On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •Define status epilepticus (SE) using the two-timepoint framework: Timepoint 1 (t1) is 5 minutes of continuous activity, indicating the seizure is unlikely to self-terminate; Timepoint 2 (t2) is 30 minutes, indicating a high risk of long-term neuronal injury.
- •Recognize the receptor trafficking hypothesis, which explains why SE becomes pharmacoresistant: prolonged seizures cause the internalization (endocytosis) of synaptic GABA-A receptors and the increased surface expression of excitatory NMDA and AMPA receptors.
- •Distinguish between the two physiological stages of SE: Stage 1 (Compensated) involves massive autonomic discharge with , tachycardia, and hyperglycemia; Stage 2 (Uncompensated) involves hemodynamic collapse, hypotension, hyperkalemia, and metabolic (lactic) acidosis.
- •Identify common etiologies including medication non-compliance, acute structural brain injury (stroke, hemorrhage, trauma), metabolic derangements, and .
- •Understand the concept of (NORSE), a clinical construct describing a previously healthy patient presenting with refractory SE without an obvious acute cause, often requiring an aggressive workup for autoimmune or paraneoplastic triggers.
Evaluation
- •Suspect SE in any patient presenting with rhythmic motor activity, fluctuating mental status, or persistent coma following a witnessed seizure.
- •Obtain a fingerstick glucose immediately upon arrival to rule out hypoglycemia, which is a rapidly reversible cause of status-like activity.
- •Time the seizure activity from the moment of onset or arrival; clinical protocols for first-line therapy must be activated at the 5-minute mark.
- •Examine the patient for signs of "subtle" status epilepticus, such as nystagmus, rhythmic eye blinking, or small-amplitude twitching of the face or extremities, which may persist after overt convulsions cease.
- •Order emergent laboratory studies including a comprehensive metabolic panel (to check for hyponatremia or hypocalcemia), toxicology screen, and serum levels of known antiseizure medications (ASMs).
- •Perform a pregnancy test in all women of reproductive age to guide ASM selection and screen for , which requires different management (magnesium sulfate).
- •Obtain a non-contrast CT as soon as the patient is stabilized to rule out intracranial hemorrhage, large masses, or acute hydrocephalus.
- •Order an emergent (EEG) within 30–60 minutes if the patient does not regain consciousness after motor seizures stop to rule out nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE).
- •Utilize point-of-care EEG (pocEEG) in the emergency department for rapid screening if full continuous EEG (cEEG) is not immediately available.
- •Consider a lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis if there is clinical suspicion of meningitis, encephalitis, or if the patient has a fever of unknown origin.
- •Calculate the STESS (Status Epilepticus Severity Score) or EMSE (Etiology, Age, Comorbidities, EEG) score to assist in prognostic stratification and mortality risk assessment.
- •Look for specific MRI findings such as Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis (CCD)—reversible hyperintensity in the contralateral cerebellum—which indicates high metabolic demand from a supratentorial seizure focus.
Management
- •Administer first-line benzodiazepines immediately at the 5-minute mark: IV Lorazepam 4 mg (may repeat once) or IM Midazolam 10 mg for patients weighing >40 kg.
- •Initiate second-line non-sedating intravenous ASMs if seizures persist after the first benzodiazepine dose: IV Levetiracetam 60 mg/kg (maximum 4500 mg) is often preferred for its safety profile.
- •Consider alternative second-line agents: IV Fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg (maximum 1500 mg PE) or IV Valproate 40 mg/kg (maximum 3000 mg).
- •Avoid IV Valproate in pregnant patients due to high teratogenic risk unless all other options have failed.
- •Escalate to Refractory Status Epilepticus (RSE) management if seizures continue despite one benzodiazepine and one appropriately dosed second-line ASM.
- •Induce anesthesia for RSE using IV Midazolam: 0.2 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05–2.0 mg/kg/hr.
- •Utilize IV Propofol as an alternative anesthetic: 1–2 mg/kg bolus followed by 20–100 μg/kg/min; monitor closely for Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome (PRIS) characterized by metabolic acidosis and bradycardia.
- •Incorporate NMDA antagonism for super-refractory cases: IV Ketamine 1–2 mg/kg bolus followed by 1–5 mg/kg/hr infusion.
- •Maintain continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring to guide anesthetic titration; the goal is typically the cessation of electrographic seizures or a burst-suppression pattern.
- •Administer Magnesium Sulfate 4–6 g IV loading dose followed by 1–2 g/hr infusion if the patient is pregnant and eclampsia is suspected.
- •Monitor for systemic complications including , acute kidney injury, and neurogenic pulmonary edema.
- •Avoid underdosing in elderly patients; while they are more sensitive to side effects, subtherapeutic dosing is a primary cause of treatment failure.
- •Consult neurocritical care early for patients requiring anesthetic infusions or those with suspected NORSE.
- •Initiate gradual weaning of anesthetics only after at least 24 hours of electrographic seizure control to prevent rebound status epilepticus.
- •Consider adjunctive Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) in cases of refractory SE with a suspected autoimmune or neuroinflammatory component.
- •Refer for surgical evaluation or (VNS) in cases of super-refractory SE that fail all pharmacological interventions.
Board Review — High Yield
- •GABA-A Internalization — The primary molecular mechanism for benzodiazepine resistance in prolonged SE.
- •T1 vs T2 — T1 (5 min) is when to start treatment; T2 (30 min) is when permanent damage begins.
- •Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis — A reversible MRI finding in SE showing contralateral cerebellar hyperintensity.
- •Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome (PRIS) — Metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and cardiac failure during high-dose propofol use.
- •Eclampsia Treatment — Magnesium sulfate is the drug of choice, not standard antiseizure medications.
- •Subtle Status — The transition from convulsive SE to electrographic SE with minimal motor movements.
- •Ketamine Mechanism — Non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist used for refractory SE when GABAergic drugs fail.
- •NORSE — New-onset refractory status epilepticus in a healthy person, often autoimmune.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury
- ▸**More than 5 minutes** of seizure activity marks a time-critical state in which self-sustaining mechanisms and neuronal injury become increasingly likely. [3][4]
- ▸SE causes reciprocal receptor trafficking: GABA_A receptors are internalized while NMDA and AMPA receptors increase at synapses, promoting benzodiazepine resistance and excitotoxicity. [3][5][17]
- ▸Calcium overload, mitochondrial depolarization, oxidative stress, impaired neurovascular coupling, inflammation, and programmed cell death converge to produce neuronal injury. [1][3][11][19][110]
- ▸Neuronal damage is regionally heterogeneous and may progress to network reorganization, brain atrophy, and epileptogenesis. [7][16][111][113]
Overview and time dependence
Status epilepticus (SE) is generally defined as a seizure lasting more than 5 minutes or recurrent seizures without recovery to baseline. Persistent activity converts a normally self-terminating seizure into a self-sustaining state through interacting synaptic, metabolic, vascular, inflammatory, and cell-death mechanisms. [3]D The duration of SE is clinically important because progressive molecular changes increase treatment resistance and amplify the risk of neuronal injury; consequently, time is brain. [4]D[5]D Experimental and clinical observations indicate that termination of electrographic seizure activity is itself the simplest neuroprotective intervention, although preservation of neuronal function and prevention of epileptogenesis are not necessarily equivalent to preventing cell loss. [6]D
Failure of inhibition and enhancement of excitation
During prolonged SE, synaptic γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A) receptors are progressively internalized, reducing the effectiveness of GABAergic inhibition and contributing to benzodiazepine resistance. In parallel, glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and AMPA receptors are trafficked toward the synaptic membrane, increasing excitatory transmission. [3]D[5]D Experimental models demonstrate increased surface expression of NMDA receptor NR1 subunits and increased synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA currents in dentate granule cells during SE. [17]D These reciprocal receptor changes help explain why GABAergic treatment becomes less effective as seizure duration increases, whereas strategies that additionally reduce glutamatergic excitation may retain mechanistic relevance. [5]D
BDNF–TrkB signaling may further promote hyperexcitability by increasing synaptic accumulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors and altering hippocampal glutamatergic synaptic plasticity during SE. [12]D The GluN2B/NMDA receptor system is therefore implicated in both seizure-associated plasticity and excitotoxic signaling; age-dependent effects of the GluN2B antagonist ifenprodil have been examined after SE in immature rats, indicating that developmental stage can modify NMDA-related pharmacology. [12]D[13]D Prolonged convulsive SE may also cause GABA signaling to become excitatory, providing a further rationale for combined rather than isolated GABAergic treatment in advanced or high-risk SE. [4]D
Calcium overload, mitochondrial injury, and oxidative stress
Increased activation of NMDA and other excitatory pathways produces sustained intracellular calcium accumulation. When calcium influx exceeds mitochondrial buffering capacity, mitochondrial membrane depolarization and mitochondrial injury can become irreversible. [3]D Mitochondrial dysfunction compromises energy production and promotes additional cellular stress, while excessive metabolic demand during ictal activity can exceed regional perfusion capacity. [1]C[3]D Oxidative stress and downstream molecular injury are among the mechanisms associated with SE-related neuronal damage. [3]D
Ion-channel activity also contributes to network persistence. In a pilocarpine model, inhibition of Nav1.6 sodium currents reduced SE severity, supporting a role for persistent sodium-channel-dependent excitability in seizure maintenance. [15]D ATP-mediated purinergic signaling may contribute to injury and epileptogenesis: SE selectively increased hippocampal P2X7 receptor expression in mice, particularly in dentate granule neurons, and P2X7-targeted treatment produced seizure-suppressing and neuroprotective effects in the experimental model. [18]D
Neurovascular, blood–brain barrier, and regional mechanisms
Ictal activity increases neuronal metabolic demand and can contribute to lesion progression when neurovascular coupling is impaired. Spreading depolarizations produce sustained neuronal and astroglial depolarization, major ion shifts, cytotoxic edema, electrical silencing, and—in some injured brains—inverse neurovascular coupling with severe hypoperfusion. Ictal events may similarly increase metabolic demand, although the relationship between ictal activity and abnormal coupling is incompletely defined. [1]C SE is also associated with blood–brain barrier disruption, inflammation, and altered local microenvironments, all of which may intensify neuronal vulnerability. [11]D[113]D
