Skip to main content
WoMWeb of Medicine
SearchGraphHistory
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation›Condition·Updated Jul 11, 2026·v1

Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

SCI rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary, ICF-based process that integrates neurological classification, functional assessment, and tailored therapy to maximize recovery and prevent complications. Key clinical tools: ASIA exam, FIM transfer score for pressure injury risk, PHQ-9 for depression, and SCIM III for functional outcomes. Avoid gait training in non-ambulatory patients. Early neuromodulation (FES, tSCS, AIH) and task-specific training are essential.

Moderate Evidence128 references·10,012 words·41 min read·v1
spinal cord injuryrehabilitationICFASIApressure injuryneurogenic bladderfunctional electrical stimulationgait trainingphysiatry

Quick Reference

RxDrug of choicePregabalin 150-300 mg/day (or gabapentin) for neuropathic pain; NFX88 2.1 g/day as add-on for refractory pain. Baclofen up to 80 mg/day for spasticity.
AltAlternativesTizanidine 36 mg/day, intrathecal baclofen, botulinum toxin for spasticity. Mirabegron 50 mg/day for neurogenic detrusor overactivity.
⊘AvoidNon-dihydropyridine CCBs (diltiazem, verapamil) worsen autonomic dysreflexia. Lithium for neuroregeneration is ineffective. Avoid NSAIDs for neuropathic pain.
DxTest of choiceISNCSCI exam (ASIA) for neurological classification. FIM motor subscale (bed/chair transfer score) for pressure injury risk. PHQ-9 for depression screening.
ScKey scoreAIS grade (A-E) for severity; FIM bed/chair transfer score <4 for pressure injury risk; SCIM III total score <40 predicts institutional discharge; PHQ-9 ≥11 for depression.
→When to referRefer to physiatry for rehabilitation management; to urology for neurogenic bladder; to wound care for pressure ulcers; to vocational rehabilitation for return to work; to psychology for adjustment and depression.
SCI rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary, ICF-based process that prioritizes function and participation. Key interventions: early mobility, pressure injury prevention (FIM transfer score-driven), task-specific training, neuromodulation (FES, tSCS, AIH), and comprehensive complication surveillance. Avoid gait training in non-ambulatory patients. Use PHQ-9 to rule out depression and FIM transfer score to predict pressure injury.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary process grounded in the WHO ICF biopsychosocial model, aiming to restore function and participation after SCI. The cornerstone is the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) for neurological classification, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) for functional assessment, and a multidisciplinary team to deliver tailored therapy, prevent complications, and coordinate community reintegration. Recovery is most rapid in the first 6 months, with outcomes predicted by AIS grade, age, and admission functional scores. The single best predictor of pressure injury during rehabilitation is the admission FIM bed/chair transfer score <4, while PHQ-9 ≥11 rules out depression with high sensitivity.

Overview and Recommendations

Background

  • •Spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation is a life-changing, interdisciplinary process that applies the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model to restore function and participation. It predominantly affects young men (mean age 44 years, 76% male), with a global incidence that is rising as survival improves. The paradigm shift from a disease-cure approach to the biopsychosocial model has redefined rehabilitation goals: impairment, activity limitation, and participation restriction are addressed simultaneously. The ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) classifies completeness from A (complete) to E (normal), and together with the neurological level of injury (cervical, thoracic, lumbar) it is the primary predictor of functional recovery. Rehabilitation is organized into overlapping phases: acute (stabilization, prevention of secondary complications), inpatient rehabilitation (intensive, goal-oriented therapy), and community reintegration (transition to home and work).
  • •The ICF framework distinguishes three domains: impairment (loss of body function or structure, e.g., absent voluntary movement below C5), activity limitation (difficulty executing a task, e.g., inability to transfer from bed to chair), and participation restriction (problems in life situations, e.g., unemployment). The goal of rehabilitation is to mitigate each level through targeted interventions, from neuromodulation to aquatic therapy to supported employment. Outcome measures such as the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) are grounded in this framework to ensure person-centered care.
  • •Neuroplasticity is the substrate for recovery. After SCI, cortical motor maps remain active: in patients with complete injuries, functional near-infrared spectroscopy shows preserved foot motor cortex activity during attempted foot movements. Moreover, multisensory illusions (e.g., rubber hand illusion) can elicit tactile sensations in insentient fingers even years after deafferentation, demonstrating that the brain can update its body representation. Spinal central pattern generators and spared sublesional circuits can be modulated by afferent input, which rehabilitation exploits through activity-dependent stimulation, task-specific training, and neuromodulation.
  • •The landmark trial by Esclarín-Ruz et al. (2014) established robotic locomotor training plus overground therapy as superior to conventional overground training for walking recovery after incomplete SCI, catalyzing the adoption of technology-assisted therapy. The field has also seen advances in pharmacological neuromodulation (e.g., acute intermittent hypoxia improving hand dexterity) and neuromodulation devices (transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, functional electrical stimulation). However, no single intervention has reversed the fundamental neurological deficit; the greatest gains have come from managing complications, setting realistic expectations, and integrating evidence-based therapies into a coordinated care plan.

