aneurysm syndromes.
- •Advise patients to avoid heavy isometric lifting (e.g., weightlifting) and fluoroquinolone antibiotics, which may increase the risk of future aortic events.
Board Review — High Yield
- •Tearing/Ripping Pain — The classic description of pain that is maximal at onset, unlike the crescendo pain of MI.
- •BP Differential — A difference of >20 mmHg between arms suggests the dissection involves the aortic arch/subclavian artery.
- •Stanford Type A — Involves the ascending aorta; always a surgical emergency regardless of the entry tear location.
- •Fluoroquinolones — Black box warning: avoid in patients with aortic disease due to increased risk of dissection/rupture.
- •Cystic Medial Necrosis — The classic histopathological finding in the aortic media, especially in Marfan syndrome.
- •D-dimer — Useful only for its high negative predictive value (NPV) to rule out dissection in low-risk patients.
- •Beta-blockers before Vasodilators — Essential sequence to prevent reflex tachycardia and increased aortic wall shear stress.
- •1% to 2% per hour — The mortality rate of untreated acute Type A aortic dissection in the first 24-48 hours.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
Definition, Synonyms, and Classification
- ▸Aortic dissection is an acute aortic wall separation associated with true- and false-lumen formation; AAS is the broader category that also includes intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. [22][23]
- ▸Stanford classification is based on ascending-aortic involvement: **type A involves the ascending aorta**, whereas type B does not. [19]
- ▸DeBakey type I extends beyond the ascending aorta, while type II is confined to the ascending aorta in the cited studies. [16][27]
- ▸SVS/STS classification adds primary entry-tear location and subdivides traditional acute Stanford type A disease into SVS/STS-A and SVS/STS-B0. [15][19]
- ▸The 301 classification describes type B true/false-lumen configuration for TEVAR prognostication. [23]
- ▸Penn is a complication-based mortality-risk classification rather than an anatomic classification. [278]
Definition
Aortic dissection (AD) is an aortic wall separation that creates distinct true- and false-lumen channels; this anatomic configuration is explicitly incorporated into modified classification systems used for prognosis after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). [23]D The term acute aortic dissection (AAD) is used for patients presenting with an acute clinical and radiologically confirmed dissection, whereas acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and type B aortic dissection (TBAD) specify the relevant anatomic category. [1][16]D[19]D[23]D Abbreviations used in the literature include AD, AAD, ATAAD, and TBAD. [1][10][16]D[19]D[23]D
AD is one component of the broader acute aortic syndrome (AAS) spectrum; AAS also includes intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. [22]D Therefore, AAS and AD should not be treated as exact synonyms. In emergency and stroke settings, AD may present with neurological manifestations and can mimic an acute stroke; one code-stroke cohort specifically evaluated acute aortic dissection among patients with neurological deficits suggestive of stroke. [5] Chest pain is more commonly associated with Stanford type A disease, whereas back or abdominal pain is more characteristic of type B disease, although atypical neurological presentations, including transient monoplegia caused by malperfusion, have been reported. [11]C
Stanford classification
The Stanford system classifies AD according to involvement of the ascending aorta. [19]D Stanford type A involves the ascending aorta and includes dissections treated as acute type A disease in surgical series. [1][19]D[25]D Stanford type B does not involve the ascending aorta and is the category generally evaluated for medical therapy or descending-aortic interventions such as TEVAR in the cited studies. [23]D The Stanford distinction is clinically important because studies separately evaluate operative treatment for type A disease and TEVAR-based treatment or prognostication for type B disease. [1][19]D[23]D
The Stanford system is an anatomic classification, but it does not distinguish antegrade from retrograde primary entry tears in patients with type A dissection. [15]D Consequently, a dissection traditionally labeled Stanford type A may be subdivided by the Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS/STS) system into SVS/STS-A or SVS/STS-B0 according to the location of the primary entry tear. [15]D[19]D The newer classification is intended to add information about tear location that is not captured by ascending-aorta involvement alone, although its prognostic and therapeutic utility remains under evaluation. [15]D
DeBakey classification
The DeBakey system describes dissection by its extent and is used particularly to subdivide Stanford type A disease. [16]D[27]D DeBakey type I extends beyond the ascending aorta, whereas DeBakey type II is confined to the ascending aorta in the cited comparative studies. [16]D[27]D In a 599-patient surgical cohort, DeBakey type I accounted for 90.7% and type II for 9.3% of acute Stanford type A dissections. [27]D A separate 429-patient study examined whether types I and II represent distinct pathophysiologic entities or different extents of a related process, reflecting ongoing debate about the classification’s biological meaning. [274]
Age may be associated with DeBakey distribution: younger patients were more likely to have type I disease, whereas older patients more commonly had type II disease in a 400-patient radiologically confirmed AAD cohort. [16]D In the 2026 morphologic study, type I patients were younger than type II patients, with reported mean ages of 65.5 versus 77 years, respectively. [274] These observations are population-specific and should not be used as diagnostic criteria. [16]D[274]
Additional classification systems
The SVS/STS classification supplements Stanford anatomy by emphasizing the primary entry-tear location; published cohorts distinguish SVS/STS-A from SVS/STS-B0 among patients otherwise classified as acute Stanford type A. [15]D[19]D Cases with an unidentified entry tear may be designated SVS/STS type I in studies applying this system. [19]D
The 301 classification is a proposed modification for type B dissection undergoing TEVAR. [23]D It divides TBAD into B1, B2, and B3 according to the relationship and configuration of the true and false lumens along the thoracic vertebral bodies: B1 and B3 have one lumen—true in B1 and false in B3—closely aligned with the vertebral column, whereas B2 has a semispiral or spiral configuration. [23]D This system was developed to improve risk stratification for post-TEVAR thoracic aortic expansion. [23]D
The Penn classification is a complication-based prognostic system rather than a purely anatomic classification. [278]C It stratifies mortality risk in acute Stanford type A dissection undergoing surgery and has also been evaluated in patients with Stanford type A or B disease managed surgically or medically. [278]C Thus, Stanford and DeBakey primarily describe anatomy and extent, SVS/STS adds entry-tear location, the 301 system characterizes type B lumen configuration, and Penn incorporates clinical severity and complications. [15]D[23]D[27]D[278]C
| Classification | Defining feature | Main use in the cited evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford A | Ascending-aorta involvement | Defines acute type A disease, commonly evaluated in surgical cohorts. [1][19]D |
| Stanford B | No ascending-aorta involvement | Used in studies of medical management, TBAD, and TEVAR. [19]D[23]D |
| DeBakey I | Extends beyond the ascending aorta | Describes extensive Stanford type A disease. [16]D[27]D |
| DeBakey II | Confined to the ascending aorta | Describes a more limited Stanford type A pattern. [16]D[27]D |
| SVS/STS-A or B0 | Primary entry-tear location | Refines traditional Stanford type A classification. [15]D[19]D |
| 301 B1/B2/B3 | True/false-lumen configuration and relation to thoracic vertebrae | Prognostication after TEVAR for TBAD. [23]D |
| Penn | Clinical severity and complications | Mortality-risk stratification. [278]C |
Etiology and Triggering Factors
- ▸Haploinsufficient FBN1 variants in Marfan syndrome carry a higher risk for pregnancy-related dissection than non-HI variants.
- ▸Fluoroquinolone use is associated with a significantly increased risk of aortic dissection within 30 days of exposure.
- ▸A baseline aortic diameter of ≥4.0 cm is a significant threshold for increased risk of aortic events.
- ▸Baseline descending thoracic aortic diameter (DTAD) is the strongest predictor of failure for conservative management in Type B dissection.
- ▸High glucose variability in the first 3 days post-surgery is a significant predictor of mortality in Type A dissection patients.
- ▸Sarcopenia and low grip strength are associated with worse 3-month survival post-aortic surgery.
The etiology of aortic dissection (AD) is multifactorial, involving a complex interplay between genetic predispositions, structural vascular degeneration, and acute pharmacological or physiological triggers. While hypertension remains a primary driver, recent evidence highlights specific genetic variants, anatomical markers, and pharmacological exposures that significantly elevate risk.
Genetic and Syndromic Predispositions
Genetic factors play a critical role, particularly in younger populations. Marfan syndrome (MFS), caused by mutations in the FBN1 gene, is a well-established risk factor. Recent data indicates that haploinsufficient (HI) FBN1 variants are associated with more severe aortic phenotypes compared to non-HI variants [281]. In pregnant women with MFS, these HI variants significantly increase the risk of pregnancy-related aortic dissection, particularly during the third trimester or within six months postpartum [281]. Notably, standard monitoring of aortic root diameter often fails to predict Stanford type B dissections in this population [281].
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) has also been epidemiologically linked to an increased incidence of both aortic dissection and aortic aneurysm, suggesting systemic connective tissue fragility beyond the renal system [285]. Furthermore, while bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with progressive aortic dilation, recent meta-analyses suggest that the risk of major aortic events after valve replacement may be comparable to those with tricuspid valves, provided longitudinal monitoring is maintained [288].
Pharmacological and Environmental Triggers
Fluoroquinolone (FQ) use has emerged as a significant pharmacological trigger for aortic events. Meta-analyses of large cohort studies demonstrate that FQ exposure is associated with a significantly elevated risk of de novo aortic aneurysm or dissection within 30 days of treatment [33][36]. This risk encompasses both Stanford Type A and Type B dissections, as well as aortic-specific mortality [36].
Anatomical and Morphological Risk Factors
Specific anatomical features are predictive of dissection and subsequent failure of conservative management:
- Aortic Diameter: In veterans, a baseline diameter of ≥4.0 cm is a critical threshold for increased aortic events and all-cause mortality [50]D. For uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection (uTBAD), the baseline descending thoracic aortic diameter (DTAD) is a primary driver of long-term failure in conservative medical management [291]C.
- Calcification: The presence of aortic and iliac calcifications, particularly when measured in a 5-segment model, serves as a predictor for aortic dissection and aneurysm rupture [38].
- Intimal Tear Location: In Stanford Type A dissection, the primary entry tear is most commonly located in the ascending aorta (56.2%), followed by the aortic arch (30.1%) and descending aorta (13.6%) [283]. The location of the tear significantly impacts long-term survival and surgical outcomes [283].
- Atherosclerotic Index of Plasma (AIP): High AIP levels are independently associated with long-term aortic-related adverse events (ARAEs) in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) [47]D.
Physiological and Perioperative Stressors
Acute physiological stressors can trigger or exacerbate the clinical course of dissection. Sarcopenia, characterized by reduced grip strength and muscle mass, is a prognostic marker for early mortality following surgical repair, as perioperative factors can accelerate functional decline [282]. In acute Type B dissection, factors such as younger age, higher BMI, and a completely patent false lumen are influential in the development of severe respiratory failure requiring respiratory assist devices [286]C.
For patients undergoing surgical repair (such as the modified Bentall procedure for Type A dissection), operative parameters including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time and circulatory arrest duration are critical predictors of early mortality and neurologic complications [287]. Postoperative metabolic stability is also vital; high blood glucose variability within the first 3 days in the ICU is strongly associated with increased all-cause mortality [289]. Additionally, the need for emergency intubation prior to hospital admission in DeBakey Type I patients is a marker for poor early and long-term surgical outcomes [290].
| Tear Location | Frequency (%) | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Ascending Aorta | 56.2% | Most common site; influences surgical approach |
| Aortic Arch | 30.1% | Associated with complex arch repair |
| Descending Aorta | 13.6% | Retrograde extension; impacts long-term survival |
Pathophysiology
- ▸Hypertension is the strongest risk factor for thoracic aortic dissection with a hazard ratio of 2.51.
- ▸The primary mechanism involves an intimal tear and the formation of a false lumen within the tunica media.
- ▸Medial neovascularization (MN) of the vasa vasorum is a proposed mechanism for dissection in hypertensive patients.
- ▸Aortic calcifications, particularly microcalcifications, are linked to the site of primary intimal tears by altering wall shear stress.
- ▸Target hemodynamics for acute management are SBP <120 mmHg and HR <60–80 bpm.
- ▸Advanced 4D flow MRI and CFD help identify high-risk hemodynamic biomarkers like wall shear stress and helical flow.
The pathophysiology of aortic dissection (AD) involves a complex interplay of mechanical, hemodynamic, and structural factors that culminate in the separation of the aortic wall layers. The process typically begins with an intimal tear, which allows blood to penetrate the tunica media, creating a false lumen that propagates along the vessel [32][283].
Hemodynamic Stress and Hypertension
Hypertension is the primary driver of aortic dissection, associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.51 [32]. The mechanical forces acting on the aortic wall are characterized by the rate of ventricular contraction (dP/dt), heart rate, and absolute blood pressure [61]. Elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) increase the shear stress on the intima. Current management targets for acute Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) include an SBP <120 mmHg and HR <60–80 bpm to limit propagation [85]D. Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) is frequently utilized in these hypertensive emergencies due to its nitric oxide-mediated activation of the cGMP pathway, which induces balanced arterial and venous vasodilation, effectively reducing both preload and afterload [295].
Structural and Cellular Mechanisms
Structural integrity of the aorta is maintained by the extracellular matrix, particularly fibrillin-1. Mutations in the FBN1 gene, as seen in Marfan syndrome (MFS), lead to weakened aortic walls [299]D[300]D. Recent research suggests that medial neovascularization (MN)—an increased density of vasa vasorum within the outer third of the tunica media—may be a novel mechanism in hypertensive populations, as these vessels often coincide with the site of medial rupture [294]C. Additionally, aortic calcification distribution is significantly associated with the location of primary intimal tears (PITs). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging have demonstrated that microcalcifications near PIT regions alter local wall shear stress (WSS), potentially predisposing the intima to tearing [297].
Tear Location and Remodeling
The location of the primary intimal tear significantly influences clinical outcomes. In Stanford Type A dissections, tears are most common in the ascending aorta (56.2%), followed by the aortic arch (30.1%) and descending aorta (13.6%) [283]. Localized aortic root dissection is a rare variant where the tear is confined to the root without distal propagation, often misdiagnosed as a congenital membrane [67]C. Iatrogenic dissections, occurring during hemodynamic procedures, differ from classic dissections in the angle of entry of the flap and the formation of the false lumen [68]C. Post-surgical remodeling can be heterogeneous; for instance, the use of hybrid prostheses like the AMDS can sometimes result in negative aortic remodeling requiring rescue via the frozen elephant trunk technique [69]C.
Advanced Biomechanical Assessment
Modern imaging techniques such as 4D flow MRI and CFD provide insights into hemodynamic heterogeneity. These tools measure biomarkers like helical flow patterns, wall shear stress (WSS), and systolic flow reversal ratios [71]D[292]C. In Marfan syndrome patients, the implantation of non-compliant synthetic grafts during aortic root surgery can alter biomechanics, leading to undampened flow and abnormal displacement in the proximal descending aorta, which may increase the risk of subsequent Type B dissection [300]D[301]D. Generative AI models (e.g., CE-MRA-FLOWnet) are now being developed to predict these complex hemodynamics directly from standard contrast-enhanced MRA images [293].
| Location | Frequency (%) | Clinical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Ascending Aorta | 56.2% | Most common site for Stanford Type A |
| Aortic Arch | 30.1% | Requires complex arch repair |
| Descending Aorta | 13.6% | Retrograde propagation in Type A |
Clinical Features
- ▸Aortic dissection pain is typically maximal at onset and may migrate as the dissection propagates distally.
- ▸A systolic blood pressure differential >20 mmHg between arms or pulse deficits are high-yield physical exam findings for branch vessel involvement.
The clinical presentation of (AD) is notoriously heterogeneous, often earning it the moniker of the "great masquerader." A high index of clinical suspicion is required, as delayed diagnosis is a significant contributor to the high early mortality rate associated with acute aortic syndromes [92]. The presentation typically reflects the anatomical extent of the dissection, the involvement of branch vessels (malperfusion), and the presence of secondary complications such as or cardiac tamponade. ### Presenting Symptoms The hallmark of acute aortic dissection is the sudden onset of severe pain, often described as "tearing," "ripping," or "sharp." Unlike the crescendo pain of , AD pain is typically maximal at its inception [92].
Clinical Features and Variants
- ▸Acute aortic syndrome comprises classic dissection, intramural haematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer; these lesions may overlap or evolve. [109,329]
- ▸Stanford type A involves the ascending aorta, including retrograde extension; type B is confined to the descending thoracic aorta. [113,125,128]
- ▸Malperfusion, rupture, tamponade, neurological deficit, shock, and cardiac arrest are major markers of severe disease. [113,124,128,130]
- ▸Acute type B dissection is clinically stratified as complicated, high-risk, or uncomplicated; acute disease may be defined by symptom onset within **2 weeks**. [54,128]
- ▸CTA remains the reference diagnostic modality; POCUS, clinical scores, and D-dimer are adjuncts rather than substitutes when suspicion remains. [110,123,330]
Clinical spectrum
Aortic dissection is part of acute aortic syndrome (AAS), a group of life-threatening disorders that also includes intramural haematoma (IMH) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU). [109] Classic dissection is characterised by creation of an intimal tear and a false lumen, whereas IMH is bleeding within the aortic media without an initially demonstrable intimal tear. [329] PAU is an atherosclerotic ulcer that penetrates from the aortic intima into the media and may progress to IMH, classic dissection, aneurysm, or rupture. [109] These entities can coexist or evolve sequentially, so clinical presentation and imaging findings may overlap. [109][125]D
The Stanford classification separates disease involving the ascending aorta (type A) from disease confined to the descending thoracic aorta distal to the left subclavian artery (type B). [125]D[128]D Type A disease includes antegrade ascending dissections, retrograde dissections extending into the ascending aorta, and ascending-aortic IMH. [125]D[113] Type B disease includes classic descending dissection and type B IMH; comparative evidence indicates that these are clinically related but distinct entities requiring separate assessment of mortality, malperfusion, and time-dependent outcomes. [329]
Presentation and complications
Acute aortic syndrome commonly presents with abrupt thoracic or back pain, although symptoms may be atypical or absent, particularly in patients with PAU or incidentally detected disease. [109][127]D Misdiagnosis is clinically important: patients with missed AAS may initially be suspected of having acute myocardial infarction, and ischaemic electrocardiographic changes can contribute to diagnostic error. [127]D Clinical features may therefore overlap with acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and other causes of chest or back pain. [110][127]D
The major clinical determinants of severity are haemodynamic instability, rupture, tamponade, acute aortic regurgitation, coronary involvement, and malperfusion of cerebral, spinal, visceral, or limb territories. [113][124]D[128]D Neurological deficits, renal or mesenteric ischaemia, limb ischaemia, shock, and cardiac arrest identify particularly high-risk presentations and may accompany acute type A disease or extensive AAS. [124]D[130]D Malperfusion is also a principal outcome when comparing type B IMH with type B classic dissection. [329]
Type A variants
Acute type A dissection is a surgical emergency because the ascending aorta may be involved directly or secondarily by retrograde propagation. [125]D[331] Retrograde type A dissection and retrograde type A IMH are important variants in which the primary lesion may be located in the descending thoracic aorta while the ascending aorta is affected. [113][125]D Open repair remains the conventional treatment for these disorders, although endovascular treatment has been investigated as a less invasive alternative in selected patients. [113]
Ascending-aortic syndromes include classic dissection, retrograde dissection, PAU, and IMH. [125]D A first-in-human multicentre study evaluated an ascending-aortic stent-graft in 10 patients, comprising classic type A dissection, retrograde type A dissection, PAU, and IMH; one patient died during anaesthetic induction before deployment and was excluded from the device analysis. [125]D These findings demonstrate the heterogeneity of ascending AAS but do not establish endovascular repair as routine care. [125]D
Type B variants
Acute type B dissection is generally classified clinically as complicated, high-risk, or uncomplicated. [128]D Complicated disease is associated with rupture, malperfusion, refractory pain or hypertension, or rapid aortic deterioration; high-risk disease may lack an immediate complication but retain features predicting progression or later intervention. [128]D[54]D In a protocolised cohort, acute TBAD was defined as newly diagnosed isolated dissection on imaging within 2 weeks of symptom onset. [54]D
Uncomplicated TBAD is usually managed initially with optimal medical therapy, whereas early thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is established for complicated disease and remains debated in selected high-risk or uncomplicated cases. [54]D[128]D Contemporary protocolised management has been associated with reduced disease progression and need for surgery in observational data, while nationwide outcome studies have examined survival and reintervention across complicated, high-risk, and uncomplicated groups. [54]D[128]D These findings support risk-based rather than anatomy-only classification. [54]D[128]D
Type B IMH is a specific variant that may have a different early and overall mortality profile from classic type B dissection; a systematic review and meta-analysis directly compared mortality, malperfusion, and time-to-event outcomes, but the available evidence is observational and its certainty was assessed with GRADE. [329] PAU is another type B-predominant AAS phenotype, particularly relevant in patients with extensive atherosclerosis, and may present with pain, IMH, aneurysmal change, or rupture. [109]
Diagnostic features
Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is the reference diagnostic test for suspected AAS and is required for definitive anatomical diagnosis in most patients. [110][123]D[330] CTA identifies the intimal flap, true and false lumens, IMH, PAU, branch-vessel involvement, rupture, and malperfusion, thereby guiding classification and treatment. [109][110] Magnetic resonance imaging can improve detection and characterisation of PAU, although availability and speed limit its use in unstable patients. [109]
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may provide rapid bedside evidence of proximal aortic pathology or complications when immediate imaging is difficult, particularly in haemodynamically unstable patients; however, CTA remains the reference modality. [330] Clinical scores and biomarkers, including the aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer, may help select patients for CTA, but diagnostic strategies remain imperfect and no universally validated rule-out pathway has been established for all risk groups. [110][123]D A low or intermediate pre-test probability combined with D-dimer has been specifically investigated, but retrospective evidence does not replace definitive imaging when clinical suspicion persists. [123]D
Contemporary anatomical and procedural variants
Arch involvement creates additional clinical complexity because repair may require coverage of the left subclavian artery or supra-aortic branches. [35][126]D[131]D In situ laser fenestration and laser-fenestrated endografts have been studied to preserve branch perfusion during TEVAR for acute complicated or high-risk TBAD and other complex arch pathology. [35][131]D Frozen elephant trunk and total arch replacement are used for extensive arch and proximal descending disease, including presentations with neurological injury, malperfusion, or prior resuscitation. [124]D[130]D These procedural variants reflect anatomical complexity and disease severity rather than separate diagnostic categories. [124]D[126]D[130]D
| Variant | Defining clinical or anatomical feature | Important associated concerns |
|---|---|---|
| Type A classic dissection | Ascending-aortic involvement | Rupture, tamponade, aortic regurgitation, coronary or cerebral malperfusion [125]D[124]D |
| Retrograde type A dissection or IMH | Descending origin with retrograde ascending involvement | Requires prompt assessment for proximal complications; open and selected endovascular strategies have been studied [113][125]D |
| Type B classic dissection | Disease confined to the descending thoracic aorta | Malperfusion, rupture, progression, and need for delayed intervention [54]D[128]D[329] |
| Type B IMH | Intramural bleeding without an initially visible intimal tear | Mortality and malperfusion may differ from classic type B dissection [329] |
| PAU | Atherosclerotic ulcer penetrating into the media | IMH, dissection, aneurysm, and rupture [109] |
Differential Diagnosis
- ▸Ischemic ECG changes or an initial diagnosis of MI do not exclude acute aortic syndrome; they are features associated with missed AAS. [127]
- ▸Coronary malperfusion in type A dissection can produce acute MI findings and may lead to coronary angiography or PCI. [307]
- ▸PE and AAS overlap clinically and seasonally; winter predominance cannot distinguish them. [127,144]
- ▸Pericardial effusion or tamponade may accompany or mimic proximal dissection and requires etiologic assessment. [334]
- ▸Intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer are important imaging differentials for classic dissection. [125,309]
- ▸No cited ECG, biomarker, blood-pressure, or prognostic test replaces definitive aortic imaging when dissection is suspected. [57,134,147,151,332]
Diagnostic scope
Acute aortic dissection is part of the acute aortic syndrome (AAS) spectrum and may present with chest or back pain, ischemic electrocardiographic findings, myocardial injury, neurologic symptoms, or pericardial disease. Because these manifestations overlap with other time-critical conditions, the differential diagnosis should remain broad until definitive aortic imaging is obtained. In a large Swedish emergency-department study of 630,275 visits, cases of AAS diagnosed within 30 days after the initial visit were specifically examined because AAS is frequently missed; missed cases were associated with ischemic ECG changes and an initial suspicion of myocardial infarction (MI). [127]D
Acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarction
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including unstable angina and acute MI, is a major competing diagnosis when chest pain, ischemic ECG changes, or elevated cardiac biomarkers are present. The Swedish study identified initial suspicion of MI and ischemic ECG findings as features associated with missed AAS, demonstrating that coronary and aortic emergencies can be clinically indistinguishable at presentation. [127]D Patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) and those with unstable angina or AMI may also share acute chest or back pain and substantial fear of movement; a retrospective cohort directly compared 65 patients with AAD, 167 with unstable angina, and 99 with AMI. [308]
Coronary malperfusion is an important mechanism by which type A dissection can mimic primary ACS. In a nationwide Japanese cohort of surgically treated acute type A aortic dissection, coronary malperfusion was defined using a diagnosis of acute MI and/or coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention on the day of admission. [307] Thus, MI findings do not exclude dissection and may instead indicate coronary involvement by the dissection. CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) has been evaluated in patients with type A dissection undergoing coronary CT angiography to predict preoperative myocardial ischemia and 30-day postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events; however, this test addresses myocardial ischemia and does not replace dedicated assessment of the aorta. [147]D
Digital ECG findings may assist risk recognition but are not specific enough to establish or exclude dissection. In the Coupling Study, flat T waves were defined as amplitude <0.1 mV and a T-wave/R-wave ratio <10% in at least two of leads I, II, aVL, and V4–V6; the cardiovascular endpoint included stroke, MI, heart-failure hospitalization, and aortic dissection. [57]D
Pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic disease
Pulmonary embolism (PE) can overlap with dissection through acute chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or hemodynamic instability. AAS and PE are both conditions for which contemporary emergency diagnostic pathways may involve high-sensitivity troponin, D-dimer, and CT-based imaging; the Swedish missed-diagnosis study specifically evaluated these diagnostic contexts. [127]D Seasonal hospital-admission analysis found pronounced winter peaks for both PE and aortic dissection, with PE admissions decreasing from 21.5 to 17.6 per day between peak and trough seasons and dissection admissions from 2.53 to 2.06 per day; seasonality therefore cannot distinguish the two disorders in an individual patient. [144]D
Acute ischemic stroke is another relevant differential when neurologic deficits dominate the presentation. Whole-body CT protocols have been studied in patients presenting with suspected acute ischemic stroke, but the cited study evaluated imaging feasibility and post-contrast acute kidney injury rather than establishing a diagnostic rule for aortic dissection. [311]C Neurologic manifestations may also occur in type A dissection with arch-vessel involvement; isolated left vertebral artery anatomy was associated with greater perioperative brain-injury risk in one retrospective ATAAD cohort. [310]
Pericardial disease and cardiac tamponade
Pericardial effusion with tamponade may resemble proximal dissection when hypotension, chest discomfort, or obstructive shock is present. A nationwide Japanese study examined patients with pericardial effusion requiring invasive drainage and classified etiologies according to the underlying disease, underscoring that invasive-drainage cases represent a heterogeneous group rather than a single diagnosis. [334] In suspected proximal dissection, pericardial findings should therefore be interpreted alongside direct aortic imaging rather than treated as proof of primary pericardial disease. [334]
Other acute aortic syndromes and structural mimics
Intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer can clinically mimic classic dissection and may coexist within the same acute ascending-aortic presentation. In a first-in-human ascending-aortic endovascular study, the enrolled syndromes included classic type A dissection, retrograde type A dissection, penetrating aortic ulcer, and intramural hematoma. [125]D Similarly, a hybrid arch-repair cohort included aneurysm, dissection, penetrating ulcer, and intramural hematoma as distinct arch lesions. [309]C These entities require differentiation by cross-sectional imaging because their treatment pathways and procedural risks differ. [125]D[309]C
Chronic aneurysmal disease and post-repair aortic remodeling may also complicate interpretation of follow-up imaging. Distal aortic expansion after TEVAR is a recognized long-term outcome and has been investigated through systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of postoperative risk factors. [133] Endovascular arch-repair series likewise included aneurysm, dissection, and penetrating ulcer as separate indications, supporting careful lesion classification before attributing aortic enlargement to recurrent or residual dissection. [149]D
Diagnostic safety considerations
The differential should be driven by the most dangerous plausible diagnosis, not by a single symptom, ECG pattern, biomarker, or blood-pressure reading. Evidence on intensified treatment of asymptomatic elevated blood pressure during non-cardiac admission concerns retrospective cohorts and outcomes such as stroke, acute kidney injury, MI, and length of stay; it does not validate blood pressure response as a discriminator between dissection and its mimics. [134] Biomarkers such as peripheral-leukocyte mRNA signatures and serum beta-hydroxybutyrate have been investigated for diagnosis or postoperative risk stratification in type A dissection, but the cited studies do not establish them as substitutes for definitive imaging. [151]D[332] Aortic dissection has also been examined in association with assisted reproductive technology and infertility in a Swedish cohort, but those epidemiologic findings do not distinguish dissection from acute chest-pain mimics at presentation. [333] Finally, civil-liability literature emphasizes that complex diagnostic processes and high-risk cardiovascular conditions can generate preventable adverse events, reinforcing the need for prompt escalation when AAS remains plausible. [306]
| Differential diagnosis | Features that may overlap with dissection | Evidence-based caution |
|---|---|---|
| ACS/acute MI | Chest pain, ischemic ECG changes, myocardial ischemia | MI suspicion and ischemic ECG changes were associated with missed AAS; coronary malperfusion may represent dissection involvement. [127]D[307] |
| Pulmonary embolism | Acute chest symptoms, cardiopulmonary instability, overlap in emergency testing | Both PE and dissection show seasonal variation; clinical context and imaging are required. [127]D[144]D |
| Acute ischemic stroke | Predominant neurologic deficit | Type A dissection may involve arch vessels, including the left vertebral circulation. [310][311]C |
| Pericardial effusion/tamponade | Hypotension, chest discomfort, obstructive physiology | Drainage-requiring effusions have heterogeneous etiologies; pericardial findings do not establish primary pericardial disease. [334] |
| Intramural hematoma/penetrating ulcer | Acute aortic pain and related imaging abnormalities | These are distinct acute aortic syndromes requiring lesion classification on cross-sectional imaging. [125]D[309]C |
| Aneurysmal or post-TEVAR remodeling | Aortic enlargement on follow-up imaging | Distal aortic expansion and arch aneurysm are separate structural considerations from recurrent dissection. [133][149]D |
Management of Aortic Dissection
- ▸Anti-impulse therapy must target a heart rate of **≤60 bpm** and SBP of **100-120 mmHg** to prevent dissection propagation [61].
- ▸Stanford Type A dissection requires emergent surgical repair, ideally facilitated by a Direct Bypass Protocol to minimize delays [121].
The of acute aortic dissection (AD) is a clinical exigency requiring simultaneous stabilization and definitive intervention. The primary goal is to limit the propagation of the dissection by reducing the shear stress on the aortic wall, followed by anatomical repair based on the Stanford classification [61][121]D. ### Step 1: Initial Assessment and Severity Classification Immediate management begins with rapid classification into Stanford Type A (involving the ascending aorta) or Type B (involving only the descending aorta).