Injury is spatially heterogeneous. In a patient with nonconvulsive SE, increased blood flow and persistent cortical MRI abnormalities occurred in the actively involved left cerebrum, whereas a contralateral right cerebellar diffusion abnormality did not progress despite absent increased cerebellar blood flow. The authors attributed this difference to substantially greater excitotoxicity in the cerebrum than in the cerebellum, illustrating that perfusion alone does not determine tissue injury. [7]C
Inflammation, proteostasis, and programmed cell death
Experimental SE produces microglial activation and neuronal death in multiple limbic and paralimbic regions, including the hippocampus, amygdala, piriform cortex, and entorhinal cortex. [11]D Inflammatory and neurotoxic mediators, including reactive oxygen species, glutamate, and cytokines, are components of the post-SE environment and potential targets of neuroprotective interventions. [113]D The ubiquitin–proteasome system, which regulates proteins involved in survival, synaptic plasticity, neurotransmission, and excitability, is inhibited after SE in a spatiotemporal and cell-specific pattern; this response may represent a protective adaptation against hippocampal injury rather than only a pathological failure. [14]D
SE activates programmed cell-death pathways. Seizures rapidly increase p53, and p53-dependent induction of the proapoptotic protein Puma contributes to hippocampal damage in experimental models. Pharmacological inhibition of p53 or genetic absence of Puma reduces seizure-associated neuronal injury. [19]D[110]D However, p53 deficiency can prolong electrographic seizures and worsen the later epileptic phenotype despite altering acute neuronal death, emphasizing that seizure duration, cell death, and epileptogenesis are mechanistically related but not interchangeable outcomes. [19]D[6]D
Structural and long-term consequences
Prolonged or super-refractory SE can cause neuronal death, network reorganization, and progressive cortical and subcortical atrophy. Serial MRI observations in super-refractory SE documented measurable progressive brain atrophy over time. [16]D Post-SE plasticity is regionally variable and extends beyond the hippocampus; chronic temporal lobe epilepsy models show altered corticostriatal synaptic communication and changes in long-term potentiation, indicating disruption of extralimbic network function. [20]D Aberrant neurogenesis, inflammation, neuronal loss, and network reorganization may contribute to later spontaneous recurrent seizures and cognitive dysfunction. [111]D[113]D
Endogenous responses can be protective or harmful depending on timing, intensity, and cellular context. For example, ERK1/2 signaling may support neuronal survival or promote neuronal death, while later inhibition of apoptotic pathways and early NMDA-receptor antagonism have distinct therapeutic rationales. [6]D Systemic complications of refractory SE—including cardiopulmonary injury, hemodynamic collapse, and multisystem failure—can impose additional secondary insults on the brain and increase overall mortality. [2]D
| Mechanism | Principal consequence | References |
|---|---|---|
| GABA_A receptor internalization | Reduced inhibition and increasing benzodiazepine resistance | [3]D[5]D |
| NMDA/AMPA receptor trafficking and BDNF–TrkB signaling | Sustained glutamatergic excitation and calcium influx | [3]D[12]D[17]D |
| Calcium overload and mitochondrial failure | Membrane depolarization, metabolic failure, and oxidative injury | [3]D |
| Neurovascular and blood–brain barrier dysfunction | Metabolic mismatch, edema, inflammation, and secondary injury | [1]C[11]D[113]D |
| p53–Puma and related death pathways | Apoptotic neuronal loss and later network consequences | [19]D[110]D |
| Inflammation, purinergic signaling, and impaired proteostasis | Microglial activation, excitability changes, and altered cellular stress responses | [11]D[14]D[18]D |
Etiology and Triggering Factors
- ▸SE has structural, vascular, infectious, autoimmune/inflammatory, genetic, metabolic, toxic, and medication-related causes; evaluation should proceed concurrently with seizure treatment.[138]
- ▸Stroke, viral encephalitis, FIRES, autoimmune encephalitis, genetic epilepsy, and POLG-related mitochondrial disease are especially important etiologies in the supplied cohorts.[30,114,115,116,119,139].
- ▸NORSE is defined by new-onset refractory SE without a rapidly identified structural, toxic, metabolic, or other cause; cryptogenic cases remain common.[21,32,36].
- ▸Early immunotherapy in NORSE has been operationalized as first-line treatment within 7 days and second-line treatment within 30 days.[38]
- ▸A negative metabolic evaluation does not exclude all inherited disease, and cryptogenic classification does not prove absence of an underlying immune or genetic predisposition.[35,118]
Overview
Status epilepticus (SE) is a final common pathway produced by diverse structural, infectious, inflammatory/autoimmune, genetic, metabolic, toxic, vascular, and medication-related processes. The etiologic evaluation should therefore be pursued in parallel with seizure termination, because identifying a reversible cause may alter acute treatment and prognosis.[138] In a prospective multicenter ICU registry, the predefined investigation included brain CT/MRI, laboratory testing, lumbar puncture, toxicology screening, antiseizure-medication assays, and paraneoplastic testing, reflecting the breadth of potentially actionable causes.[138]
Structural, vascular, and infectious triggers
Acute cerebrovascular disease is an important precipitant. In a pediatric ischemic-stroke cohort, 30 of 137 children with acute seizures had SE, demonstrating that SE may occur as an early symptomatic complication of pediatric stroke.[139] In adults with acute stroke monitored with point-of-care EEG, early post-stroke SE was specifically evaluated during the first 72 hours after admission; the reported incidence of SE after acute stroke is approximately 1.5%.[122] Stroke can also be mimicked by nonconvulsive SE: ictal paresis may present with hemiparesis or isolated limb weakness, sensory symptoms, mutism, or hemianopia, and EEG may show an ictal-interictal continuum.[140]C Consequently, acute focal deficits should not be attributed automatically to ischemia without electroclinical assessment.[140]C
Infection, particularly encephalitis, is a major trigger of refractory SE. In a cohort of severe viral encephalitis, seizures occurred in 55.2% of patients and 18.9% developed refractory SE; mortality was 20% among those with refractory SE compared with 5.5% in the overall cohort.[114] Cerebrospinal-fluid and serum cytokine abnormalities differed between patients with severe viral encephalitis who had no seizures, controlled seizures, or refractory SE, supporting an inflammatory contribution to seizure refractoriness.[114] Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a catastrophic infection-associated neuroinflammatory presentation characterized by refractory SE; in a 41-child cohort, all patients required pharmacologic coma after a median of seven antiseizure medications had been tried.[115]C
Autoimmune and inflammatory causes
Autoimmune encephalitis is an important cause of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis commonly includes seizures, and a Mayo Clinic series characterized electroclinical features and factors associated with SE during the acute encephalitic phase.[116]C Among patients with autoimmune encephalitis presenting with NORSE, persistent seizures despite adequate immunotherapy and resolution of active inflammation defined autoimmune-associated epilepsy; the DAME score was developed to predict this outcome after at least 24 months of follow-up.[33]D In adult and pediatric NORSE, early immunotherapy was defined as first-line treatment within 7 days of admission and second-line treatment within 30 days, allowing evaluation of treatment timing in relation to functional outcome.[38]D
Cryptogenic NORSE may still have an immune-mediated biological substrate despite negative conventional testing. Whole-genome sequencing in 31 patients with cryptogenic NORSE found increased polygenic risk scores for autoimmune diseases, enrichment of variants in genes expressed in the central nervous system and lymphocytes, and associations between autoimmune polygenic risk and selected clinical phenotypes.[118] Altered fecal microbiomes have also been reported in NORSE and conventional SE compared with chronic epilepsy, with longitudinal analyses examining relationships between microbiota and cytokines; these findings are associative and do not establish the microbiome as a confirmed cause.[36]D
Genetic and metabolic causes
Genetic etiologies are particularly relevant in children with epilepsy complicated by SE. A multicenter Italian pediatric cohort was designed to characterize confirmed or presumed genetic causes and identify clinical features associated with genetic epilepsy complicated by SE.[30]D POLG-related mitochondrial disease is a notable example: among 195 genetically confirmed patients, 130 had epilepsy and SE was identified in 97 of 126 evaluable patients; SE was the presenting manifestation in 40 of 93 affected individuals, with a median age of onset of 7 years.[119]C These findings support consideration of mitochondrial and other genetic disorders when SE is recurrent, unusually severe, early-onset, or accompanied by multisystem features.[30]D[119]C
Metabolic disease is an important but relatively infrequent explanation for adult NORSE. In a single-centre evaluation of 42 suspected adult NORSE cases, 62% were classified as cryptogenic and 38% as symptomatic; despite 100 metabolic-related tests, no inherited metabolic disorder was identified as the cause in that cohort.[35]D A negative metabolic screen therefore reduces, but does not eliminate, the possibility of an inherited metabolic disorder, particularly when clinical features remain suggestive.[35]D
NORSE and cryptogenic presentations
NORSE occurs in individuals without active epilepsy or a pre-existing neurologic disorder and without a rapidly identified structural, toxic, metabolic, or other cause.[21][36]D In a 72-patient adult cohort, the most common classification was cryptogenic NORSE (54%), followed by viral encephalitis (25%); 51.3% progressed to super-refractory SE and overall mortality was 27.8%.[32]D The high proportion of cryptogenic cases underscores that “cryptogenic” is a diagnostic category rather than proof that no trigger exists.[32]D[35]D[118]
Toxic, medication-related, and systemic precipitants
Toxic exposure and antiseizure-medication factors should be assessed early because toxicology screening and serum antiseizure-medication assays are included in structured etiologic protocols for SE.[138] Medication nonadherence, withdrawal, drug interactions, and inadequate drug exposure are clinically plausible precipitants, but the supplied studies do not quantify their relative contribution. Systemic infection and fever may act as proximate triggers, particularly in FIRES and viral encephalitis.[114][115]C
Age- and phenotype-related considerations
Etiology varies with age and seizure phenotype. Pediatric SE cohorts emphasize stroke, FIRES, genetic epilepsy, mitochondrial disease, and autoimmune encephalitis.[30]D[115]C[119]C[139] In older adults, myoclonic SE has been studied as a near-continuous myoclonus syndrome with epileptiform EEG abnormalities; its etiologies and prognosis were evaluated in patients older than 60 years, with duration and underlying cause assessed in relation to outcome.[123]C Crossed cerebellar diaschisis may accompany SE from multiple etiologies and has been described using MRI, PET, or SPECT; it is an imaging phenomenon rather than an independent cause.[26] Similarly, cytokine abnormalities, microbiome changes, and genetic risk profiles may provide mechanistic clues but should not replace evaluation for treatable structural, infectious, autoimmune, toxic, metabolic, or genetic causes.[26][36]D[114][118]