Evaluation

  • •Suspect SCI in any patient with acute motor and sensory loss after trauma, or with progressive weakness, pain, and autonomic dysfunction in non-traumatic causes (tumors, infections, demyelination). The initial clinical presentation depends on level and completeness: complete lesions cause flaccid paralysis during spinal shock (1-6 weeks), evolving to spasticity, hyperreflexia, and upper motor neuron signs. Incomplete lesions produce variable patterns, central cord syndrome (upper limb > lower limb weakness), Brown-Sequard syndrome (ipsilateral motor loss, contralateral pain/temperature loss), anterior cord syndrome (loss of motor and pain/temperature, preserved proprioception).
  • •Examine systematically using the ASIA International Standards (ISNCSCI) within 72 hours of injury and again at rehabilitation admission. This yields the neurological level of injury (NLI) and AIS grade (A-E). The motor examination tests 10 key myotomes bilaterally (total motor score 0-100). The sensory examination maps light touch and pinprick to 28 dermatomes. Reflexes: bulbocavernosus (S2-S4) and anal wink (S5) are early indicators of spinal shock resolution; presence within 24 hours predicts better prognosis. Lower extremity reflexes become hyperactive after shock resolves. Autonomic examination: heart rate, blood pressure, sweating patterns; orthostatic hypotension is common in lesions above T6.
  • •Order functional assessment within 72 hours of admission. The FIM motor subscale is the most widely used measure of disability, with the bed/chair transfer score (1-7) being a particularly powerful predictor. A score of 1 (total assist) identifies patients at high risk for developing pressure injuries during inpatient rehabilitation (sensitivity 97%, AUC 0.74). The SCIM III is a condition-specific alternative assessing self-care, respiration/sphincter management, and mobility. For cervical SCI, administer the Capabilities of the Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) within 2 weeks; a cutoff of 37 points predicts independence in self-care.
  • •Assess risk factors for secondary complications: pressure injury risk is best predicted by the FIM bed/chair transfer score <4. Use the SCI-PreSORS instrument (recursive partitioning model) which outperforms both the SCIPUS and Braden scales. Screen for depression with the PHQ-9 (cutoff ≥11 gives sensitivity 1.00, specificity 0.84). Assess for sleep-disordered breathing with overnight oximetry or polygraphy. Obtain a fasting lipid panel, glucose, and waist circumference on admission and at discharge to screen for cardiometabolic syndrome, which is present in 39.4% of patients at discharge.
  • •Diagnostic criteria for SCI are based on the ISNCSCI exam. The AIS is the gold standard for grading completeness. Imaging (MRI) is essential to identify the lesion type, edema, hemorrhage, and to rule out ongoing compression. In the acute phase, monitor for autonomic dysreflexia (sudden hypertension, headache, bradycardia in lesions above T6 triggered by noxious stimuli below the level) and respiratory failure (FVC < 15 mL/kg or a drop > 20% from baseline). Also consider deep vein thrombosis (high risk in first 3 months) and pulmonary embolism.
  • •Prognostic factors: AIS grade (A/B worse), NLI (tetraplegia worse than paraplegia), age (≥74 years predicts facility discharge), comorbidity burden (MSCI), pre-existing pressure ulcer (30.2% risk of new ulcer), and coping style (social reliance predicts worse motor FIM). Decision tree analysis using admission data: subtotal SCIM mobility score ≤5, age ≥74 years, and upper extremity motor score (UEMS) <23 predict discharge to a facility (AUC 0.869).