Supportive Care and Complication Management
- ▸Early prone positioning (within 48 hours) reduces mechanical ventilation duration in post-ATAAD ARDS.
- ▸Postoperative glucose variability over the first 3 days is a significant predictor of ICU mortality.
- ▸Sarcopenia and reduced grip strength are associated with poor 3-month survival outcomes.
- ▸VA-ECMO for postcardiotomy shock after ATAAD repair carries a high in-hospital mortality rate of 72.4%.
- ▸Methylguanidine is a candidate biomarker for the early detection of mesenteric malperfusion syndrome.
- ▸Autograft dissection after the Ross procedure frequently occurs at root diameters ≤ 55 mm.
Respiratory and Neurological Management
Postoperative respiratory failure is a significant concern following acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. In patients developing moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (MS-ARDS), early prone positioning (≤ 48 hours) has been shown to be safe, feasible, and effective in shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation [313]. Preoperative status also dictates outcomes; emergency intubation performed prior to hospital admission for DeBakey Type I dissection is associated with higher early and long-term surgical mortality [290]. Neurological complications, particularly postoperative delirium (POD), are common; risk prediction models utilizing factors such as age, surgical duration, and inflammatory markers can help identify high-risk patients [319].
Malperfusion Syndrome (MPS) and Organ Protection
Malperfusion syndrome remains a highly lethal complication of acute aortic dissection (AAD), necessitating stratified treatment strategies based on the specific ischemic organs and underlying mechanisms [318]. For stable ATAAD patients with MPS but without aortic rupture or tamponade, a strategy of endovascular reperfusion followed by delayed open aortic repair has been utilized, though hospital mortality remains high at 37.2% compared to those without MPS [184]D. Mesenteric malperfusion (ATAAD-MMPS) is particularly challenging to diagnose; recent metabolomic profiling suggests methylguanidine may serve as a potential early diagnostic biomarker for this condition [317]C.
Metabolic and Nutritional Considerations
Metabolic stability in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a critical determinant of survival. High 3-day postoperative blood glucose variability (measured by the coefficient of variation) is significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality in survivors of TAAD repair [289]. Furthermore, the presence of sarcopenia—characterized by reduced grip strength and metabolic reserves—serves as a potent prognostic marker, correlating with increased early mortality and a higher risk of complications within 3 months postoperatively [282].
Renal and Hemodynamic Support
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication following dissection repair. Predictive models integrating clinical features with the dynamic neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (ΔNLR) have been validated to identify patients at risk for postoperative AKI [315]. In cases of refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock following ATAAD repair, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may be employed. While weaning success is approximately 48.3%, overall in-hospital mortality remains high at 72.4%, often complicated by AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy [158].
Surgical and Endovascular Complications
Long-term management must address potential failures of the initial repair. Proximal anastomotic new entry tears (PANE) can occur following ATAAD surgery, presenting as true-false lumen communication or pseudoaneurysms at the anastomosis site [284]. For residual arch dissections, arch branched endovascular aortic repair (a-BEVAR) is emerging as a less invasive alternative to redo open arch repair [171]D. When performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), preservation of the left subclavian artery (LSA) using dedicated branched or fenestrated endografts is feasible and effective [159].
In patients undergoing the Ross procedure, rare but catastrophic autograft (neoaortic) dissection or rupture can occur, often years later (median 10 years); 60% of these events occur when the autograft root diameter is ≤ 55 mm, particularly in patients with native bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) morphology [314]C. For patients with BAV undergoing valve interventions, longitudinal monitoring is essential as they exhibit different aortic growth rates and risks of major aortic events compared to tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients [288].
| Complication/Scenario | Key Finding | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|
| Malperfusion Syndrome (MPS) | 37.2% hospital mortality with delayed repair strategy | 3b [184]D |
| VA-ECMO Support | 48.3% weaning success; 72.4% in-hospital mortality | 2a [158] |
| Ross Procedure Autograft | Median 10-year interval to dissection/rupture | 4 [314]C |
| MS-ARDS (Post-ATAAD) | Early prone positioning (≤ 48h) is safe and effective | 2b [313] |
| Bentall Procedure | Operative parameters influence early mortality/neurologic outcomes | 2a [287] |
Landmark Trials and Key Evidence
- ▸Modern aortic-dissection evidence is primarily observational, with IRAD providing the largest longitudinal multicenter data source.[198][209]
- ▸Rapid transfer and treatment systems matter: a direct-to-operating-room pathway shortened acceptance-to-operating-room time by **82 minutes**.[204]
- ▸Surgically treated acute type A dissection continues to carry approximately **22% in-hospital mortality** in external validation data.[200]
- ▸Cerebrovascular accident, tamponade, myocardial infarction, advanced age, and malperfusion identify high-risk clinical subsets.[145][197][216]
- ▸Mesenteric malperfusion in type B dissection has a limited comparative evidence base despite high reported mortality.[194]
- ▸Aortic diameter alone is an incomplete risk marker because approximately **60%** of IRAD type A dissections occurred below **55 mm**.[325]
Evidence base and contemporary trends
The contemporary evidence base for aortic dissection is dominated by registries, retrospective cohorts, systematic reviews, and institutional series rather than randomized trials. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) remains the principal multicenter observational resource, comprising data from multiple countries and decades of evolving diagnostic and operative practice.[198]D[209]D A 2024 IRAD analysis included 11,355 patients with nontraumatic acute aortic dissection enrolled at 61 centers in 15 countries between 1996 and 2022; approximately two-thirds had type A dissection, the mean age was approximately 62 years, and approximately 65.5% were men.[198]D Across time-based tertiles, hypertension increased from 77.8% to 80.4%, while smoking decreased from 34.1%; the study evaluated temporal changes in diagnosis, treatment, in-hospital mortality, and 3-year mortality.[198]D
The classic estimate of untreated type A dissection mortality increasing by 1%–2% per hour during the first 48 hours was reassessed in a contemporary IRAD cohort of patients enrolled from 1996 through 2018.[209]D That study compared patients managed with intended surgical versus medical treatment and specifically examined early mortality and the effect of time to surgery.[209]D A separate direct-to-operating-room transfer program reduced median transfer acceptance-to-operating-room arrival time by 82 minutes—from 3.30 to 1.93 hours—compared with the preimplementation pathway; the study included 42 preprogram and 84 postprogram patients.[204]D
Acute type A dissection: operative strategy and risk
External validation of four mortality-prediction scores in 1,895 surgically treated patients with acute type A dissection from 10 European centers found 30-day mortality of 21.7% and in-hospital mortality of 22.5%; discrimination, calibration, and observed-to-expected mortality ratios were assessed for early and 1-year outcomes.[200]D These findings support risk stratification but also demonstrate the substantial residual mortality of operative repair.[200]D
In a 2,145-patient IRAD interventional cohort, axillary cannulation was used in 1,106 patients and femoral cannulation in 1,039; the study compared early mortality, neurologic, respiratory, and renal complications, malperfusion, and tamponade.[106]D The available registry evidence does not establish a universal cannulation gold standard.[106]D Operative practice evolved substantially from 1996 to 2016: valve-sparing procedures increased from 3.9% to 26.7%, biologic valve use increased from 35.6% to 52.0%, and mechanical valve use decreased from 57.6% to 45.4% among patients requiring aortic valve replacement.[323]C
Time of day alone may be less important than system organization. In a 286-patient institutional series spanning 1998–2019, 80 operations occurred before and 206 after establishment of a specialized aortic rota; no significant difference in 30-day mortality was reported between in-hours and out-of-hours repair groups in either period.[219]D
Advanced age and neurologic presentation identify high-risk groups but do not automatically define futility. Among IRAD patients aged ≥70 years with type A dissection, 110 of 1,449 patients presented with cerebrovascular accident; in-hospital mortality was 32.7% versus 21.7% without cerebrovascular accident, and postoperative stroke was also more frequent.[216]D No patient presenting with cerebrovascular accident after age 87 underwent surgery in that analysis.[216]D In an institutional comparison of 70 octogenarians and 165 septuagenarians undergoing emergency repair, midterm clinical and functional outcomes were assessed, including quality of life; the study was undertaken because prior registry data had not demonstrated a clear surgical mortality advantage in octogenarians.[324]
Complications, special populations, and etiology
Preoperative myocardial infarction complicates type A dissection through coronary malperfusion or hemodynamic collapse. In an IRAD analysis of 5,762 type A dissections from 1996–2024, myocardial infarction was present in 662 patients (10.8%); patients managed endovascularly, with iatrogenic dissection, or with insufficient data were excluded.[145]D The study compared presentation, management, and outcomes with patients without preoperative myocardial infarction.[145]D
Cardiac tamponade is another catastrophic type A complication. A 25-year IRAD analysis included 6,014 patients with type A dissection enrolled from 63 centers and compared those with and without preoperative tamponade, using multivariable modeling and survival analysis; median follow-up was 35.8 months.[197]D
Pregnancy-related dissection is uncommon but clinically important. IRAD identified 29 women with dissection during pregnancy or within 12 weeks postpartum between 1998 and 2018; the study characterized underlying aortopathy, aortic dimensions, imaging, management, and outcomes.[322] Sex-related differences were assessed in 11,586 IRAD patients enrolled from 1996–2022, including 7,819 type A and 3,867 type B cases; approximately one-third were women, and women were older than men in both dissection types.[48]D
Iatrogenic dissection represented 333 patients (2.5%) among IRAD acute dissections from 1996–2023, compared with 13,122 spontaneous cases. Cardiac surgery accounted for 146 iatrogenic cases and catheter-induced injury for 134; iatrogenic patients were more likely to be older and to have atherosclerosis, known aneurysm, valve disease, or peripheral arterial disease.[196]D
Type B dissection and malperfusion
Mesenteric malperfusion syndrome is a high-mortality complication of acute or chronic Stanford type B dissection. A systematic review evaluated in-hospital mortality for surgical and endovascular management, excluding reports that did not provide patient-level outcomes by intervention or did not report in-hospital mortality.[194] The review highlights the limited comparative quality of the available literature and the need to interpret intervention-specific mortality estimates cautiously.[194]
Familial and anatomic risk are increasingly recognized. A retrospective IRAD analysis of type B dissection from 1996–2024 compared nonsyndromic familial, sporadic, and Marfan syndrome-associated disease, examining clinical characteristics, imaging, operative management, and outcomes.[321] Separately, a cohort study found that approximately 60% of IRAD type A patients had a maximum aortic diameter below 55 mm; it evaluated aortic size ratios and height-based metrics as potential markers distinguishing type A dissection from thoracic aneurysm.[325]
Long-term care and global evidence gaps
Among survivors of acute dissection, medication-adherence patterns were examined in a cross-sectional survey of patients discharged after type A or type B dissection. The report noted prior evidence associating beta-blockers with improved survival in both types and calcium-channel blockers with selective benefit in type B disease, while emphasizing the lack of adherence data.[326]C Evidence from Africa remains sparse: a systematic review found that the continent, despite representing approximately 17% of the world population, contributed about 1% of the available literature, which consisted predominantly of case reports, small series, and few original studies.[195]
| Evidence domain | Study population/design | Principal contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Temporal trends | 11,355 IRAD patients, 1996–2022; observational registry analysis | Evaluated evolving presentation, treatment, and mortality.[198]D |
| Early mortality and timing | IRAD type A cohort, 1996–2018 | Reassessed early mortality and association with timely surgery.[209]D |
| Transfer systems | 126 patients before/after direct-to-operating-room implementation | Reduced transfer acceptance-to-operating-room time by 82 minutes.[204]D |
| Surgical risk prediction | 1,895 patients from 10 European centers | 30-day mortality 21.7%; in-hospital mortality 22.5%.[200]D |
| Cannulation | 2,145 IRAD acute type A repairs | Compared axillary with femoral cannulation; no universal gold standard established.[106]D |
| Type B malperfusion | Systematic review of surgical and endovascular reports | Examined in-hospital mortality in mesenteric malperfusion; evidence was heterogeneous.[194] |
Special Populations
- ▸Pregnancy-related dissection risk in MFS may depend on FBN1 variant type, particularly haploinsufficient variants, and not solely on aortic-root diameter. [281]
- ▸Pregnancy and the postpartum period require multidisciplinary surveillance in HTAD; reported study definitions include periods extending to 12 weeks or 6 months postpartum. [224,228,239,281]
- ▸Late-gestation and postpartum presentations are common in reported pregnancy-associated type A dissection cohorts, but management must be individualized according to maternal and fetal status. [224,229,341]
- ▸Turner syndrome requires lifelong aortic surveillance, comprehensive imaging, and attention to updated lower thresholds for Heart Team referral. [223,335,337,339]
- ▸Aortic-root surgery does not eliminate distal aortic risk in Marfan syndrome; lifelong residual-aorta imaging remains necessary. [300,301]
- ▸Family history may be clinically relevant in nonsyndromic type B dissection, while Loeys–Dietz-specific evidence remains limited. [321,340]
Pregnancy and heritable thoracic aortic disease
Pregnancy should be managed as a high-risk state in women with heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD), including Marfan syndrome (MFS), Loeys–Dietz syndrome (LDS), ACTA2-related disease, and other genetically mediated aortopathies. The prospective ROPAC III registry included 176 pregnancies in 170 women with HTAD: 122 with MFS, 14 with LDS, 10 with ACTA2 variants, and 30 with other HTAD diagnoses. The registry assessed maternal, obstetric, fetal, medication, breastfeeding, and aortic-diameter outcomes, supporting multidisciplinary surveillance rather than management based only on a single aortic measurement. [239]D
In women with MFS, pregnancy-related aortic dissection is defined as dissection occurring during pregnancy or within 6 months postpartum in the FBN1 genotype study. Haploinsufficient (HI) FBN1 variants were specifically investigated because they are associated with more severe aortic phenotypes, and genotype may improve risk assessment beyond aortic-root diameter alone, particularly for Stanford type B dissection. [281] Aortic-root size therefore should not be interpreted as the sole determinant of pregnancy risk in genetically confirmed MFS. [281]
Pregnancy-related acute aortic dissection may occur late in gestation or after delivery. In a pregnancy case report, type A dissection was described as occurring most often in the third trimester (50%–60%) or postpartum (30%–50%); management requires individualized consideration of gestational age, maternal anatomy, fetal maturity, and whether delivery should precede repair or aortic surgery should proceed with the fetus in utero. [229]C A multicentre Chinese cohort of 67 women with dissection during pregnancy or within 12 weeks postpartum reported a median presentation at 32 weeks’ gestation; 46 patients (68.7%) had type A dissection, 41 underwent immediate surgery, and overall maternal mortality was 10.4% (7/67). [224]
A single-centre series of 12 surgically treated pregnant patients with acute type A dissection included gestational ages from 11 weeks 4 days to 40 weeks 1 day; four patients had MFS, while gestational hypertension and diabetes were also reported among comorbidities. The authors emphasize individualized surgical strategies because established pregnancy-specific management guidance remains limited. [341]D In a reported 25-week twin pregnancy complicated by acute type A dissection with a dilated root and severe regurgitation, emergency Bentall surgery was selected; the mother recovered uneventfully and the twins were delivered at 31 weeks. [229]C
Women with Marfan-related disorders—including MFS, LDS, and Ehlers–Danlos syndrome—were evaluated in a Japanese nationwide database study of deliveries from 2010–2023. The study assessed dissection during pregnancy or postpartum hospitalization and rehospitalization for dissection, and also described cabergoline use, highlighting the importance of postpartum as well as antepartum surveillance. [228] Available evidence does not establish a single universally applicable delivery or surgical pathway; decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in aortopathy, cardiac surgery, maternal–fetal medicine, anesthesia, and neonatology. [224][229]C[239]D[341]D
Marfan syndrome and genotype-specific risk
MFS is caused by pathogenic FBN1 variants and is characterized by progressive aortic disease. In a prospective tissue study of 20 MFS patients undergoing surgery for aortic aneurysm or dissection and 20 non-MFS controls, patients with dissection had significantly higher FBN1 messenger-RNA expression; FBN1, TGFBR1, TGFBR2, and TGFB2 expression were investigated as potential molecular mechanisms. [242]D A separate study of 59 molecularly confirmed adults with MFS found shorter leukocyte telomere length than in 59 age- and sex-matched controls, supporting biological differences in this population, although the clinical role of telomere length in individual dissection prediction remains uncertain. [234]D
Late recognition may worsen outcomes. In a European reference-centre cohort of patients with pathogenic FBN1 variants, late MFS diagnosis was defined as diagnosis at age ≥21 years, while early optimal pharmacologic therapy (OPT) initiation was defined as before age 21. The study evaluated delayed replacement of the ascending aorta when aneurysm diameter exceeded 5.0 cm, acute type A dissection, and death, reflecting the importance of early diagnosis, surveillance, and preventive therapy. [248]D
After aortic-root surgery, MFS patients remain at risk for distal disease, including type B dissection. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic-resonance studies investigated abnormal aortic displacement and wall shear stress in patients with prior root surgery and proposed that a noncompliant graft may alter proximal descending-aortic hemodynamics. [300]D[301]D These mechanistic findings support lifelong imaging of the residual thoracic aorta after root repair. [300]D[301]D
Turner syndrome
Turner syndrome (TS) confers substantial aortic risk, particularly in the presence of bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation, or aortic dilatation. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is valuable during transition from pediatric to adult care because echocardiography may incompletely characterize aortic morphology; this assessment is especially relevant before conception or assisted reproduction. [337]C