Practical etiologic approach
A systematic evaluation should be guided by age, seizure semiology, fever or systemic illness, focal neurologic findings, medication exposure, immune or cancer history, and evidence of multisystem disease.[138] Initial testing generally encompasses urgent neuroimaging, metabolic and laboratory studies, medication concentrations, toxicology, EEG, and lumbar puncture when infection or inflammation is suspected; autoimmune, paraneoplastic, genetic, and metabolic testing should be selected according to the clinical phenotype.[138] Early recognition of autoimmune or inflammatory NORSE is particularly important because immunotherapy timing is associated with outcome-focused clinical assessment.[38]D
| Etiologic category | Examples or associated findings | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Vascular/structural | Ischemic stroke; focal deficits may be ictal rather than vascular | [122][139][140]C |
| Infectious/neuroinflammatory | Viral encephalitis; FIRES | [114][115]C |
| Autoimmune | Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis; autoimmune NORSE | [33]D[38]D[116]C |
| Genetic/mitochondrial | Pediatric genetic epilepsy; POLG disease | [30]D[119]C |
| Cryptogenic/immune predisposition | Cryptogenic NORSE; autoimmune polygenic-risk enrichment | [32]D[35]D[118] |
| Toxic/metabolic/medication-related | Toxic exposure, abnormal ASM levels, inherited metabolic disease | [35]D[138] |
Recognition and Triage
- ▸Treat suspected status epilepticus as a time-critical neurological emergency and assess, stabilize, treat, and investigate in parallel. [40]
- ▸Suspect NCSE when altered mental status persists without an explanation, especially after convulsive seizures or with a postictal deficit lasting more than 1 hour. [124][128][137]
- ▸Use urgent EEG and consider continuous EEG when consciousness does not recover, seizures recur, or electrographic seizures are likely. [42][126][132]
- ▸Point-of-care or rapid-response EEG can shorten access to monitoring when conventional EEG is delayed, but automated interpretation requires clinical and expert EEG oversight. [41][124][128][129][130]
- ▸Use prognostic scores to support triage and communication, not to delay treatment or independently determine goals of care. [23][44][95]
Recognize status epilepticus as a time-critical emergency
Status epilepticus (SE) is a major neurological emergency in adults, and mortality remains substantial despite advances in acute neurological care; delays may result from a persistent gap between clinical-practice-guideline recommendations and bedside implementation. [40] Recognition should therefore trigger simultaneous resuscitation, seizure characterization, cause assessment, treatment preparation, and escalation planning rather than a sequential diagnostic process. [40]
Convulsive SE is usually apparent from ongoing or recurrent convulsive activity, but motor manifestations may diminish or stop while electrographic seizures continue. Nonconvulsive SE (NCSE) should be suspected in patients with otherwise unexplained altered mental status, persistent impaired awareness after convulsive seizures, prolonged postictal deficits, or unexplained focal neurological findings. [124]C[128]C[137] A prolonged postictal deficit lasting more than 1 hour can represent either uncomplicated Todd’s palsy or ongoing/recurrent nonconvulsive seizure activity; clinical examination alone may not reliably distinguish these conditions. [137]
Immediate triage and parallel assessment
Patients with suspected SE require emergency assessment of airway, breathing, circulation, consciousness, seizure activity, glucose, temperature, and likely precipitants while antiseizure treatment and definitive monitoring are arranged. The supplied guideline systematic review supports use of formal SE management pathways, although the abstract does not provide a single universal triage algorithm or treatment threshold. [40] Under-recognition and benzodiazepine underdosing are clinically important hazards: the available emergency-department study specifically addresses frequent administration below guideline-recommended doses and the concern that respiratory or cardiovascular complications may lead clinicians to undertreat, despite the greater complication burden associated with untreated SE. [125]C
EMS dispatch and prehospital systems should treat suspected SE as a high-acuity neurological emergency. Dispatch algorithms are intended to identify seizure-related emergencies and allocate appropriate EMS resources, but their accuracy and effect on resource allocation remain active areas of investigation. [141] Community-level social vulnerability may influence out-of-hospital identification and the quality of EMS care for neurological emergencies, including SE, and should be considered when evaluating delays or disparities in access. [127]
Identify nonconvulsive seizures rapidly
NCSE is commonly overlooked among emergency-department patients presenting with acute or unexplained mental-status changes. [124]C EEG is essential for diagnosis, and a standard EEG may be unavailable or delayed, particularly outside regular working hours or in resource-constrained settings. [41][128]C[129] Rapid-response or limited EEG can provide earlier bedside assessment, but automated or artificial-intelligence interpretation should supplement—not replace—qualified clinical and EEG review. [124]C[130]
Point-of-care EEG is a potential triage tool when conventional EEG is not immediately available. A pediatric systematic review identified six studies using simplified montages, with cohorts ranging from 20 to 242 patients, and concluded that point-of-care EEG is feasible for acute assessment while emphasizing important evidence gaps. [41] A pediatric quality-improvement program used a rapid, low-cost two-channel device for children with altered mental status, including children recovering from convulsive seizures without visible ongoing seizure activity. [128]C A related implementation study analyzed 62 pediatric point-of-care EEG recordings and evaluated feasibility and concordance with standard interpretation, although implementation evidence remains limited. [129]
Arrange continuous EEG when risk persists
Patients with persistent impaired consciousness, suspected NCSE, recurrent seizures, or high risk of electrographic seizures should undergo urgent EEG and, when clinically indicated, continuous EEG monitoring. In critically ill patients at risk for nonconvulsive seizures or NCSE, a multicenter randomized study compared 24–72 hours of tele-continuous EEG with a 30-minute tele-routine EEG; the trial was designed to compare seizure detection, mortality, and functional outcomes. [42] Pediatric ICU data indicate that electrographic seizures after SE occur in approximately 26–57% of critically ill children, usually within 48 hours of onset, and are associated with adverse neurological outcomes. [126]C Fever-associated SE represents approximately 40–49% of pediatric SE in the cited literature, making continued EEG vigilance particularly relevant in this group. [126]C
Interpret EEG findings within the clinical context. The Salzburg EEG criteria are proposed consensus criteria for NCSE, but their diagnostic accuracy requires independent clinical validation and may vary according to the reference standard and reader expertise. [132]C Emergency EEG studies demonstrate that clinically relevant seizures and SE are detected in a minority—but meaningful proportion—of referred patients: one tertiary emergency-department series found SE-related seizures in 5.40% of emergency EEGs and seizures without SE in 3.05%. [133]
Triage severity and prognosis
Prognostic scores can support—not replace—clinical judgment, treatment escalation, or goals-of-care discussions. STESS, EMSE-EACE, and END-IT have been evaluated in neurology ICU populations requiring continuous EEG, while the modified END-IT tool was developed to provide individualized prediction of 3-month functional outcome after convulsive SE. [44][23] STESS and qSOFA are also being studied as rapidly applicable prehospital tools for predicting early and in-hospital mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation. [95] These tools should not be used to withhold urgent treatment solely because a predicted outcome is unfavorable. [23][44][95]
In refractory or prolonged SE, early transfer to an ICU or center with continuous EEG, neurocritical care, and anesthetic-management capability is appropriate. Contemporary registries emphasize that evidence remains limited for third-line anesthetic treatment and many NCSE management questions, including the prognostic significance of distinct EEG patterns. [136] Pediatric ICU monitoring studies similarly evaluate seizure detection, treatment changes, NCSE, and longer-term epilepsy outcomes, reinforcing the need for specialty escalation when electrographic seizures persist. [135]C
| Clinical situation | Triage implication |
|---|---|
| Ongoing or recurrent convulsive activity | Activate emergency SE pathway and provide simultaneous resuscitation, treatment preparation, and cause assessment. [40] |
| Persistent altered mental status or impaired awareness after convulsive seizures | Urgently evaluate for NCSE with EEG; absence of visible convulsions does not exclude ongoing seizure activity. [124]C[128]C |
| Postictal focal deficit lasting >1 hour | Obtain EEG to distinguish Todd’s palsy from recurrent nonconvulsive seizures or NCSE. [137] |
| Critically ill patient at risk for electrographic seizures | Consider continuous EEG for 24–72 hours when clinically indicated. [42] |
| Pediatric SE with fever or critical illness | Maintain heightened surveillance because electrographic seizures may occur within 48 hours and are reported in 26–57% of critically ill children after SE. [126]C |
| Suspected refractory or prolonged SE | Escalate to ICU or a center with continuous EEG and neurocritical-care expertise. [136] |
Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management
- ▸Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) requires immediate ICU admission and escalation to continuous anesthetic infusions like midazolam or propofol.
- ▸Ketamine is a critical adjunctive therapy that targets NMDA receptor upregulation, which occurs as GABAergic medications lose efficacy during prolonged seizures.
- ▸Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is defined by seizure persistence 24 hours after anesthetic initiation and may require immunomodulatory therapy or NMDA-receptor weaning strategies.
Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is defined as seizure activity that persists despite the administration of a first-line and at least one appropriately dosed second-line non-sedating intravenous (IV) antiseizure medication (ASM) [60][66]D. Approximately 10% to 40% of pediatric status epilepticus cases progress to RSE [54]. Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) occurs when seizures continue or recur 24 hours or more after the initiation of anesthetic therapy, including instances where seizures return during the weaning of anesthetic infusions [55][63]D[71]C. requires rapid escalation to continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs) to prevent neuronal injury and systemic complications [64]D[66]D.
Step 1: Initial Assessment and Severity Classification
Upon failure of second-line ASMs (e.g., , , or ), the patient must be classified as having RSE and immediately transitioned to an intensive care unit (ICU) for continuous hemodynamic and electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring [60][66]D. Clinicians must decide between adding a second non-sedating IV ASM or proceeding directly to anesthetic induction. While equipoise exists, rapid sedation is often preferred in convulsive RSE to halt systemic metabolic exhaustion [58]C. For non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), the FAST trial suggests comparing high-dose IV ASMs against rapid ICU sedation to determine if the risks of intubation outweigh the benefits of immediate seizure suppression [57].
Step 2: Induction of Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs (CIVADs)
Administer Midazolam 0.2 mg/kg IV bolus, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05–2.0 mg/kg/hr [61]. Midazolam is often the preferred initial CIVAD due to its rapid onset and familiar safety profile [64]D. In pediatric populations, a dose threshold of 0.8 mg/kg/hr has been identified; exceeding this dose may be associated with diminishing returns in seizure cessation and increased risk of treatment failure [61]. Alternatively, Propofol 1–2 mg/kg IV bolus followed by 20–100 μg/kg/min may be used [60]. A multicenter study found no significant difference in efficacy between midazolam and propofol for RSE control, though propofol requires caution regarding propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) during prolonged use [60].
Step 3: Integration of NMDA Antagonism (Ketamine)
Administer Ketamine 1–2 mg/kg IV bolus, followed by an infusion of 1–5 mg/kg/hr [54][67]D. As status epilepticus persists, GABA-A receptors are internalized and become less responsive to benzodiazepines and barbiturates, while N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are upregulated [64]D[67]D. Ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, targets this mechanism and is increasingly used as an advanced second-line or early third-line agent [67]D[75]C. Unlike other anesthetics, ketamine does not significantly suppress respiratory drive, potentially allowing for seizure management without endotracheal intubation in select cases of NCSE [73]C[74]C. Prehospital administration of ketamine for benzodiazepine-refractory SE has also shown promise in terminating seizures before ICU arrival [65]D[72]C.
Step 4: Monitoring and Titration
Continuous EEG (cEEG) is mandatory to guide titration, especially as clinical convulsions may cease while electrographic seizures persist (electromechanical dissociation) [66]D. The therapeutic goal is typically the cessation of all electrographic seizures or the achievement of a burst-suppression pattern [66]D. When using ketamine, EEG monitoring may reveal increased beta-frequency activity, which has been suggested as a potential marker for treatment response [70]. Clinicians should monitor for drug-specific adverse effects, such as hypotension with midazolam or propofol, and metabolic acidosis or bradycardia with propofol [60].
Step 5: Resolution, Weaning, and Transition
Anesthetic weaning should only be attempted after at least 24 hours of electrographic seizure control [63]D. Weaning must be gradual to prevent rebound SE. For patients who fail repeated weaning attempts (SRSE), adjunctive therapies may be required. Memantine 20 mg/day (oral NMDA antagonist) has been used off-label to facilitate weaning from ketamine infusions in refractory cases [71]C. In cases with suspected neuroinflammatory components, Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) may be considered; a randomized trial indicated that adding tocilizumab to standard anesthetic regimens may improve outcomes in RSE by modulating inflammatory cytokines [59].
| Drug | Initial Bolus | Maintenance Dose | Key Considerations | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midazolam | 0.2 mg/kg | 0.05–2.0 mg/kg/hr | Preferred for rapid onset; threshold of 0.8 mg/kg/hr in peds | 2b [60][61] |
| Propofol | 1–2 mg/kg | 20–100 μg/kg/min | Risk of PRIS; avoid in prolonged pediatric infusions | 2b [60] |
| Ketamine | 1–2 mg/kg | 1–5 mg/kg/hr | NMDA antagonist; minimal respiratory suppression | 2a [54][55] |
| Pentobarbital | 5–15 mg/kg | 0.5–5.0 mg/kg/hr | High risk of hypotension and immunosuppression | 2a [56] |
| Tocilizumab | 8 mg/kg | Single dose (adjunct) | Used for neuroinflammatory RSE/SRSE | 1b [59] |
Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup
- ▸Status epilepticus is defined by the t1 (failure to terminate) and t2 (risk of neuronal injury) timepoints, with 5 minutes being the threshold for generalized convulsive SE.
- ▸EEG is mandatory for the diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), as clinical signs are often subtle or absent in critically ill patients.
- ▸A seizure burden exceeding 12 minutes per hour on continuous EEG is a critical threshold for defining status epilepticus in the ICU setting.
The diagnosis of status epilepticus (SE) is a time-sensitive neuro-emergency that requires a parallel approach: stabilizing the patient while simultaneously identifying the seizure type and underlying etiology [83]D[84]D. Because prolonged seizure activity leads to progressive changes in neurotransmission—specifically the internalization of GABA receptors and the mobilization of NMDA receptors—prompt recognition is vital to prevent the transition to refractory states [84]D. The diagnostic process is guided by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) framework, which classifies SE across four axes: semiology, EEG correlates, etiology, and age [89]D.
Diagnostic Criteria
Formal diagnosis relies on the ILAE two-timepoint definition. Timepoint 1 (t1) represents the duration beyond which a seizure is unlikely to self-terminate (typically 5 minutes for generalized tonic-clonic SE), while Timepoint 2 (t2) represents the duration beyond which there is a significant risk of long-term consequences, including neuronal injury and death [84]D[89]D.
- Required Features: Continuous seizure activity or recurrent seizures without a return to clinical baseline between episodes [84]D[88]D.
- Supportive Features: For nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), supportive features include fluctuating mental status, subtle motor twitches (e.g., nystagmus, perioral twitching), or a response to antiseizure medications (ASMs) accompanied by EEG improvement [83]D[90]D.
- Exclusion Criteria: Clinicians must exclude mimics such as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), syncope, or movement disorders. Notably, in patients with (CJD), periodic sharp wave complexes (PSWCs) may respond to benzodiazepines without clinical improvement; this should not be misdiagnosed as NCSE [46]D.
Laboratory Tests
Laboratory evaluation should be initiated immediately to identify reversible metabolic triggers and systemic complications of prolonged muscle activity.
- Fingerstick Glucose: Must be performed immediately in all patients to rule out hypoglycemia as a reversible cause [88]D.
- Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: To assess for hyponatremia, , and renal or hepatic failure which may lower the seizure threshold [88]D.
- Toxicology Screen: Essential for identifying sympathomimetic toxicity or withdrawal states (e.g., alcohol or benzodiazepine withdrawal) [88]D.
- Pregnancy Test: Mandatory for all women of reproductive age to guide ASM selection and screen for eclampsia [88]D.
- Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Analysis: Indicated if there is clinical suspicion of meningitis, encephalitis, or autoimmune epilepsy, particularly after the acute phase is stabilized [89]D.
Imaging
Neuroimaging is used to identify acute structural brain injuries that may be the primary cause of SE, such as hemorrhage, tumor, or stroke [78]D.
- Non-contrast CT : The emergent modality of choice to rule out large intracranial hemorrhages or masses [78]D.
- MRI Brain: Superior for detecting subtle cortical dysplasia, encephalitis, or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Specific findings in SE include Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis (CCD), a phenomenon where supratentorial seizure activity causes functional deafferentation and metabolic depression in the contralateral cerebellar hemisphere [26].
- Special Considerations: In patients receiving amyloid-targeting therapies (e.g., aducanumab), clinicians should look for Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), which can trigger fatal super-refractory SE [87]C.
Electrodiagnostic Studies
Electroencephalography (EEG) is the gold standard for diagnosing NCSE and monitoring treatment response in refractory SE [90]D.
- Continuous EEG (cEEG): Recommended in the ICU for patients with unexplained altered mental status or those who do not wake up within 10–20 minutes of seizure cessation [78]D[83]D. A seizure burden of >12 minutes per hour (20%) is often used to define SE in the critical care setting [78]D.
- Point-of-Care EEG (pocEEG): Utilizes simplified montages for rapid bedside assessment in the emergency department. It is highly feasible in pediatric populations for the early detection of NCSE [41].
- AI-Integrated EEG: Emerging AI platforms offer a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 83% for detecting nonconvulsive seizures, potentially reducing unnecessary ASM administration [86].
- EEG-EMG Monitoring: Combined monitoring is useful in the ICU to differentiate between epileptic myoclonus and non-epileptic movement disorders like postanoxic myoclonus or tremors [82]D.
Diagnostic Algorithm
- Step 1: Clinical Suspicion: Identify prolonged motor activity (>5 min) or persistent altered mental status without recovery [84]D[88]D.
- Step 2: Immediate Metabolic Screen: Check fingerstick glucose and electrolytes [88]D.
- Step 3: Emergent EEG: Order EEG (pocEEG or routine) within 30–60 minutes if the patient remains encephalopathic to rule out NCSE [41][83]D.
- Step 4: Neuroimaging: Perform CT head once the patient is stabilized; follow with MRI if the etiology remains unknown [26][78]D.
- Step 5: Etiological Workup: Conduct targeted testing (CSF, toxicology, or autoimmune panels) based on clinical context [89]D.
| Test | Finding | Timing | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fingerstick Glucose | Hypoglycemia | Immediate (<5 min) | High for metabolic SE | N/A |
| pocEEG | Ictal discharges | <30 min | High for NCSE | Moderate |
| AI-EEG | Seizure detection | Continuous | 95% [86] | 83% [86] |
| CT Head | Hemorrhage/Mass | Emergent | High for acute bleed | Low for subtle lesions |
| MRI (DWI/FLAIR) | Cortical edema/CCD | Subacute | High for focal SE [26] | High |
| CSF Analysis | Pleocytosis/Protein | Post-stabilization | High for infection | Variable |
Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly
- ▸The elderly have the highest incidence of SE (89.6/100,000) and a fourfold higher mortality rate compared to younger adults [97].
- ▸In pregnancy, differentiating SE from eclampsia is critical, as eclampsia requires Magnesium sulfate rather than standard ASMs [88].
- ▸Continuous EEG monitoring for at least 36.8 hours is recommended in SE to reduce the risk of missed seizure recurrence below 5% [106].
of (SE) requires significant modification when encountered in specific patient cohorts. Physiological variations, altered pharmacokinetics, and distinct etiologic profiles necessitate a departure from standard adult protocols to optimize outcomes and minimize iatrogenic harm [88]D[97]D.
Pediatrics
In the pediatric population, SE is a common neurological emergency where rapid intervention is critical to prevent long-term developmental and cognitive sequelae [99]D. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) included patients as young as 2 years old, demonstrating that second-line management with Levetiracetam (60 mg/kg, max 4500 mg), Fosphenytoin (20 mg PE/kg, max 1500 mg PE), or Valproic acid (40 mg/kg, max 3000 mg) shows comparable efficacy in benzodiazepine-refractory convulsive SE [91].
Diagnostic considerations in children must prioritize metabolic disturbances and infection. In cases of (NORSE), which can occur in previously healthy children, the prognosis is often guarded, and clinicians must aggressively investigate for autoimmune or paraneoplastic etiologies [21][32]D. For pediatric patients with super-refractory SE (SRSE), adjunctive therapies such as (VNS) have emerged as safe options, with some evidence suggesting they may assist in SE resolution when anesthetic weaning fails [93][94].
Pediatric Monitoring Protocol:
- Step 1: Immediate stabilization and administration of weight-based benzodiazepines (e.g., Midazolam 0.2 mg/kg IM or Lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg IV).
- Step 2: If seizures persist at 5–10 minutes, initiate a second-line ASM (Levetiracetam, Fosphenytoin, or Valproate) [91].
- Step 3: Early transition to continuous EEG (cEEG). In pediatric SE, monitoring should ideally persist for 36.8 hours after the last seizure to ensure the risk of recurrence is reduced below 5% [106]D.
Pregnancy
SE in pregnancy represents a dual-emergency involving both the mother and the fetus. The primary clinical challenge is differentiating SE from , as the treatments differ fundamentally [88]D. While SE is managed with standard ASMs, eclampsia requires Magnesium sulfate (4–6 g IV loading dose followed by 1–2 g/h infusion).
Physiological changes in pregnancy, such as increased glomerular filtration and volume of distribution, often lead to subtherapeutic ASM levels. Furthermore, the risk of fetal hypoxia during prolonged maternal seizures is high, necessitating continuous fetal heart rate monitoring if the fetus is viable (typically >24 weeks gestation) [88]D.
Management of SE in Pregnancy:
- Teratogenicity: While Valproate is highly effective, it is generally avoided in pregnancy due to significant teratogenic risks (neural tube defects). Levetiracetam (60 mg/kg) or Fosphenytoin (20 mg PE/kg) are preferred second-line agents [91].
- Delivery Planning: SE is not an absolute indication for immediate Cesarean section unless there is evidence of fetal distress that does not resolve with maternal seizure control.
- : Most ASMs are compatible with breastfeeding, though infants should be monitored for sedation if the mother is receiving high-dose benzodiazepines or phenobarbital.
Elderly
Patients aged ≥60 years represent the demographic with the highest incidence of SE, reaching 89.6 per 100,000 person-years in women [97]D. Mortality in this group increases nearly fourfold compared to younger adults, often due to the underlying etiology such as , intracranial hemorrhage, or neuro-oncological complications [97]D[105]D.
Pharmacokinetic changes in the elderly, including reduced hepatic metabolism and renal clearance, increase the risk of drug-induced toxicity. Clinicians must be vigilant against underdosing, which is a frequent cause of treatment failure in the emergency department [98]. However, the use of highly protein-bound drugs (e.g., Phenytoin) is complicated by age-related hypoalbuminemia, which increases the free (active) fraction of the drug, potentially leading to toxicity even with "normal" total serum levels [97]D.
Elderly Prognostic Stratification: Prognostic scores like the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and qSOFA are utilized to predict mortality, though their performance in the elderly can be limited by the complexity of comorbidities [95]. Structured EEG reporting is increasingly recognized as a vital tool for predicting length of stay and mortality in this population [101]D. Biomarkers such as Neurofilament light-chain (Nf-L) in the CSF or serum may also serve as indicators of neuroaxonal injury following SE [102]D.
Immunocompromised Patients
In immunocompromised individuals (e.g., HIV/AIDS, post-transplant, or those on chemotherapy), SE is frequently the result of opportunistic CNS infections or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy [88]D. These patients are at higher risk for (NCSE), which may present subtly as altered mental status or "brain fog" rather than overt motor activity.
Management must include a low threshold for lumbar puncture and broad-spectrum antimicrobial coverage while awaiting culture results. Clinicians must also account for significant drug-drug interactions between ASMs (especially enzyme-inducers like Carbamazepine or Phenytoin) and immunosuppressant medications (e.g., calcineurin inhibitors), which can lead to graft rejection or increased ASM toxicity.
| Medication | Pediatric Dose (≥2 years) | Maximum Dose | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Levetiracetam | 60 mg/kg IV | 4500 mg | 1b [91] |
| Fosphenytoin | 20 mg PE/kg IV | 1500 mg PE | 1b [91] |
| Valproic Acid | 40 mg/kg IV | 3000 mg | 1b [91] |
| Factor | Change in Elderly | Clinical Impact on SE Management |
|---|---|---|
| Albumin Levels | Decreased | Increases free fraction of protein-bound drugs (e.g., Phenytoin) [97]D |
| Renal Clearance | Decreased | Requires dose adjustment for Levetiracetam and Lacosamide [96][97]D |
| Comorbidities | Increased | Higher risk of multi-organ failure and STESS score elevation [95][97]D |
| Etiology | Shift to Vascular | Stroke and neoplasm are the most common triggers [97]D[105]D |
Guidelines and Resources
- ▸The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) 2012 guidelines establish a three-tiered pharmacological framework: Emergent (Benzodiazepines), Urgent (AEDs), and Refractory (Anesthetic infusions).
- ▸Continuous EEG (cEEG) is recommended by the NCS within 60 minutes of seizure onset to rule out non-convulsive status epilepticus in patients who do not regain consciousness.
- ▸According to AAN/AES guidelines, women with epilepsy on AEDs do not have a substantially increased risk (>2x) of cesarean delivery or late pregnancy bleeding.
Clinical practice guidelines for (SE) emphasize a time-sensitive, tiered approach to . Because SE is a neurological emergency with high morbidity, standardized protocols are essential to reduce institutional variability and improve patient outcomes [107]. The primary objectives of all major guidelines are the rapid termination of clinical and electrographic seizure activity and the prevention of seizure recurrence.
Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) 2012 Guidelines
The 2012 NCS guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for the evaluation and management of SE in critically ill patients [107]. These guidelines utilize the GRADE system to categorize recommendations based on the quality of evidence and the balance between benefits and risks. A central tenet of the NCS approach is the categorization of treatment into three distinct phases: Emergent, Urgent, and Refractory.
Emergent Initial Therapy (0–5 Minutes)
The goal of the emergent phase is the immediate cessation of seizure activity. are the established first-line agents due to their rapid onset of action. The NCS recommends the following protocols:
- Step 1: Stabilization — Assess airway, breathing, and circulation (ABCs). Initiate cardiac monitoring and . Perform a rapid finger-stick glucose check to rule out hypoglycemia.
- Step 2: Pharmacological Intervention — Administer a rapid-acting benzodiazepine.
- Lorazepam: 0.1 mg/kg IV (up to 4 mg per dose), may repeat once.
- Midazolam: 10 mg IM (for patients without IV access) or 0.2 mg/kg IV.
- Diazepam: 0.15 mg/kg IV (up to 10 mg per dose).
Urgent Control Therapy (5–20 Minutes)
If seizures persist after the initial benzodiazepine dose, the patient enters the urgent control phase. The goal is to achieve long-term seizure control using non-sedating antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The NCS highlights that the choice of agent often depends on the patient's comorbidities and the side-effect profile of the drug [107].
- Fosphenytoin: 20 mg PE/kg IV (max 1500 mg/dose) at a rate of 150 mg PE/min.
- Valproate Sodium: 20–40 mg/kg IV at a rate of 3–6 mg/kg/min.
- Levetiracetam: 1000–3000 mg IV over 15 minutes.
Refractory Status Epilepticus (RSE)
Refractory SE is defined as continued seizures despite the administration of an emergent and an urgent agent. The NCS recommends moving to continuous intravenous infusions (cIVIs) with anesthetic agents. This stage requires intensive care monitoring and often endotracheal intubation [107].
- Midazolam Infusion: Loading dose of 0.2 mg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.05–2.0 mg/kg/hr.
- Propofol: Loading dose of 1–2 mg/kg followed by 20–200 mcg/kg/min.
- Pentobarbital: Loading dose of 5–15 mg/kg followed by 0.5–5.0 mg/kg/hr.
Management in Special Populations: Pregnancy
The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the American Epilepsy Society (AES) provided a practice parameter update regarding women with epilepsy (WWE) and pregnancy [108][109]. While SE during pregnancy is a life-threatening event for both the mother and the fetus, the guidelines offer reassurance regarding general obstetrical risks for WWE.
Key findings from the AAN/AES update include:
- Obstetrical Complications: For WWE taking AEDs, there is probably no substantially increased risk (defined as > 2 times the expected rate) of cesarean delivery or [108].
- Labor and Delivery: There is probably no moderately increased risk (defined as > 1.5 times the expected rate) of premature contractions or premature labor and delivery [109].
- Seizure Frequency: While the risk of SE remains a concern, many women remain seizure-free throughout pregnancy. Monitoring AED serum levels is recommended to maintain therapeutic thresholds as physiological changes in pregnancy can alter drug metabolism.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The NCS guidelines emphasize the role of (EEG) in the management of SE, particularly for identifying non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) [107]. Continuous EEG (cEEG) should be initiated within 1 hour of SE onset if seizures continue or if the patient does not return to clinical baseline. This is critical because clinical cessation of motor activity does not always correlate with the cessation of electrographic seizure activity, a phenomenon known as electromechanical dissociation.
| Guideline | Organization | Year | Key Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of SE | Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) | 2012 | Tiered pharmacological approach (Emergent, Urgent, Refractory); emphasis on rapid benzodiazepine use; use of cEEG for monitoring [107]. |
| Practice Parameter Update: Management Issues for WWE | AAN / American Epilepsy Society (AES) | 2009 | SE risk in pregnancy is low; no substantial increase in C-section or late bleeding for WWE on AEDs; no moderate increase in premature labor [108][109]. |
References
- [1]
Winkler MK, Chassidim Y, Lublinsky S et al.. “Impaired neurovascular coupling to ictal epileptic activity and spreading depolarization in a patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage: possible link to blood-brain barrier dysfunction.” Epilepsia (2012). PMID: 23134492 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [2]
Iglesias AH, Balabanov A, Raedy A. “Systemic Complications of Status Epilepticus.” Current neurology and neuroscience reports (2025). PMID: 41068542 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury, Etiology and Triggering Factors - [3]
Alshehri RS, Alrawaili MS, Zawawi BMH et al.. “Pathophysiology of Status Epilepticus Revisited.” International journal of molecular sciences (2025). PMID: 40806628 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [4]
Magro G, Laterza V. “Status epilepticus: Is there a Stage 1 plus?” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 38507275 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [5]
Wasterlain CG, Chen JW. “Mechanistic and pharmacologic aspects of status epilepticus and its treatment with new antiepileptic drugs.” Epilepsia (2008). PMID: 19087119 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [6]
Walker M. “Neuroprotection in epilepsy.” Epilepsia (2007). PMID: 18330004 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [7]
Ohe Y, Hayashi T, Deguchi I et al.. “A case of nonconvulsive status epilepticus with a reversible contralateral cerebellar lesion: temporal changes in magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography finding.” Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association (2013). PMID: 23910513 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [8]
Specchio N, Auvin S. “To what extent does status epilepticus contribute to brain damage in the developmental and epileptic Encephalopathies.” Epilepsy & behavior : E&B (2025). PMID: 39883989 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [9]
Niquet J, Lumley L, Baldwin R et al.. “Early polytherapy for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus.” Epilepsy & behavior : E&B (2019). PMID: 31636007 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [10]
Scott RC. “What are the effects of prolonged seizures in the brain?” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2014). PMID: 25323416 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [11]
Engrand N, Crespel A. “[Pathophysiologic basis of status epilepticus].” Revue neurologique (2009). PMID: 19243800 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [12]
De Luca P, Mele M, Tanqueiro S et al.. “Synaptic accumulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors mediates the effects of BDNF-TrkB signalling on synaptic plasticity and in hyperexcitability during status epilepticus.” Journal of biomedical science (2025). PMID: 40890771 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [13]
Abbasova K, Kubová H, Mareš P. “Does status epilepticus modify the effect of ifenprodil on cortical epileptic afterdischarges in immature rats?” Pharmacological reports : PR (2018). PMID: 29355816 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [14]
Engel T, Martinez-Villarreal J, Henke C et al.. “Spatiotemporal progression of ubiquitin-proteasome system inhibition after status epilepticus suggests protective adaptation against hippocampal injury.” Molecular neurodegeneration (2017). PMID: 28235423 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [15]
Shao H, Yang Y, Qi AP et al.. “Gastrodin Reduces the Severity of Status Epilepticus in the Rat Pilocarpine Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy by Inhibiting Nav1.6 Sodium Currents.” Neurochemical research (2017). PMID: 27743286 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [16]
Hocker S, Nagarajan E, Rabinstein AA et al.. “Progressive Brain Atrophy in Super-refractory Status Epilepticus.” JAMA neurology (2016). PMID: 27533350 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [17]
Wasterlain CG, Naylor DE, Liu H et al.. “Trafficking of NMDA receptors during status epilepticus: therapeutic implications.” Epilepsia (2013). PMID: 24001081 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [18]
Engel T, Gomez-Villafuertes R, Tanaka K et al.. “Seizure suppression and neuroprotection by targeting the purinergic P2X7 receptor during status epilepticus in mice.” FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (2012). PMID: 22198387 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [19]
Engel T, Tanaka K, Jimenez-Mateos EM et al.. “Loss of p53 results in protracted electrographic seizures and development of an aggravated epileptic phenotype following status epilepticus.” Cell death & disease (2010). PMID: 21368852 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [20]
Avchalumov Y, Kirschstein T, Köhling R. “Altered physiology and pharmacology in the corticostriatal system in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy.” Epilepsia (2011). PMID: 21070218 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [21]
Peng W, Lu L, Yin J et al.. “Factors associated with long-term outcomes in people with new onset refractory epilepticus: A single-center cohort study.” Epilepsia (2026). PMID: 41277767 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [22]
Lopez-Espejo M, Skorin I, Mesa T et al.. “Three-year incidence and acute setting predictors of epilepsy after neonatal and childhood arterial ischaemic stroke: a disease-based cohort study.” European journal of pediatrics (2024). PMID: 38170290 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [23]
Wang X, Wang YY, Gao Q et al.. “Development and validation of a nomogram to provide individualized predictions of functional outcomes in patients with convulsive status epilepticus at 3 months: The modified END-IT tool.” CNS neuroscience & therapeutics (2023). PMID: 37334755 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Recognition and Triage - [24]
Lee S, Kim SH, Kim HD et al.. “Identification of etiologies according to baseline clinical features of pediatric new-onset refractory status epilepticus in single center retrospective study.” Seizure (2024). PMID: 38908141 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [25]
Mikdashi J, Krumholz A. “Long-term outcome of status epilepticus-related to systemic lupus erythematosus: An observational study and a systematic review.” Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism (2023). PMID: 37595509 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [26]
Tabaee Damavandi P, Bosque-Varela P, Santos HBH et al.. “Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in status epilepticus: A systematic review of the literature.” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2026). PMID: 41483388 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [27]
Romozzi M, Vollono C, Calabresi P et al.. “Epilepsia Partialis Continua as a manifestation of aquaporin-4 autoimmunity.” Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) (2024). PMID: 39077880 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [28]
Cabreira V, Ferreira D, Melo C et al.. “Child Neurology: Anti-Hu Encephalitis in an Adolescent With a Mediastinal Seminoma.” Neurology (2023). PMID: 37527936 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [29]
Gaillard JR, Whitt Z, Selwa LM et al.. “Pearls & Oy-sters: Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Neurologic Patient Leads to Diagnosis With Treatment Implications.” Neurology (2023). PMID: 37460236 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [30]
Marini C, Rosati A, Fusco L et al.. “Genetic Etiologies of Epilepsies With Status Epilepticus: Insights From the Italian Pediatric Status Epilepticus Group Cohort.” Neurology (2026). PMID: 41915870 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [31]
Damiano M, Lambrecq V, Nguyen-Michel VH et al.. “EEG, clinical, and MRI features of status epilepticus associated with mitochondrial diseases.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41729327 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [32]
Jayalakshmi S, Pachipala S, Patil A et al.. “Clinical characteristics, etiology and outcome of new onset refractory status epilepticus in adults.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2026). PMID: 41498863 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [33]
Lattanzi S, Matricardi S, Vogrig A et al.. “Predicting epilepsy after new onset refractory status epilepticus due to autoimmune encephalitis: The DAME score.” Epilepsia (2026). PMID: 41467927 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [34]
Pelletier J, Merriman W, Koyfman A et al.. “Benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus: A narrative review.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2026). PMID: 40974752 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Recognition and Triage, Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [35]
Kilmer J, Ransley G, Murphy E et al.. “The Role of Metabolic Testing in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Adult NORSE: A Retrospective, Single-Centre Study.” European journal of neurology (2025). PMID: 40470573 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [36]
Steriade C, Thomas SC, Xu F et al.. “Patients with status epilepticus and new-onset refractory status epilepticus display drastically altered fecal microbiomes compared to chronic epilepsy patients.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 40387216 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [37]
Ferreira JHF, Gomes AM, Zetehaku AC et al.. “Performance of cryptogenic new onset refractory status epilepticus score in a Brazilian cohort after testing for antineuronal antibodies with tissue-based and cell-based assays.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 40318023 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [38]
Halawani LM, Myers KA. “Comparative analysis of new-onset refractory status epilepticus in adult and pediatric patients: immunotherapy timing and functional outcomes.” Journal of neurology (2025). PMID: 40251332 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [39]
Ferhat L, Soussi R, Masse M et al.. “A peptide-neurotensin conjugate that crosses the blood-brain barrier induces pharmacological hypothermia associated with anticonvulsant, neuroprotective, and anti-inflammatory properties following status epilepticus in mice.” eLife (2025). PMID: 40152901 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [40]
Vignatelli L, Tontini V, Meletti S et al.. “Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 38606469 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Recognition and Triage - [41]
Simma L, Kammerl A, Ramantani G. “Point-of-care EEG in the pediatric emergency department: a systematic review.” European journal of pediatrics (2025). PMID: 40053132 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Recognition and Triage, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [42]
Limotai C, Jirasakuldej S, Wongwiangiunt S et al.. “Efficacy of delivery of care with Tele-continuous EEG in critically ill patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Tele-cRCT study) study.” Critical care (London, England) (2025). PMID: 39773282 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Recognition and Triage, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [43]
Rubinos C. “Emergent Management of Status Epilepticus.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) (2024). PMID: 38830068 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Recognition and Triage, Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [44]
Shen JY, Saffari SE, Yong L et al.. “Evaluation of prognostic scores for status epilepticus in the neurology ICU: A retrospective study.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2024). PMID: 38490090 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Recognition and Triage - [45]
Gélisse P, Crespel A. “Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in patients under intensive care: Should we view epilepsy as a sleep disorder?” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 39821147 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [46]
Gélisse P, Crespel A. “When patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease are misdiagnosed as having nonconvulsive status epilepticus.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 39754446 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [47]
O'Kula SS, Hill CE. “Improving Quality of Care for Status Epilepticus: Putting Protocols into Practice.” Current neurology and neuroscience reports (2024). PMID: 38995482 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [48]
Gélisse P, Tatum WO, Crespel A et al.. “Stimulus-induced arousal with transient electroencephalographic improvement distinguishes nonictal from ictal generalized periodic discharges.” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 38624097 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [49]
Green A, Wegman ME, Ney JP. “Economic review of point-of-care EEG.” Journal of medical economics (2024). PMID: 38014443 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [50]
Davey Z, Gupta PB, Li DR et al.. “Rapid Response EEG: Current State and Future Directions.” Current neurology and neuroscience reports (2022). PMID: 36434488 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [51]
De Stefano P, Kaplan PW, Quintard H et al.. “Nonconvulsive status epilepticus following cardiac arrest: overlooked, untreated and misjudged.” Journal of neurology (2023). PMID: 36076090 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [52]
Alkhachroum A, Appavu B, Egawa S et al.. “Electroencephalogram in the intensive care unit: a focused look at acute brain injury.” Intensive care medicine (2022). PMID: 35997792 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [53]
Rosati A, Bartolotta P, Marini C et al.. “Optimizing pediatric status epilepticus management: The role of early midazolam infusion and adherence to clinical practice guidelines.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 40377450 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [54]
Chiriboga N, Spentzas T, Abu-Sawwa R. “A systematic review and meta-analysis of ketamine in pediatric status epilepticus.” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 38881333 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [55]
Yan M, Sun T, Liu J et al.. “The efficacy and safety of ketamine in the treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review.” Journal of neurology (2024). PMID: 38782798 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [56]
Au YK, Kananeh MF, Rahangdale R et al.. “Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus With Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs: A Systematic Review.” JAMA neurology (2024). PMID: 38466294 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [57]
Cornwall CD, Piilgaard H, Engedal TS et al.. “Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial.” Critical care explorations (2025). PMID: 40953286 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [58]
Vossler DG. “First Seizures, Acute Repetitive Seizures, and Status Epilepticus.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) (2025). PMID: 39899098 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [59]
El-Haggar SM, Hegazy SK, Mustafa W et al.. “Possible immuno-modulatory effects of tocilizumab in patients with refractory status epilepticus.” European review for medical and pharmacological sciences (2023). PMID: 36876691 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [60]
Chiu WT, Campozano V, Schiefecker A et al.. “Management of Refractory Status Epilepticus: An International Cohort Study (MORSE CODe) Analysis of Patients Managed in the ICU.” Neurology (2022). PMID: 35918156 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [61]
Daniels ZS, Srdanovic N, Rychlik K et al.. “High-Dose Midazolam for Pediatric Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.” Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies (2022). PMID: 35894600 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [62]
Aboul-Fotouh S, Habib MZ, Magdy SM et al.. “Tranexamic acid-associated fatal status epilepticus in a paediatric non-cardiac surgery: A case report and literature review.” British journal of clinical pharmacology (2022). PMID: 35244235 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [63]
Hu Y, Peng X, Wang X. “Therapeutic approaches for super-refractory status epilepticus: an update of the literature.” Expert review of neurotherapeutics (2025). PMID: 40583044 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [64]
Kapur J. “Strategies to innovate emergency care of status epilepticus.” Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics (2025). PMID: 39701892 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [65]
Finney JD, Schuler PD, Rudloff JR et al.. “Evaluation of the Use of Ketamine in Prehospital Seizure Management: A Retrospective Review of the ESO Database.” Prehospital emergency care (2025). PMID: 39058382 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [66]
Rossetti AO, Claassen J, Gaspard N. “Status epilepticus in the ICU.” Intensive care medicine (2024). PMID: 38117319 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [67]
Buratti S, Giacheri E, Palmieri A et al.. “Ketamine as advanced second-line treatment in benzodiazepine-refractory convulsive status epilepticus in children.” Epilepsia (2023). PMID: 36792542 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [68]
Roberti R, Rocca M, Iannone LF et al.. “Status epilepticus in pregnancy: a literature review and a protocol proposal.” Expert review of neurotherapeutics (2022). PMID: 35317697 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [69]
Mastroianni G, Iannone LF, Roberti R et al.. “Management of status epilepticus in patients with liver or kidney disease: a narrative review.” Expert review of neurotherapeutics (2021). PMID: 33297776 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [70]
Machado RA, Patel J, Elsayed MS. “The role of ketamine-induced beta activity in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Is the EEG useful to determine responder's rate? A retrospective study.” Epilepsy & behavior : E&B (2022). PMID: 34974373 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [71]
Chakravartty A, Gilmore EJ, Hirsch LJ et al.. “Clinical Reasoning: A 40-Year-Old Man With Refractory Status Epilepticus After Small Bowel Resection for Volvulus.” Neurology (2025). PMID: 40986431 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [72]
Finney JD, Kowalski M, Wang J et al.. “Prehospital Ketamine Administration in Benzodiazepine Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Case Series Review.” Prehospital emergency care (2026). PMID: 40193549 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [73]
Syed MJ, Zutshi D, Muzammil SM et al.. “Ketamine to Prevent Endotracheal Intubation in Adults with Refractory Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Case Series.” Neurocritical care (2024). PMID: 37783825 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [74]
Kimmons LA, Alzayadneh M, Metter EJ et al.. “Safety and Efficacy of Ketamine Without Intubation in the Management of Refractory Seizures: A Case Series.” Neurocritical care (2024). PMID: 37610640 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [75]
Perlmutter M, Price M, Kothari K et al.. “Prehospital Treatment of Benzodiazepine-Resistant Pediatric Status Epilepticus with Parenteral Ketamine: A Case Series.” Prehospital emergency care (2023). PMID: 37276174 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [76]
Pirgit ML, Beniczky S. “EEG and semiology in the elderly: A systematic review.” Seizure (2025). PMID: 39294074 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [77]
Peña-Ceballos J, Moloney PB, Kinney MO et al.. “How are we doing? The electroclinical diagnosis of status epilepticus in idiopathic generalized epilepsy in a tertiary referral center: A case series and scoping review of 40 years of literature.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2026). PMID: 41807915 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [78]
Hirsch LJ, Gopaul MT. “EEG in the critical care setting.” Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (2026). PMID: 41297117 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [79]
Spagnoli C, Ramantani G, Sharpe C et al.. “Rethinking the definition of neonatal status epilepticus.” European journal of pediatrics (2025). PMID: 40906263 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [80]
De Stefano P. “Reconsidering the management and prognostic implications of myoclonus and status epilepticus post-cardiac arrest.” Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (2026). PMID: 40436658 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [81]
Nagarajan L, Ghosh S. “Status epilepticus in the neonate.” BMJ paediatrics open (2025). PMID: 40121015 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [82]
Lévi-Strauss J, Marois C, Worbe Y et al.. “Utility and Value of Movement Recording with Combined EEG-EMG Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit.” Neurocritical care (2025). PMID: 40032771 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [83]
Haider HA. “Initial Management of Acute Seizures and Status Epilepticus.” The Medical clinics of North America (2025). PMID: 39893025 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [84]
Gettings JV, Mohammad Alizadeh Chafjiri F, Patel AA et al.. “Diagnosis and management of status epilepticus: improving the status quo.” The Lancet. Neurology (2025). PMID: 39637874 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [85]
Chiarello D, Perrone A, Ricci E et al.. “The Role of Electroencephalography in Children with Acute Altered Mental Status of Unknown Etiology: A Prospective Study.” Neuropediatrics (2024). PMID: 39106957 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [86]
Gomutbutra P, Krongsut S, Lott J. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Clinical Impact and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in EEG for the Early Detection of Nonconvulsive Seizures.” The Neurodiagnostic journal (2025). PMID: 40679314 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [87]
Neves Briard J, Duquette A, Cayrol R et al.. “Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Patient With Aducanumab-Induced Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities.” Neurology (2024). PMID: 39121445 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [88]
Siegel CR, Khoujah D. “Status Epilepticus.” Emergency medicine clinics of North America (2026). PMID: 41260851 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup, Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [89]
Leitinger M, Bosque-Varela P, Kuchukhidze G et al.. “Seminars in epileptology: How to diagnose status epilepticus in adults and children.” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2025). PMID: 40528536 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [90]
Ford H, Seneviratne U. “The electroencephalogram in the diagnosis and classification of status epilepticus: a practical guide.” Practical neurology (2025). PMID: 39890455 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [91]
Zehtabchi S, Beall J, Silbergleit R et al.. “Chronological Sequence of Convulsive Status Epilepticus Treatment Steps in a Real-Life Scenario for Patients Enrolled in a Large Multicenter Trial.” Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (2026). PMID: 41854499 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [92]
Wang P, Lu L, Gao H et al.. “Will Memantine Exacerbate Seizures in People With Epilepsy? A Prospective Cohort Study.” Annals of clinical and translational neurology (2026). PMID: 41288262 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [93]
Pichardo-Rojas D, Camarena-Rubio KJ, Gómez-Oropeza I et al.. “Optimizing vagus nerve stimulation for Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A case series and systematic review.” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2025). PMID: 40539748 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [94]
Yoo JY, Bloomfield J, Eka O et al.. “Vagus nerve stimulation as an adjunctive therapy for super-refractory status epilepticus including NORSE: a retrospective cohort study.” Epilepsy & behavior : E&B (2026). PMID: 41875755 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [95]
Manai H, Kharraz T, Zouari H et al.. “Prognostic performance of STESS and qSOFA scores in pre-hospital status epilepticus: A prospective cohort study.” Seizure (2026). PMID: 41679101 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [96]
Nakamura Y, Aso S, Yasunaga H et al.. “In-hospital outcomes of lacosamide versus levetiracetam for early adjunctive treatment of status epilepticus: A Nationwide Japanese retrospective cohort study.” Epilepsia open (2026). PMID: 41222404 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [97]
Woodward MR, Armahizer MJ, Wang TI et al.. “Status epilepticus in older adults: A critical review.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 40365943 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [98]
Alghadeer SM, Alsuwayegh A, AlMuqati H et al.. “Underdosing and response to pharmacotherapy in patients with status epilepticus: a retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.” Annals of medicine (2025). PMID: 40317249 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [99]
Al Wahaibi A, Kazazian K, Gopaul M et al.. “The spectrum of cognitive outcomes following admission to hospital for refractory status epilepticus (RSE): A scoping review.” Seizure (2025). PMID: 40972237 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [100]
Spuler K, Kaukas L, Tawfik S et al.. “Fatal Status Epilepticus After Elective Revision Cranioplasty: Case Report and Literature Review.” The American journal of case reports (2026). PMID: 41719224 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [101]
Lanzone J, Bellini A, Cursi M et al.. “Structured EEG report complements the prognostic stratification of status epilepticus.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41986752 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [102]
Schlabitz S, Doerrfuss JI, Hebel JM et al.. “Neurofilament light-chain (Nf-L) as a biomarker in seizures and status epilepticus of varying duration.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41927849 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [103]
Orav K, Bosque-Varela P, Lauth W et al.. “Peri-Ictal MRI Abnormalities and Risk of Unprovoked Seizures After De Novo Status Epilepticus.” Neurology (2026). PMID: 41838966 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [104]
Sala Padró J, Fonseca E, Quintana M et al.. “Impact of Treatment Delays in Epileptic Seizures: Time to Hospital Care and to EEG Increases Risk of Status Epilepticus and ICU Admission in Epileptic Seizures.” European journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41778530 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [105]
De Stefano P, Baumann SM, Fisch U et al.. “Impact of Etiology on Mortality and Recovery in Patients With Status Epilepticus.” Neurology (2026). PMID: 41637681 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [106]
Krishnamurthy PV, Philibert-Rosas S, Rivkin M et al.. “Duration of EEG monitoring needed to ensure a low risk of seizure recurrence in hospitalized patients.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41507611 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [107]
Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J et al.. “Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus.” Neurocritical care (2012). PMID: 22528274 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [108]
Harden CL, Hopp J, Ting TY et al.. “Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society.” Neurology (2009). PMID: 19398682 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [109]
Harden CL, Hopp J, Ting TY et al.. “Management issues for women with epilepsy-Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): I. Obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.” Epilepsia (2009). PMID: 19496807 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [110]
Engel T, Murphy BM, Hatazaki S et al.. “Reduced hippocampal damage and epileptic seizures after status epilepticus in mice lacking proapoptotic Puma.” FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (2009). PMID: 19890018 ↗
L5Cited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [111]
Jung KH, Chu K, Lee ST et al.. “Region-specific plasticity in the epileptic rat brain: a hippocampal and extrahippocampal analysis.” Epilepsia (2008). PMID: 19054393 ↗
L5Cited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [112]
Coleman BR, Ratcliffe RH, Oguntayo SA et al.. “[+]-Huperzine A treatment protects against N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced seizure/status epilepticus in rats.” Chemico-biological interactions (2008). PMID: 18588864 ↗
L5Cited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [113]
Chu K, Jung KH, Lee ST et al.. “Erythropoietin reduces epileptogenic processes following status epilepticus.” Epilepsia (2008). PMID: 18479396 ↗
L5Cited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [114]
Huang P, Yang F, Dong R et al.. “Cerebrospinal fluid and serum cytokine profiles in severe viral encephalitis with implications for refractory status epilepticus: a retrospective observational study.” Frontiers in immunology (2025). PMID: 39995678 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [115]
Bandi R, Jain V, Lingappa L et al.. “Challenges in Management of Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome: Real-World Experience From a Large Cohort of Pediatric Patients.” Pediatric neurology (2025). PMID: 39908710 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [116]
Farooqi AM, Sawalha A, Omidi SJ et al.. “Seizures and status epilepticus in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.” Journal of neurology (2025). PMID: 39777556 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [117]
Gururangan K, Kozak R, Dorriz PJ. “Time is brain: detection of nonconvulsive seizures and status epilepticus during acute stroke evaluation using point-of-care electroencephalography.” Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association (2024). PMID: 39549970 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [118]
Jang Y, Hong SE, Ahn SH et al.. “Polygenic Landscape of Cryptogenic New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Whole-Genome Sequencing Study.” Annals of neurology (2024). PMID: 39440581 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [119]
Hikmat O, Naess K, Engvall M et al.. “Status epilepticus in POLG disease: a large multinational study.” Journal of neurology (2024). PMID: 38822839 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [120]
Kuki I, Inoue T, Fukuoka M et al.. “Efficacy and safety of ketamine for pediatric and adolescent super-refractory status epilepticus and the effect of cerebral inflammatory conditions.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2024). PMID: 38461760 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [121]
Zhang Y, Niu J, Wang J et al.. “Neurological function and drug-refractory epilepsy in Sturge-Weber syndrome children: a retrospective analysis.” European journal of pediatrics (2024). PMID: 38305888 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [122]
Furlanis G, Ricci E, Ajčević M et al.. “Early point-of-care EEG in acute stroke: Prevalence and predictive factors of early post-stroke status epilepticus (e-PSSE).” Seizure (2025). PMID: 41075376 ↗
L3bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [123]
Saianda Duarte M, Fonseca V, Correia JN et al.. “Myoclonic status epilepticus in the elderly.” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2025). PMID: 41035408 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [124]
Richard C, Schriger D, Weingrow D. “Rapid Electroencephalography and Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Management of Nonconvulsive Seizures.” Annals of emergency medicine (2024). PMID: 38888533 ↗
L4Cited in: Recognition and Triage - [125]
O'Keefe M, Feih J, Feldman R et al.. “Optimization of benzodiazepine use for status epilepticus in the emergency department.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2026). PMID: 42013624 ↗
L4Cited in: Recognition and Triage - [126]
Inui T, Uneoka S, Ikeda M et al.. “Electrographic Seizures Following Status Epilepticus With Fever in Critically Ill Children.” Pediatric neurology (2026). PMID: 41950775 ↗
L4Cited in: Recognition and Triage - [127]
Wood AJ, Rosendale N, Crowe R et al.. “Social Vulnerability and Out-of-Hospital Identification of Neurologic Emergencies.” Annals of emergency medicine (2026). PMID: 41632058 ↗
L3bCited in: Recognition and Triage - [128]
Simma L, Moser K, Seiler M et al.. “Rapid diagnosis of pediatric nonconvulsive status epilepticus using point-of-care EEG.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2025). PMID: 41075724 ↗
L4Cited in: Recognition and Triage - [129]
Simma L, Moser K, Seiler M et al.. “Implementation of point-of-care EEG in a pediatric emergency department: a quality improvement study.” European journal of pediatrics (2025). PMID: 41015957 ↗
L3bCited in: Recognition and Triage - [130]
Sheikh ZB, Dhakar MB, Fong MWK et al.. “Accuracy of a Rapid-Response EEG's Automated Seizure-Burden Estimator: AccuRASE Study.” Neurology (2024). PMID: 39724534 ↗
L3bCited in: Recognition and Triage - [131]
Fetta A, Bergonzini L, Dondi A et al.. “Community-onset pediatric status epilepticus: Barriers to care and outcomes in a real-world setting.” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 39704293 ↗
L3bCited in: Recognition and Triage - [132]
Ulvin LB, Nilsen KB, Taubøll E et al.. “Sensitivity and specificity of the Salzburg EEG criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus.” Annals of clinical and translational neurology (2024). PMID: 39186316 ↗
L4Cited in: Recognition and Triage - [133]
Bellini A, Curti DG, Cursi M et al.. “Predictors of seizure detection and EEG clinical impact in an italian tertiary emergency department.” Journal of neurology (2024). PMID: 38816481 ↗
L3bCited in: Recognition and Triage - [134]
Donnan AM, Schneider AL, Russ-Hall S et al.. “Rates of Status Epilepticus and Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy in People With Genetic Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies.” Neurology (2023). PMID: 36750385 ↗
L3bCited in: Recognition and Triage - [135]
Koker A, Donbaloğlu F, Çebişli E et al.. “Utility and Prognostic Implications of Continuous Electroencephalogram Monitoring in Pediatric Intensive Care.” Neuropediatrics (2025). PMID: 41407293 ↗
L4Cited in: Recognition and Triage - [136]
Damien C, Leitinger M, Kellinghaus C et al.. “Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European academy of neurology registry on adult refractory status epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE).” BMC neurology (2024). PMID: 38178048 ↗
L2bCited in: Recognition and Triage - [137]
Kermorvant H, Di Caprio KL, Damien C et al.. “Prolonged postictal deficit: Uncomplicated Todd's palsy or nonconvulsive status epilepticus?” Epilepsia (2026). PMID: 41661101 ↗
L3bCited in: Recognition and Triage - [138]
Repplinger S, Chelly J, Lesieur O et al.. “Diagnostic Yield and Therapeutic Impact of Etiologic Investigations After Status Epilepticus: Insights From the ICTAL Registry.” Neurology (2026). PMID: 42766827 ↗
L2bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [139]
Dong Y, Zhu B, Zhang W et al.. “Associations of Acute Seizure Patterns With Functional Outcomes, Mortality, and Remote Seizures After Pediatric Ischemic Stroke.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 42714418 ↗
L2bCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [140]
Gélisse P, Lefevre PH, Boitet R et al.. “Nonconvulsive status epilepticus featuring ictal paresis mimicking a stroke.” Seizure (2026). PMID: 42772079 ↗
L4Cited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [141]
McInnis RP, Wood AJ, Shay CL et al.. “Dispatch Decisions and Emergency Medical Services Response in the Prehospital Care of Status Epilepticus.” The western journal of emergency medicine (2025). PMID: 40562000 ↗
L3bCited in: Recognition and Triage