Management

  • •Initiate acute rehabilitation immediately after stabilization. The core team includes physiatrist, physical and occupational therapists, rehabilitation nurses, psychologist, social worker, and therapeutic recreation specialist. Weekly physician-led safety huddles reduce adverse events from 31.2 to 22.9 per month. Begin discharge planning on admission: assess social support, home accessibility, and funding for durable medical equipment.
  • •Implement pressure injury prevention on day 1. Calculate the FIM bed/chair transfer score; if <4 (especially 1 = total assist), trigger enhanced protocols: specialty mattress, repositioning every 2 hours, individualized prevention plan. This is more accurate than any risk scale. Patients admitted with a stage ≥2 pressure ulcer have a 30.2% risk of developing a new ulcer during rehabilitation, mandating intensified surveillance.
  • •Prescribe graded arm ergometry or functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling at least 3-5 sessions per week, titrating intensity to 60-80% of peak heart rate when autonomic function permits. For high cervical injuries (C3 AIS B), consider early integration of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) alongside physical therapy (case-level evidence). Monitor blood pressure closely during mobilization: orthostatic hypotension occurs in 73% of motor complete tetraplegia. Use abdominal binder, compression stockings, and gradual tilt-table progression.
  • •For motor incomplete injuries, gait training is indicated but only if the patient is likely to become a functional ambulator. Avoid gait training in patients who will primarily use a wheelchair, it carries opportunity costs: less transfer and wheeled mobility training, and worse CHART scores at 1 year. Instead, prioritize wheelchair skills training and transfer training. Use robotic locomotor training plus overground therapy (LKOGT) for walking recovery; it improves the 6-minute walk test more than conventional overground training.
  • •For upper limb function in cervical SCI, use task-specific training with high repetition. The CUE-T predicts ADL independence; cutoff values from 13 to 61 points guide therapy. Prescribe at least 3-5 sessions per week of occupational therapy focusing on self-care, computer access, and environmental control. Consider acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH): 15 episodes of 9% oxygen per day for 5 days combined with hand opening practice improves Box and Block Test scores and hand aperture in chronic cervical SCI.
  • •For neuropathic pain, NFX88 2.1 g/day added to pregabalin (150-300 mg/day) provides significant relief without severe adverse effects (phase II trial). Alternative: gabapentin or pregabalin alone. Avoid nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for neuropathic pain. For spasticity, use stretching, oral agents (baclofen up to 80 mg/day, tizanidine up to 36 mg/day), botulinum toxin, or intrathecal baclofen. Animal-assisted therapy (equine) may reduce spasticity but long-term effects are contested.
  • •Manage neurogenic bladder with intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) as first-line if possible. Age >65 years and high-level tetraplegia are negative predictors for ISC; consider suprapubic catheterization. Use antimuscarinics or β3-agonists (e.g., mirabegron) for detrusor overactivity; mirabegron reduces incontinence from 60.3% to 38.1% and maximum detrusor pressure. Perform video-urodynamic surveillance even in asymptomatic patients to detect morphologic changes. Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA is used infrequently in the post-acute phase but is an option.
  • •Screen for depression with PHQ-9 (cutoff ≥11) at admission and during rehabilitation. Provide psychological support and cognitive behavioral therapy as needed. Screen significant others for caregiver burden; ~20% score above the clinical cutoff at admission and discharge. Early identification allows targeted support. For return to work, refer to supported employment (Individual Placement and Support) which achieves 30.8% employment rates vs 2.3% with standard care.
  • •Monitor cardiometabolic risk: fasting lipid panel, glucose, waist circumference at admission and discharge. Initiate dietary counseling and pharmacotherapy (statin if LDL >100 mg/dL or 10-year risk >7.5%) per standard guidelines. By discharge, 64% of patients are overweight and 39.4% have metabolic syndrome. BMI increases significantly in the first year after discharge.
  • •Provide assistive technology (AT) prescription based on person-centered goals. Manual wheelchair seat height should achieve an elbow angle of 100-130° to optimize efficiency. Assess wheelchair skills using validated models; supplement clinical judgment. For tetraplegia, computer-access devices have high abandonment rates (18.4%), so involve the patient in selection. Consider virtual reality platforms for group therapy to improve mood and self-esteem.
  • •Discharge criteria: total SCIM score <40 predicts institutional discharge. Use decision tree: if subtotal mobility score ≤5, age ≥74 years, UEMS <23 → plan for facility placement. Begin home modification planning early. Arrange for a weekend home pass and at least one therapeutic community outing before discharge. Ensure follow-up with a multidisciplinary SCI clinic.
  • •What NOT to do: Do not prescribe gait training for non-ambulatory patients. Do not rely on SCIPUS or Braden Scale for pressure injury risk, use the FIM transfer score. Do not delay discharge planning until the end of rehabilitation. Do not ignore caregiver burden screening. Do not start lithium for neuroregeneration, it has no benefit beyond pain reduction.

Board Review — High Yield

  • •ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), The gold standard for classifying SCI completeness: A (complete) to E (normal). AIS A/B have worse functional prognosis.
  • •FIM bed/chair transfer score <4, The single best predictor of pressure injury during rehabilitation (sensitivity 97%), outperforming SCIPUS and Braden scales.
  • •PHQ-9 cutoff ≥11, Sensitivity 1.00, specificity 0.84 for major depressive disorder in SCI; negative predictive value 1.00, making it an excellent rule-out.
  • •Gait training in wheelchair users, Associated with worse CHART physical independence, mobility, and occupation at 1 year due to opportunity costs (less transfer and wheelchair training).
  • •Acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH), 15 episodes of 9% oxygen/day for 5 days combined with hand opening practice improves Box and Block Test and hand aperture in chronic cervical SCI.
  • •NFX88 2.1 g/day, Phase II trial showed significant neuropathic pain reduction as add-on to pregabalin, without severe adverse effects.
  • •Mirabegron, β3-agonist reduces urinary incontinence (60.3% to 38.1%) and maximum detrusor pressure in neurogenic bladder, with good tolerability.
  • •Robotic locomotor training (LKOGT), Superior to conventional overground training for 6-minute walk test in incomplete SCI (Esclarín-Ruz et al., 2014).
  • •Decision tree for discharge, Subtotal SCIM mobility ≤5, age ≥74 years, UEMS <23 predicts facility discharge (AUC 0.869).
  • •Cardiometabolic syndrome at discharge, 39.4% of patients meet criteria; overweight/obesity increases from 56% at admission to 75% at 5 years post-discharge.

Deep Dive — Evidence Details

References

  1. [1]

    Esclarín-Ruz A, Alcobendas-Maestro M, Casado-Lopez R et al.. “A comparison of robotic walking therapy and conventional walking therapy in individuals with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions: a randomized controlled trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24393781 ↗

    L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  2. [2]

    Li J, Chen T, Yan X et al.. “The effect of device-based neuromodulation on the motor recovery of patients with spinal cord injury.” Spinal cord (2025). PMID: 41139722 ↗

    L2SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  3. [3]

    Maribo T, Jensen CM, Madsen LS et al.. “Experiences with and perspectives on goal setting in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies.” Spinal cord (2020). PMID: 32424174 ↗

    L5SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  4. [4]

    Tahseen D, Flate H, Osterman H et al.. “Early Application of Cervical and Thoracic Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation During Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation for High Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41592338 ↗

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  5. [5]

    Zbogar D, Eng JJ, Noble JW et al.. “Cardiovascular Stress During Inpatient Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28623144 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
  6. [6]

    Kato C, Uemura O, Sato Y et al.. “Decision Tree Analysis Accurately Predicts Discharge Destination After Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37714507 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  7. [7]

    Zanca JM, Dijkers MP, Hsieh CH et al.. “Group therapy utilization in inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 23527770 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  8. [8]

    Shea C, Slocum C, Goldstein R et al.. “Trauma Indicators in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank and National Spinal Cord Injury Database.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34936887 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  9. [9]

    Dijkers MP, Whiteneck GG, Gassaway J. “CER, PBE, SCIRehab, NIDRR, and other important abbreviations.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 23527774 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  10. [10]

    Horn SD, Smout RJ, DeJong G et al.. “Association of various comorbidity measures with spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcomes.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 23527775 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  11. [11]

    Abdulsalam AJ, Al Jadid MS, Shehab D et al.. “Employment and Social Integration Failures in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Across Arabic-Speaking Countries: A Narrative Review.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42021001 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  12. [12]

    DeJong G, Hsieh CH, Brown P et al.. “Factors associated with pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24879551 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  13. [13]

    Recio AC, Kubrova E, Stiens SA. “Exercise in the Aquatic Environment for Patients With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury and Invasive Appliances: Successful Integration and Therapeutic Interventions.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 31361621 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  14. [14]

    Eriks-Hoogland IE, Brinkhof MW, Al-Khodairy A et al.. “Measuring body structures and body functions from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health perspective: considerations for biomedical parameters in spinal cord injury research.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2011). PMID: 21975677 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
  15. [15]

    Hu Y, Mak JN, Wong YW et al.. “Quality of life of traumatic spinal cord injured patients in Hong Kong.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2008). PMID: 18509577 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
  16. [16]

    Alajam R, Alqahtani AS, Liu W. “Effect of Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training on Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Function in People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.” Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31844387 ↗

    L2SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  17. [17]

    Byrnes M, Beilby J, Ray P et al.. “Patient-focused goal planning process and outcome after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: quantitative and qualitative audit.” Clinical rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 22653375 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
  18. [18]

    Bertels N, Janssen-Potten Y, Delooz E et al.. “A validated framework to guide therapists in arm-hand rehabilitation for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury.” Clinical rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41603584 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  19. [19]

    de Groot S, Bevers GE, Dallmeijer AJ et al.. “Development and validation of prognostic models designed to predict wheelchair skills at discharge from spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Clinical rehabilitation (2009). PMID: 19933243 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  20. [20]

    Wade DT. “Is rehabilitation's unifying expertise its holistic scope and cognitive approach to the patient's problems? An exploration.” Clinical rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41137512 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
  21. [21]

    Appelgren-González JP, Covarrubias-Escudero F, Balbontín-Miranda F et al.. “Hybrid Home-Based FES Protocol for Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Single-Center Observational Cohort Study.” Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42211047 ↗

    L2COHORTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  22. [22]

    Williamson SD, Aaby AO, Ejersbo AO et al.. “Animal-assisted treatment in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a scoping review.” Spinal cord (2026). PMID: 42218314 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  23. [23]

    van Diemen T, Scholten EWM, Langerak NG et al.. “Psychological screening of significant others during spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Spinal cord (2024). PMID: 39191860 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  24. [24]

    Panisset MG, Galea MP, El-Ansary D. “Does early exercise attenuate muscle atrophy or bone loss after spinal cord injury?” Spinal cord (2015). PMID: 26345485 ↗

    L2REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  25. [25]

    Jimbo K, Takahama K, Yoshimura T et al.. “Establishing the predictive validity and determining cutoff values of the capabilities of upper extremity test for predicting activities of daily living independence in cervical spinal cord injury.” Spinal cord (2026). PMID: 42168601 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  26. [26]

    Williamson SD, Aaby AO, Ravn SL. “Psychological outcomes of extended reality interventions in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a systematic scoping review.” Spinal cord (2025). PMID: 39789357 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  27. [27]

    Chen J, Luo X, Zhang Y et al.. “Efficacy of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with resistance training on motor function in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury: protocol for an open-label, single-blind randomized controlled trial.” Trials (2026). PMID: 42057082 ↗

    L5TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
  28. [28]

    Cotner BA, Ottomanelli L, Keleher V et al.. “Scoping review of resources for integrating evidence-based supported employment into spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29485303 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  29. [29]

    Giurleo C, McIntyre A, Kras-Dupuis A et al.. “Addressing the elephant in the room: integrating sexual health practice in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 33305969 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  30. [30]

    Kusumoto H, Alvarez IM, Fukunaga D et al.. “Immediate supraphysiologic load bearing of the spine appears safe after gunshot-related spinal cord injury: a case-control study.” Spinal cord (2025). PMID: 41094116 ↗

