On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •Myasthenic crisis is the most severe form of myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction, defined by the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for >24 hours (manifest crisis) or a narrow window of impending respiratory failure (impending myasthenic crisis). It occurs in 10-20% of MG patients over their lifetime, with a median time from MG diagnosis to first crisis of 5.3 months. In-hospital mortality is approximately 5%, and 1-year all-cause mortality reaches 15% despite modern therapy.
- •The underlying pathophysiology is driven by autoantibodies, most commonly against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR, ~85% of generalized MG) or muscle-specific kinase (MuSK, ~6%), which impair neuromuscular transmission. The transition from stable MG to crisis is not merely a quantitative antibody increase but a qualitatively distinct inflammatory state characterized by hypercytokinemia, activation of FCGR3B⁺ monocytes, elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and T-cell exhaustion. This innate immune amplification rapidly reduces the safety factor of neuromuscular transmission, preferentially affecting bulbar and respiratory muscles.
- •Crisis is almost always triggered by a superimposed event. Infection is the most common trigger, accounting for 30-40% of episodes. Other triggers include surgery (especially thymectomy), immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab), and drugs that exacerbate MG (beta-blockers, aminoglycosides, macrolides except azithromycin, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers). The risk of crisis is highest in the first 6 months after MG diagnosis, and thymoma confers a 4.8-fold increased risk of requiring intensive care.
- •Key risk factors for crisis include older age at MG onset (median 60.5 years in ICU vs. 48.3 years in outpatients), female sex (OR 2.1), thymoma (OR 4.8), history of prior crisis (OR 67 for postoperative crisis), preoperative vital capacity <80% predicted, disease duration <3 months, and bulbar symptoms before thymectomy. Diabetes mellitus and hypomagnesemia are independent risk factors for recurrent infection-triggered crisis. The MGFA clinical classification grades severity from class I (ocular only) to class V (intubation), with class IVb (severe bulbar/respiratory) carrying the highest risk of progression to crisis.
Evaluation
- •Suspect myasthenic crisis in any patient with known MG, or in undiagnosed patients, who presents with rapidly progressive bulbar weakness (dysphagia, dysphonia, nasal regurgitation, inability to manage secretions) or respiratory difficulty (orthopnea, tachypnea, use of accessory muscles, paradoxical breathing). The median age at crisis is 72 years, and de novo MG can present with crisis: isolated dysphagia or bilateral vocal fold paralysis may be the only initial symptom.
- •Ask about the timeline of symptom worsening (hours to days), recent infections, surgeries, medication changes (especially immune checkpoint inhibitors), and prior history of MG or crisis. In a known MG patient, confirm the antibody profile (AChR, MuSK) and current immunotherapy regimen. The single breath count test (SBCT) is a rapid bedside screen: a count <15 indicates severe respiratory compromise; a threshold of ≤25 on telephone screening has 71% positive predictive value for exacerbation.
- •Examine for fatigable ptosis, diplopia, weak palatal elevation, poor cough, and tongue weakness. Perform the ice pack test if ptosis is present (improvement after 2 minutes supports MG). Measure forced vital capacity (FVC) and negative inspiratory force (NIF) at the bedside: FVC <20 mL/kg or <1 L, NIF < -30 cmH₂O signal impending respiratory failure and warrant immediate ICU admission. Check for concurrent myositis if ICI-induced MG is suspected (elevated CK, proximal weakness) and for myocarditis (troponin, ECG).
- •Order serological testing for AChR antibodies (positive in ~90% of generalized MG), MuSK antibodies if AChR-negative, and LRP4 antibodies if double-seronegative. In seronegative patients, repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) showing a decremental response >10% or single-fiber EMG (SFEMG) demonstrating increased jitter are diagnostic. Perform chest CT or MRI to screen for thymoma, which is present in 10-15% of MG patients and significantly increases crisis risk.
- •Consider alternative diagnoses: Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (autonomic symptoms, areflexia, incremental RNS), botulism (acute descending paralysis, dilated pupils, GI symptoms), Guillain-Barré syndrome (ascending paralysis, areflexia, CSF albuminocytologic dissociation), brainstem stroke (sudden onset, cranial nerve deficits without fluctuation, imaging evidence), and mitochondrial myopathy (chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, no fluctuation). In a patient with known MG and respiratory distress, do not delay treatment for serological confirmation, rely on clinical history and prior antibody status.
- •Red flags requiring immediate action: tachypnea, accessory muscle use, paradoxical breathing, inability to complete sentences, drooling, inability to swallow secretions, ineffective cough, rapidly progressive weakness over hours to days, and autonomic instability (hypotension, arrhythmia, chest pain), the latter may signal takotsubo cardiomyopathy, which occurs in 0.5-1% of crises and carries 17.5% mortality.
Management
- •Admit all patients with impending or manifest myasthenic crisis to a neurological intensive care unit (ICU) or high-dependency unit. Initiate continuous monitoring of respiratory parameters: FVC, NIF, SpO₂, and arterial blood gases every 2-4 hours.
- •For impending respiratory failure (FVC <20 mL/kg, NIF < -30 cmH₂O, or severe bulbar weakness with inability to manage secretions), start noninvasive ventilation (BiPAP) as first-line ventilatory support. BiPAP reduces the need for intubation and avoids complications of invasive mechanical ventilation. If bulbar weakness is severe, or if NIV fails to maintain oxygenation or ventilation, proceed to endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation immediately.
- •Simultaneously initiate rescue immunomodulation. Start therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX): 5-7 exchanges of 1.0-1.5 plasma volumes every other day. Alternatively, administer intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 consecutive days. The choice between PLEX and IVIG depends on institutional preference, vascular access, and hemodynamic stability; both are first-line. No high-quality trial has directly compared them in crisis.
- •If the patient fails to improve after a full course of PLEX or IVIG (within 48-72 hours), consider escalation to a targeted biologic. For AChR antibody-positive patients, eculizumab 900 mg IV weekly for 4 weeks (then 1200 mg every 2 weeks) can produce dramatic improvement within 48 hours, case series report extubation within 17 hours and nasogastric tube removal within 48 hours. Ensure meningococcal vaccination at least 2 weeks before starting (or prophylactic antibiotics if urgent).
- •Alternatively, efgartigimod 10 mg/kg IV weekly for 4 weeks (neonatal Fc receptor antagonist) has shown rapid action in crisis: all patients weaned from ventilation after a mean of 10.4 days, with MG-ADL scores dropping from 15.6 to 3.4 after one cycle. It is well tolerated and does not require central venous access. Baseline IgG levels should be monitored; mean IgG reduction is 58% after one cycle.
- •Start corticosteroids (prednisone 1 mg/kg/day or equivalent) concurrently with PLEX/IVIG, but ideally after the first dose of rescue therapy to avoid early transient worsening. Taper to the lowest effective dose as soon as possible, high-dose steroids (≥60 mg/day) during ICU stay increase sepsis risk (OR 13.07).
- •Avoid all medications that exacerbate neuromuscular blockade: non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers, beta-blockers, aminoglycosides, macrolides (except azithromycin, which appears safe), fluoroquinolones, magnesium-containing drugs, and certain antiarrhythmics (procainamide, quinidine). Azithromycin can be used safely in MG patients with COVID-19.
- •Once the crisis resolves, initiate a long-term immunosuppressive regimen to prevent recurrence. The backbone is prednisone plus a steroid-sparing immunosuppressant (SSIS): azathioprine (2-3 mg/kg/day), mycophenolate mofetil (2-3 g/day), or tacrolimus (target trough 5-10 ng/mL). A combination of prednisone plus tacrolimus has shown sustained response in both non-thymomatous (HR 0.40) and thymomatous MG compared to prednisone alone.
- •For patients with refractory disease (failure to lower prednisone below 20 mg/day, need for regular IVIG/PLEX, or MG-ADL ≥6 after ≥12 months of therapy), consider eculizumab or efgartigimod as maintenance therapy. Chronic low-dose IVIG (0.4 g/kg/month) is an effective steroid-sparing option, with mean prednisone dose decreasing from 33.1 mg/day to 7.2 mg/day after 36 months.
- •Thymectomy is indicated for all patients with thymoma and for selected nonthymomatous patients with generalized MG up to the fifth decade, ideally within the first year of diagnosis. Preoperative optimization with immunotherapy (PLEX, IVIG, or a biologic) for at least 14 days reduces postoperative crisis risk (HR 0.419). Endoscopic thymectomy is preferred when feasible.
- •Monitor for complications: pneumonia (most common infection, 15-70% of intubated patients), prolonged mechanical ventilation (>15 days in 55%), extubation failure (5-43%), sepsis, and takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Provide DVT prophylaxis with LMWH or unfractionated heparin. Initiate early but moderate-intensity rehabilitation, high-intensity therapy may paradoxically delay functional recovery (HR 0.69).
- •Discharge criteria: stable respiratory status off mechanical ventilation, adequate bulbar function (safe swallow confirmed by instrumental evaluation), stable immunotherapy regimen, and clear plan for outpatient follow-up. Educate patients to recognize early warning signs (worsening dysphagia, shortness of breath, declining single breath count) and to avoid triggers including infections and exacerbating drugs.
Board Review — High Yield
- •Myasthenic crisis, life-threatening respiratory failure or severe bulbar weakness due to MG; occurs in 10-20% of MG patients.
- •Most common trigger, infection (30-40% of crises); other triggers include surgery, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and exacerbating drugs.
- •Pathophysiology, autoantibodies (AChR, MuSK) impair neuromuscular transmission; crisis involves hypercytokinemia and innate immune activation, not just antibody titer increase.
- •First-line ventilation, BiPAP preferred for impending crisis; intubate if bulbar weakness severe or NIV fails.
- •Rescue therapy, PLEX (5-7 exchanges) or IVIG (0.4 g/kg/day ×5 days); both first-line, no proven superiority.
- •Refractory crisis, eculizumab (AChR+) or efgartigimod can produce rapid improvement within 48 hours to days.
- •Avoid, non-depolarizing NMBs, beta-blockers, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, magnesium, procainamide, quinidine.
- •Thymoma, increases risk of crisis 4.8-fold; requires thymectomy after preoperative immunotherapy optimization.
- •Prognosis, in-hospital mortality ~5%, 1-year mortality ~15%; 80% achieve good functional recovery by 12 months.
- •Key surveillance, single breath count test ≤25 on telephone screening warrants immediate ED referral; serial FVC and NIF in ICU.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
Definition, Classification & Nomenclature
- ▸Myasthenic crisis is defined by respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; impending myasthenic crisis (IMC) is a pre-crisis state with rapid deterioration of bulbar or respiratory function within ≤2 weeks, defined by MGFA class IVb, QMG bulbar subscore ≥3, respiratory subscore ≥2, or combined ≥4.
- ▸MGFA clinical classification (I-V) is the standard for staging severity and guiding treatment decisions, with class V indicating intubation.
- ▸MC occurs in 10-20% of MG patients; in-hospital mortality is approximately 5%, and 1-year all-cause mortality reaches 15%.
- ▸Thymoma increases the risk of intensive care for MC nearly 5-fold, and the majority of crises occur within 6 months of diagnosis.

Myasthenic crisis is a life-threatening neurological emergency defined by acute respiratory failure or severe bulbar weakness due to (MG). It represents the most severe end of the MG spectrum, requiring immediate intensive care and mechanical ventilation.
Also Called / Synonyms
- Myasthenic crisis (MC)
- Impending myasthenic crisis (IMC), a pre-crisis state of rapid clinical decline with high risk of progression to MC [4]A1b
- Myasthenic exacerbation, a broader term for any acute worsening, not necessarily meeting crisis criteria
Defining the Phases: Impending vs. Manifest Crisis
In 2016, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) introduced the term impending myasthenic crisis to identify patients with a narrow therapeutic window. According to the 2024 Chinese MG Collaborative Group Expert Consensus, IMC is defined as significant worsening of bulbar or respiratory muscle function within ≤2 weeks, meeting any of the following: MGFA type IVb; Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) bulbar subscore ≥3; QMG respiratory subscore ≥2; or combined bulbar-respiratory subscore ≥4 [4]A1b. Manifest crisis (MC) is defined by the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for >24 hours [9]B2b.
Classification Systems
MG severity and crisis risk are categorized using multiple axes:
MGFA Clinical Classification (adapted from [2]C4)
| Class | Description |
|---|---|
| I | Any ocular muscle weakness; may have weakness of eye closure |
| II | Mild generalized weakness; IIa predominantly limb/axial, IIb predominantly bulbar/respiratory |
| III | Moderate generalized weakness; IIIa limb/axial, IIIb bulbar/respiratory |
| IV | Severe generalized weakness; IVa limb/axial, IVb bulbar/respiratory (requires intubation or noninvasive ventilation) |
| V | Defined by intubation, with or without mechanical ventilation |
Antibody Profile, 90% of generalized MG patients are seropositive: 84.5% anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR), 5.9% anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) [11]C4. Rarer targets include LRP4 [1]D5.
Age of Onset, Early-onset MG (<50 years) and late-onset MG (≥50 years) have distinct epidemiological and prognostic features [10]B2c. Very-late-onset MG (≥65 years) carries higher crisis risk [13]C4.
Thymic Pathology, Thymoma occurs in 20% of MG patients; thymic hyperplasia in 70% [1]D5. Thymoma confers a 4.8-fold increased risk of intensive care for MC (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.19-19.43) [13]C4.
Clinical Significance
MC occurs in 10% to 20% of patients with MG [3]D5[19]C4. In a Czech nationwide registry, 6.1% of patients required intensive care for MC, with a median time from diagnosis of 5.3 months [13]C4. The in-hospital mortality of MC is 5.05% (14/277), and the 1-year all-cause mortality is 15.16% (42/277) [19]C4. Incidence of MG is rising (0.62 to 3.13 per 100,000), with a prevalence of 27.19 per 100,000 [10]B2c.
These definitions and classifications form the basis for every subsequent section, from pathophysiology to acute , ensuring a consistent vocabulary across the emergency-condition template.
Pearl: Thymoma increases the risk of intensive care for MC nearly 5-fold, and the majority of crises occur within 6 months of diagnosis.
Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization)
- ▸Myasthenic crisis arises from a hypercytokinemic state driven by innate immune activation (FCGR3B⁺ monocytes, high NLR) that amplifies underlying autoantibody-mediated NMJ dysfunction.
- ▸Triggers such as infection (e.g., WNV), ICI therapy, and surgery induce a pro-inflammatory milieu that converts stable MG into crisis, often without a change in antibody specificity.
- ▸The neuroanatomic vulnerability of respiratory and bulbar muscles stems from their low safety factor for neuromuscular transmission, leading to descending paralysis from ocular to respiratory failure.
Having defined myasthenic crisis as a life-threatening escalation of MG, we now examine the pathophysiologic cascade that transforms stable neuromuscular junction dysfunction into fulminant respiratory failure.
Core Autoimmune Mechanism
The disease originates from autoantibodies targeting the . In ~85% of generalized MG patients, pathogenic IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies bind the (AChR), impairing neuromuscular transmission by reducing available receptors [22]D5. A smaller subset (1-6%) harbor antibodies against (muscle-specific kinase), which disrupts agrin-LRP4-MuSK signaling and clustering of AChR at the postsynaptic membrane [22]D5. Both antibody types cause fluctuating weakness, but the precise molecular events that precipitate crisis involve additional systemic immune dysregulation.
Triggers and the Transition to Crisis
Crisis occurs when a superimposed trigger amplifies the baseline autoimmune attack. Common precipitants include infection, surgery (especially ), and (ICI) therapy [23]C4[25]D5[28]C4.
- Infection: West Nile virus (WNV) can convert stable ocular MG into crisis via a post-infectious pro-inflammatory state that amplifies pre-existing autoantibody-mediated pathology, rather than through molecular mimicry [23]C4.
- ICI therapy: Bulbar symptoms and myasthenic crisis are frequent in ICI-induced MG; anti-AChR antibodies are found in only half of these patients, and the clinical picture often overlaps with ICI-related myositis [25]D5.
- Surgery: Thymectomy in patients with thymoma and concurrent Castleman’s disease carries elevated risk of postoperative crisis, mitigated by pre- and postoperative [28]C4.
Cellular Mediators of Hypercytokinemia
Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of peripheral blood during AChR-positive crisis reveals a hypercytokinemia driven by innate immune activation [24]B3b. A discrete monocyte subset (FCGR3B⁺ monocytes) exhibits marked upregulation of pro-inflammatory signaling pathways during crisis, which normalizes three months later [24]B3b. This is accompanied by a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), confirmed in 22 additional patients and correlated with MG severity scores [24]B3b. Concurrently, age-associated B cells show oligoclonal expansion with high autoimmune activity, while CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells display persistent exhaustion [24]B3b. Together, these findings define a peripheral immune landscape dominated by innate activation and T-cell exhaustion, favoring sustained inflammation and antibody-driven NMJ blockade.
Neuroanatomic Localization of Weakness
The clinical phenotype of crisis, respiratory failure, dysphagia, dysphonia, reflects the topographic distribution of NMJ vulnerability. The diaphragm and intercostal muscles are highly dependent on a large safety factor of neuromuscular transmission; when AChR density is reduced, these muscles fail first. Bulbar muscles (palatal, pharyngeal, laryngeal) are also exquisitely sensitive, producing the hallmark “nasal voice” and pooling secretions that further compromise airway protection. The neuroanatomic consequence is a descending paralysis: ocular → bulbar → axial → respiratory, culminating in the need for ventilatory support.
Mechanism Cascade
Pearl: The transition from stable MG to crisis is not simply a quantitative increase in antibody titer; it is a qualitatively distinct inflammatory state driven by innate immune activation (hypercytokinemia, FCGR3B⁺ monocytes, elevated NLR). Recognizing this mechanistic shift may guide earlier use of targeted immunomodulation rather than escalation of symptomatic therapy alone.
Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors
- ▸Myasthenic crisis occurs in 10-20% of MG patients, with hospitalization rates rising 6.8% annually.
- ▸Thymoma (OR 4.8) and female sex (OR 2.1) are independent risk factors for ICU admission due to crisis.
- ▸Infection is the most common trigger, and diabetes, hypomagnesemia, and cautionary drugs markedly increase risk.
The clinical burden of myasthenic crisis reflects its underlying autoimmune pathophysiology, with rising incidence and prevalence globally. Myasthenic crisis occurs in 10% to 20% of patients with (MG) over their lifetime [42]B3b.
Incidence and Prevalence
Incidence of MG itself ranges from 0.3 to 6.1 per 100,000 person‑years across populations, and prevalence from 2.2 to 58.6 per 100,000 [40]B2a. For crisis, population‑based estimates are limited. In the US, hospitalization rates for MG crisis rose by 6.8% annually from 2010-2019, outpacing non‑crisis admissions (4.4% per year) [34]B2c. In Taiwan, the incidence of first crisis among incident MG patients was 4.7% within the first year, with 96.2% of those events occurring within 3 months of diagnosis [33]B2c.
Demographic Patterns
Crisis affects all ages but shows a bimodal distribution: young women and older men [30]B2c. Among US hospitalizations, black women had the highest annual incidence of MG admission (0.01 per 1,000), followed by white women, white men, and black men (0.009, 0.008, 0.007 per 1,000) [30]B2c. Older age is a major risk factor: among Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years, in‑hospital mortality for crisis admissions averaged 5.0% versus 1.8% for all adults [34]B2c. Hispanic and African American patients with MG have higher cumulative incidence of exacerbations over time [36]B2c.
Temporal Trends
MG incidence is increasing in multiple regions. In the Czech Republic, incidence rose from 0.62 to 3.13 per 100,000 between 2015 and 2017 [10]B2c. In Germany, prevalence in 2019 was estimated at 39.3 per 100,000 and incidence at 4.6 per 100,000 [31]B2c. Taiwan’s prevalence increased from 19 to 24 per 100,000 from 2013-2019 [33]B2c. These trends are partly attributed to an aging population, improved diagnostics, and increasing awareness [38]D5.
Risk Factors for Myasthenic Crisis
Multiple factors predispose to crisis, as summarized in the table below.
| Risk Factor | Odds Ratio / Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Thymoma | OR 4.8 (1.19-19.43) for ICU admission | [13]C4 |
| Female sex | OR 2.1 (1.02-4.48) for ICU admission | [13]C4 |
| Older age at MG onset | Mean age 60.5 vs 48.3 years (ICU vs outpatient) | [13]C4 |
| History of myasthenic crisis | OR 67.18 for postoperative crisis | [46]B3b |
| Infection (trigger of crisis) | Pneumonia OR 3.45 for weaning failure | [37]B3b |
| Diabetes mellitus | Independent risk factor for recurrent infection‑triggered crisis | [42]B3b |
| Hypomagnesemia | Independent risk factor for recurrent infection‑triggered crisis | [42]B3b |
| Cautionary drugs (e.g., beta‑blockers, neuromuscular blockers) | OR 4.09 (1.88-8.90) for clinical worsening | [45]B3b |
| Preoperative vital capacity <80% | Identified in postoperative crisis predictive score | [43]B3b |
| Disease duration <3 months | Identified in postoperative crisis predictive score | [43]B3b |
| Bulbar symptoms before thymectomy | Identified in postoperative crisis predictive score | [43]B3b |
Infection is the most common trigger, accounting for 67% of crises in some series [38]D5[42]B3b. Seasonality is not well‑established, but respiratory infections peak in winter, likely contributing to seasonal variation. The risk of crisis is highest within the first 6 months after MG diagnosis (median 5.3 months in one study) [13]C4. Vaccination against influenza and pneumococcus is recommended because infection prevention is critical; there is no evidence that standard vaccines trigger crisis, though live vaccines are generally avoided in patients on immunosuppression [38]D5.
Pearl: Infection is the most common trigger, and diabetes, hypomagnesemia, and cautionary drugs markedly increase risk.
| Risk Factor | Odds Ratio / Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Thymoma (ICU admission) | OR 4.8 (1.19-19.43) | [13]C4 |
| Female sex (ICU admission) | OR 2.1 (1.02-4.48) | [13]C4 |
| History of myasthenic crisis | OR 67.18 (postoperative crisis) | [46]B3b |
| Pneumonia (weaning failure) | OR 3.45 (in crisis) | [37]B3b |
| Diabetes mellitus (recurrent infection‑triggered crisis) | Independent risk factor | [42]B3b |
| Hypomagnesemia (recurrent infection‑triggered crisis) | Independent risk factor | [42]B3b |
| Cautionary drugs (any) | OR 4.09 (1.88-8.90) | [45]B3b |
| Preoperative vital capacity <80% | Postoperative predictive score | [43]B3b |
| Disease duration <3 months | Postoperative predictive score | [43]B3b |
| Bulbar symptoms before thymectomy | Postoperative predictive score | [43]B3b |
Clinical Presentation
- ▸Bulbar symptoms (dysphagia, dysphonia) and respiratory failure dominate the crisis presentation, often overshadowing ocular signs.
- ▸ICI‑induced MG has a distinct phenotype with rapid onset, high rate of crisis, and frequent coexisting myositis/myocarditis.
- ▸Takotsubo cardiomyopathy complicates 0.5-1% of crises and must be suspected in any patient with hemodynamic instability or chest pain.
The transition from stable to crisis is often heralded by a recognizable constellation of symptoms, though the pace and pattern vary with the trigger. The median age at crisis is 72 years, and the initial presentation may be ocular, bulbar, or respiratory from the outset [51]C4.
Presenting Symptoms
- Ocular symptoms (ptosis, diplopia) are the most common first manifestation overall, but during crisis they are often overshadowed by bulbar and respiratory complaints [22]D5[61]B2a.
- Bulbar weakness dominates: dysphagia, dysphonia, nasal regurgitation, and inability to manage secretions. In one series, 4 of 5 patients with de novo MG presented with dysphagia as the primary symptom, and one was already in crisis [47]C4. Bilateral vocal fold paralysis can be the leading sign, easily mistaken for airway obstruction [48]C4.
- Respiratory difficulty may develop insidiously as orthopnea, tachypnea, or use of accessory muscles, or abruptly with paradoxical breathing and respiratory arrest.
- Autonomic symptoms are uncommon but serious: chest pain or hemodynamic instability should raise suspicion for takotsubo cardiomyopathy, which occurs in 0.5-1% of crises and carries 17.5% mortality [49]C4[60]C4.
- Non‑motor symptoms such as dysgeusia (altered taste) can precede crisis and may predict relapse in thymoma‑associated MG [50]C4.
Neurological Examination Findings
- Motor system: Fluctuating, fatigable weakness in ocular, bulbar, and proximal limb muscles. Key findings include ptosis fatigable on sustained upgaze, impaired adduction or elevation of the eyes, weak palatal elevation, poor cough, and tongue weakness. Neck flexor and respiratory muscle strength should be assessed quantitatively.
- Sensory examination is normal; reflexes are normal or brisk but not depressed.
- Specific bedside maneuvers:
- Single breath count (normal > 20; < 15 indicates severe respiratory compromise).
- Ice pack test: improvement of ptosis after 2 minutes of ice application supports MG.
- Forced vital capacity (FVC) measurement: a decline to < 20 mL/kg is a widely used threshold for imminent respiratory failure, though not validated in crisis-specific trials [51]C4.
- Examination in ICI‑induced MG: may reveal concurrent myositis (proximal weakness, elevated creatine kinase to a mean of 4,799 IU/L) and , requiring cardiac monitoring [52]B2b[25]D5.
Phenotypic Variants
| Variant | Key Features | Frequency | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thymoma‑associated MG | Shorter duration from symptom onset to crisis (mean 18 vs. 51 months), higher proportion of MGFA class IVa, longer hospital stay (mean 39 vs. 33 days) | 58/149 crisis patients | [54]B2b |
| ICI‑induced MG | Rapid onset early after ; bulbar symptoms and crisis in 67%; 33% have myositis, 25% myocarditis; AChR‑Ab positive in 83% | 0.12% of treated patients | [52]B2b[25]D5 |
| Double‑seronegative MG | Ocular onset in 82%, but 40% of extrathymic cases have crisis; 20% harbor LRP4 antibodies | 45 patients in systematic review | [59]C4 |
| Juvenile MG | Ptosis in 77.7%, ocular onset in 60.6%; crisis occurs in 10.6% | 1,109 patients | [61]B2a |
| MG with takotsubo cardiomyopathy | Older females (median 69 yr, 67.5% female); crisis is the trigger in 37.5%; apical TTC in 71.8%; 95% require mechanical ventilation | 40 cases | [49]C4[60]C4 |
Red Flags Requiring Immediate Action
- Respiratory distress: tachypnea, accessory muscle use, paradoxical breathing, inability to complete sentences, single breath count < 20.
- Severe bulbar weakness: drooling, inability to swallow secretions, cough ineffective, dysphonia.
- Rapidly progressive weakness over hours to days.
- Autonomic instability: hypotension, arrhythmia, chest pain → suspect takotsubo cardiomyopathy [49]C4[60]C4.
- New dysgeusia in a known MG patient with thymoma may herald crisis [50]C4.
Atypical Presentations
- Isolated dysphagia can be the sole presenting symptom of MG, leading to delayed diagnosis until crisis [47]C4.
- Bilateral vocal fold paralysis as first manifestation mimics acute airway obstruction and requires urgent laryngoscopy [48]C4.
- Dysgeusia as a non‑motor symptom may precede other signs by weeks [50]C4.
- ICI‑induced MG often presents with overlapping myositis/myocarditis, so elevated CK or troponin should not be dismissed as non‑specific [52]B2b[25]D5.
Pearl: In an elderly patient with new-onset bulbar weakness and respiratory difficulty, always consider myasthenic crisis even if no prior MG diagnosis, half of takotsubo‑associated crises occur in undiagnosed MG [49]C4.
Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG)
- ▸Serological testing for AChR antibodies is the first-line diagnostic step; nearly 90% of generalized MG patients are seropositive.
- ▸RNS and SFEMG are complementary electrophysiological tools; SFEMG is the most sensitive test, particularly in seronegative or ocular MG.
- ▸Chest imaging to detect thymoma is mandatory in all patients at diagnosis due to the elevated risk of crisis.
The clinical presentation of fluctuating, fatigable weakness in ocular, bulbar, or limb muscles directs the workup toward confirming neuromuscular junction dysfunction. The diagnosis rests on serological detection of pathogenic antibodies, electrophysiological evidence of impaired transmission, and exclusion of mimics.
Serological Testing
- Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies - Found in nearly 90% of patients with generalized MG and in nearly 50% of those with isolated ocular MG [64]D5. Their presence confirms the diagnosis.
- Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies - Identified in a smaller subset, often with prominent bulbar and respiratory involvement. Testing is indicated when AChR antibodies are negative [22]D5.
- LRP4 antibodies - Detected in approximately 20% of double-seronegative patients (negative for both AChR and MuSK) [59]C4.
- Seronegative MG - Up to 10-15% of MG patients have no detectable antibodies [62]B2b. In these patients, electrophysiological testing becomes critical.
Electrophysiological Testing
- Repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) - A decremental response of >10% in a distal or proximal muscle supports the diagnosis. In double-seronegative MG, RNS is positive in 57.7% of cases [59]C4.
- Single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) - This is the most sensitive electrodiagnostic test, particularly useful in ocular MG or when RNS is equivocal [64]D5. It demonstrates increased jitter and blocking, reflecting impaired neuromuscular transmission. In experienced hands, SFEMG can detect abnormalities in the majority of patients with MG, though exact sensitivity numbers are not reported in the available literature.
Imaging
- Chest computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - Essential for detecting thymoma, which is present in 10-15% of MG patients. Thymoma is a risk factor for myasthenic crisis (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.19-19.43) [13]C4. Imaging should be performed in all patients at diagnosis.
Other Tests
- Ice pack test - Placing ice over a ptotic eyelid for 2 minutes can transiently improve ptosis in ocular MG. This test is simple and specific.
- Edrophonium (Tensilon) test - Rarely used now due to risk of bradycardia and availability of serology; however, a positive response (improvement in weakness) supports the diagnosis.
Diagnostic Algorithm
Differential Diagnosis
The following conditions can mimic myasthenic crisis and must be considered:
| Condition | Key distinguishing features |
|---|---|
| Autonomic symptoms, areflexia, incremental response on RNS, associated with | |
| Acute onset, dilated pupils, descending paralysis, GI symptoms, history of contaminated food | |
| Guillain-Barré syndrome | Ascending paralysis, areflexia, CSF albuminocytologic dissociation, demyelinating features on NCS |
| Brainstem stroke | Sudden onset, cranial nerve deficits without fluctuation, imaging evidence |
| Mitochondrial myopathy | Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, ptosis without fluctuation, lactate elevation, muscle biopsy |
| Drug-induced myasthenia | Check for penicillamine, , immune checkpoint inhibitors [63]D5 |
Pearl: In a patient with a known MG diagnosis presenting with respiratory distress, do not delay treatment for serological confirmation, rely on clinical history and prior antibody status. In seronegative patients, SFEMG is the most sensitive test and can clinch the diagnosis when clinical suspicion is high.
Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification
- ▸MGFA clinical classification (I-V) is the universal severity staging system; MGFA-PIS captures longitudinal outcomes.
- ▸Refractory MG (5-20% of patients) carries a 2.5-fold increased mortality and 3.1-fold increased crisis risk; defined by failure to taper prednisolone below 20 mg/day or need for rescue therapies.
- ▸Validated predictive models exist for postoperative crisis (Kanai score, nomograms), post-MSE exacerbation (AChR-ab dynamics), and weaning difficulty (thymoma, lack of immunosuppression at ICU admission).
Once the diagnosis is established, severity must be classified using a structured system to anchor treatment decisions and prognosis. The Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification remains the universal staging tool, grading weakness from Class I (ocular only) through Class V (intubation) [10]B2c[11]C4[53]B2b. Most patients with generalized disease fall into Class II (mild) or III (moderate); late-onset MG (≥50 years) more often presents as Class IIb (predominantly bulbar) [10]B2c. The MGFA post-intervention status (MGFA-PIS) then captures longitudinal outcomes, from complete stable remission to unchanged or worse [9]B2b[11]C4.
Refractory Disease
Refractory MG carries a substantially worse prognosis and requires early identification. By one commonly used definition, patients fail to lower prednisolone below 20 mg/day, need regular intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis, or maintain a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score ≥6 after ≥12 months of corticosteroids plus at least one oral immunosuppressant [53]B2b. An alternative nationwide cohort definition required plasma exchange or IVIG at least three times per year after ≥2 immunosuppressants [68]B2b. In a Czech registry, 5.0% of patients were refractory, with a higher proportion of MGFA Class IIb (45.3% vs 33.6%) and IIIb (14.1% vs 4.6%) compared to non-refractory patients, and significantly lower forced vital capacity (FVC 70.1% vs 74.0% predicted) [10]B2c. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in refractory MG is 2.49 (95% CI 1.26-4.94) and for myasthenic crisis 3.14 (95% CI 2.25-4.38) compared to non-refractory MG [68]B2b.
Predictive Models for Crisis and Exacerbation
| Predictive Tool | Population | Variables | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kanai score (postoperative crisis) | Thymectomy patients | Vital capacity <80%, disease duration <3 months, bulbar symptoms | AUC 0.84 derivation, 0.80 validation [43]B3b |
| Exacerbation nomogram (post-MSE, ≤35.1 months) | AChR-Ab+ MG with minimal symptom expression | Shorter onset-to-MSE duration, smaller ΔAChR-ab, thymoma, comorbid immune-related diseases, history of crisis/impending crisis | AUC 0.886 derivation, 0.829 validation [70]B2b |
| Postoperative crisis nomogram (all MG) | Thymectomy patients | Older age at thymectomy, open approach, MGFA IV-V | AUC 0.832 [9]B2b |
| Postoperative crisis nomogram (thymomatous MG) | Thymoma patients | Open approach, MGFA IV-V, Masaoka stage IV | AUC 0.871 [9]B2b |
| Long-term mortality nomogram (all MG) | Post-thymectomy | Thymoma, very-late-onset/late-onset MG, MGFA IV-V | AUC 0.887 (1-year) [9]B2b |
Early features also predict refractory disease: failure to achieve a lowest effective prednisolone dose ≤20 mg/day plus initiation of an oral immunosuppressant during the first year after diagnosis conferred an 18.7-fold higher risk of refractory MG) [53]B2b.
Weaning Risk Stratification
In myasthenic crisis requiring invasive ventilation, 91% of patients undergo intermediate (2-6 days) or prolonged (≥7 days) weaning by the WEAN Safe classification [74]B2b. Independent predictors of prolonged weaning are thymoma (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.01-9.07) and absence of MG-specific immunosuppressive treatment at ICU admission (OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.22-11.23) [74]B2b. Age itself is not a predictor, but very-late-onset (≥65 years) patients have more comorbidities and similar outcomes [74]B2b.
Long-Term Mortality Risk
In a nationwide Korean cohort, the all-cause mortality rate in MG was 144.40 per 10,000 person-years vs 92.60 in matched controls (adjusted HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.34-1.49) [32]B2c. Risk factors include older age, male sex, high comorbidity burden, high-dose corticosteroid use (≥15 mg/day), thymoma, and history of myasthenic crisis. Thymectomy is associated with reduced mortality [32]B2c. Non-thymomatous MG follows a more benign course than thymomatous MG, with lower postoperative crisis rates (5.6% vs 13.4%) and long-term mortality (1.4% vs 9.9%) [9]B2b.
These stratification tools directly inform treatment thresholds, guiding the intensity of acute therapy (Section 7) and long-term immunotherapy decisions.
Pearl: Use the Kanai score (vital capacity <80%, disease duration <3 months, bulbar symptoms) to identify patients at high risk for postoperative crisis before thymectomy, a score ≥4 points warrants preoperative optimization and planned ICU admission [43]B3b.
### Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion
- ▸Immediate BiPAP is preferred over intubation in myasthenic crisis unless bulbar weakness is severe.
- ▸PLEX and IVIG are first-line rescue therapies; no high-quality trial shows superiority of one over the other.
- ▸For refractory crisis, eculizumab or efgartigimod can produce rapid improvement within 48 hours to 7 days.
Once a myasthenic crisis is recognized and severity classified (Section 6), proceeds simultaneously along three axes: airway/respiratory support, rapid immunomodulation to abort the attack, and identification/removal of the trigger. The goal is to halt disease activity within hours to days, prevent progression to respiratory failure, and facilitate weaning from ventilatory support.
Step 1: Triage and Respiratory Support
All patients with impending or manifest crisis require immediate admission to a neurological intensive care unit (ICU) or high-dependency unit [78]D5 [79]D5. Forced vital capacity (FVC) < 20 mL/kg, maximal inspiratory pressure < 30 cmH₂O, or maximal expiratory pressure < 40 cmH₂O signal impending respiratory failure and warrant proactive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) [79]D5. Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is the preferred first-line ventilatory strategy in myasthenic crisis because it reduces the need for intubation and avoids the complications of [79]D5 (Evidence: 5). However, if bulbar weakness is severe (inability to manage secretions, weak cough), or if NIV fails to maintain oxygenation or ventilation, early intubation is mandatory [79]D5.
Step 2: Rescue Immunomodulation, Plasma Exchange or IVIG
Two established therapies rapidly remove or neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies. (PLEX) is often favored in the acute setting because it rapidly removes circulating anti-AChR antibodies and other immune mediators; a typical course is 5 to 7 exchanges of 1.0-1.5 plasma volumes every other day [78]D5 [80]D5 (Evidence: 5). Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is administered as 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days [78]D5 [81]B2b (Evidence: 2b). A 12-year neuro-ICU case series reported that over 90% of patients received prednisolone and/or IVIG, and intubation was required in 63% [81]B2b. No high-quality randomized trial directly compares PLEX to IVIG in crisis; the choice often depends on institutional preference, vascular access, and hemodynamic stability [78]D5 [80]D5. Both modalities are considered first-line rescue therapy [82]D5.
Step 3: Escalation for Refractory Crisis, Newer Targeted Agents
For patients who fail to improve after a full course of PLEX or IVIG, or who have refractory disease, complement inhibitors and FcRn antagonists offer rapid rescue. Eculizumab, a terminal complement C5 inhibitor approved for refractory generalized MG (AChR antibody-positive), has been used as rescue therapy in crisis with dramatic responses: within 48 hours of administration, Quantitative (QMG) scores improved from 28.2±4.8 to 15.0±4.1, and MG-ADL scores decreased from 16.8±2.8 to 6.0±4.3 in a retrospective case series [20]C4 (Evidence: 4). Individual case reports describe extubation within 17 hours and nasogastric tube removal within 48 hours [20]C4 [86]C4 (Evidence: 4). Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor antagonist (10 mg/kg IV weekly for 4 weeks), has also shown rapid action: in a prospective case series of 10 patients with MC, all were weaned from ventilation after a mean of 10.44±4.30 days, and MG-ADL scores dropped from 15.6±4.4 to 3.4±2.2 after one cycle [77]C4 (Evidence: 4). A separate case series of 3 patients reported extubation at 7 days after the first efgartigimod infusion [87]C4 (Evidence: 4). Both agents are well tolerated and do not require central venous access.
(30-50 mg/kg monthly IV) has been used as induction therapy in refractory MG, with clinical improvement in 75% of patients and median progression-free survival of 9 months, but it is not a first-line acute rescue therapy [91]B2b (Evidence: 2b).
Step 4: Corticosteroids and Trigger Management
High-dose corticosteroids (e.g., 1 mg/kg/day) are often started concurrently with PLEX/IVIG, but they should be initiated after the acute immunotherapy has begun because early high-dose steroids can transiently worsen weakness [78]D5 [81]B2b. In the acute phase, the primary goal is to avoid exacerbating agents, do not use non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers, beta-blockers, aminoglycosides, macrolides (except ), or certain antiarrhythmics (e.g., procainamide, quinidine) [78]D5 [88]C4 [79]D5. Azithromycin appears safe in MG patients with [88]C4.
Monitoring and Transition
Frequent assessment of respiratory parameters (FVC, negative inspiratory force, oxygen saturation, and arterial blood gases) is essential. Once the patient is hemodynamically stable and weaning from ventilatory support has begun, transition to the chronic management program (Section 8) should be arranged, including optimization of long-term immunotherapy and thymectomy evaluation.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength of disagreement | Implication for practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLEX versus IVIG as first-line rescue therapy | PLEX is advocated as primary modality in acute crisis due to rapid antibody removal [78]D5 | IVIG is equally effective and easier to administer; no high-quality comparative trial [81]B2b | Moderate (institutional preference) [78]D5[81]B2b | Both are acceptable; choice depends on local resources, vascular access, and patient comorbidities. |
| Role of eculizumab/efgartigimod in crisis | Case series show rapid improvement within 48 hours to days, supporting use as rescue therapy [20]C4[77]C4[86]C4 | No randomized controlled trials have included patients in crisis; regulatory approval is for chronic refractory MG, not acute crisis [82]D5[55]C4 | Strong (evidence gap) [20]C4[55]C4 | These agents are promising for refractory crisis but should be used after failure of PLEX/IVIG or in patients with contraindications to these therapies. |
Pearl: In myasthenic crisis, initiate BiPAP early for impending respiratory failure and start PLEX or IVIG immediately; if no response within 48-72 hours, consider eculizumab or efgartigimod as rescue therapy, as they have shown rapid clinical improvement even in refractory cases [20]C4[77]C4.
Figure 1: Acute management algorithm for myasthenic crisis (adapted from [78]D5[79]D5[20]C4).
| Therapy | Dose | Evidence Level | Key References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma exchange (PLEX) | 5-7 exchanges, 1.0-1.5 plasma volumes every other day | 5 | [78]D5[80]D5 |
| IVIG | 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days | 2b | [78]D5[81]B2b |
| Eculizumab | 900 mg IV weekly for 4 weeks, then 1200 mg every 2 weeks (label dose for gMG) | 4 | [20]C4[55]C4[85]C4 |
| Efgartigimod | 10 mg/kg IV weekly for 4 weeks | 4 | [77]C4[87]C4[89]B2b |
| Cyclophosphamide | 30-50 mg/kg IV monthly for ≥6 months | 2b | [91]B2b |
Long-term & Definitive Management (Evidence Ladder)
- ▸Long-term immunosuppression after myasthenic crisis relies on a ladder of oral agents (corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus) guided by observational studies.
- ▸Eculizumab improves MG-ADL scores by 2.976 points at 1 month and 5.430 points at 12 months in refractory AChR-Ab+ LOMG, with a 72.24% MSE rate at 12 months.
- ▸Thymectomy is recommended for nonthymoma generalized MG patients up to the 5th decade, ideally within the first year of disease.
Once the acute crisis resolves, the focus shifts to a chronic immunosuppressive strategy designed to prevent recurrence and achieve sustained remission. The evidence ladder for long-term therapy is built largely on observational studies and expert consensus, with only a few drugs tested in randomized trials. The following steps outline a rational escalation approach, integrating the limited but actionable data from the myasthenic crisis literature.
Step 1: Initiate or Optimize Oral Immunosuppression
For all patients who survive a myasthenic crisis, long-term immunotherapy is indicated. Corticosteroids ( ) remain the backbone. The goal is to titrate to the lowest effective dose, often combined with a steroid-sparing agent. Azathioprine is the most studied baseline immunosuppressant, supported by decades of observational data [93]D5. Alternatives include mofetil, A, , and , all used off-label in most Western countries [93]D5. The choice depends on tolerability, comorbidities, and speed of onset. Azathioprine requires several months to achieve full effect, so corticosteroids are used in the interim.
Step 2: Second-Line Agents for Refractory Disease
When disease remains active despite adequate doses of corticosteroids and azathioprine (or an alternative first-line agent), escalation to combination therapy is warranted. Drug combinations, such as corticosteroids plus cyclosporine A, can provide more rapid control [93]D5. All such regimens require supervision by an experienced neuroimmunological center because of potentially serious adverse reactions [93]D5. Serial measurement of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, when elevated, can guide tapering and monotherapy reduction [93]D5.
Step 3: Biologic Therapies for Refractory Myasthenic Crisis
A subset of patients remain resistant to conventional immunotherapy. Two biologic options have emerged from the available evidence:
-
Eculizumab (complement C5 inhibitor) has shown rapid and sustained benefits in refractory acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) late-onset generalized (LOMG). In a retrospective study of 31 patients with refractory LOMG, eculizumab reduced the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score by 2.976 points at Month 1 and 5.430 points at Month 12 (both P<0.001). The cumulative minimal symptom expression (MSE) rate reached 22.58% at Month 1 and 72.24% at Month 12, and the mean prednisone dose decreased by 7.574 mg/day (P<0.001) [72]B2b. In a case report series, eculizumab enabled ventilator discontinuation within 2 days in a patient with refractory myasthenic crisis [86]C4. These findings, while not from randomized trials, position eculizumab as a promising rescue therapy for refractory cases.
-
Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, sargramostim) was associated with clinical improvement, expansion of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, and enhanced Treg suppressive function in a single patient with prolonged myasthenic crisis refractory to conventional therapy [92]C4. Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn, but the correlation with animal models suggests further clinical trials are warranted [92]C4.
Step 4: Thymectomy
In nonthymoma patients with generalized myasthenia gravis, including older children and adults up to the fifth decade, complete transsternal thymectomy is recommended based on available open trials and expert opinion, preferentially during the first year of disease [93]D5. Endoscopic surgery may also be effective [93]D5. Before surgery, pretreatment with immunosuppressive medication or plasmapheresis is usually recommended to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality, which is now near zero in experienced centers [93]D5. Thymoma patients require thymomectomy and sometimes postsurgical chemotherapy and radiation treatment [93]D5.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Role of eculizumab in refractory myasthenic crisis | Case-series evidence supports eculizumab as rapid rescue therapy in ventilator-dependent refractory crisis [86]C4 | Lack of RCT evidence; conventional immunotherapies (IVIG, PE) remain first-line, and eculizumab is not yet guideline-endorsed for crisis | Moderate | Eculizumab may be considered in refractory cases after failure of standard therapies, but does not replace established acute treatments |
Pearl: After stabilizing a myasthenic crisis, initiate chronic immunosuppression early with corticosteroids plus a steroid-sparing agent (azathioprine or mycophenolate); for refractory AChR-Ab+ disease, eculizumab can provide rapid symptom improvement and allow corticosteroid reduction, though its use in the acute crisis setting remains off-label and based on limited evidence [72]B2b[86]C4.
| Drug | Indication | Evidence Level | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azathioprine | Baseline immunosuppression | Level 5 (expert opinion, observational) [93]D5 | Standard baseline; delayed onset (months) |
| Mycophenolate mofetil | Alternative to azathioprine | Level 5 (expert opinion) [93]D5 | Off-label; similar efficacy |
| Cyclosporine A | Second-line combination | Level 5 (expert opinion) [93]D5 | Rapid action; requires monitoring |
| Eculizumab | Refractory AChR-Ab+ generalized LOMG | Level 2b (retrospective cohort) [72]B2b | MG-ADL reduction 2.976 at 1 mo, 5.430 at 12 mo; MSE 72.24% at 12 mo |
| GM-CSF | Refractory crisis (experimental) | Level 4 (single case) [92]C4 | Clinical improvement; Treg expansion |
History and Evolution of Treatment
- ▸The landmark Gajdos trial (1997) established IVIG as an alternative to PE for crisis with similar efficacy and better tolerance [94].
- ▸FcRn antagonists (efgartigimod, nipocalimab) and complement inhibitors (eculizumab) represent the newest evolution, offering faster onset and targeted immunotherapy [4,96,98].
- ▸Prophylactic IVIG before surgery does not reduce postoperative crisis in well-controlled patients [95], and sugammadex reduces POMC risk by approximately half [102].
The evidence ladder for long-term , built on decades of clinical experience, rests on a foundation of landmark trials that sequentially shifted the standard of care for both maintenance therapy and crisis management. Understanding this evolution - from the empiric use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors to the rise of targeted biologics - clarifies why current protocols are structured as they are.
The Era of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors and Thymectomy
Before the 1970s, treatment of myasthenic crisis relied almost entirely on continuous intravenous or . A systematic review of eight observational studies found that while these agents could improve outcome measures when or were unavailable, they carried risks of cardiac arrhythmia and pneumonia, though not statistically different from those of plasmapheresis [99]B2a. Thymectomy emerged as a mainstay after the landmark observation that removal of the thymus improved long-term outcomes, but it also introduced the risk of postoperative myasthenic crisis (POMC). Meta-analyses of over 25 studies confirmed that preoperative bulbar symptoms, a history of crisis, and disease severity (Osserman stage IIA-IV) are independent predictors of POMC, with odds ratios ranging from 3.8 to 10.0 [6]A1a[101]B3a[103]B2b. The use of for neuromuscular blockade reversal, introduced in the 2010s, was associated with a reduction in POMC from 8.7% to 4.3% (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.91) in a Japanese nationwide database analysis [102]B2b.
The Shift to Immunomodulation: Plasma Exchange and IVIG
The 1990s brought a pivotal change. The randomized trial by Gajdos et al. (1997) compared three sessions of plasma exchange with IVIG at 0.4 g/kg/day for either 3 or 5 days in 87 patients with MG exacerbation. The median improvement in the myasthenic muscular score was similar between groups: +18 in the PE group and +15.5 in the IVIG group (p = 0.65). Tolerance favored IVIG, with only 1 side effect versus 8 in the PE group (p = 0.01) [94]A1b. This trial established IVIG as a first-line alternative to PE, though the small sample size precluded a definitive superiority claim. Subsequent work investigated whether IVIG could prevent crisis after surgery. A double-blind, randomized trial of 47 well-controlled patients found that preoperative IVIG 0.4 g/kg/day × 5 days did not reduce the incidence of postoperative crisis compared with placebo (1 patient in each arm) [95]A1b. This provided Class I evidence that prophylactic IVIG is unnecessary in stable patients.
The Arrival of Targeted Biologics
The 2020s introduced a new treatment paradigm. The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) antagonist was shown in the phase 3 ADAPT trial to produce rapid, clinically meaningful improvements in MG-ADL scores in anti-AChR antibody-positive patients, with a favorable safety profile [97]D5. For the specific setting of impending myasthenic crisis, a randomized open-label study of 38 patients compared efgartigimod (10 mg/kg weekly × 4) with IVIG (0.4 g/kg/day × 5). Remission rates were similar (90.48% vs 94.12%, p = 1.000), but the median time to remission was significantly shorter with efgartigimod: 8 days (95% CI 5.75-10.67) versus 12 days (95% CI 9.92-13.20) (p = 0.009) [4]A1b. A multicenter real-world study of 61 patients with acute exacerbations confirmed that 81.9% achieved a meaningful improvement at week 1 (after a single dose), and 98.1% at week 4 [18]C4. Even in the extreme elderly (≥80 years), efgartigimod reduced MG-ADL scores by 52.2% at week 4, with a 91.7% clinical meaningful improvement rate [104]B2b.
Complement inhibition entered the crisis arena through case reports. A 32-year-old woman with thymomatous AChR-antibody-positive generalized MG who failed TPE and high-dose during a postpartum crisis was treated with after prophylactic meningococcal vaccination. She was extubated 6 days after the first dose [98]C4. A systematic review accompanying that case identified 19 additional patients treated with eculizumab for crisis, supporting its role when conventional therapies fail.
Most recently, the phase 3 Vivacity-MG3 trial of (30 mg/kg loading then 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks) added to standard therapy in 153 antibody-positive patients demonstrated a least-squares mean MG-ADL reduction of -4.70 versus -3.25 for placebo (difference -1.45, 95% CI -2.38 to -0.52; p = 0.0024) over 6 months [96]A1b. Serious adverse events were similar (9% vs 14%), though three fatal outcomes occurred (one myasthenic crisis in the nipocalimab group).
What Was Abandoned and Why
Early reliance on high-dose as a first-line agent waned after a 12-year survey of 104 patients reported adverse reactions in 35%, including hematologic (18%), (13%), and infectious complications (13%), with temporary discontinuation needed in 11% [100]C4. The overlapping toxicity of prednisone and azathioprine led to the adoption of and as preferred steroid-sparing agents in many centers [44]A1c. The use of during crisis itself is now discouraged by most guidelines because it can worsen airway secretions; the systematic review noted that only a small proportion of patients received AChE inhibitors at the start of crisis, and those who did had a numerically higher rate of pneumonia [99]B2a.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which is first-line for crisis: IVIG or PE? | IVIG first (Taiwan guidelines) [44]A1c | PE first (many US centers) [94]A1b | Moderate | Choice depends on availability, contraindications, and patient history; both are effective. |
| Is efgartigimod appropriate for crisis? | Yes, as a rapid-acting alternative (emerging evidence) [4]A1b[18]C4 | No, not yet guideline-endorsed (most guidelines) [44]A1c | Weak | Off-label use may be considered if conventional therapies fail or are contraindicated. |
Pearl: The evolution from acetylcholinesterase inhibitors to IVIG/PE and now to FcRn antagonists reflects a consistent drive toward faster, safer, and more targeted therapy - the median time to remission with efgartigimod (8 days) is one-third shorter than with IVIG (12 days) [4]A1b, a difference that matters in the narrow window of crisis.
| Trial / Study | Year | Population | Intervention | Key Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gajdos et al. [94]A1b | 1997 | 87 patients with MG exacerbation | PE (3 sessions) vs IVIG (0.4 g/kg/d × 3 or 5 d) | Median MSS change +18 vs +15.5 (p=0.65); fewer side effects with IVIG (p=0.01) |
| Gamez et al. [95]A1b | 2019 | 47 well-controlled MG patients scheduled for surgery | Preoperative IVIG vs placebo | No difference in postoperative crisis (1 each) |
| Li et al. [4]A1b | 2026 | 38 AChR-Ab+ patients with impending MC | Efgartigimod (10 mg/kg weekly ×4) vs IVIG (0.4 g/kg/d ×5) | Remission 90.48% vs 94.12% (p=1.000); time to remission 8 vs 12 days (p=0.009) |
| Antozzi et al. (Vivacity-MG3) [96]A1b | 2025 | 153 antibody-positive gMG patients | Nipocalimab (30 mg/kg load then 15 mg/kg q2w) vs placebo | MG-ADL change -4.70 vs -3.25 (difference -1.45, p=0.0024) |
| Rossini et al. [98]C4 | 2025 | 1 case + 19 literature cases | Eculizumab for refractory MC | 6/20 extubated within 6 days; overall response supportive |
Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation
- ▸Extended preoperative immunotherapy (>14 days) reduces postoperative exacerbation risk in thymoma-associated MG (HR 0.419).
- ▸Complement inhibitors (eculizumab, ravulizumab) and FcRn inhibitors (efgartigimod) offer rapid onset and a favorable safety profile in crisis, requiring specific monitoring (meningococcal vaccination, IgG levels).
- ▸Post-crisis de-escalation should prioritize steroid tapering using tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil, with chronic low-dose IVIg as a steroid-sparing alternative.
Building on the historical evolution of immunosuppression, the post-crisis immunotherapy program is now stratified by antibody profile, trigger factors, and comorbidity burden. The goal is to achieve rapid, sustained disease control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity, a balance that requires explicit sequencing rules, safety monitoring protocols, and de-escalation thresholds.
Step 1: Selecting the Maintenance Immunotherapy After Crisis Resolution
For patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized MG, the first-line acute therapies (IVIG or PLEX) are followed by a bridging plan to long-term immunotherapy. The 2016 International Consensus Guidance from the Foundation of America notes that expert experience favors PLEX for faster onset, but IVIG offers a more favorable safety profile [20]C4. However, new evidence supports early use of targeted biologics in selected patients. The extended preoperative immunotherapy duration exceeding 14 days reduced the risk of postoperative acute exacerbation in thymoma-associated MG (HR 0.419, P < 0.001) [105]B2b. This suggests that in patients awaiting thymectomy, a minimum 2-week preoperative immunotherapy course (e.g., IVIG, PLEX, or a biologic) is protective.
For patients with refractory crisis or poor response to IVIG/PLEX, complement C5 inhibitors offer a rapid-acting alternative. In a retrospective case series, eculizumab 900 mg IV (single dose) led to ventilator weaning within 17 hours and nasogastric tube removal within 48 hours in 3 of 4 impending crisis episodes [20]C4. Ravulizumab, a long-acting C5 inhibitor, has also shown efficacy in thymoma-associated MG crisis, with two of three patients achieving rapid extubation [107]C4. The FcRn inhibitor efgartigimod (10 mg/kg weekly × 4 doses) produced a 52.2% reduction in MG-ADL scores at week 4 in elderly patients (≥80 years), with a mean time to clinically meaningful improvement of 1.3 weeks [104]B2b.
Step 2: Safety Monitoring Protocols for Biologics
All complement inhibitors require meningococcal vaccination at least 2 weeks before initiation, or prophylactic (e.g., penicillin) if urgent dosing is needed. Patients should be monitored for Neisseria meningitidis infection, a boxed warning for eculizumab [20]C4. In the case series, no infections occurred during short-term follow-up [20]C4. For efgartigimod, baseline IgG levels should be checked; the mean reduction in IgG was 58.0% after one cycle [104]B2b. In patients with baseline IgG < 6 g/L, individualized dosing may be needed, one patient with IgG 4.24 g/L achieved a 59% reduction without serious infection, but continued administration beyond the second infusion did not further improve IgG clearance [104]B2b. Routine IgG monitoring every 4 weeks during the first cycle is prudent.
For PLEX, a less recognized phenomenon is antibody overshoot, a rise in AChR antibody titer to a median of 1292% of baseline following 3-12 sessions, associated with clinical deterioration in 4 of 5 patients [109]C4. Clinicians should watch for worsening symptoms 4-6 weeks after PLEX and consider re-treatment or escalation to a biologic if overshoot occurs.
Step 3: De-escalation and Steroid-Sparing Strategies
Once the patient is stable, the goal is to taper corticosteroids to the lowest effective dose while maintaining disease control. Post-thymectomy, the combination of plus (Pred + TAC) was associated with sustained clinical response in both non-thymomatous (HR 0.40, P = 0.026) and thymomatous MG (HR 0.35, P = 0.030) compared to prednisone alone [9]B2b. Pred + mofetil (MMF) also showed benefit (HR 0.21, P = 0.020) in non-thymomatous cases [9]B2b.
For patients unable to tolerate oral immunosuppressants, chronic low-dose IVIg (0.4 g/kg/month) is a steroid-sparing option. In a retrospective study of 109 patients, mean prednisone dose decreased from 33.1 mg/day at baseline to 7.2 mg/day after 36 months, with the greatest effect within 6 months (33.1 to 17.9 mg/day) [110]B2b. 92.5% of patients remained stable over 3 years [110]B2b.
Special Population: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Triggered MG
Checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., , , ) can trigger de novo or exacerbate pre-existing MG, often with severe crisis. Steroids are first-line; eculizumab has been used successfully in PD-1 inhibitor-induced MG with rapid improvement [106]C4[112]C4[113]C4. Combination CTLA-4/PD-1 blockade carries a higher risk of fatal outcomes [113]C4. These patients require urgent cessation of the checkpoint inhibitor and multidisciplinary oncology-neurology co- .
| Drug | Dose (first cycle) | Key monitoring | Special considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eculizumab | 900 mg IV weekly × 4, then 1200 mg q2w | Meningococcal vaccination, monitor for Neisseria | Rapid onset (24-48 h in crisis) [20]C4 |
| Ravulizumab | 2400-3000 mg IV loading, then 1800-3000 mg q8w | Same as eculizumab | Long-acting, fewer infusions [107]C4 |
| Efgartigimod | 10 mg/kg IV weekly × 4 | IgG levels at baseline and week 4 | Steroid-sparing, effective in elderly [104]B2b |
| IVIG maintenance | 0.4 g/kg IV monthly | Renal function, hypercoagulable state | Steroid-sparing over 36 months [110]B2b |
Pearl: After crisis, choose the maintenance immunotherapy based on antibody status and thymoma; for AChR-positive refractory cases, complement inhibitors (eculizumab/ravulizumab) provide rapid, sustained control, while efgartigimod offers a steroid-sparing option with a favorable safety profile in elderly patients [20]C4[104]B2b[107]C4.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First-line biologic for acute crisis after IVIG/PLEX failure | Eculizumab, supported by the REGAIN trial and rapid-onset case series [20]C4 | Efgartigimod, used in MGAE and MC, but less evidence in crisis [104]B2b | Moderate (different mechanisms; no -to-head trial) | Choice depends on availability, cost, and patient comorbidities; eculizumab is preferred for complement-mediated rapid deterioration |
| Role of chronic low-dose IVIg | 2016 MGFA guidance, IVIg is primarily for acute therapy, not maintenance [20]C4 | Retrospective data, chronic low-dose IVIg is effective as steroid-sparing over 3 years [110]B2b | Moderate (guideline vs. real-world evidence) | Consider chronic IVIg for patients intolerant of oral immunosuppressants or with steroid-refractory disease |
Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care
- ▸Early rehabilitation should be initiated with careful monitoring for overwork weakness; high-intensity rehabilitation may delay recovery (HR 0.69) [114].
- ▸Dysphagia assessment with instrumental evaluation (FEES/VFSS) is essential because 75% of silent aspirators develop aspiration pneumonia [8].
- ▸Avoid fluoroquinolones and other drugs that exacerbate neuromuscular transmission; fluoroquinolone exposure leads to ventilatory support in 30% of cases [123].
Once the acute immunomodulatory phase has stabilized the patient, the clinical focus transitions to restoring function, managing residual symptoms, and preventing secondary complications. This phase requires a structured, multidisciplinary approach integrating respiratory weaning, dysphagia , early mobilization, and prophylaxis against hospital-acquired events.
Respiratory Monitoring and Weaning
Serial measurements of forced vital capacity (FVC) and negative inspiratory force (NIF) guide extubation readiness. In the case series by Ramos-Fransi et al., median time to was 12 days (range 3-176 days) [118]B2b. Alarm thresholds used during early mobilization include:
- Tidal volume < 180 mL
- SpO₂ < 90%
- Respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths/min [115]C4
Table 1. Intubation and Extubation Thresholds
| Parameter | Threshold for Intubation | Threshold for Extubation Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| FVC | < 20 mL/kg or < 1 L | > 20 mL/kg or > 1 L |
| NIF | < -30 cmH₂O | > -30 cmH₂O |
| SpO₂ | < 90% on room air | ≥ 92% on minimal support |
| Tidal volume | < 180 mL during spontaneous breathing | > 5 mL/kg |
Note: Thresholds are derived from general ICU practice and the monitoring parameters reported in Okamoto et al. [115]C4.
Autonomic Complications
Autonomic instability, including cardiac arrhythmias, blood pressure lability, ileus, and urinary retention, can occur during critical illness and should be monitored with continuous telemetry and daily abdominal examination. A multidisciplinary team including a neurointensivist and pharmacist is recommended [116]D5.
DVT/PE Prophylaxis
Standard pharmacologic prophylaxis with low molecular weight (e.g., 40 mg subcutaneously once daily) or unfractionated heparin 5000 U subcutaneously three times daily is indicated unless contraindicated by bleeding risk. Sequential compression devices should be added when pharmacologic prophylaxis is delayed.
Pain Management
Pain in myasthenic crisis is typically musculoskeletal (from prolonged immobility) or neuropathic (from critical illness polyneuropathy). First-line agents include acetaminophen 650 mg every 6 hours and gabapentin 300 mg three times daily (titrated). Avoid fluoroquinolones ( , , ) because they can precipitate acute exacerbation; in FDA postmarketing reports, 30% of fluoroquinolone-associated exacerbations required ventilatory support and 5% were fatal [123]C4. Also avoid magnesium-containing medications and certain that impair neuromuscular transmission.
Rehabilitation
Early rehabilitation should be initiated as soon as the patient is hemodynamically stable, but with careful monitoring for overwork weakness. In a nationwide Japanese database study, high-intensity rehabilitation was associated with delayed recovery in activities of daily living (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.99) [114]B2b. Therefore, a moderate, stepwise approach is recommended:
- Start: Range-of-motion exercises and assisted sitting (day 3-5 in ICU) [115]C4
- Progress: Standing and gait training once respiratory status is stable (tidal volume ≥ 500 mL, SpO₂ ≥ 92%)
- Monitor: Grip strength and leg elevation duration before each session; reduce workload if Borg Scale ≥ 16 or heart rate exceeds 70% of heart rate reserve [115]C4
- Advance: Resistance training and endurance exercise (e.g., lower-limb ergometer) after weaning from ventilation, targeting 60-90 min/day [115]C4
Hospital-Acquired Complications
is the most common preventable complication. In a scoping review, 75% of patients with silent aspiration developed aspiration pneumonia [8]D5. All patients should undergo instrumental swallowing assessment (FEES or VFSS) before oral feeding is resumed. Pressure injuries are prevented with regular turning (every 2 hours) and specialized mattresses. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are minimized by removing indwelling catheters as soon as possible.
Table 2. Common Hospital-Acquired Complications
| Complication | Frequency | Prevention | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspiration pneumonia | 75% of silent aspirators [8]D5 | Instrumental swallow evaluation, NPO until safe | Antibiotics, respiratory support |
| Prolonged mechanical ventilation (>15 days) | 57.1% of MC patients [119]B2b | Early weaning protocol, avoid over-sedation | Tracheostomy if expected >14 days |
| Recurrent myasthenic crisis | 50% of MC patients [119]B2b | Optimize immunotherapy, avoid triggers | Re-institute rescue therapy (IVIg/PLEX) |
| DVT/PE | Standard ICU incidence | Pharmacologic + mechanical prophylaxis | Therapeutic anticoagulation |
Pearl: Early rehabilitation after myasthenic crisis should be moderate in intensity, high-intensity therapy may paradoxically delay functional recovery [114]B2b; always monitor grip strength and leg elevation duration before each session to detect overwork weakness [115]C4.
| Parameter | Threshold for Intubation | Threshold for Extubation Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| FVC | < 20 mL/kg or < 1 L | > 20 mL/kg or > 1 L |
| NIF | < -30 cmH₂O | > -30 cmH₂O |
| SpO₂ | < 90% on room air | ≥ 92% on minimal support |
| Tidal volume | < 180 mL during spontaneous breathing | > 5 mL/kg |
Complications and Supportive Care
- ▸Prolonged mechanical ventilation affects >50% of patients; weaning failure is common and predicted by age, comorbidities, pneumonia, and absence of pre-crisis immunosuppression.
- ▸Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a rare but lethal autonomic complication; suspect it in any hemodynamic instability or ECG abnormality even without chest pain.
- ▸Hospital-acquired infections, especially pneumonia, are the leading cause of death; prevention bundles and early detection are essential.
Building on the rehabilitation foundation, the ICU phase of myasthenic crisis is marked by a constellation of complications that determine outcome. Prevention and early detection are as critical as immunomodulation itself.
Respiratory Monitoring
Serial bedside spirometry remains the cornerstone of respiratory surveillance. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and negative inspiratory force (NIF) are measured every 4-6 hours; a declining trend prompts escalation to noninvasive ventilation or intubation [51]C4. In the German multicenter cohort of 250 crises, the median duration of mechanical ventilation was 12 days; prolonged ventilation (>15 days) was associated with age, late-onset MG, multiple comorbidities, pneumonia (OR 3.13, p=0.0001), and resuscitation (OR 9.15, p=0.0008) [51]C4. Weaning failure occurred in 64.2% of episodes, and extubation failure in 43.0% after the first attempt [37]B3b. Independent predictors of weaning failure included older age, ≥3 comorbidities, late-onset MG, atelectasis, pneumonia, and sepsis [37]B3b. In a French expert center, 91% of patients experienced intermediate or prolonged weaning per the WEAN Safe classification, yet extubation failure was only 5%, reflecting a cautious, stepwise approach with repeated spontaneous breathing trials [74]B2b.
Autonomic Complications
Autonomic instability is underrecognized. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (stress-induced cardiomyopathy) has been reported in MG exacerbation, often with myasthenic crisis as the trigger (37.5% of cases in a systematic review of 40 cases) [60]C4. It presents with ECG abnormalities, troponin elevation, and transient left ventricular dysfunction, but chest pain is absent in 82.5% of cases [60]C4. Mortality in these patients was 17.5% [60]C4. Ileus and urinary retention may occur from anticholinergic overload or from the crisis itself; monitoring of bladder scans and bowel sounds is warranted.
DVT/PE Prophylaxis
Prolonged immobility and central venous access increase thromboembolic risk. All patients should receive pharmacologic prophylaxis with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin, in accordance with general ICU guidelines [51]C4. No specific MG crisis data exist, but the high rate of sepsis and multiorgan failure (the main cause of death) underscores the importance of minimizing additional complications [51]C4.
Pain
Pain is often overlooked. Sources include oropharyngeal ulceration from endotracheal tubes, pressure points, and musculoskeletal strain from positioning. Acetaminophen (1 g every 6 hours) is first-line; opioids should be used cautiously due to respiratory depression risk. Avoid neuromuscular blocking agents and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants entirely.
Rehabilitation
Early mobilization, as soon as hemodynamic and respiratory stability permit, reduces ICU-acquired weakness. Passive range-of-motion exercises, followed by active-assisted therapy, are initiated in the ICU. Speech therapy for dysphagia and respiratory muscle training are integral to weaning success.
Hospital-Acquired Complications
Pneumonia is the most frequent infection, occurring in 69.6% of deceased patients in one necropsy series [39]B3b. before the first weaning attempt occurred in 15% of patients in a French cohort [74]B2b. Urinary tract infections (17.7%) and bloodstream infections (16.5%) are also common [39]B3b. Prevention bundles include oral care, -of-bed elevation, and daily sedation interruption. Pressure injury prophylaxis with specialized mattresses and regular repositioning is mandatory. The table below summarizes key complications, their frequency, prevention, and management.
| Complication | Frequency | Prevention | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumonia (VAP) | 15-70% [74]B2b[39]B3b | Oral care, elevation, sedation interruption, weaning protocol | Culture-directed , lung-protective ventilation |
| Prolonged MV (>15 days) | 55% of intubated [74]B2b | Early immunomodulation, complication prevention | Tracheostomy if expected >10-15 days, stepwise weaning [74]B2b |
| Extubation failure | 5-43% [37]B3b[74]B2b | Cautious SBT, treat bulbar weakness | Reintubation, tracheostomy if repeated failure |
| Sepsis/multiorgan failure | 12% mortality [51]C4 | Infection prevention bundles, early antibiotics | Source control, vasopressors, ICU support |
| Takotsubo cardiomyopathy | Rare (case series) [60]C4 | ECG monitoring, troponin if hemodynamic instability | Supportive care, treat underlying crisis |
| DVT/PE | Not reported in cohorts | LMWH or UFH prophylaxis [51]C4 | Anticoagulation, IVC filter if contraindicated |
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal DVT prophylaxis agent | LMWH standard | UFH in renal impairment | Both reasonable | No MG-specific evidence; follow general ICU guidelines |
| Extubation timing | Early extubation (day 7-12) [37]B3b | Delayed extubation with tracheostomy | Cautious approach favored | Individualized based on bulbar function and cough strength |
Pearl: The most critical intervention to prevent complications is early, aggressive immunomodulation - the single strongest predictor of short weaning duration is the presence of MG-specific immunosuppressive therapy at ICU admission [74]B2b.
Prognosis & Natural History
- ▸In-hospital mortality for myasthenic crisis is 5-12% with modern care; all-cause 1-year mortality reaches 15%.
- ▸Prolonged mechanical ventilation (>15 days) is predicted by age >72 years, MGFA class IVb, pneumonia, and >3 comorbidities.
- ▸After achieving minimal symptom expression, median time to exacerbation is 35.1 months; a nomogram using disease duration, ΔAChR-ab, thymoma, comorbid immune diseases, and prior crisis predicts risk (AUC 0.886).
Complications such as sepsis and multiorgan failure drive the mortality of myasthenic crisis, but the trajectory after the acute phase is equally determined by baseline disease characteristics and the choice of rescue therapy. Understanding the natural history, both untreated and with modern immunomodulation, grounds prognostication and shared decision-making.
Survival and Functional Outcomes
In-hospital mortality has fallen substantially with protocol-driven care. Contemporary series report rates of 5.05% (14/277) in a prospective Chinese cohort [19]C4 and 12% in a German multicenter analysis of 250 mechanically ventilated patients [51]C4. A smaller prospective study found 2.63% (2/76) mortality [41]B2b. All-cause mortality at one year post-crisis reaches 15.16% (42/277), with septic shock (35.7%) and multiple organ failure (21.4%) as leading causes [19]C4. Among survivors, 20.5% still require mechanical ventilation at hospital discharge [51]C4.
Functional recovery is often substantial. MG-ADL scores improve from a mean of 21.3 at crisis onset to 5.5 at 6 months and 2.8 at 1 year [19]C4. By one year, 79.76% (197/247) of patients achieve a favorable post-intervention status [19]C4. The median duration of mechanical ventilation is 12 days (IQR not reported) [51]C4 to 17.1 days [41]B2b.
Predictors of Poor Prognosis
Several factors independently predict prolonged ventilation, higher mortality, and worse long-term outcomes:
- In-hospital mortality: >3 comorbidities, acute respiratory distress syndrome, resuscitation [51]C4; older age at crisis (OR 1.03), thymoma (OR 1.84), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3 (OR 2.68), prolonged ICU stay (OR 1.03) [19]C4
- Long-term mortality: history of myasthenic crisis within 2 years of diagnosis (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.87-2.89) [35]B2c
- Recurrent crisis: prior crisis (HR 5.75, 95% CI 4.15-7.96) [35]B2c
| Predictor | Outcome | Effect Size | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age >72 years | Prolonged MV | p=0.0001 | [51]C4 |
| MGFA IVb pre-crisis | Prolonged MV | OR infinite | [51]C4 |
| Pneumonia | Prolonged MV | OR 3.13 | [51]C4 |
| Thymoma | Prolonged MV | OR 0.20 (protective for shorter) | [41]B2b |
| CCI ≥3 | 1-year non-response | OR 2.68 | [19]C4 |
| Prior crisis | Recurrent crisis | HR 5.75 | [35]B2c |
Long-Term Trajectory After Crisis
Even after achieving minimal symptom expression (MSE), the risk of exacerbation persists. The median time to exacerbation post-MSE is 35.1 months (25th-75th percentile: 12.7-63.9 months) [70]B2b. A validated nomogram incorporating five factors, shorter disease duration to MSE, smaller AChR-ab reduction (ΔAChR-ab), thymoma, comorbid immune-related diseases, and history of crisis/impending crisis, predicts exacerbation risk with an AUC of 0.886 (derivation) and 0.829 (external validation) [70]B2b.
Thymoma-associated MG (TAMG) follows a more aggressive course: shorter time from symptom onset to crisis (17.95 vs 51.31 months), longer hospital stay (39.2 vs 33.2 days), and higher risk of postoperative crisis [54]B2b. Novel therapies such as efgartigimod (10 mg/kg weekly ×4) and complement inhibitors (eculizumab, ravulizumab) show promise in refractory cases, with rapid symptom improvement and steroid-sparing effects [4]A1b[57]B2b[72]B2b[75]B2b[107]C4[124]B2b[127]C4.
Pearl: A patient who survives a myasthenic crisis has a 1 in 5 chance of requiring ventilation at discharge and a 1 in 6 chance of dying within the year, but nearly 80% achieve good functional recovery by 12 months. The strongest modifiable predictor of prolonged ventilation is pneumonia; prevention and early treatment of respiratory infection is the single most impactful intervention after the crisis is controlled.
Special Populations & Pregnancy
- ▸Pregnancy carries a 6.4% risk of myasthenic crisis; exacerbation occurs in 33.8% of pregnancies, most commonly in the first trimester and postpartum [131].
- ▸Efgartigimod is effective and safe in elderly patients ≥80 years, with rapid improvement in acute exacerbations and a steroid-sparing effect [104].
- ▸Immunocompromised MG patients, especially those on steroids with thymoma, are at risk for nocardiosis, which can trigger crisis [142].
While the natural history of MG continues to improve with modern therapy, special populations present unique diagnostic and challenges that require tailored approaches.
Pediatrics
Pediatric myasthenic crisis is rare but life-threatening. Diagnosis may be delayed because young children cannot articulate fluctuating symptoms. Presenting features include ptosis, diplopia, bulbar weakness, and respiratory distress, often triggered by infection [137]C4. Repetitive nerve stimulation is diagnostic; single-fiber EMG may be more sensitive [3]D5. Management follows adult guidelines, but doses are weight-based. IVIG and PLEX are first-line immunomodulatory therapies for crisis [130]D5. Thymectomy is considered in seropositive children, though timing remains debated [130]D5. Prognosis is generally favorable with prompt treatment, but complications such as can occur.
Pregnancy
Pregnancy has an unpredictable effect on MG. Exacerbation occurs in 33.8% of pregnancies, with a 6.4% risk of myasthenic crisis during pregnancy and 8.2% postpartum [131]B2a. Worsening is most common in the first trimester and postpartum period [141]D5. Stable disease before conception is associated with fewer relapses [136]B2b. Transient neonatal MG occurs in 13% of newborns due to transplacental passage of antibodies [131]B2a. Fetal is a rare but serious complication [136]B2b.
Treatment considerations: Pyridostigmine is first-line symptomatic therapy and is generally considered safe during pregnancy [141]D5. Corticosteroids are used but carry an increased risk of cleft palate (first trimester) and preterm delivery [141]D5. Immunosuppressants with known teratogenicity (e.g., mofetil, ) should be avoided [130]D5. IVIG and PLEX are safe and effective for acute exacerbations [130]D5[136]B2b. For myasthenic crisis, PLEX is often preferred due to faster onset, but IVIG is an alternative [130]D5.
Delivery planning: Spontaneous vaginal delivery is encouraged when possible; caesarean section is reserved for obstetric indications [135]C4. Regional anesthesia (epidural) is preferred over general anesthesia due to risk of prolonged neuromuscular blockade [135]C4. is generally safe with pyridostigmine and ; limited data exist for other immunosuppressants [141]D5.
Elderly
in the elderly is increasingly recognized, with late-onset MG (LOMG, onset ≥50 years) and very-late-onset MG (VLOMG, ≥65 years) comprising a growing proportion [134]B2b[104]B2b. Elderly patients often present with ocular symptoms or bulbar weakness, which can mimic stroke, leading to diagnostic delay [133]C4. Myasthenic crisis occurs at similar rates as in younger patients (13%) [134]B2b. Comorbidities are common, including cardiovascular disease and renal impairment, which complicate management [104]B2b[134]B2b. Thymoma is less frequent, and thymectomy is not routinely recommended [134]B2b.
Treatment modifications: Immunosuppressants carry higher risk of infection and side effects. Efgartigimod 10 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks has shown efficacy and safety in patients ≥80 years, with rapid improvement in acute exacerbations (MG-ADL reduction 69.8% ± 16.9% at week 4) [104]B2b. IVIG carries a risk of thromboembolic complications, especially in elderly patients with vascular risk factors [140]C4. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy has been reported in association with myasthenic crisis in elderly patients [138]C4[139]C4; close cardiac monitoring is advised.
Immunocompromised
Patients with MG on immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk for opportunistic infections. is a rare but serious infection, with risk factors including elderly men, thymoma, and steroid use [142]C4. Pulmonary nocardiosis can precipitate myasthenic crisis; treatment with co-trimoxazole is effective [142]C4. In patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced MG, eculizumab has been used successfully [20]C4. Efgartigimod may also be considered [132]C4. Vaccination against encapsulated organisms (e.g., Neisseria meningitidis) is recommended before complement inhibitor therapy [20]C4.
Pearl: In elderly patients with myasthenic crisis, consider Takotsubo cardiomyopathy if hemodynamic instability occurs; and in immunocompromised hosts, nocardiosis should be in the differential for new pulmonary infiltrates.
Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
- ▸Annual influenza and COVID-19 vaccination are safe and recommended; influenza vaccine does not increase crisis risk (RR 0.84) [148].
- ▸Maintenance steroid-sparing immunosuppression at crisis onset is associated with shorter ICU stay and shorter ventilation duration [144].
- ▸Telephonic single breath count test (cutoff ≤25) is a practical screening tool with 71% PPV for detecting MG exacerbation [147].
Building on the considerations for pregnant patients, the same principles of proactive apply to all individuals with MG to prevent crisis. Prevention centers on modifying risk factors, optimizing baseline therapy, and early detection of deterioration.
Primary Prevention
Avoiding precipitating events is the cornerstone. Respiratory infections are the most common identifiable trigger, occurring in 30-40% of crises [143]D5. Annual influenza vaccination and vaccination are recommended, influenza vaccine does not increase crisis risk (relative incidence 0.84, 95% CI 0.65-1.09) [148]C4. COVID-19 vaccination may rarely trigger new-onset MG or exacerbation, but the benefit of preventing infection outweighs this risk, especially in well-compensated patients [149]C4.
Optimizing maintenance immunosuppression reduces crisis likelihood. The presence of a steroid-sparing immunosuppressant (SSIS) at crisis onset predicts shorter ICU stay (HR for time to discharge 2.23, 95% CI 1.13-4.42) and shorter ventilation duration (HR for extubation 2.73, 95% CI 1.37-5.43) [144]B2b. When is used, doses ≥60 mg/day during ICU stay increase sepsis risk (OR 13.07, 95% CI 2.17-86.73); thus, the lowest effective dose should be targeted [144]B2b.
Other modifiable factors: avoid drugs that exacerbate MG (e.g., certain , beta-blockers, magnesium), promptly treat infections, and manage emotional stress, which can trigger in some patients [49]C4.
Secondary Prevention
After a myasthenic crisis, the goal is to prevent recurrence. Initiate or continue a maintenance SSIS (e.g., , , ) and taper prednisone to <60 mg/day as feasible [144]B2b. Serial monitoring of MG functional status and respiratory function (e.g., forced vital capacity, single breath count) is essential. The telephonic single breath count test (SBCT) with a cutoff of ≤25 has a positive predictive value of 71% for detecting exacerbation and can triage patients for early intervention [147]C4.
Screening & Surveillance
Screen for MG in patients with unexplained pharyngeal dysphagia: initial AChR antibody testing; if negative, test for MuSK and LRP4 antibodies [47]C4. Routine instrumental swallowing evaluations (VFSS or FEES) are recommended because silent aspiration occurs in 75% of silent aspirators and leads to [8]D5.
In known MG patients, surveillance for thymoma and associated autoimmune conditions is warranted. Titin antibodies should be checked in all MG patients, as their presence in AChR-positive patients predicts more severe disease, including crisis [146]C4. Also screen for Hashimoto's thyroiditis (present in 21% of MG patients) [146]C4.
Myocardial injury surveillance: troponin T elevation is an independent predictor of death (OR 8.818, p<0.001) and is associated with infection and crisis [145]B2b. Consider checking troponin levels in hospitalized MG patients with clinical suspicion.
Patient Education
Most crises do not occur suddenly, there is a window for prevention [143]D5. Patients should be taught to recognize early warning signs: worsening dysphagia, shortness of breath, declining single breath count, and increased fatigue. They should have an action plan including when to contact their neurologist, when to use rescue medications, and when to go to the emergency department. Emphasize infection prevention (hand hygiene, vaccinations) and avoidance of stress and exacerbating drugs.
Pearl: A single breath count ≤25 on telephone screening should prompt immediate ED referral, early recognition during the prodromal window can avert intubation and improve outcomes [147]C4.
References
- [1]
Berrih-Aknin S, Frenkian-Cuvelier M, Eymard B. “Diagnostic and clinical classification of autoimmune myasthenia gravis.” Journal of autoimmunity (2014). PMID: 24530233 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [2]
Marulli G, Schiavon M, Perissinotto E et al.. “Surgical and neurologic outcomes after robotic thymectomy in 100 consecutive patients with myasthenia gravis.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2013). PMID: 23312969 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [3]
Ciafaloni E. “Myasthenia Gravis and Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) (2019). PMID: 31794470 ↗
L5CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation, Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion, Special Populations & Pregnancy - [4]
Li N, Zhang Y, Liu L et al.. “Efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in the treatment of impending myasthenic crisis.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 41909657 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis & Natural History - [5]
Alvarez-Ortega AC, Padilla-Londoño N, Posso-Nuñez JA et al.. “Clinical outcomes and follow-up after thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis: A Colombian cohort study.” JTCVS open (2025). PMID: 41960072 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [6]
Liu C, Liu P, Zhang XJ et al.. “Assessment of the risks of a myasthenic crisis after thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 studies.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2020). PMID: 32993739 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, History and Evolution of Treatment - [7]
Lv Z, Zhong H, Huan X et al.. “Predictive Score for In-Hospital Mortality of Myasthenic Crisis: A Retrospective Chinese Cohort Study.” European neurology (2019). PMID: 31661691 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [8]
Arrese L, Di Meglio M, Byrne L et al.. “Swallowing Impairments in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Scoping Review.” Dysphagia (2025). PMID: 41361129 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [9]
Zhang Q, Pan X, Bi Z et al.. “Comparison of outcomes and postoperative immunotherapy between patients with non-thymomatous and thymomatous myasthenia gravis following thymectomy.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2025). PMID: 40547861 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [10]
Voháňka S, Tichopád A, Horáková M et al.. “Burden of Myasthenia Gravis in the Czech Republic: Analysis of the Nationwide Patient Registry.” Neurology and therapy (2024). PMID: 39630385 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [11]
Reyes-Leiva D, Carbayo Á, Vesperinas-Castro A et al.. “Persistent symptoms, exacerbations and drug side effects despite treatment in myasthenia gravis.” European journal of neurology (2024). PMID: 39624955 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [12]
Bershan S, Meisel A, Mergenthaler P. “Data-driven explainable machine learning for personalized risk classification of myasthenic crisis.” International journal of medical informatics (2024). PMID: 39566349 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [13]
Myllynen C, Tuulasvaara A, Atula S et al.. “Intensive care due to myasthenia gravis: Risk factors and prognosis.” European journal of neurology (2024). PMID: 39435628 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Complications - [14]
Ruan Z, Su Y, Tang Y et al.. “Nomogram for predicting the risk of postoperative myasthenic crisis in patients with thymectomy.” Annals of clinical and translational neurology (2023). PMID: 36879415 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [15]
Mahic M, Bozorg A, Rudnik J et al.. “Treatment patterns in myasthenia gravis: A United States health claims analysis.” Muscle & nerve (2023). PMID: 36721910 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [16]
Stascheit F, Hotter B, Hoffmann S et al.. “Calprotectin as potential novel biomarker in myasthenia gravis.” Journal of translational autoimmunity (2021). PMID: 34458711 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [17]
Sakaguchi H, Yamashita S, Hirano T et al.. “Myasthenic crisis patients who require intensive care unit management.” Muscle & nerve (2012). PMID: 22907237 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [18]
Lin J, Chang T, Xiao L et al.. “Rapid efficacy of efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis patients in acute exacerbations/worsening: multicenter real-world retrospective study.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41699286 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications, Prognosis & Natural History - [19]
Huan X, Chen R, Jin L et al.. “1-Year Clinical Outcome Post-Myasthenic Crisis: A Multicenter Prospective Study in China.” European journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41589418 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Complications, Prognosis & Natural History - [20]
Huang Y, Xiong Y, Zhan H et al.. “Emergency use of eculizumab in impending and manifest myasthenic crisis: a retrospective case series.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2026). PMID: 41769309 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion, Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation, Special Populations & Pregnancy - [21]
Yang H, Liu D, Hong X et al.. “Effectiveness and safety of thymectomy plus prednisone compares with prednisone monotherapy for the treatment of non-thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis: Protocol for a systematic review.” Medicine (2020). PMID: 32569233 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization) - [22]
Juel VC. “Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) (2025). PMID: 41037173 ↗
L5CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization), Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation, Prognosis & Natural History - [23]
Hawkes MA, Hocker SE, Leis AA. “West Nile virus induces a post-infectious pro-inflammatory state that explains transformation of stable ocular myasthenia gravis to myasthenic crises.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2018). PMID: 30267806 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization) - [24]
Zhong H, Huan X, Zhao R et al.. “Peripheral immune landscape for hypercytokinemia in myasthenic crisis utilizing single-cell transcriptomics.” Journal of translational medicine (2023). PMID: 37620910 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization) - [25]
Seki M, Kitano S, Suzuki S. “Neurological disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an association with autoantibodies.” Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII (2021). PMID: 34515815 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization), Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG) - [26]
Du X, Gao X, Cui J et al.. “Clinicopathological Features and Pathogenesis of Thymoma Complicated with Alopecia Areata: A Multicenter, Matched Case Analysis.” Cancers (2025). PMID: 40867301 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization), Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [27]
Dalakas MC, Löscher WN. “7th International Immunoglobulin Conference: Interlaken Leadership Awards.” Clinical and experimental immunology (2014). PMID: 25546789 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization), Long-term & Definitive Management (Evidence Ladder) - [28]
Abdelmeguid A, Rojansky R, Berry GJ et al.. “Dysphagia and Dysphonia, a Pairing of Symptoms Caused by an Unusual Pair of Diseases: Castleman's Disease and Myasthenia Gravis.” The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology (2020). PMID: 32812444 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization), Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [29]
Yang Q, Yu S, Wang X et al.. “Perioperative Administration of Efgartigimod in myasthenia gravis patients with Thymoma: A six-case series.” Journal of neuroimmunology (2026). PMID: 42462363 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology & Mechanism (Neuroanatomic Localization) - [30]
Alshekhlee A, Miles JD, Katirji B et al.. “Incidence and mortality rates of myasthenia gravis and myasthenic crisis in US hospitals.” Neurology (2009). PMID: 19414721 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Complications - [31]
Mevius A, Jöres L, Biskup J et al.. “Epidemiology and treatment of myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study using a large insurance claims dataset in Germany.” Neuromuscular disorders : NMD (2023). PMID: 36921445 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors - [32]
Chung HY, Yu MH, Shin HY et al.. “Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea.” Neuroepidemiology (2026). PMID: 42154663 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [33]
Tsai NW, Chien LN, Hung C et al.. “Epidemiology, Patient Characteristics, and Treatment Patterns of Myasthenia Gravis in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study.” Neurology and therapy (2024). PMID: 38678112 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG) - [34]
Habib AA, Sacks N, Cool C et al.. “Hospitalizations and Mortality From Myasthenia Gravis: Trends From 2 US National Datasets.” Neurology (2023). PMID: 38165317 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Complications - [35]
Woo J, Kim SW, Kim JH et al.. “Identification of High-Risk Population for Mortality and Severe Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Myasthenia Gravis: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea.” Journal of Korean medical science (2025). PMID: 40985852 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications, Prognosis & Natural History - [36]
Qi CZ, Lin Y, Li Y et al.. “Characteristics and healthcare utilization of patients with myasthenia gravis exacerbation.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2024). PMID: 39615151 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG) - [37]
Neumann B, Angstwurm K, Dohmen C et al.. “Weaning and extubation failure in myasthenic crisis: a multicenter analysis.” Journal of neurology (2023). PMID: 37923937 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Long-term & Definitive Management (Evidence Ladder), Complications - [38]
Bril V, Gilhus NE. “Aging and infectious diseases in myasthenia gravis.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2024). PMID: 39671879 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors - [39]
Chen H, Wang Y, Zhang N et al.. “The Etiology Analysis of Myasthenia Gravis with In-Hospital Mortality in the Neurocritical Care Unit.” Neurocritical care (2025). PMID: 40877497 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Complications - [40]
Pasnoor M, Miller-Wilson LA, Edwards Y et al.. “Burden of Disease in Myasthenia Gravis: A Targeted Literature Review.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 42033462 ↗
L2REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [41]
Wang Y, Huan X, Zhu X et al.. “Independent risk factors for in-hospital outcome of myasthenic crisis: a prospective cohort study.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2024). PMID: 38344193 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Complications, Prognosis & Natural History - [42]
Chien CY, Chang CW, Liao MF et al.. “Myasthenia gravis and independent risk factors for recurrent infection: a retrospective cohort study.” BMC neurology (2023). PMID: 37400755 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, Complications - [43]
Kanai T, Uzawa A, Sato Y et al.. “A clinical predictive score for postoperative myasthenic crisis.” Annals of neurology (2017). PMID: 29083502 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Complications - [44]
Yeh HL, Chang CC, Liu AB et al.. “Taiwan Clinical Practice Guidelines for Myasthenia Gravis.” Acta neurologica Taiwanica (2026). PMID: 42033803 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), History and Evolution of Treatment - [45]
Han HJ, Kim SW, Lee M et al.. “Effect of the Administration of Cautionary Drugs on the Risk of Worsening Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study.” Yonsei medical journal (2025). PMID: 40134081 ↗
L3CASE_CONTROLCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors - [46]
Zou J, Yao X, Liu Z et al.. “Predictive Value of Perioperative Blood Lactic Acid Levels for Postoperative Crisis in Myasthenia Gravis Patients Undergoing Thymectomy.” Muscle & nerve (2025). PMID: 39949242 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications - [47]
Moffatt C, Pillutla P, Soltanzadeh P et al.. “Heterogeneous Presentations and Serologies in Myasthenia Gravis Patients Presenting with Dysphagia.” The Laryngoscope (2024). PMID: 38949061 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [48]
Nelke C, Labeit B, Meuth SG et al.. “Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis in Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Report and Literature Review.” Frontiers in neurology (2020). PMID: 33178124 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Presentation, Special Populations & Pregnancy - [49]
Rathish D, Karalliyadda M. “Takotsubo syndrome in patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review of previously reported cases.” BMC neurology (2019). PMID: 31718587 ↗
L4SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [50]
Zhu K, Chen J, Li J et al.. “Myasthenia Gravis With Thymoma, Manifesting as AChR-Ab-Positive, Distinct Bulbar Palsy Accompanied by Dysgeusia: A Case Series and Review of Literature.” Frontiers in neurology (2018). PMID: 29670572 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Presentation - [51]
Neumann B, Angstwurm K, Mergenthaler P et al.. “Myasthenic crisis demanding mechanical ventilation: A multicenter analysis of 250 cases.” Neurology (2019). PMID: 31801833 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation, Long-term & Definitive Management (Evidence Ladder), Complications, Prognosis & Natural History, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [52]
Suzuki S, Ishikawa N, Konoeda F et al.. “Nivolumab-related myasthenia gravis with myositis and myocarditis in Japan.” Neurology (2017). PMID: 28821685 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation - [53]
Han HJ, Kim S, Park HJ et al.. “Early prediction of refractory myasthenia gravis based on response to treatment within the first year of diagnosis.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2025). PMID: 40281192 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [54]
Huan X, Ruan Z, Zhao R et al.. “Myasthenic crisis in thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.” Neuromuscular disorders : NMD (2023). PMID: 37783628 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Clinical Presentation, Complications, Prognosis & Natural History - [55]
Messina C, Basile L, Crescimanno G et al.. “Prominent and fast response to eculizumab in myasthenic crisis: the potential as rescue therapy in refractory myasthenia gravis.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2025). PMID: 40111671 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Presentation, Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion, Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [56]
Vinciguerra C, Bevilacqua L, Toriello A et al.. “Starting eculizumab as rescue therapy in refractory myasthenic crisis.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2023). PMID: 37306795 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Presentation, Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [57]
Jin L, He D, Zeng Q et al.. “Eculizumab in thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis: a real-world cohort study.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2024). PMID: 39735403 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Clinical Presentation, Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Prognosis & Natural History - [58]
Oyama M, Okada K, Masuda M et al.. “Suitable indications of eculizumab for patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2020). PMID: 32215054 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation, Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [59]
Abuhammad A, Ayyad M, Albandak M et al.. “Double-seronegative myasthenia gravis: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes - a systematic review of case reports and case series.” BMC neurology (2026). PMID: 41559594 ↗
L4SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [60]
Itagaki H, Hagino T, Endo T. “Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review of case reports with subtype-based analysis.” International journal of emergency medicine (2026). PMID: 41680628 ↗
L4SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation, Complications - [61]
Lin Y, Kuang Q, Li H et al.. “Outcome and clinical features in juvenile myasthenia gravis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Frontiers in neurology (2023). PMID: 36970540 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation, History and Evolution of Treatment - [62]
Mergenthaler P, Stetefeld HR, Dohmen C et al.. “Seronegative myasthenic crisis: a multicenter analysis.” Journal of neurology (2022). PMID: 35389099 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG) - [63]
Yeung SJ, Qdaisat A, Chaftari P et al.. “Diagnosis and management of immune-related adverse effects of immune checkpoint therapy in the emergency department.” Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open (2020). PMID: 33392573 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [64]
Jacob S. “Treating myasthenia gravis beyond the eye clinic.” Eye (London, England) (2024). PMID: 38789789 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [65]
Schaller-Paule MA, Steinmetz H, Vollmer FS et al.. “Lessons in clinical reasoning - pitfalls, myths, and pearls: the contribution of faulty data gathering and synthesis to diagnostic error.” Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) (2021). PMID: 33759405 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG) - [66]
Mishra AK, Varma A. “Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review.” Cureus (2023). PMID: 38186498 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), History and Evolution of Treatment - [67]
Harris L, Graham S, MacLachlan S et al.. “A retrospective longitudinal cohort study of the clinical burden in myasthenia gravis.” BMC neurology (2022). PMID: 35534810 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG) - [68]
Jeong S, Noh Y, Oh IS et al.. “Survival, Prognosis, and Clinical Feature of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: a 15-year Nationwide Cohort Study.” Journal of Korean medical science (2021). PMID: 34636500 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [69]
Dion M, Gavoille A, Chamouard V et al.. “Predictive Factors for Non-response to First Use of Polyvalent Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis.” Neurology and therapy (2026). PMID: 42091851 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Diagnosis & Workup (Neuroimaging, EEG, LP, NCS/EMG), Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [70]
He D, Chen H, Zhong H et al.. “Predictors of exacerbation in myasthenia gravis after minimal symptom expression: a bicenter cohort study.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 41972143 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis & Natural History - [71]
Sobieszczuk E, Napiórkowski Ł, Szczudlik P et al.. “Myasthenia gravis-treatment and severity in nationwide cohort.” Acta neurologica Scandinavica (2022). PMID: 34981830 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [72]
Wang L, Qu M, Rong X et al.. “Clinical outcomes and quality of life associated with eculizumab in patients with late-onset myasthenia gravis.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 42367791 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Long-term & Definitive Management (Evidence Ladder), Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care, Prognosis & Natural History - [73]
Ma T, Liu Y, Zhu Y et al.. “Effectiveness and Safety of Eculizumab in Highly Active AChR+gMG and Its Therapeutic Response in Different Subtypes of gMG.” ImmunoTargets and therapy (2026). PMID: 41847264 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [74]
Marois C, Combes A, Bouguerra M et al.. “Weaning from mechanical ventilation in myasthenic crisis according to WEAN safe: most patients experience intermediate or prolonged weaning with no differences between early and late-onset compared to very-late onset myasthenia Gravis.” Annals of intensive care (2025). PMID: 40658304 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Complications - [75]
Wang S, Zhu M, Dong J et al.. “Perioperative Safety and Efficacy of Efgartigimod for Thymoma-Associated Myasthenia Gravis: A Prospective, Multicenter, Phase II Clinical Trial.” Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (2025). PMID: 40320172 ↗
L2TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Prognosis & Natural History - [76]
Luo S, Jiang Q, Zeng W et al.. “Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: A multicenter real-world cohort study in China.” Annals of clinical and translational neurology (2024). PMID: 38973109 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification - [77]
Song J, Wang H, Huan X et al.. “Efgartigimod as a promising add-on therapy for myasthenic crisis: a prospective case series.” Frontiers in immunology (2024). PMID: 39136012 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Severity, Staging & Risk Stratification, Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [78]
Jani-Acsadi A, Lisak RP. “Myasthenic crisis: guidelines for prevention and treatment.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2007). PMID: 17544450 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion, Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [79]
Rabinstein AA. “Acute Neuromuscular Respiratory Failure.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) (2015). PMID: 26426233 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [80]
Schröder A, Linker RA, Gold R. “Plasmapheresis for neurological disorders.” Expert review of neurotherapeutics (2009). PMID: 19769448 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [81]
Spillane J, Hirsch NP, Kullmann DM et al.. “Myasthenia gravis--treatment of acute severe exacerbations in the intensive care unit results in a favourable long-term prognosis.” European journal of neurology (2013). PMID: 23398500 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [82]
Mantegazza R, Saccà F, Antonini G et al.. “Therapeutic challenges and unmet needs in the management of myasthenia gravis: an Italian expert opinion.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2024). PMID: 38967883 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [83]
Rodrigues CL, de Freitas HC, Lima PRO et al.. “Myasthenia gravis exacerbation and myasthenic crisis associated with COVID-19: case series and literature review.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2022). PMID: 35039987 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [84]
Menacher M, Ellssel M, Kwiedor I et al.. “Complement inhibition in seropositive generalized myasthenia gravis as rescue therapy in impending and effective treatment in frequently recurring impending myasthenic crisis-a case series.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2024). PMID: 39735401 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [85]
Song J, Huan X, Chen Y et al.. “The safety and efficacy profile of eculizumab in myasthenic crisis: a prospective small case series.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2024). PMID: 39072008 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [86]
Takenobu Y, Ikeda K, Hasebe S et al.. “Rapid response of eculizumab: a rescue therapy for ventilator-dependent refractory myasthenic crisis.” Immunological medicine (2025). PMID: 40327031 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion, Long-term & Definitive Management (Evidence Ladder) - [87]
Hong Y, Gao L, Huang SQ et al.. “Efgartigimod as a fast-acting add-on therapy in manifest and impending myasthenic crisis: A single-center case series.” Journal of neuroimmunology (2024). PMID: 39142025 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion, Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [88]
Saied Z, Rachdi A, Thamlaoui S et al.. “Myasthenia gravis and COVID-19: A case series and comparison with literature.” Acta neurologica Scandinavica (2021). PMID: 33914898 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion, Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [89]
D'Amico F, Campo S, Rini N et al.. “Efgartigimod in Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Refractory or Intolerant to IVIg.” Neurology and therapy (2026). PMID: 41922674 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [90]
Rini N, D'Amico F, Portera V et al.. “Efgartigimod as Fast-Acting Rescue Therapy in Very Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis.” Neurology and therapy (2025). PMID: 41258323 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [91]
Gomez-Figueroa E, Garcia-Trejo S, Bazan-Rodriguez L et al.. “Intravenous cyclophosphamide monthly pulses in refractory myasthenia gravis.” Journal of neurology (2019). PMID: 31720821 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Acute Management: Neurologic Emergencies & Attack Abortion - [92]
Rowin J, Thiruppathi M, Arhebamen E et al.. “Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor treatment of a patient in myasthenic crisis: effects on regulatory T cells.” Muscle & nerve (2012). PMID: 22907239 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Long-term & Definitive Management (Evidence Ladder) - [93]
Gold R, Hohlfeld R, Toyka KV. “Progress in the treatment of myasthenia gravis.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2008). PMID: 21180568 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Long-term & Definitive Management (Evidence Ladder) - [94]
Gajdos P, Chevret S, Clair B et al.. “Clinical trial of plasma exchange and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis. Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Study Group.” Annals of neurology (1997). PMID: 9189040 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [95]
Gamez J, Salvadó M, Carmona F et al.. “Intravenous immunoglobulin to prevent myasthenic crisis after thymectomy and other procedures can be omitted in patients with well-controlled myasthenia gravis.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2019). PMID: 31360225 ↗
L1OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [96]
Antozzi C, Vu T, Ramchandren S et al.. “Safety and efficacy of nipocalimab in adults with generalised myasthenia gravis (Vivacity-MG3): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.” The Lancet. Neurology (2025). PMID: 39862879 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [97]
Jiang L, Wei J, Qin J et al.. “Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives.” Frontiers in neurology (2026). PMID: 42358938 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [98]
Rossini E, Morino S, Garibaldi M et al.. “Emergent role of complement inhibitors in myasthenic crisis: Understanding why, when and how.” Clinical neurology and neurosurgery (2025). PMID: 40505554 ↗
L4SR_OBSCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [99]
Prado MB, Adiao KJ. “Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Myasthenic Crisis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.” Neurocritical care (2021). PMID: 34292475 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [100]
Hohlfeld R, Michels M, Heininger K et al.. “Azathioprine toxicity during long-term immunosuppression of generalized myasthenia gravis.” Neurology (1988). PMID: 3340289 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [101]
Akaishi T, Motomura M, Shiraishi H et al.. “Preoperative risks of post-operative myasthenic crisis (POMC): A meta-analysis.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2019). PMID: 31654832 ↗
L3SR_OBSCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [102]
Mouri H, Jo T, Matsui H et al.. “Effect of Sugammadex on Postoperative Myasthenic Crisis in Myasthenia Gravis Patients: Propensity Score Analysis of a Japanese Nationwide Database.” Anesthesia and analgesia (2020). PMID: 31124838 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [103]
Xue L, Wang L, Dong J et al.. “Risk factors of myasthenic crisis after thymectomy for thymoma patients with myasthenia gravis.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2017). PMID: 29156018 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [104]
Hong Y, Yuan CW, Lu J et al.. “Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis in the extreme elderly (≥80 years): a multicenter retrospective real-world study.” Frontiers in immunology (2025). PMID: 41280898 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation, Prognosis & Natural History, Special Populations & Pregnancy - [105]
Chen J, Chen H, Chu X et al.. “Extended Preoperative Immunotherapy Duration Reduces the Risk of Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbation for Patients with Thymoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.” Neurology and therapy (2026). PMID: 42365147 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation, Complications - [106]
Gonzalez NL, Puwanant A, Lu A et al.. “Myasthenia triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors: New case and literature review.” Neuromuscular disorders : NMD (2017). PMID: 28109638 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [107]
Mitsutake A, Suzuki A, Murai H et al.. “Myasthenic crisis associated with invasive thymoma successfully treated with ravulizumab: A case series.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2025). PMID: 41274033 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation, Prognosis & Natural History - [108]
Sieb JP. “Myasthenia gravis: an update for the clinician.” Clinical and experimental immunology (2014). PMID: 24117026 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation, Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [109]
Ching J, Richards D, Lewis RA et al.. “Myasthenia gravis exacerbation in association with antibody overshoot following plasmapheresis.” Muscle & nerve (2021). PMID: 34076268 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [110]
Wilf-Yarkoni A, Lotan I, Steiner I et al.. “Chronic low-dose intravenous immunoglobulins as steroid-sparing therapy in myasthenia gravis.” Journal of neurology (2021). PMID: 33829320 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [111]
Drakou E, Aziz A, Brown A et al.. “Cloudy or Clear? Readability and Content Analysis of Patient Education Materials in Myasthenia Gravis.” Muscle & nerve (2026). PMID: 41793243 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [112]
Cooper DS, Meriggioli MN, Bonomi PD et al.. “Severe Exacerbation of Myasthenia Gravis Associated with Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy.” Journal of neuromuscular diseases (2017). PMID: 28505981 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [113]
Werner JM, Schweinsberg V, Schroeter M et al.. “Successful Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis Following PD-1/CTLA-4 Combination Checkpoint Blockade in a Patient With Metastatic Melanoma.” Frontiers in oncology (2019). PMID: 30828569 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Disease-Modifying & Immunotherapy Program: Sequencing, Safety Monitoring & De-escalation - [114]
Otaka H, Imai S, Tani T et al.. “Influence of inpatient rehabilitation after crisis in patients with myasthenia gravis: A retrospective cohort study using a nationwide administrative database in Japan.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2022). PMID: 35594695 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [115]
Okamoto A, Sasaki Y, Mizutani Y et al.. “Case Report: Early rehabilitation initiated in the intensive care unit for myasthenic crisis.” Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences (2026). PMID: 42358803 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [116]
Malaiyandi D, James E. “Neuromuscular Weakness in Intensive Care.” Critical care clinics (2022). PMID: 36333027 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [117]
Li KK, Qian K, Feng YG et al.. “Predictive factors of prolonged mechanical ventilation, overall survival, and quality of life in patients with post-thymectomy myasthenic crisis.” World journal of surgical oncology (2017). PMID: 28789662 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [118]
Ramos-Fransi A, Rojas-García R, Segovia S et al.. “Myasthenia gravis: descriptive analysis of life-threatening events in a recent nationwide registry.” European journal of neurology (2015). PMID: 25847221 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [119]
Kalita J, Kohat AK, Misra UK. “Predictors of outcome of myasthenic crisis.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2014). PMID: 24497206 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [120]
Wang Y, Huan X, Song J et al.. “Clinical outcome and peripheral CD4+ T profile in impending myasthenic crisis: A prospective cohort study.” Journal of neuroimmunology (2025). PMID: 40054023 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [121]
Ohara H, Kikutsuji N, Iguchi N et al.. “Efgartigimod combined with steroids as a fast-acting therapy for myasthenic crisis: a case report.” BMC neurology (2024). PMID: 39174898 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [122]
Kalita J, Gutti NB, Ahamed F et al.. “Effect of Intravenous Immunoglobulin or Plasmapheresis in Myasthenic Crisis and Worsening Myasthenia Gravis Compared to Without Rescue Treatment.” Clinical therapeutics (2025). PMID: 40645852 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care, