Board Review — High Yield
- •SABR vs SBRT — These terms are synonymous; SABR (Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy) is often preferred internationally to emphasize the ablative intent.
- •The 'No-Fly Zone' — Refers to the area within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree where high-dose SBRT (3-fraction) is avoided due to risks of bronchial necrosis or fistula.
- •Local Control — SBRT typically achieves local control rates of >90%, which is comparable to surgical resection in most retrospective series.
- •Nodal Staging — The primary disadvantage of SBRT compared to surgery is the lack of pathological nodal assessment, leading to a risk of under-treating occult N1/N2 disease.
- •Radiation Pneumonitis — The most common symptomatic toxicity of SBRT, usually presenting 2-6 months post-treatment with cough and dyspnea.
- •FEV1/DLCO Thresholds — Values <50% predicted identify 'high-risk' surgical candidates; <30% often identifies 'inoperable' candidates.
- •STARS and ROSEL Trials — Pooled analysis of these small randomized trials suggested SBRT might have superior survival to surgery, though the data is controversial due to low accrual.
- •Standard SBRT Dose — 54 Gy in 3 fractions is a classic regimen for peripheral Stage I tumors.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
References
- [1]
Edwards JP, Datta I, Hunt JD et al.. “Forecasting the impact of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer on the thoracic surgery workforce.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2016). PMID: 26796110 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Operable vs. Inoperable Patients - [2]
Timmerman RD, Fernando HC. “A radiation oncologist's and thoracic surgeon's view on the role of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for operable lung cancer.” Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2013). PMID: 23800524 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Operable vs. Inoperable Patients - [3]
Pennathur A, Lanuti M, Merritt RE et al.. “Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.” Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 39672521 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [4]
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Dieckmann K et al.. “ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on implementation and practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripherally located early stage non-small cell lung cancer.” Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (2017). PMID: 28687397 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [5]
Howington JA, Blum MG, Chang AC et al.. “Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.” Chest (2013). PMID: 23649443 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [6]
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Alheit H et al.. “Definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy: principles and practice for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.” Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] (2014). PMID: 24052011 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [7]
Videtic GM, Chang JY, Chetty IJ et al.. “ACR appropriateness Criteria® early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.” American journal of clinical oncology (2014). PMID: 25180631 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