    L3CASE_CONTROLCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  31. [31]

    Hitzig SL, Jeyathevan G, Farahani F et al.. “Development of community participation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.” The journal of spinal cord medicine (2021). PMID: 34779731 ↗

    L5SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  32. [32]

    de Groot S, Dallmeijer AJ, Post MW et al.. “Demographics of the Dutch multicenter prospective cohort study 'Restoration of mobility in spinal cord injury rehabilitation'.” Spinal cord (2006). PMID: 16462822 ↗

    L2COHORTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
  33. [33]

    Belliveau T, Jette AM, Seetharama S et al.. “Developing Artificial Neural Network Models to Predict Functioning One Year After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27208647 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
  34. [34]

    Dijkers MP, Zanca JM. “Factors complicating treatment sessions in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: nature, frequency, and consequences.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 23465468 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  35. [35]

    Kennedy P, Lude P, Elfström ML et al.. “Psychological contributions to functional independence: a longitudinal investigation of spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2011). PMID: 21440705 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  36. [36]

    van Langeveld SA, Post MW, van Asbeck FW et al.. “Feasibility of a classification system for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports therapy interventions for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2008). PMID: 18674980 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
  37. [37]

    Scalise M, Bora TS, Zancanella C et al.. “Virtual Reality as a Therapeutic Tool in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Systematic Review.” Journal of clinical medicine (2024). PMID: 39336916 ↗

    L5SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
  38. [38]

    Wirz M, Zörner B, Rupp R et al.. “Outcome after incomplete spinal cord injury: central cord versus Brown-Sequard syndrome.” Spinal cord (2009). PMID: 19901956 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  39. [39]

    Vo AK, Geisler F, Grassner L et al.. “Serum albumin as a predictor of neurological recovery after spinal cord injury: a replication study.” Spinal cord (2020). PMID: 32839519 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
  40. [40]

    Heinemann AW, Steeves JD, Boninger M et al.. “State of the Science in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2011: informing a new research agenda.” Spinal cord (2012). PMID: 22430512 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
  41. [41]

    Zanin E, Leochico CFD, Salizzato S et al.. “Differences between males and females with spinal cord injury in the experience of subliminal and explicit sexual pictures.” Spinal cord (2021). PMID: 34719671 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
  42. [42]

    Mahmoud H, Qannam H, Zbogar D et al.. “Spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: time to rehabilitation admission, length of stay and functional independence.” Spinal cord (2017). PMID: 28139661 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
  43. [43]

    Leving MT, de Groot S, Woldring FAB et al.. “Motor learning outcomes of handrim wheelchair propulsion during active spinal cord injury rehabilitation in comparison with experienced wheelchair users.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31656102 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
  44. [44]

    de Groot S, Bevers G, Post MW et al.. “Effect and process evaluation of implementing standardized tests to monitor patients in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2010). PMID: 20136477 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  45. [45]

    Lim JE, Lee HJ, Cho DY et al.. “The combined effects of rTMS and upper extremity robotic therapy for restoring upper extremity function in patients with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.” The journal of spinal cord medicine (2025). PMID: 41021824 ↗

    L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
  46. [46]

    Koenraadt KL, Duysens J, Rijken H et al.. “Preserved foot motor cortex in patients with complete spinal cord injury: a functional near-infrared spectroscopic study.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2013). PMID: 24213959 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
  47. [47]

    Lenggenhager B, Scivoletto G, Molinari M et al.. “Restoring tactile awareness through the rubber hand illusion in cervical spinal cord injury.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2013). PMID: 23757296 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
  48. [48]

    Kennedy P, Lude P, Elfström ML et al.. “Cognitive appraisals, coping and quality of life outcomes: a multi-centre study of spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Spinal cord (2010). PMID: 20212500 ↗

    L2TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  49. [49]

    Anderson CE, Birkhäuser V, Liechti MD et al.. “Sex differences in urological management during spinal cord injury rehabilitation: results from a prospective multicenter longitudinal cohort study.” Spinal cord (2022). PMID: 36224336 ↗

    L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  50. [50]

    New PW. “Prospective study of barriers to discharge from a spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit.” Spinal cord (2014). PMID: 25266693 ↗

    L4COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  51. [51]

    Hitzig SL, Cimino SR, Alavinia M et al.. “Examination of the Relationships Among Social Networks and Loneliness on Health and Life Satisfaction in People with Spinal Cord Injury/Dysfunction.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33932359 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
  52. [52]

    Rigot S, Worobey L, Boninger ML. “Gait Training in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation-Utilization and Outcomes Among Nonambulatory Individuals: Findings From the SCIRehab Project.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29510092 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  53. [53]

    Flett HM, Delparte JJ, Scovil CY et al.. “Determining Pressure Injury Risk on Admission to Inpatient Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Comparison of the FIM, Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale, and Braden Scale.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31054293 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  54. [54]

    Borg DN, Foster MM, Legg M et al.. “The Effect of Health Service Use, Unmet Need, and Service Obstacles on Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being in the First Year After Discharge From Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32145278 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  55. [55]

    Raguindin PF, Stoyanov J, Eriks-Hoogland I et al.. “Cardiometabolic risk profiling during spinal cord injury rehabilitation: A longitudinal analysis from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury (SwiSCI) cohort.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35648677 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  56. [56]

    Renaud R, Locke HN, Hariharan R et al.. “Developing a spinal cord injury rehabilitation service in Madagascar.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2018). PMID: 29582900 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  57. [57]

    de Groot S, Post MW, Postma K et al.. “Prospective analysis of body mass index during and up to 5 years after discharge from inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2010). PMID: 21031288 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  58. [58]

    Krebs J, Wöllner J, Rademacher F et al.. “Bladder management in individuals with spinal cord injury or disease during and after primary rehabilitation: a retrospective cohort study.” World journal of urology (2022). PMID: 35599284 ↗

    L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  59. [59]

    Barbetta DC, Cassemiro LC, Assis MR. “The experience of using the scale of functional independence measure in individuals undergoing spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Brazil.” Spinal cord (2014). PMID: 24492639 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
  60. [60]

    Kennedy P, Hasson L. “Return-to-work intentions during spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an audit of employment outcomes.” Spinal cord (2015). PMID: 26193814 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
  61. [61]

    Jimbo K, Miyata K, Yuine H et al.. “Classification of upper-limb dysfunction severity and prediction of independence in activities of daily living after cervical spinal-cord injury.” Spinal cord (2024). PMID: 38886575 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
  62. [62]

    Chishtie J, Chishtie F, Yoshida K et al.. “Spinal cord injury rehabilitation and pressure ulcer prevention after the 2005 South Asian Earthquake: a CBR case study from Pakistan.” Disability and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29513051 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  63. [63]

    Wee JY. “Adjusting expectations after spinal cord injury across global settings: a commentary.” Disability and rehabilitation (2006). PMID: 16690580 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  64. [64]

    Escribá PV, Gil-Agudo ÁM, Vidal Samsó J et al.. “Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentric, phase IIA clinical trial for evaluating the safety, tolerability, and therapeutic efficacy of daily oral administration of NFX88 to treat neuropathic pain in individuals with spinal cord injury.” Spinal cord (2024). PMID: 38898145 ↗

    L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  65. [65]

    Yang ML, Li JJ, So KF et al.. “Efficacy and safety of lithium carbonate treatment of chronic spinal cord injuries: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.” Spinal cord (2011). PMID: 22105463 ↗

    L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  66. [66]

    van der Woude LH, Bouw A, van Wegen J et al.. “Seat height: effects on submaximal hand rim wheelchair performance during spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2009). PMID: 19229446 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  67. [67]

    Eng JJ, Teasell R, Miller WC et al.. “Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence: Methods of the SCIRE Systematic Review.” Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 22767989 ↗

    L2SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  68. [68]

    Zbogar D, Eng JJ, Miller WC et al.. “Movement repetitions in physical and occupational therapy during spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Spinal cord (2016). PMID: 27752057 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
  69. [69]

    Hammell KR. “Spinal cord injury rehabilitation research: patient priorities, current deficiencies and potential directions.” Disability and rehabilitation (2010). PMID: 20131945 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  70. [70]

    Xue X, Yang X, Tu H et al.. “The improvement of the lower limb exoskeletons on the gait of patients with spinal cord injury: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.” Medicine (2022). PMID: 35089234 ↗

    L5SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype
  71. [71]

    van Langeveld SA, Post MW, van Asbeck FW et al.. “Reliability of a new classification system for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: the Spinal Cord Injury-Interventions Classification System.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2009). PMID: 19577037 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
  72. [72]

    Delparte JJ, Scovil CY, Flett HM et al.. “Psychometric Properties of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment During Inpatient Rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 26205694 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  73. [73]

    Kuiper H, van Leeuwen CMC, Stolwijk-Swüste JM et al.. “Reliability and validity of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) in individuals with a recently acquired spinal cord injury.” Clinical rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34818113 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
  74. [74]

    Su X, Liu Q, Wang J et al.. “Patient activation during the first 6 months after the start of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a cohort study.” European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine (2025). PMID: 40202279 ↗

    L2COHORTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  75. [75]

    van Lis MS, van Asbeck FW, Post MW. “Monitoring healing of pressure ulcers: a review of assessment instruments for use in the spinal cord unit.” Spinal cord (2009). PMID: 19949418 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  76. [76]

    Goodwin-Wilson C, Watkins M, Gardner-Elahi C. “Developing evidence-based process maps for spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Spinal cord (2009). PMID: 19687799 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
  77. [77]

    New PW, Simmonds F, Stevermuer T. “Comparison of patients managed in specialised spinal rehabilitation units with those managed in non-specialised rehabilitation units.” Spinal cord (2011). PMID: 21468042 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
  78. [78]

    Delparte JJ, Flett HM, Scovil CY et al.. “Development of the spinal cord injury pressure sore onset risk screening (SCI-PreSORS) instrument: a pressure injury risk decision tree for spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Spinal cord (2020). PMID: 32694750 ↗

    L3OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  79. [79]

    Scivoletto G, Bonavita J, Torre M et al.. “Observational study of the effectiveness of spinal cord injury rehabilitation using the Spinal Cord Injury-Ability Realization Measurement Index.” Spinal cord (2015). PMID: 26369890 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  80. [80]

    Hodel J, Stucki G, Prodinger B. “The potential of prediction models of functioning remains to be fully exploited: A scoping review in the field of spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Journal of clinical epidemiology (2021). PMID: 34329726 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
  81. [81]

    Scivoletto G, Morganti B, Cosentino E et al.. “Utility of delayed spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an Italian study.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2006). PMID: 16816903 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
  82. [82]

    Macciocchi S, Seel RT, Warshowsky A et al.. “Co-occurring traumatic brain injury and acute spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcomes.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 22480549 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  83. [83]

    Trumbower RD, Hayes HB, Mitchell GS et al.. “Effects of acute intermittent hypoxia on hand use after spinal cord trauma: A preliminary study.” Neurology (2017). PMID: 28972191 ↗

    L2RCTCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  84. [84]

    Charters E, Gillett L, Simpson GK. “Efficacy of electronic portable assistive devices for people with acquired brain injury: a systematic review.” Neuropsychological rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 25121394 ↗

    L1SR_OBSCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  85. [85]

    Warner N, Ikkos G, Gall A. “Spinal cord injury rehabilitation and mental health, SCReaM.” Spinal cord (2016). PMID: 27401124 ↗

    L3OTHERCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  86. [86]

    Kennedy P, Kilvert A, Hasson L. “Ethnicity and rehabilitation outcomes: the Needs Assessment Checklist.” Spinal cord (2015). PMID: 25687511 ↗

    L3REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  87. [87]

    Kennedy P, Hasson L. “An audit of demographics and rehabilitation outcomes in non-traumatic spinal cord injury.” Spinal cord (2016). PMID: 27001132 ↗

    L3OTHERCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification
  88. [88]

    Mooney A, Hewitt AE, Hahn J. “Nothing to lose: a phenomenological study of upper limb nerve transfer surgery for individuals with tetraplegia.” Disability and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32356497 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  89. [89]

    Li Y, Bressington D, Chien WT. “Pilot evaluation of a coping-oriented supportive program for people with spinal cord injury during inpatient rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28994618 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
  90. [90]

    Pelletier CA, Jones G, Latimer-Cheung AE et al.. “Aerobic capacity, orthostatic tolerance, and exercise perceptions at discharge from inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 23747647 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
  91. [91]

    Krause JS, Murday D, Corley EH et al.. “Concentration of Costs Among High Utilizers of Health Care Services Over the First 10 Years After Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Population-based Study.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 30476487 ↗

    L3OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  92. [92]

    Bragge P, Chau M, Pitt VJ et al.. “An overview of published research about the acute care and rehabilitation of traumatic brain injured and spinal cord injured patients.” Journal of neurotrauma (2012). PMID: 22191665 ↗

    L5SR_OBSCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
  93. [93]

    Albaum E, Quinn E, Sedaghatkish S et al.. “Accuracy of the Actigraph wGT3x-BT for step counting during inpatient spinal cord rehabilitation.” Spinal cord (2019). PMID: 30737452 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
  94. [94]

    Anzai K, Young J, McCallum J et al.. “Factors influencing discharge location following high lesion spinal cord injury rehabilitation in British Columbia, Canada.” Spinal cord (2006). PMID: 16030516 ↗

    L3OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
  95. [95]

    Verschueren JH, Post MW, de Groot S et al.. “Occurrence and predictors of pressure ulcers during primary in-patient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Spinal cord (2010). PMID: 20531357 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  96. [96]

    DeVivo MJ. “Sir Ludwig Guttmann Lecture: trends in spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcomes from model systems in the United States: 1973-2006.” Spinal cord (2007). PMID: 17279098 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  97. [97]

    Singh H, Collins K, Flett HM et al.. “Therapists' perspectives on fall prevention in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a qualitative study.” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33789064 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
  98. [98]

    Scovil CY, Flett HM, McMillan LT et al.. “The application of implementation science for pressure ulcer prevention best practices in an inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation program.” The journal of spinal cord medicine (2014). PMID: 25029674 ↗

    L4TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  99. [99]

    Gur Arie A, Toren I, Hadar R et al.. “Lack of gut microbiome recovery with spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Gut microbes (2024). PMID: 38324278 ↗

    L3OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
  100. [100]

    Theros JS, Zumpf KB, Lagu T et al.. “Cost Implications of Insurance Associated Disparities in Post-Acute Traumatic Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.” Journal of neurotrauma (2022). PMID: 36401500 ↗

    L3OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
  101. [101]

    Singh I. “Dignified Moving and Handling in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Global Call for Practice Transformation.” Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42211036 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  102. [102]

    van Diemen T, Tran Y, Stolwijk-Swuste JM et al.. “Trajectories of Self-Efficacy, Depressed Mood, and Anxiety From Admission to Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation to 1 Year After Discharge.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34038709 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Special Populations & Pregnancy, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  103. [103]

    Guo M, Tardif G, Bayley M. “Medical Safety Huddles in Rehabilitation: A Novel Patient Safety Strategy.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 29030096 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  104. [104]

    Bombardier CH, Kalpakjian CZ, Graves DE et al.. “Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in assessing major depressive disorder during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 22555007 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Special Populations & Pregnancy, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  105. [105]

    Uddin T, Shakoor MA, Rathore FA et al.. “Ethical issues and dilemmas in spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the developing world: a mixed-method study.” Spinal cord (2022). PMID: 35523952 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  106. [106]

    van der Schriek LMM, Post MWM, Dijkstra CA et al.. “Patient flow problems affecting in-patient spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands.” Spinal cord (2025). PMID: 39856328 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  107. [107]

    Graco M, Gobets DF, M O'Connell C et al.. “Management of sleep-disordered breathing in three spinal cord injury rehabilitation centres around the world: a mixed-methods study.” Spinal cord (2022). PMID: 35241799 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  108. [108]

    Lakhani A, Martin K, Gray L et al.. “What Is the Impact of Engaging With Natural Environments Delivered Via Virtual Reality on the Psycho-emotional Health of People With Spinal Cord Injury Receiving Rehabilitation in Hospital? Findings From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32502564 ↗

    L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  109. [109]

    Mackelprang JL, Hoffman JM, Garbaccio C et al.. “Outcomes and Lessons Learned From a Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Health Care Utilization During the First Year After Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Telephone Counseling Versus Usual Care.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27039058 ↗

    L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  110. [110]

    Evans RW, Bantjes J, Shackleton CL et al.. “"I was like intoxicated with this positivity": the politics of hope amongst participants in a trial of a novel spinal cord injury rehabilitation technology in South Africa.” Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology (2020). PMID: 32886532 ↗

    L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
  111. [111]

    Zhou G, Han S, Li Z et al.. “Comprehensive and Visualized Analysis of Interventional Clinical Trials of Spinal Cord Injury in the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric Study.” World neurosurgery (2023). PMID: 38052362 ↗

    L5TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
  112. [112]

    Krebs J, Pannek J, Rademacher F et al.. “Real-World Effects of Mirabegron in Patients with Chronic Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity - A Retrospective Cohort Study.” Research and reports in urology (2020). PMID: 32548077 ↗

    L2COHORTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
  113. [113]

    Awad BI, Carmody MA, Zhang X et al.. “Transcranial magnetic stimulation after spinal cord injury.” World neurosurgery (2013). PMID: 23321378 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
  114. [114]

    Almeida SBS, Macedo RC, Souza RFA et al.. “Assistive technology in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: use or non-use? Understanding what happens post-discharge in tetraplegic individuals at a rehabilitation centre in Northeast Brazil.” Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology (2025). PMID: 40828875 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
  115. [115]

    Hilton G, Unsworth C, Murphy G. “The experience of attempting to return to work following spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the qualitative literature.” Disability and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28395535 ↗

    L2SR_OBSCited in: Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
  116. [116]

    van Diemen T, van Lankveld W, van Leeuwen C et al.. “Multidimensional fatigue during rehabilitation in persons with recently acquired spinal cord injury.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2016). PMID: 26449895 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
  117. [117]

    Kataoka M, Yasuda T, Kataoka T et al.. “Movement strategies during car transfers in individuals with tetraplegia: a preliminary study.” Spinal cord (2012). PMID: 22270189 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
  118. [118]

    Clifton S, Bourke J. “Are standing and walking overrated? Ableism in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40833384 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
  119. [119]

    Friesen EL, Theodoros D, Russell TG. “Assistive technology devices for toileting and showering used in spinal cord injury rehabilitation - a comment on terminology.” Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology (2014). PMID: 25399923 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
  120. [120]

    Tamplin J, Loveridge B, Clarke K et al.. “Development and feasibility testing of an online virtual reality platform for delivering therapeutic group singing interventions for people living with spinal cord injury.” Journal of telemedicine and telecare (2019). PMID: 30823854 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
  121. [121]

    Wöllner J, Pannek J. “Urodynamic or video-urodynamic assessment in patients with spinal cord injury: this is not a question!” Spinal cord (2015). PMID: 25900286 ↗

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  122. [122]

    Wöllner J, Krebs J, Pannek J. “Sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.” Spinal cord (2015). PMID: 26215913 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  123. [123]

    Anderson CE, Birkhäuser V, Jordan X et al.. “Timing of urological management during post-acute spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” BJU international (2025). PMID: 40390256 ↗

    L2OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  124. [124]

    Chen YC, Ou YC, Hu JC et al.. “Bladder Management Strategies for Urological Complications in Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.” Journal of clinical medicine (2022). PMID: 36431327 ↗

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
  125. [125]

    Samuel VM, Moses J, North N et al.. “Spinal cord injury rehabilitation: the experience of women.” Spinal cord (2007). PMID: 17768426 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
  126. [126]

    May L, Day R, Warren S. “Perceptions of patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2006). PMID: 16950734 ↗

    L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
  127. [127]

    May L, Day R, Warren S. “Evaluation of patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: knowledge, problem-solving and perceived importance.” Disability and rehabilitation (2006). PMID: 16507503 ↗

    L4OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
  128. [128]

    Craven BC, Balioussis C, Hitzig SL et al.. “Use of screening to recruitment ratios as a tool for planning and implementing spinal cord injury rehabilitation research.” Spinal cord (2014). PMID: 25135057 ↗

    L5SR_OBSCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance

Revision History

All updates applied to this page

Loading revisions…