Updated European and international TS guidance has lowered aortic-size thresholds for referral to a multidisciplinary Heart Team. In a UK cohort of 156 individuals with TS, 21 (13%) met updated criteria for consideration of elective aortic surgery, 15 more than under the 2016 guidance. [339]C In a Japanese national inpatient cohort of adult women hospitalized for first-time dissection or aneurysm between 2010 and 2022, TS and MFS were compared with women without either syndrome for in-hospital mortality. [335] A Swedish national cohort of 472 women with TS followed for a mean of 17 years found 35 deaths (7.4%), compared with 70 (3.0%) among 2,357 matched controls; mortality analyses included death from aortic dissection. [223] These findings support risk-factor-based imaging and earlier specialist referral in TS. [223][335][337]C[339]C
Familial, nonsyndromic, and LDS-associated disease
Familial nonsyndromic type B dissection was compared with sporadic type B dissection and MFS-related type B dissection in an International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection analysis covering 1996–2024. The study evaluated prevalence, clinical characteristics, imaging, surgical management, and outcomes, reflecting that family history may identify aortic vulnerability even without a recognized syndromic phenotype. [321] LDS is associated with aggressive aortic and extra-aortic vascular disease, but evidence for gene-specific surveillance, medication, operative thresholds, pregnancy care, and pediatric management remains limited and is still largely consensus-based. [340]D
Perioperative considerations
Acute type A dissection surgery carries substantial postoperative morbidity. In a retrospective cohort of 483 patients, severe postoperative acute lung injury was examined as a major complication after repair, emphasizing the need for careful perioperative respiratory and intensive-care management in high-risk presentations, including pregnancy-associated dissection. [338]
| Population | Evidence-based consideration |
|---|---|
| Marfan syndrome | Assess FBN1 variant type; HI variants may indicate greater pregnancy-related risk, including type B dissection. [281] |
| Pregnancy with HTAD | Use multidisciplinary maternal–fetal and aortic management; monitor during pregnancy and postpartum. [239]D |
| Turner syndrome | Evaluate bicuspid valve, coarctation, and aortic dimensions with echocardiography and/or CMR; apply updated Heart Team referral criteria. [337]C[339]C |
| Familial nonsyndromic disease | Family history may identify increased vulnerability in type B dissection even without a syndromic diagnosis. [321] |
| Loeys–Dietz syndrome | Treat as an aggressive multisystem aortopathy; gene-specific evidence and thresholds remain limited. [340]D |
| After Marfan root surgery | Continue lifelong distal-aortic surveillance because type B dissection may develop after root repair. [300]D[301]D |
Guidelines and Resources
- ▸Use the 2022 ACC/AHA guideline as the principal broad framework for diagnosis, genetic evaluation, family screening, treatment, and surveillance of aortic disease. [251][252][253]
- ▸Use ESVS guidance for descending thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic disease, with recommendations graded by class I–III and evidence level A–C. [256]
- ▸Apply SVS/STS terminology for type B dissection, including chronicity, complicated versus uncomplicated disease, high-risk features, false-lumen status, and aortic remodeling. [254]
- ▸Treat suspected acute aortic syndrome as time-critical and select imaging that supports diagnosis and treatment planning. [255]
- ▸Assess the entire aorta when planning treatment for a new abdominal aortic aneurysm or dissection presentation without prior imaging, and continue surveillance after open or endovascular repair. [260]
- ▸Contrast-enhanced CT is identified in ESC-oriented guidance as the first-choice examination for suspected acute aortic syndrome and should not be delayed when clinical suspicion is high. [266]
- ▸Ascending-aortic disease remains principally an open-surgical domain in the cited ESC-oriented guidance; an asymptomatic diameter above **5.5 cm** is identified as an elective-surgery threshold in that source. [266]
- ▸Pregnancy-related risk is particularly important in Turner syndrome, where reported dissection or rupture risk is **2% or higher** and mortality may increase up to **100-fold**. [263]
Major clinical practice guidelines
The principal contemporary reference is the 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease, published in Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. It addresses diagnosis, genetic evaluation, family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance across asymptomatic disease, stable symptomatic disease, and acute aortic syndromes (AAS). [251][252][253] The guideline was based on a comprehensive literature search of human studies, reviews, and other evidence published in English, principally from January 2021 through April 2021, with additional relevant studies incorporated through June 2022. [251][252][253]
For descending thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic disease, the ESVS 2026 Clinical Practice Guidelines update the 2017 version and provide recommendations for evaluation and treatment of these pathologies. [256] The ESVS process combines scientific evidence with expert opinion, and recommendations are graded by recommendation class I–III and evidence level A–C. [256] These guidelines should be considered complementary to the ACC/AHA guideline when disease involves the descending thoracic or thoraco-abdominal aorta. [251][256]
Classification and reporting of type B dissection
The SVS/STS reporting standards provide a practical nomenclature for type B aortic dissection, including the aortic arch, chronicity, previous aortic repair, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. [254] They distinguish complicated from uncomplicated dissection and introduce a high-risk category for reporting and clinical discussion. [254] The standards also define follow-up terminology, false-lumen status, aortic measurement criteria, and aortic-remodeling concepts. [254]
Diagnostic imaging and treatment planning
AAS includes acute aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. [255] Typical presentations include sudden severe tearing anterior or interscapular back pain, although malperfusion may dominate when the true and false lumens or branch vessels become obstructed. [255] Timely diagnosis is essential; untreated ascending aortic dissection has reported early mortality rates of approximately 1%–2% per hour after symptom onset. [255]
The ACR Appropriateness Criteria for suspected AAS evaluate imaging procedures according to their ability to establish the diagnosis and provide information needed for open surgical, endovascular, or medical treatment planning. [255] The updated ACR criteria for thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection emphasize that imaging is central to diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment planning, and that recommendations are reviewed by a multidisciplinary expert panel using a systematic assessment of peer-reviewed literature. [108] For patients presenting for initial treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm or dissection without prior imaging, the entire aorta, including the thoracic segment, should be assessed to characterize the full anatomic extent of disease. [260] Preoperative imaging focuses on treatment need and feasibility, including anatomy, disease extent, and growth rate; surveillance imaging is required after both open and endovascular repair. [260]
Earlier ESC-oriented guidance identifies contrast-enhanced CT as the first-choice imaging modality because it is rapidly available and can evaluate the entire aorta in a single examination. [266] In patients with a high clinical suspicion of AAS based on symptoms or family history, CT should be performed without delay to confirm or exclude the diagnosis. [266] Ultrasound-based assessment is addressed in the echovascular imaging recommendations, which include practical guidance for imaging the aorta and peripheral arterial beds and discuss aortic dissection among other arterial disorders. [272]D
Surgical, endovascular, and medical management resources
The ACC/AHA guideline provides the overarching framework for medical therapy, endovascular intervention, open surgery, genetic assessment, family screening, and longitudinal surveillance in aortic disease. [251][252][253] ESC-oriented guidance states that disease involving the ascending aorta remains primarily managed with open surgery in the relevant clinical settings, including emergency treatment of acute type A dissection and elective treatment of asymptomatic aneurysm when the aortic diameter exceeds 5.5 cm; risk factors such as bicuspid aortic valve and Marfan syndrome may affect decision-making. [266] The ESVS guideline is particularly relevant to treatment selection for descending thoracic and thoraco-abdominal disease. [256]
The 2015 ACC/AHA clarification on bicuspid aortic valve–associated aortic dilatation was issued because earlier ACC/AHA guidance documents differed regarding the aortic root or ascending-aorta diameter threshold for preventive surgery. [258][259] Contemporary observational work continues to evaluate aortic-root dilatation, dissection risk, and real-world application of guideline-based surgical thresholds in bicuspid aortic valve disease, but the cited 2025 study is retrospective and observational rather than a replacement for guideline recommendations. [268] Another retrospective study examined whether concomitant coarctation is associated with greater ascending-aortic event risk in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease, in the context of European guidance recommending a lower operative threshold when coarctation is present. [270]D
Special populations and related resources
Pregnancy requires specialized risk assessment and multidisciplinary planning in patients with aortopathy. In Turner syndrome, pregnancy has been associated with a risk of aortic dissection or rupture of 2% or higher and an increase in pregnancy-related mortality of up to 100-fold. [263] Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of maternal mortality; a French review reported that aortic dissection was among the leading cardiovascular etiologies of maternal death and identified substantial proportions of non-optimal and potentially preventable care. [267] A multicenter Italian study evaluated adherence to ESC recommendations regarding mode of delivery in women with heart disease and assessed maternal and neonatal outcomes, highlighting the importance of guideline-concordant obstetric management. [327]
Chronic kidney disease is an important context for vascular care because it is associated with high cardiovascular risk, while patients with CKD are frequently underrepresented or excluded from clinical trials. [262] KDIGO therefore highlights persistent evidence gaps relevant to management of central and peripheral arterial disease in CKD. [262] The practical guide to thoracic aortic disease remains a useful resource for organizing diagnosis, specialist referral, medical therapy, surgery, follow-up, and family screening, particularly when inherited or syndromic disease is suspected. [257]
| Clinical need | Primary resource | Main contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Broad aortic disease management | 2022 ACC/AHA guideline | Diagnosis, genetics, family screening, medical therapy, surgery, endovascular treatment, and surveillance [251][252][253] |
| Descending thoracic or thoraco-abdominal disease | ESVS 2026 guideline | Evaluation and treatment recommendations using class I–III and evidence levels A–C [256] |
| Type B dissection nomenclature | SVS/STS reporting standards | Classification, chronicity, complications, high-risk grouping, follow-up, false lumen, and remodeling [254] |
| Suspected acute aortic syndrome | ACR Appropriateness Criteria | Imaging selection for diagnosis and treatment planning [255] |
| Thoracic follow-up and planning | ACR 2024 update | Imaging-based treatment planning and surveillance [108] |
| Initial abdominal aortic dissection assessment | ACR 2025 update | Imaging of the entire aorta when prior imaging is unavailable [260] |
References
- [1]
Bin L, Fei J, Zhao L et al.. “Comparative effectiveness and safety of open triple-branched stent graft technique with stented elephant trunk implantation in treating Stanford type A aortic dissection: A trial sequential meta-analysis.” Journal of cardiac surgery (2022). PMID: 36352782 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [2]
Yamashita Y, Sicouri S, Dokollari A et al.. “Double arterial vs. single axillary cannulation in acute type A aortic dissections: a meta-analysis.” Future cardiology (2024). PMID: 38963122 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [3]
Yamashita Y, Sicouri S, Kjelstrom S et al.. “Direct aortic cannulation versus femoral arterial cannulation for early outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection: A study-level meta-analysis.” Perfusion (2025). PMID: 38537032 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [4]
Yamashita Y, Sicouri S, Dokollari A et al.. “Aortic versus axillary cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A meta-analysis.” Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals (2024). PMID: 38343086 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [5]
Guglielmi V, Groeneveld NS, Posthuma L et al.. “Aortic dissection masquerading as a code stroke: A single-centre cohort study.” European stroke journal (2020). PMID: 32232170 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [6]
Modares M, Hanneman K, Ouzounian M et al.. “Computed Tomography Angiography Assessment of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Classification, Differentiating Imaging Features, and Imaging Interpretation Pitfalls.” Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes (2022). PMID: 33874779 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [7]
Zhu Y, Lingala B, Baiocchi M et al.. “Type A Aortic Dissection-Experience Over 5 Decades: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2020). PMID: 33004136 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [8]
Saremi F, Hassani C, Lin LM et al.. “Image Predictors of Treatment Outcome after Thoracic Aortic Dissection Repair.” Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc (2018). PMID: 30312138 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [9]
Gutschow SE, Walker CM, Martínez-Jiménez S et al.. “Emerging Concepts in Intramural Hematoma Imaging.” Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc (2016). PMID: 27163587 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [10]
Li S, Liu X, Yang J et al.. “Clinical features and survival analysis of non-hypertensive aortic dissection patients post-thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a 10-year retrospective study.” Journal of thoracic disease (2024). PMID: 39678834 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [11]
Uriu Y, Kuriyama A. “Malperfusion-associated transient monoplegia as an initial manifestation of aortic dissection.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2021). PMID: 33036846 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [12]
Ramesh P, Al-Zubaidi FI, Abdelghaffar M et al.. “TEM Classification of Aortic Dissection-The Evolving Scoring System: A Literature Review.” Heart, lung & circulation (2024). PMID: 38143192 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [13]
Gao Y, Li D, Cao Y et al.. “Prognostic value of serum albumin for patients with acute aortic dissection: A retrospective cohort study.” Medicine (2019). PMID: 30732220 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [14]
Abarca Rozas BA, Schwarze Fieldhouse MW, Contreras Bertolo RI et al.. “Atypical presentation and late diagnosis of acute aortic dissection without timely surgical treatment: case report and literature review.” Medwave (2018). PMID: 30240389 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [15]
Wu Z, Yuan Y, Chai C et al.. “Impact of the society for vascular surgery/society of thoracic surgeons classification on prognosis and therapeutic strategies in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41953671 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [16]
Shirakura K, Ushioda R, Kunioka S et al.. “Association of Stanford, DeBakey classification and false-lumen blood flow with age of onset in acute aortic dissection.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41859548 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [17]
Xu Y, Huang C, Huang C et al.. “Analysis of epidemiological characteristics and prognosis based on 1,343 cases of aortic dissection from a regional single center.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41725939 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [18]
Canalejo-Codina F, López-Lluva MT, Rumoroso JR et al.. “Epidemiology, treatment, and data management trends in aortic dissection and related syndromes: Insights and limitations from the RAE-CMBD in Spain (2016-2021).” Progress in cardiovascular diseases (2025). PMID: 41448445 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [19]
Ikeno Y, Tanaka A, Troncone MJ et al.. “Impact of new classification from the Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons on acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40692091 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [20]
Zhang J, Han L, Liu H et al.. “Metabolomic analysis reveals the metabolic disturbance in aortic dissection: Subtype difference and accurate diagnosis.” Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD (2023). PMID: 37263915 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [21]
Huang LT, Tsai YS, Liou CF et al.. “Automated Stanford classification of aortic dissection using a 2-step hierarchical neural network at computed tomography angiography.” European radiology (2022). PMID: 34854930 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [22]
Xu W, Mani K, Khashram M. “Ethnic differences in incidence and outcomes of acute aortic syndromes in the Midland region of New Zealand.” Journal of vascular surgery (2022). PMID: 34506891 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [23]
Ge YY, Rong D, Ge XH et al.. “The 301 Classification: A Proposed Modification to the Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Classification for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Prognostication.” Mayo Clinic proceedings (2020). PMID: 32622443 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [24]
Pan E, Gudbjartsson T, Ahlsson A et al.. “Low rate of reoperations after acute type A aortic dissection repair from The Nordic Consortium Registry.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2018). PMID: 29753501 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [25]
Platon A, Bernard S, Perrin N et al.. “Type A aortic dissection: Are there CT signs suggestive of valvular involvement?” European journal of radiology (2016). PMID: 27776642 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [26]
Xue J, Ni Y, He J et al.. “A case of twin pregnancy with "precious fetuses" complicated by DeBakey type I aortic dissection.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41126334 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [27]
Varela-Jaramillo S, Taub-Krivoy A, Gómez-Gutiérrez MA et al.. “Neurological Manifestations of Aortic Dissection: A Scoping Review.” Journal of acute medicine (2024). PMID: 39624147 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [28]
Gao ZC, Wang Y, Li GS et al.. “[Risk factors for adverse prognosis in acute aortic syndrome: a single-center retrospective cohort study].” Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi (2025). PMID: 39965848 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [29]
Nakajima T, Shibata T, Mukawa K et al.. “Treatment Strategies for Acute Aortic Dissection With Malperfusion: A Retrospective Study.” Cureus (2024). PMID: 39219975 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [30]
MacKerricher W, Klein RR, Winston DC. “Association of Antemortem Central Nervous System Symptoms and Location of Aortic Dissections; A Retrospective Study from 2001-2014.” Academic forensic pathology (2016). PMID: 31239925 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [31]
Han Z, Li B, Liu J. “Predictive value of machine learning for mortality risk in aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” International journal of medical informatics (2026). PMID: 41539126 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [32]
Sharma S, Seth J, Rabkin SW. “Hypertension in Thoracic Aortic Dissection: A Meta-Analysis-Based Consideration in the Choice of Antihypertensive Agents.” American journal of hypertension (2026). PMID: 41206434 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [33]
Chen Q, Jiang Y, Shen Y et al.. “Risk of aortic aneurysm/aortic dissection associated with fluoroquinolones use: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.” Vascular (2026). PMID: 41678806 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [34]
Squizzato F, Bilato MJ, Menegolo M et al.. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Outcomes of Distal Aortic Interventions for Residual Aortic Dissection.” Annals of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41106673 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [35]
Peng Z, Liang S, Zhang R et al.. “Left Subclavian Artery Revascularization With In Situ Laser Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Acute Complicated or High-Risk Type B Aortic Dissection: Results of the LLTEVAR Trial.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 41368828 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Clinical Features and Variants, Differential Diagnosis, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [36]
Wu ZY, Yang Y, Li ZL et al.. “Effects of Fluoroquinolones on Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection Processes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Reviews in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41923717 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [37]
Kaewboonlert N, Pongsuwan N, Chatkaewpaisal C et al.. “Survival outcomes of hybrid versus total arch replacement in type A aortic dissection: A meta-analysis of reconstructed individual participant data.” Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals (2026). PMID: 41236863 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [38]
Petersen CS, Karon Z, Obel LM et al.. “Aortic and Iliac Calcifications as Predictors of Aortic Dissection, Aneurysm Rupture, and Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study from the DANCAVAS Trials.” Circulation (2026). PMID: 41766556 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [39]
Shao Z, Lu Z, Duan W et al.. “Insulin resistance indicators in aortic disease: A large cohort study.” Clinical and translational medicine (2026). PMID: 41499559 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [40]
Bashir M, Jubouri M, Surkhi AO et al.. “From Equipoise to Evidence: Pre-Trial Setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair Clinical Trial.” Annals of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41421577 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [41]
Yan M, Wang K, Liu S et al.. “Factors associated with device-associated health care-associated infections after cardiac surgery: a matched cohort study.” PeerJ (2026). PMID: 41978887 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [42]
Imbriani M, Marchesini D, Piras GN et al.. “Mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation as a histopathological marker of aortic fragility: Two autopsy cases and a literature review.” Legal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) (2026). PMID: 41525745 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [43]
Pruna-Guillen R, Rojanathagoon T, Oo A et al.. “Impact of an On-Call Specialist Aortic Rota Implementation in Acute Type a Aortic Dissection on Outcomes and Repair Complexity: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41148058 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [44]
Li C, Liu C. “Multimodal imaging of acquired aortic diseases: clinical efficacy, comparative analysis, and future perspectives.” The international journal of cardiovascular imaging (2026). PMID: 41549183 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Clinical Features and Variants - [45]
Pan C, Ning S, Zhou Y et al.. “Influencing Factors of Postoperative Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Outcomes in Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.” British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005) (2025). PMID: 41134180 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [46]
Ram E, Lau C, Gregg A et al.. “Comparative Analysis of Risk Profile and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Chronic Dissection Versus Degenerative Disease.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41904662 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [47]
Li S, Li W, Zhang J et al.. “Association between atherosclerotic index of plasma and long-term aortic-related adverse events in type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair.” Cardiovascular diabetology (2026). PMID: 41787449 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Management - [48]
Jackson E, Carbone A, Shalhub S et al.. “Sex-Related Differences in Clinical Profile, Management, and Outcomes of Patients With Type A and B Acute Aortic Dissection: Observations From IRAD.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 41744110 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Management, Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [49]
Dell'Aquila AM, Georgevici AI, Wisniewski K et al.. “Risk Profile and Outcomes of Patients Requiring Coronary Revascularization as Concomitant Procedure to Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41563923 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Pathophysiology - [50]
Gomez A, Carroway W, Tu S et al.. “Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms in a Veterans Affairs Health System: Longitudinal Outcomes and Risk Factors.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 41532501 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [51]
Tang C, Wang T, Diao H et al.. “Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with type A aortic dissection based on the 2023 updated definition.” Respiratory research (2025). PMID: 41388298 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [52]
Abusafia M, Jadam S, Kalahasti V et al.. “Sex-Based Differences in Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Ascending Aortic Dilation.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 41334743 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [53]
Maznyczka A, Gill C, Norman S et al.. “Outcomes of Non-Anesthetist Led Conscious Sedation for 2000 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantations.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2026). PMID: 41332125 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [54]
Gober LM, Telma K, Richmond E et al.. “Protocolized management of acute type B aortic dissections reduces disease progression and need for surgery.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41317972 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Clinical Features and Variants - [55]
Frumkin D, Nersesian G, Spethmann S et al.. “Acute type A aortic dissection following TAVI.” International journal of cardiology (2026). PMID: 41276188 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [56]
Yokota A, Kabutoya T, Hoshide S et al.. “Digital electrocardiogram-measured P-wave duration and hypertensive heart disease are associated with cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular risks.” Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (2026). PMID: 41272126 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [57]
Kabutoya T, Hoshide S, Kario K. “Digital ECG detection of flat T waves predicts cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: the Coupling Study.” Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (2026). PMID: 41272124 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Differential Diagnosis - [58]
Chamseddine H, Halabi M, Hamdan H et al.. “The impact of intervention timing, etiology, and revascularization strategy on acute mesenteric ischemia outcomes.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41242625 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [59]
Nadel J, Suinesiaputra A, Paratz ED et al.. “Site-Specific Analysis of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Cardiovascular Mortality: Insights From the National Echo Database Australia.” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography (2026). PMID: 41242620 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [60]
Kletzer J, van Kampen A, Peterss S et al.. “Weathering the Aorta: The Impact of Environmental Factors on Acute Aortic Dissection.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2025). PMID: 41223150 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [61]
Liu G, Wang D, Yang Y et al.. “Efficacy and Safety of preoperative Controlling Heart Rate in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ESCORT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.” BMJ open (2026). PMID: 41962972 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination, Management - [62]
Chen X, Xie W, Li W et al.. “Cerebral Oximetry Index-Guided Blood Pressure Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Reduces Postoperative Delirium in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (2025). PMID: 39855957 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [63]
Naito N, Takagi H. “Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for retrograde type a intramural hematoma or aortic dissection with intimal disruption in the descending aorta: Systematic review and meta-analysis.” Perfusion (2025). PMID: 39977541 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology - [64]
Hochberg CH, Yan L, Card ME et al.. “Outcomes of patients with hypertensive emergency managed in intensive vs intermediate care settings: a multihospital retrospective cohort study.” Annals of the American Thoracic Society (2026). PMID: 41915559 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination, Management - [65]
Song T, Han Y, Xie L et al.. “Cellular Heterogeneity in Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.” Circulation research (2026). PMID: 41886549 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [66]
Hu M, Chen B, Luo Y. “Computational fluid dynamics modelling of hemodynamics in aortic aneurysm and dissection: a review.” Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology (2025). PMID: 40190707 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [67]
Jia Q, Bian Y, Wang X et al.. “Case Report: Diagnostic pitfalls in localized aortic root dissection: two cases and a literature review.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41953663 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [68]
Cosco V, Grenci G, Fiorentino A et al.. “Limited Iatrogenic Dissection of the Aortic Root: To Treat or Not to Treat?” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2025). PMID: 41078216 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology, Clinical Features and Variants - [69]
Kelly JJ, Brown CR, Eisenga JB et al.. “Repair of Arch Aneurysm With Frozen Elephant Trunk for DeBakey Type I Dissection Previously Treated With a Hybrid Arch Bare-Metal Stent.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 40609665 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [70]
Cui P, Sun HH, Luo Y et al.. “Aortic dissection: the role of macrophages in disease pathogenesis and their potential as a treatment target.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41765885 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [71]
Bissell MM, Garg P. “Clinical 4D flow MRI assessment in aortopathy-what the clinician needs to know.” Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy (2025). PMID: 41509618 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [72]
Clothier JS, Kobsa S. “Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” Cardiology clinics (2025). PMID: 40268355 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [73]
Ahmad HM, Iskandar Z, Lang CC et al.. “Emerging imaging and circulating biomarkers in relation to underlying mechanisms in Bicuspid Aortic Valve aortopathy.” International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature (2025). PMID: 40130209 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [74]
Murtada A, Jubouri M, Refaie M et al.. “Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia in Aortic Surgery: What You Need to Know.” Annals of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 39863280 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [75]
Al-Rawi M, Lim ETA, Khashram M et al.. “Utility of Computational Modeling in Reassessing the Threshold for Intervention and Progression into Type A Aortic Dissection.” Biomedicines (2026). PMID: 41898340 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [76]
Li B, Zhu Y, Wang K et al.. “Strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction analysis of TEVAR with double-branched endograft for non-A non-B aortic dissection: a patient-specific case study.” Journal of biomechanics (2026). PMID: 41391440 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [77]
Liu W, Lin Q, Zhong H et al.. “Microbiomics and metabolomics explored the characteristics of gut microbiota and metabolites in patients with aortic dissection.” Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology (2025). PMID: 41132489 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [78]
Kario K, Okawara Y, Kanegae H et al.. “Relationship Between Home Blood Pressure Monitoring-Confirmed Resistant Hypertension and Cardiovascular Prognosis.” Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) (2025). PMID: 41127912 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [79]
Osswald A, Tsagakis K, Thielmann M et al.. “Can computational fluid dynamics simulations predict a distal stent graft-induced new entry after frozen elephant trunk operation?” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2025). PMID: 41112231 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [80]
Kario K, Nishiyama A, Shibata S et al.. “The JSH Morning Hypertension Eradication Program Project.” Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (2025). PMID: 40858749 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination, Differential Diagnosis - [81]
Wu T, Zhu H, Zhuo H et al.. “Fluid-structure interaction study of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers: Assessing progression and rupture risks.” Computer methods and programs in biomedicine (2025). PMID: 40706491 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination, Clinical Features and Variants - [82]
Zhang L, Yang S, Guo X et al.. “Changes in True and False Lumen Pressures During Closure of the Primary Tear in Aortic Dissection.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2025). PMID: 40665556 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [83]
Chen Y, Guo J, Wang S et al.. “Identifying Hemodynamic Predictors of Aortic Growth After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2025). PMID: 40650600 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [84]
Larsen KSR, Tang M, Budtz-Lilly JW et al.. “Evaluation of a Rehabilitation Program With Blood Pressure-Guided Exercise Intensity Restrictions for Patients With Thoracic Aortic Dissection or Aneurysm.” Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention (Unknown). PMID: 40627738 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [85]
Chen N, Downing JV, Epstein J et al.. “Emergency Department Blood Pressure Management in Type B Aortic Dissection: An Analysis with Machine Learning.” The western journal of emergency medicine (2025). PMID: 40561988 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [86]
Öster H, Chen T, Mennander A et al.. “CMKLR-1 Expression in Human Aorta Is Dominated by Smooth Muscle Cell Positivity.” The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society (2025). PMID: 40552467 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [87]
Chen X, Xie L, Wu Q et al.. “Development and validation of a novel prognostic score to improve prognostic prediction in patients with type B aortic dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40541619 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [88]
Balasubramanya A, Gheysen L, Wagenhäuser MU et al.. “Hemodynamics in aortic dissections: A fluid-solid interaction study in an idealized dissection model with a false lumen side branch.” Journal of biomechanics (2025). PMID: 40449253 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [89]
Wang X, Song F, Jiang L et al.. “Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Combined With Mild Hypertension.” American journal of hypertension (2024). PMID: 38564196 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [90]
Zhu YL, Wang S, Gu Y et al.. “Efficacy of predictive pain intervention in patients with aortic dissection.” Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine (2024). PMID: 38943408 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [91]
Song W, Liu J, Tu G et al.. “Impact of body mass index on perioperative mortality of acute stanford type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” BMC cardiovascular disorders (2023). PMID: 37907847 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: History and Physical Examination - [92]
Xiao Y, Huang S, Zheng D et al.. “Delayed Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection: A Scoping Review.” Reviews in cardiovascular medicine (2025). PMID: 40630449 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: History and Physical Examination - [93]
Oztas DM, Ozdemir E, Bauernschmitt R et al.. “Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for pure aortic insufficiency in a patient following David-type aortic valve-sparing root replacement after aortic dissection-A successful off-label procedure.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2024). PMID: 38577923 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [94]
Gillinov LA, Kapoor SR, Sperry AE et al.. “Fate of the Aortic Root After Reconstruction With Felt Neomedia for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41557464 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [95]
Zhao R, Liu Y, Zhang B et al.. “Concomitant Aortic Root Replacement in Total Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk for Type A Aortic Dissection: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41410509 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [96]
Wagner CM, Marway PS, Ferrel MN et al.. “Sex differences in ascending aortic diameter at the time of acute type A aortic dissection.” Heart (British Cardiac Society) (2026). PMID: 41083213 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [97]
Ikeno Y, Tanaka A, Estrera GA et al.. “Aortic Root Reconstruction With Pledgeted Sutures in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 40681029 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [98]
Norton EL, Arora A, Cangut B et al.. “Association of intraoperative transfusion of blood products with postoperative outcomes and midterm survival in acute type A aortic dissection repair.” JTCVS open (2025). PMID: 40061521 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [99]
Ho CH, Lin CP, Chang FC et al.. “Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Management in Patients After Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 40057152 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [100]
Jiang B, Ren P, He C et al.. “Short-term disruption of TGF-β signaling in adult mice renders the aorta vulnerable to hypertension-induced dissection.” JCI insight (2025). PMID: 39932797 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [101]
Chen D, Fang K, Luo M et al.. “Aortic Dissection Incidence and Risk Factor Analysis: Findings from the China Kadoorie Biobank.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2025). PMID: 39643204 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [102]
Leshnower BG, Farrington WJ, Huckaby LV et al.. “Long-term Results of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 39293750 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [103]
Kario K, Okawara Y, Kanegae H et al.. “Peak nocturnal home blood pressure as an early and strong novel risk factor for stroke: the practitioner-based nationwide J-HOP Nocturnal BP study.” Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (2025). PMID: 39242824 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [104]
Zhang K, Zhou C, Gao S et al.. “The optimal degree of core temperature for hypothermic circulatory arrest in complex aortic arch surgery: results from 1310 patients.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2024). PMID: 39137134 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [105]
Kario K, Kanegae H, Okawara Y et al.. “Home Blood Pressure Variability Risk Prediction Score for Cardiovascular Disease Using Data From the J-HOP Study.” Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) (2024). PMID: 39136129 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [106]
Elbatarny M, Trimarchi S, Korach A et al.. “Axillary vs Femoral Arterial Cannulation in Acute Type A Dissection: International Multicenter Data.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2024). PMID: 38458510 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination, Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [107]
Ahmad RA, Orelaru F, Arora A et al.. “Acute type A intramural hematoma: The less-deadly acute aortic syndrome?” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 38280668 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [108]
Ripley B, Scheidt MJ, Aghayev A et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection-Treatment Planning and Follow-Up: 2024 Update.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2025). PMID: 40409894 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Guidelines and Resources - [109]
Esfahanian F, Madani MH. “Clinical and Imaging Features of Aortic Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41682880 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Management - [110]
Goodacre S, Pandor A, Thokala P et al.. “Diagnostic strategies for suspected acute aortic syndrome: systematic review, meta-analysis, decision-analytic modelling and value of information analysis.” Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) (2025). PMID: 40944621 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [111]
Anezaki H, Aoki Y, Kato H et al.. “Perioperative cardiac arrest requiring admission to intensive care units in Japan: epidemiological differences between emergency and elective surgery from a multicentre cohort study.” British journal of anaesthesia (2025). PMID: 40713194 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [112]
Yao YT, Xie CM, Wang HB et al.. “Acute type A aortic dissection patients undergoing surgical repair during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Medicine (2025). PMID: 40295228 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [113]
Yang KJ, Chi NH, Yu HY et al.. “Endovascular vs. open surgical repair in retrograde type a dissection & intramural hematoma: A study-level meta-analysis.” Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 40991360 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [114]
Ayhan C, Mekhaeil M, Channawi R et al.. “Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.” Journal of clinical medicine (2025). PMID: 41375721 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [115]
Kamel S, Chastant R, Alric P et al.. “Single- and Double-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent Grafts for Emergent Aortic Arch Lesions.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2025). PMID: 41200840 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [116]
Chochoł P, Witt-Majchrzak A, Mycko MP. “Dissected Thoracic Aorta Masked as Seizures: A Case Report.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41682827 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [117]
Pignataro G, Scafetta A, De Luca D et al.. “The Role of Biomarkers and Clinical Prediction Tools in the Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Literature-Based Review.” Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2025). PMID: 41010942 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [118]
Rahman I, Ali J, De Silva R. “Cannulation Strategies for Aortic Arch Surgery.” Journal of cardiovascular development and disease (2025). PMID: 41002639 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [119]
Garg I, Grist TM, Nagpal P. “MR Angiography for Aortic Diseases.” Cardiology clinics (2025). PMID: 40268353 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [120]
Sica G, Rea G, Lieto R et al.. “CT diagnosis and destiny of acute aortic intramural hematoma.” Frontiers in radiology (2025). PMID: 40134989 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [121]
Cai Z, Yan T, Wang H et al.. “Impact of an emergency department bypass referral pathway for surgically managed Type A aortic dissection diagnosed at non-aortic centers.” Frontiers in public health (2025). PMID: 41924021 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Management - [122]
Apostolidis G, Nana P, Panuccio G et al.. “A Retrospective Analysis of Barb-mediated Active Fixation Impact on Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Outcomes.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41857800 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Management - [123]
Bhat S, Bhat S, Schreve F et al.. “d-Dimer With the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score May Improve Patient Selection for Acute Aortic Syndrome Diagnostic Imaging.” Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA (2026). PMID: 41582603 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [124]
Meinert ÉFRC, Kremer J, Farag M et al.. “Outcomes of total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk in acute aortic syndrome.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2025). PMID: 41552679 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [125]
Yang J, Zhang X, Lou D et al.. “First in Human Evaluation of an Innovative Stent Graft for Endovascular Repair of Acute Ascending Aortic Syndromes.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2025). PMID: 41391565 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Differential Diagnosis - [126]
Keyoumu R, Wang Y, Liu R et al.. “Three Dimensional Printing Assisted Multi-fenestrated Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch: A Multicentre Study.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2025). PMID: 41380763 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [127]
Schönbeck H, Björkelund A, Møller ES et al.. “A missed diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome is associated with ischaemic ECG changes and an initial suspicion of myocardial infarction: a retrospective observational study.” BMC emergency medicine (2025). PMID: 41315990 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Differential Diagnosis - [128]
Xu W, Haran C, Lim E et al.. “Nationwide outcomes of early thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41177275 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [129]
Besola L, Biasci L, Mangifesta C et al.. “Warming up the frozen elephant trunk for aortic arch pathology.” Annals of cardiothoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41098994 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [130]
Voetsch A, Gottardi R, Winkler A et al.. “Frozen Elephant Trunk in Acute Aortic Syndrome: Retrospective Results from a Low-Volume Center.” Journal of clinical medicine (2025). PMID: 41095777 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [131]
Ullery BW, Alie-Cusson F, Magee GA et al.. “Laser in situ fenestrated endograft (LIFE) repair of complex aortic arch pathology: Early outcomes from the multicenter LIFE registry.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41075877 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [132]
Francesco Squizzato, D'Oria M, Antonello M et al.. “Editor's Choice - International Expert Consensus on the Management of Acute Aortic Type B Intramural Haematoma and Penetrating Ulcer.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41038380 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [133]
Cui D, Li X, Chen Y et al.. “Risk Factor Analysis of Post-TEVAR Distal Aortic Expansion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41833301 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis, Management - [134]
Kushnir Y, Barrera N, Arias-Sanchez P et al.. “Intensified blood pressure control during hospital admission and on discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41725942 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [135]
Benabbas R, Zehtabchi S, Wakai A et al.. “Cardiac Biomarkers, Echocardiography, and Outpatient Cardiac Monitoring for Evaluation of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Direct Evidence for SAEM GRACE.” Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (2026). PMID: 41201260 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [136]
Qazi SU, Zaide DB, Fatima U et al.. “Long term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair versus optimal medical therapy for uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Future cardiology (2025). PMID: 40923587 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [137]
Nouri A, Awashra A, Hamdan D et al.. “Cardiovascular toxicity of Fruquintinib in patients with colorectal and other cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Cardio-oncology (London, England) (2025). PMID: 40993794 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [138]
Fukano K, Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H et al.. “Preoperative coronary angiography and outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion: A retrospective cohort study.” Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions (2025). PMID: 41125468 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [139]
Li XD, Chen ZJ. “Aortic dissection disguised as musculoskeletal condition: a case report and review of literature.” BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2025). PMID: 41023648 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [140]
Lu G, Wang X, Wang X et al.. “Case Report: Rapid progression of inflammation-driven coronary artery lesions in a normolipidemic patient with ANCA-associated vasculitis complicated by Stanford type A aortic dissection.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 41909680 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [141]
Qiu F, Luo L, Huang J et al.. “Case Report: Improved axillary artery cannulation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridging therapy for cardiogenic shock caused by Marfan syndrome combined with aortic dissection.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41908050 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [142]
Ji B, Lai Y, Liu XB et al.. “Aortic Root Dissection Masquerading as Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Critical Role of Intravascular Ultrasound.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2026). PMID: 41264798 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [143]
Wang H, Bello J, Gala D et al.. “Aortic Dissection With Pseudoaneurysm Formation Masquerading as Pulmonary Embolism After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2025). PMID: 40908904 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [144]
Leinweber ME, Hofmann AG. “Seasonality of Selected Cardiovascular Disorders in Austria: A Retrospective Observational Study Between 2009 and 2023.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 41988963 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [145]
Patel S, Desai ND, Brinster DR et al.. “Type A acute aortic dissection complicated by preoperative myocardial infarction: Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” JTCVS open (2026). PMID: 41960051 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis, Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [146]
Luo Y, Peng J, Peng W et al.. “Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based electrocardiogram prediction model for emergency chest pain patients.” Frontiers in medicine (2026). PMID: 41884147 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [147]
Zhou F, Zhou X, Yang L et al.. “Evaluation of CT-FFR for Predicting Myocardial Ischaemia in Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection.” European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging (2026). PMID: 41748322 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [148]
Kwinta A, Bielański P, Szkudlarek O et al.. “Feasibility and outcomes of anaesthesiology- and intensive care-led ECPR in a hospital without cardiac surgery: a 2.5-year prospective registry.” BMC anesthesiology (2026). PMID: 41699484 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [149]
Wan Z, Jama K, Hasemaki N et al.. “Outcomes after Endovascular Arch Repair in Patients with a Native Ascending Aorta Diameter Greater than 38 mm: An Observational Study in Two High Volume Centres.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41554372 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [150]
Fujiyoshi T, Kumamaru H, Ogino H et al.. “Surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion in Japan: Nationwide database analysis.” JTCVS open (2025). PMID: 41473077 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [151]
Zhou Y, Chen C, Li J et al.. “Identification and Validation of Differentially Expressed mRNAs From Peripheral Leukocytes for Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 41378480 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [152]
Hoppe JM, Schramm MC, Diegruber K et al.. “Identification of diagnostic markers for MINOCA in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2025). PMID: 41341294 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [153]
Szeto WY, Fukuhara S, Fleischman F et al.. “One-Year Results of Novel Aortic Arch Hybrid Prosthesis for Repair of Acute DeBakey Type I Dissection With Malperfusion: PERSEVERE Study.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41238072 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [154]
Tang J, Chen F, Wu D. “Early auxiliary diagnosis model for chest pain triad based on artificial intelligence multimodal fusion.” JAMIA open (2025). PMID: 41041626 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [155]
Haimovich JS, Kolossváry M, Alam R et al.. “Risk stratification of chest pain in the emergency department using artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms.” Open heart (2025). PMID: 40889954 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [156]
Guo W, Sun G, Zhang H et al.. “The G-branch off-the-shelf mixed branch endograft for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study.” International journal of surgery (London, England) (2025). PMID: 40865966 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [157]
Irshad S, Adrejiya P, Abubaker M et al.. “Kommerell's Diverticulum Masquerading in a Right Aortic Arch: A Vascular Surprise.” Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal (2025). PMID: 40860769 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [158]
Papakonstantinou NA, Antonopoulos CN. “Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) (2026). PMID: 41736226 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Management, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [159]
Amvrazi AV, Antonopoulos CN, Spath P et al.. “Outcomes of Custom Made and Off the Shelf Endografts for Preservation of the Left Subclavian Artery during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41905582 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Management - [160]
Donndorf P, Angles T, Schafmayer C et al.. “Urgent and Emergent Endovascular Treatment of the Downstream Aorta Soon After Open Surgical Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Analyzing Indications and Outcomes of an Institutional Case Series.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41682617 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [161]
Gu JJ, Zhao TY, Tian XC et al.. “Mixed Reality-Assisted Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety.” Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc (2026). PMID: 41913345 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Management, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [162]
Peng HH, Fang QB, Wang L et al.. “Modified Candy Plug for False Lumen Embolization in Chronic Aortic Dissection: Technical Aspects and Initial Experience.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41978486 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [163]
Marzano A, Gagliardo di Carpinello G, Giordano A et al.. “Dedicated Single-Branch Platforms for Totally Endovascular Zone 2 TEVAR with LSA Revascularization: A Comparison of Castor/Cratos and Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41976960 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Management - [164]
Fang J, Cao Z, Zhang Y et al.. “Outcomes of Zone 1 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair with Single Branched Stent Graft and Left Common Carotid Artery Chimney Stenting for Zone 2 Aortic Arch Pathologies.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41936860 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [165]
Li N, Ge S, Hu J et al.. “Castor stent reconstruction of left subclavian artery reduces the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction of type B aortic dissection with insufficient proximal landing area: a propensity score matched analysis.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41908054 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [166]
Deng L, Li H, Yu W et al.. “Mid-and Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular with branch artery revascularization in the Aortic Repair for Non-A Non-B Aortic Dissection.” Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41903628 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [167]
Atash A, Mees BME, Cramer MJ et al.. “MYH11 variants in thoracic aortic aneurysm pathophysiology: From bench to bedside.” European journal of clinical investigation (2026). PMID: 41891259 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Management - [168]
Keschenau PR, Bandzius N, Weiß B et al.. “Effect of the Proximal Landing Zone Quality on TEVAR Outcomes-11-Year Real-World Experience with the Relay Stent Graft Family in Aortic Dissections.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41872993 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [169]
D'Onofrio A, Caraffa R, Cibin G et al.. “Suitability Analysis of 2 Devices for Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Following Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41803625 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [170]
Zhao Y, Qian J, He H et al.. “A Novel Method Improving Estimation of Distal Landing Zone and Remodeling in Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41728920 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [171]
Tinelli G, Sica S, Tsilimparis N et al.. “Open surgery versus branched endovascular repair of the aortic arch in residual dissections after type A surgical repair.” The British journal of surgery (2026). PMID: 41701205 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [172]
Jiang X, Fu W, Lu W et al.. “Intimo-Intimal Intussusception during Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41679455 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [173]
Dean A, Feng K, Hassan S et al.. “Midterm Outcomes of the Knickerbocker Technique following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic Post-dissection Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: A Single Centre Experience.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41672344 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [174]
Wang F, Li H, Wang Y et al.. “Endovascular treatment of retrograde type A aortic dissection: a decade of experience in a single-center.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41623614 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [175]
Jiang X, Zou L, Liu H et al.. “Endovascular Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection Accompanied by Retrograde Intramural Haematoma.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41619797 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [176]
Boshkoski G, Natour D, Jankulovski A et al.. “First Reported Use of the AMDS Hybrid Prosthesis for Secondary Type A Aortic Dissection After Prior TEVAR.” Journal of cardiovascular development and disease (2026). PMID: 41892729 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [177]
Pitts L, Kofler M, Montagner M et al.. “Total Arch Replacement with a New Hybrid Device to Manage the Left Subclavian Artery in the Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique.” Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41808447 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [178]
Asta L, Mancini V, Mantini C et al.. “Aortic dissection in a Jehovah's witness: Frozen Elephant Trunk and subsequent 4D flow MRI analysis, a case report.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41715223 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [179]
Zhao HY, Gan LX, Guo HW. “Fatal delayed superior mesenteric artery thrombosis after frozen elephant trunk repair in acute type a aortic dissection with false lumen perfusion: a case report.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41689049 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [180]
Santos K, Oya K, Umibe T et al.. “Does Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Improve Blood Conservation and Postoperative Outcomes in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (2026). PMID: 41107167 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [181]
Agard G, Tonon D, Collart F et al.. “Arterial Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Postoperative Lung Injury in Patients Undergoing Urgent Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Propensity Score-matched Retrospective Cohort Study.” Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (2026). PMID: 41193309 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [182]
Bohatch Júnior MS, de Melo Silva B, Soares EAG et al.. “Endovascular Repair in High-Risk Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41578935 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [183]
Matsumoto R, Watanabe T, Kinoshita R et al.. “Sex-Based Differences in Dissection Patterns and Surgical Strategies in Tear-Oriented Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.” Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia (2026). PMID: 41565270 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [184]
Ye M, Xue C, Wang D et al.. “Endovascular reperfusion followed by delayed open aortic repair in stable acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion syndrome: a single-center experience.” Frontiers in medicine (2025). PMID: 41755990 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [185]
Takauchi T, Hirao S, Yaegashi K et al.. “Lateral Ventricular Symmetry as a Predictor of Postoperative Neurological Outcomes in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With Cerebral Malperfusion.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41656890 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [186]
Ma WG, Chen Y, Chen SW et al.. “Frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection: long-term outcomes over two decades.” European heart journal (2026). PMID: 41614598 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [187]
Sohn B, Lee JH, Lee H et al.. “Central Aortic Cannulation as a Primary Strategy in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41570093 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [188]
Giuffrè G, Pennetta FF, Palmier M et al.. “Impact of false lumen occluders on aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of chronic type B dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41512935 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [189]
Mei X, Ji S, Jiang Y et al.. “Preoperative serum Raman spectroscopy and machine learning for predicting postoperative acute kidney injury after acute type A aortic dissection.” Renal failure (2025). PMID: 41503972 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [190]
Yalzadeh D, Tabibian K, Sakowitz S et al.. “Surgical repair of type A aortic dissection at safety-net hospitals across the United States.” Surgery (2026). PMID: 41500074 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [191]
Yang S, Zhang X, Wu X et al.. “Three-branched in situ laser fenestration for the endovascular repair of total aortic arch disease: A retrospective analysis of 5-year outcomes.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 41423026 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [192]
Sato H, Iba Y, Mikami T et al.. “Comparison of 3 Surgical Procedures for DeBakey Type I Acute Aortic Dissection: When Is Frozen Elephant Trunk Recommended?” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2025). PMID: 41247077 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [193]
Rebello KR, Green SY, Weldon SA et al.. “Early outcomes for women and men after open extent III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41197838 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [194]
Chandra VM, Norton EL, Khaja MS et al.. “Surgical and endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: A systematic review of in-hospital mortality.” JTCVS open (2022). PMID: 36590716 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [195]
Yip A, Libhaber E, Nam P et al.. “A Systematic Review of Acute Thoracic Aortic Dissections in Africa-The Need for a Registry.” Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) (2022). PMID: 36539145 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [196]
Harris KM, Parikh NB, Nienaber CA et al.. “Iatrogenic aortic dissection: Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40414525 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [197]
Gilon D, Korach A, Carbone A et al.. “Cardiac Tamponade Complicating Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From 25 Years of Registry Research.” JACC. Advances (2025). PMID: 39999651 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [198]
Bossone E, Eagle KA, Nienaber CA et al.. “Acute Aortic Dissection: Observational Lessons Learned From 11 000 Patients.” Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes (2024). PMID: 39145396 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [199]
Ogami T, Arnaoutakis GJ, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Long-term outcomes after recurrent acute thoracic aortic dissection: Insights from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 38678471 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [200]
Pollari F, Nardi P, Mikus E et al.. “Comparison of 4 mortality scores for surgical repair of type A aortic dissection: a multicentre external validation.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2024). PMID: 38212996 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [201]
Filiberto AC, Ramadan OI, Wang GJ et al.. “Sex disparities in patients with acute aortic dissection: A scoping review.” Seminars in vascular surgery (2023). PMID: 38030323 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [202]
Trimarchi S, Mandigers TJ, Bissacco D et al.. “Twenty-five years of observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) and its impact on the cardiovascular scientific community.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2024). PMID: 37453718 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [203]
Ogami T, Arnaoutakis GJ, Patel HJ et al.. “Postoperative acute kidney injury after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2023). PMID: 37327951 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [204]
Mehta CK, Chiu S, Hoel AW et al.. “Implementation of a direct-to-operating room aortic emergency transfer program: Expedited management of type A aortic dissection.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2023). PMID: 37270850 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [205]
Trimarchi S, Gleason TG, Brinster DR et al.. “Editor's Choice - Trends in Management and Outcomes of Type B Aortic Dissection: A Report From the International Registry of Aortic Dissection.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2023). PMID: 37201718 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [206]
Arnaoutakis GJ, Ogami T, Patel HJ et al.. “Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2023). PMID: 36370884 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [207]
Wolfe SB, Sundt TM, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Survival after operative repair of acute type A aortic dissection varies according to the presence and type of preoperative malperfusion.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2024). PMID: 36333247 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [208]
Catalano MA, Mamdouhi T, Pupovac S et al.. “Age, sex, and contemporary outcomes in surgical repair of type A aortic dissection: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.” JTCVS open (2022). PMID: 36172443 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [209]
Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD et al.. “Early Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” JAMA cardiology (2022). PMID: 36001309 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [210]
Slaven J, Evans M, Partyka C et al.. “Characteristics, clinical findings and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: A comparison between an Australian emergency department and the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA (2022). PMID: 35636964 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [211]
Ganapathi AM, Ranney DN, Peterson MD et al.. “Location of Aortic Enlargement and Risk of Type A Dissection at Smaller Diameters.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2022). PMID: 35550685 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [212]
Reutersberg B, Gleason T, Desai N et al.. “Neurological event rates and associated risk factors in acute type B aortic dissections treated by thoracic aortic endovascular repair.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2024). PMID: 35260280 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [213]
Hemli JM, Pupovac SS, Gleason TG et al.. “Management of acute type A aortic dissection in the elderly: an analysis from IRAD.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2022). PMID: 34977934 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [214]
Reutersberg B, Trimarchi S, Gilon D et al.. “Pleural effusion: a potential surrogate marker for higher-risk patients with acute type B aortic dissections.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2022). PMID: 34966915 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [215]
Kalogerakos PD, Zafar MA, Li Y et al.. “Root Dilatation Is More Malignant Than Ascending Aortic Dilation.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2021). PMID: 34238012 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [216]
Angleitner P, Brinster DR, Gleason TG et al.. “Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Presenting With Cerebrovascular Accident at Advanced Age.” Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2022). PMID: 34146671 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [217]
Huckaby LV, Sultan I, Trimarchi S et al.. “Sex-Based Aortic Dissection Outcomes From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2022). PMID: 34090668 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [218]
Loor G, Gleason TG, Myrmel T et al.. “Effect of Aortic Valve Type on Patients Who Undergo Type A Aortic Dissection Repair.” Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2022). PMID: 33984483 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [219]
Harky A, Mason S, Othman A et al.. “Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair: Daytime versus nighttime.” JTCVS open (2021). PMID: 36003743 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [220]
Lin TW, Tsai MT, Wu HY et al.. “Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection operations performed by early-career cardiovascular surgeons.” JTCVS open (2021). PMID: 36003577 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [221]
Eghan P, Folson AA, Donkor A et al.. “Relationship between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and cardiac remodeling during pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.” European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology (2024). PMID: 38749071 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations - [222]
John S, Young LT, Lacro RV et al.. “Extracardiac Manifestations Fail to Predict the Severity of Cardiac Phenotype in Children and Young Adults with Marfan Syndrome.” Pediatric cardiology (2025). PMID: 38727826 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations - [223]
Thunström S, Thunström E, Naessén S et al.. “All-cause mortality and death by aortic dissection in women with Turner syndrome: A national clinical cohort study.” American heart journal (2025). PMID: 39603484 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [224]
Liu H, Yang L, Chen CY et al.. “Management strategies and outcomes in pregnancy-related acute aortic dissection: a multicentre cohort study in China.” Heart (British Cardiac Society) (2024). PMID: 39266045 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [225]
Thunström S, Wide U, Landin-Wilhelmsen K et al.. “Psychiatric disorders and comorbidity in women with Turner Syndrome: a retrospective national cohort study.” Translational psychiatry (2024). PMID: 39227579 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [226]
Samman B, Deng MX, Chung JCY et al.. “Understanding Thoracic Aortic Disease in Women.” Circulation research (2025). PMID: 40080538 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations - [227]
. “Maternal cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with pregnancy in individuals with Turner syndrome: a committee opinion.” Fertility and sterility (2024). PMID: 38980250 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations - [228]
Nariai M, Wada-Hiraike O, Sasabuchi Y et al.. “Aortic dissection during the perinatal period in women with Marfan-related disorders: a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database.” The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians (2026). PMID: 41866242 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [229]
Chan CH, Chow SC, Chang AT et al.. “Emergency Bentall Procedure for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in a Patient With Preterm Twin Pregnancy.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 40466851 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [230]
Wang Z, Yu X, Ding S et al.. “Management and outcomes of aortic dissection type B in late pregnancy: A retrospective case series.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (2024). PMID: 39075929 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [231]
Trajkovski AV, Reiner K, Džaja N et al.. “Anesthetic management for cesarean section in two parturient with ascending aortic aneurysm: a case-based discussion.” BMC anesthesiology (2024). PMID: 38711027 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [232]
Manolis AA, Manolis TA, Vouliotis A et al.. “Ascending Aorta Aneurysm: What the Cardiologist Needs to Know.” Angiology (2026). PMID: 41919573 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations - [233]
de Groote K, Patel SR, Mortensen KH et al.. “Management of Cardiovascular Health Issues in Turner Syndrome: Expert Insights and Expanded Recommendations From the 2024 Guideline Development Team.” American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics (2025). PMID: 40135715 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations - [234]
Tournoy TK, D'hulst S, Demolder A et al.. “Telomere length in patients with Marfan Syndrome.” International journal of cardiology (2026). PMID: 41679654 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [235]
De Gaspari M, Basso C, Dalla Zanna F et al.. “A 4-Decade Population-Based Registry of Thoracic Aortic Dissection Causing Sudden Death in the Young.” JACC. Advances (2026). PMID: 41475307 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [236]
Shrestha M, Kaufeld T, Rudolph L et al.. “Should We Replace the Non-Aneurysmal Aortic Arch During Elective Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Marfan Patients?” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41442164 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [237]
Van Der Zande JA, Grewal J, Franx A et al.. “Cardiovascular outcomes and aortic growth in pregnant women with Turner syndrome: data from the ESC EORP Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease (ROPAC) III.” European journal of preventive cardiology (2025). PMID: 40916742 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [238]
Figueroa AV, Tanenbaum MT, Costa Filho JE et al.. “Landing zones optimization using transcatheter electrosurgical septotomy for endovascular repair of post-dissection aortic aneurysms.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40780667 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [239]
Peters PNJ, van der Zande JA, De Backer J et al.. “Pregnancy outcomes in women with heritable thoracic aortic disease: data from the EORP ESC registry of pregnancy and cardiac disease (ROPAC) III.” European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes (2025). PMID: 40576452 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [240]
Bouhatous YM, Arnaud P, Jondeau G et al.. “Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome: follow-up of the cardiovascular features in an international cohort of 29 patients with SGS.” Journal of medical genetics (2025). PMID: 40562530 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [241]
Narula N, Schwartz Y, Devereux RB et al.. “Clinical and Phenotypic Correlates of Mitral Valve Prolapse in Marfan Syndrome: The Cornell Aortic Aneurysm Registry.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 40357669 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [242]
Soto ME, Rodríguez-Brito M, Pérez-Torres I et al.. “Analysis of FBN1, TGFβ2, TGFβR1 and TGFβR2 mRNA as Key Molecular Mechanisms in the Damage of Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection in Marfan Syndrome.” International journal of molecular sciences (2025). PMID: 40243722 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [243]
Campello Jorge CA, Marway PS, Tjahjadi NS et al.. “Growth Rate Assessed by Vascular Deformation Mapping Predicts Type B Aortic Dissection in Marfan Syndrome.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 40008501 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [244]
Zhou X, Xu Q, Hu X et al.. “PP2A Attenuates Thoracic Aneurysm and Dissection in Mouse Models of Marfan Syndrome.” Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) (2025). PMID: 39878024 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [245]
Chen SW, Chang FC, Chen CY et al.. “Pregnancy, aortic events, and neonatal and maternal outcomes.” European heart journal (2025). PMID: 39528388 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [246]
Butnariu LI, Russu G, Luca AC et al.. “Identification of Genetic Variants Associated with Hereditary Thoracic Aortic Diseases (HTADs) Using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technology and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.” International journal of molecular sciences (2024). PMID: 39456956 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [247]
Thomas R, Dhanekula AS, Byers P et al.. “Elective root replacement increases the risk of type B dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 39326730 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [248]
Claus J, Schoof L, Mir TS et al.. “Late diagnosis of Marfan syndrome is associated with unplanned aortic surgery and cardiovascular death.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 39306029 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [249]
Valdivia Callejon I, Buccioli L, Bastianen J et al.. “Investigation of Strategies to Block Downstream Effectors of AT1R-Mediated Signalling to Prevent Aneurysm Formation in Marfan Syndrome.” International journal of molecular sciences (2024). PMID: 38732244 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [250]
Cha HJ, Kim JW, Moon SH et al.. “Lobar torsion following open surgical repair for type B aortic dissection in a patient with Marfan syndrome.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41353160 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [251]
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J et al.. “2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Circulation (2022). PMID: 36322642 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [252]
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black Iii J et al.. “2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2022). PMID: 36334952 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [253]
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J et al.. “2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2023). PMID: 37389507 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [254]
Lombardi JV, Hughes GC, Appoo JJ et al.. “Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections.” Journal of vascular surgery (2020). PMID: 32001058 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [255]
Kicska GA, Hurwitz Koweek LM, Ghoshhajra BB et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Acute Aortic Syndrome.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2021). PMID: 34794601 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [256]
Wanhainen A, Gombert A, Antoniou GA et al.. “European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2026 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Descending Thoracic and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Diseases - Editor's Choice.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41448425 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [257]
Bradley TJ, Alvarez NA, Horne SG. “A Practical Guide to Clinical Management of Thoracic Aortic Disease.” The Canadian journal of cardiology (2016). PMID: 26724515 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [258]
Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Surgery for aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves: A statement of clarification from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2016). PMID: 26995623 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [259]
Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Surgery for Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Statement of Clarification From the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2016). PMID: 26658475 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [260]
Sheeran DP, Tong RT, Khaja MS et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection-Interventional Planning and Follow-Up: Update 2025.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2026). PMID: 41837923 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [261]
Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Surgery for Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Statement of Clarification From the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Circulation (2016). PMID: 26637530 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [262]
Johansen KL, Garimella PS, Hicks CW et al.. “Central and peripheral arterial diseases in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.” Kidney international (2021). PMID: 33961868 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [263]
. “Increased maternal cardiovascular mortality associated with pregnancy in women with Turner syndrome.” Fertility and sterility (2006). PMID: 17055808 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [264]
Verma R, Cohen G, Colbert J et al.. “Bicuspid aortic valve associated aortopathy: 2022 guideline update.” Current opinion in cardiology (2023). PMID: 36718616 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [265]
Seki Y, Okamoto K, Ikezoe T et al.. “Clinical practice guidelines for management of disseminated intravascular coagulation in Japan 2024. Part 3: solid cancers and vascular abnormalities.” International journal of hematology (2025). PMID: 39792236 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [266]
Eggebrecht H. “[Diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases : new guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology 2014].” Herz (2014). PMID: 25406331 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [267]
Bruyère M, Morau E, Beaumont É et al.. “[Maternal mortality due to cardiovascular disease in France 2013-2015].” Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie (2021). PMID: 33161192 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [268]
Gao H, Liu X, Wang Y et al.. “Aortic root dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: impact on dissection risk and evaluation of guideline-based surgical thresholds - a retrospective cohort study.” International journal of surgery (London, England) (2025). PMID: 40479495 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [269]
Pak KJ, Hu T, Fee C et al.. “Acute hypertension: a systematic review and appraisal of guidelines.” Ochsner journal (2014). PMID: 25598731 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [270]
Duijnhouwer A, van den Hoven A, Merkx R et al.. “Differences in Aortopathy in Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve with or without Aortic Coarctation.” Journal of clinical medicine (2020). PMID: 31972995 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [271]
Seferović PM, Ristić AD, Maksimović R et al.. “Pericardial syndromes: an update after the ESC guidelines 2004.” Heart failure reviews (2013). PMID: 22855353 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [272]
Sprynger M, Rigo F, Moonen M et al.. “Focus on echovascular imaging assessment of arterial disease: complement to the ESC guidelines (PARTIM 1) in collaboration with the Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases.” European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging (2018). PMID: 30239635 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [273]
Mariucci EM, Lovato L, Rosati M et al.. “Dilation of peripheral vessels in Marfan syndrome: importance of thoracoabdominal MR angiography.” International journal of cardiology (2013). PMID: 22954416 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [274]
Lorenz V, Muzzi L, Neri E. “Should the DeBakey Classification Be Reconsidered for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 42413682 ↗
L3bCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [275]
Xin Y, Lyu S, Wang J et al.. “Predictive value of inflammatory indexes in in-hospital mortality for patients with acute aortic dissection.” BMC cardiovascular disorders (2025). PMID: 40281397 ↗
L3bCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [276]
Liu HH, Chang CB, Chen YS et al.. “Automated Detection and Differentiation of Stanford Type A and Type B Aortic Dissections in CTA Scans Using Deep Learning.” Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2024). PMID: 39795540 ↗
L3bCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [277]
Lin CY, Tung TH, Wu MY et al.. “Surgical outcomes of DeBakey type I and type II acute aortic dissection: a propensity score-matched analysis in 599 patients.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2021). PMID: 34330304 ↗
L3bCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [278]
Tien M, Ku A, Martinez-Acero N et al.. “The Penn Classification Predicts Hospital Mortality in Acute Stanford Type A and Type B Aortic Dissections.” Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (2019). PMID: 31558394 ↗
L4Cited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [279]
Halabi M, Ding J, Salim S et al.. “Equipoise: The basic necessity for conducting a trial on uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection.” Seminars in vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 42285636 ↗
L1bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [280]
Yassa ES, Fitzpatrick N, Shalhub S et al.. “The rationale for a randomized trial for uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection.” Seminars in vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 42285635 ↗
L1bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [281]
Yokouchi-Konishi T, Aoki-Kamiya C, Tsuritani M et al.. “The impact of FBN1 variant types on pregnancy-related aortic dissection in women with Marfan syndrome.” International journal of cardiology (2026). PMID: 42314848 ↗
L2bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [282]
Semań T, Krupa-Nurcek S, Szczupak M et al.. “Sarcopenia as a Prognostic Marker of Early Mortality After Surgery for Acute Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Cohort Study.” Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) (2026). PMID: 42029601 ↗
L2bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [283]
Ji Y, Zhou C, Zhang K et al.. “Impact of Intimal Tear Location on Clinical Outcomes in Extensive Arch Repair of Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 42396809 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [284]
Yamashita G, Yaegashi K, Takauchi T et al.. “Proximal Anastomotic New Entry Tear Following Surgical Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Anatomical Location, Risk Factors, and Impact on Long-Term Outcomes.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41934622 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [285]
Nakayama T, Kaneko H, Suzuki Y et al.. “Association of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease With Incident Aortic Dissection or Aneurysm.” American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation (2026). PMID: 41881380 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [286]
Tanaka K, Akutsu K, Miyata S et al.. “What Is the Most Influential Factor Affecting Severe Respiratory Failure in Uncomplicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection?” Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society (2026). PMID: 41621970 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [287]
Kurniawan K, Wartono DA. “Operative predictors of mortality and neurologic outcomes after modified Bentall for acute aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals (2026). PMID: 42060530 ↗
L2aCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [288]
Fernandes Pedro J, Figueiredo ARM, Almeida R et al.. “Growth rate of the ascending aorta and risk of aortic dissection or reintervention in patients with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves undergoing valve interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology (2026). PMID: 41932606 ↗
L2aCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [289]
Gu T, Zhang Y, Li G et al.. “Association of 3-Day Postoperative Blood Glucose Variability With All-Cause Mortality in ICU Patients After Surgical Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the MIMIC-IV Database.” Clinical cardiology (2026). PMID: 42296074 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [290]
Arar M, Beckmann E, Martens A et al.. “The impact of emergency intubation on surgical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection AADA (DeBakey I). Is a prompt treatment justified?” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 42265728 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [291]
Becker D, Frenzer C, Messerli M et al.. “Baseline Descending Aortic Diameter Drives Long-Term Failure of Conservative Management in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection.” Annals of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 42103141 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [292]
Zhang B, Gao F, Wang J et al.. “A patient-specific CTA-CFD framework deciphers hemodynamic heterogeneity after fenestrated TEVAR: a pilot study.” Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology (2026). PMID: 42339463 ↗
L4Cited in: Pathophysiology - [293]
Dushfunian D, Berhane H, Johnson E et al.. “CE-MRA-FLOWnet: Fast and Accurate Generative AI-Based Aortic Hemodynamic Mapping from Contrast-Enhanced MRA.” Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (2026). PMID: 42413872 ↗
L3bCited in: Pathophysiology - [294]
Lin Y, Lv XC, Cai ZW et al.. “Medial Neovascularization: A Novel Mechanism of Aortic Dissection in a Hypertensive Population?” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 42216260 ↗
L4Cited in: Pathophysiology - [295]
Recchioni T, Manzi G, Caputo A et al.. “Sodium nitroprusside: A comprehensive systematic review of its role across various clinical settings.” Vascular pharmacology (2026). PMID: 41903872 ↗
L1aCited in: Pathophysiology - [296]
Zimmermann WH, Ensminger S, Kutschka I et al.. “Stem-Cell-Derived Biologic Ventricular Assist Tissue in Heart Failure.” The New England journal of medicine (2026). PMID: 42202318 ↗
L4Cited in: Pathophysiology - [297]
Lu W, Cao L, Luan S et al.. “Association Between Aortic Calcification and Primary Intimal Tear in Type B Aortic Dissection.” Annals of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 41207531 ↗
L3bCited in: Pathophysiology - [298]
Johnson C, Shalhub S, Cheema M et al.. “How ominous are persistent pain and hypertension for uncomplicated Type B aortic dissections?” Seminars in vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 42285639 ↗
L4Cited in: Pathophysiology - [299]
Franklin MK, Howatt DA, Moorleghen JJ et al.. “Angiotensin II Induces Abdominal Aortic Branch Aneurysms in Fibrillin-1 C1041G/+ Mice-Brief Report.” Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology (2026). PMID: 42206371 ↗
L5Cited in: Pathophysiology - [300]
Bosshardt D, Merton R, Nederveen AJ et al.. “Aortic displacement and hemodynamics are abnormal in patients with Marfan syndrome: A combined four-dimensional balanced steady-state free precession and four-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance study.” Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (2026). PMID: 42019568 ↗
L5Cited in: Pathophysiology - [301]
Bosshardt D, Merton R, Schrauben EM et al.. “Assessing changes in aortic motion and hemodynamics after valve-sparing aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome using four-dimensional balanced steady-state free precession and four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.” Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (2026). PMID: 42001956 ↗
L5Cited in: Pathophysiology - [302]
Huang H, Ming Z, Gu W et al.. “Preoperative exercise tolerance, nutritional-inflammatory markers, and outcomes after TEVAR for type B aortic pathology.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 42344365 ↗
L3bCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [303]
De León Ayala IA, Cheng YT, Liu TT et al.. “Operative and hemostatic differences between acute type A intramural hematoma and aortic dissection.” Surgery (2026). PMID: 42134071 ↗
L3bCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [304]
de Kort JF, Mandigers TJ, Jabbour G et al.. “Endovascular repair of the ascending aorta in the Vascular Quality Initiative.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40633789 ↗
L4Cited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [305]
Du P, Liu X, Zheng Q et al.. “Real-time identification of aetiology in patients able to undergo transoesophageal echocardiography with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China: a prospective, single-centre exploratory study.” Emergency medicine journal : EMJ (2026). PMID: 42315321 ↗
L4Cited in: Differential Diagnosis - [306]
Ketsekioulafis I, Katsos K, Zouzia E et al.. “Civil Medical Liability in Cardiology: A Systematic Review.” Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese (2026). PMID: 42413578 ↗
L2aCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [307]
Fukano K, Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H et al.. “Nationwide trends in outcomes and resource utilization in surgically treated acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion.” JTCVS open (2026). PMID: 42381934 ↗
L3bCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [308]
Lin H, Sun Q, Yao W et al.. “Fear of movement and its associated psychosocial factors in patients with acute cardiovascular disease: a retrospective cohort study.” BMC cardiovascular disorders (2026). PMID: 41975277 ↗
L3bCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [309]
He B, Zheng X, Zhao Q et al.. “Debranching with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for treating aortic arch lesions: a retrospective single-center experience.” Journal of thoracic disease (2026). PMID: 41816383 ↗
L4Cited in: Differential Diagnosis - [310]
Yan L, Zhao C, Duojie D et al.. “Prognostic value of isolated left vertebral artery in acute type A aortic dissection patients.” BMC cardiovascular disorders (2026). PMID: 41501647 ↗
L3bCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [311]
Inomata T, Nakaya K, Shiozaki H et al.. “Necessity of whole-body CT in patients with acute ischemic stroke and proposal for a simple brain perfusion imaging and whole-body CT protocol using split-bolus injection.” Emergency radiology (2025). PMID: 41449297 ↗
L4Cited in: Differential Diagnosis - [312]
Cerqueira RJ, Mascarenhas JQ, Rodrigues M et al.. “Outcomes of Aortic Valve Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using Reconstructed Individual Patient Data.” Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.) (2026). PMID: 42116530 ↗
L1aCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [313]
Chen H, Wu C, Chen Y et al.. “Early Prone Positioning After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery for Moderate-to-Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Is Safe and Shortens Duration of Mechanical Ventilation.” Critical care explorations (2026). PMID: 42249540 ↗
L2bCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [314]
Ramkaran R, Briscoe J, Cameron DE et al.. “Rupture and dissection of aortic autograft following the ross procedure: a systematic review.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41803948 ↗
L4Cited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [315]
Xu Y, Huang C, Wang Y et al.. “Machine learning prediction of postoperative acute kidney injury in aortic dissection patients using dynamic inflammatory markers and clinical features.” BMC medical informatics and decision making (2026). PMID: 41882706 ↗
L3bCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [316]
Aichi C, Inagaki M, Yanagisawa J et al.. “Mid-term outcomes of trans-axillary versus thoracotomy approaches in alternative-access tavr: a retrospective multicenter study.” Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics (2026). PMID: 41762413 ↗
L3bCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [317]
Wen J, Zheng W, Sun L et al.. “A Pilot Serum Metabolomics Reveals Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Identifies Methylguanidine as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for ATAAD with Mesenteric Malperfusion Syndrome.” Metabolites (2026). PMID: 42042885 ↗
L4Cited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [318]
. “[Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acute aortic dissection with malperfusion syndrome (2026 edition)].” Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] (2026). PMID: 41771516 ↗
L1cCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [319]
Lu S, Xu A, Jiang Y et al.. “Development and validation of a nomogram-based risk prediction model for postoperative delirium in patients with stanford type A aortic dissection.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41933412 ↗
L3bCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [320]
de Kort JF, Hasami NA, Been M et al.. “Trends and Updates in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection.” Annals of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 39855380 ↗
L1bCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [321]
Lian T, Pai CW, Woznicki E et al.. “Nonsyndromic familial type B aortic dissection exhibits distinct clinical profiles and operative outcomes.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 42082039 ↗
L3bCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [322]
Braverman AC, Mittauer E, Harris KM et al.. “Clinical Features and Outcomes of Pregnancy-Related Acute Aortic Dissection.” JAMA cardiology (2021). PMID: 33052376 ↗
L3bCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [323]
Parikh N, Trimarchi S, Gleason TG et al.. “Changes in operative strategy for patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection interventional cohort program.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2017). PMID: 28168983 ↗
L4Cited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [324]
Bojko MM, Suhail M, Bavaria JE et al.. “Midterm outcomes of emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection in octogenarians.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2020). PMID: 32624307 ↗
L3bCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [325]
Sharma VJ, Kang M, Ganesh JS et al.. “Can We Better Differentiate Type A Dissections: Evaluating the Role of Aortic Ratios.” Heart, lung & circulation (2022). PMID: 35597706 ↗
L3bCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [326]
Chaddha A, Erickson S, Kline-Rogers E et al.. “Medication adherence patterns in aortic dissection survivors.” The Indian journal of medical research (2018). PMID: 29806607 ↗
L4Cited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [327]
Angeli L, Fieni S, Dall'Asta A et al.. “Mode of delivery and peripartum outcome in women with heart disease according to the ESC guidelines: an Italian multicenter study.” The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians (2023). PMID: 36935360 ↗
L3bCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [328]
Zhang J, Song Y, Jin S et al.. “Unraveling the Key Factors Behind Patient Decision Delay in Aortic Dissection Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Patient preference and adherence (2025). PMID: 41424833 ↗
L3bCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [329]
Jeon BH, Yoon TH, Cho JW. “Mortality and Clinical Outcomes of Type B Aortic Dissection Versus Intramural Haematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 42492762 ↗
L2aCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [330]
Sapalo AT. “Point-of-care ultrasound as a frontline tool for suspected acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery (2026). PMID: 42582603 ↗
L2aCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [331]
Antoun I, Layton GR, Somani R et al.. “Time Is Aorta: Can Artificial Intelligence Improve Surgical Timelines in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection? A Comprehensive Review.” Health science reports (2026). PMID: 42504240 ↗
L2bCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [332]
Zhou J, Xu L, Yang T et al.. “Serum Beta-Hydroxybutyrate as a Biomarker for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Type a Aortic Dissection Surgery.” World journal of surgery (2026). PMID: 42598866 ↗
L3bCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [333]
Mezzoiuso AG, Henriksson P, Radó M et al.. “Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease after assisted reproductive technology and infertility: A cohort study.” PLoS medicine (2026). PMID: 42585218 ↗
L3bCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [334]
Kanda H, Akata K, Yamasaki K et al.. “Etiology of pericardial effusion requiring invasive drainage: nationwide study in Japan.” Heart & lung : the journal of critical care (2026). PMID: 42600244 ↗
L3bCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [335]
Ikeda Kurakawa K, Okada A, Kawai M et al.. “Aortic Dissection or Aneurysm and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Turner Syndrome - A Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan.” Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society (2026). PMID: 42633938 ↗
L3bCited in: Special Populations - [336]
Cheng YM, Chen YJ, Wang CQ et al.. “Prognostic factors in patients with Marfan syndrome referred to a cardiac surgery center: a retrospective cohort study.” BMC cardiovascular disorders (2026). PMID: 42288721 ↗
L3bCited in: Special Populations - [337]
Więcek M, Olczak Z, Machnikowska-Sokołowska M et al.. “Diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during transition care in adolescents with Turner syndrome.” Frontiers in pediatrics (2025). PMID: 40822698 ↗
L4Cited in: Special Populations - [338]
Ding F, Liu J, Wang H et al.. “Unveiling the role of risk factors and predictive models in acute type-a aortic dissection surgery: OI downregulation and its association with immune disorders.” International journal of medical sciences (2025). PMID: 39898254 ↗
L3bCited in: Special Populations - [339]
Bradley-Watson J, Glatzel H, Turner HE et al.. “Elective Aortic Surgery for Prevention of Aortic Dissection in Turner Syndrome: The Potential Impact of Updated European Society of Cardiology and International Turner Syndrome Consensus Group Guidelines on Referrals to the Heart Team.” Clinical endocrinology (2025). PMID: 39806877 ↗
L4Cited in: Special Populations - [340]
Abdalla HM, Abdelnabi M, Khedr A et al.. “Diagnosis and Management of Loeys-Dietz Syndrome: Evidence Gaps and Future Directions.” Current cardiology reports (2026). PMID: 42334665 ↗
L5Cited in: Special Populations - [341]
Xu Y, Xia YH, Bai ZM et al.. “Management strategies for acute type A aortic dissection during pregnancy: a single-center retrospective experience.” BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2026). PMID: 41673593 ↗
L5Cited in: Special Populations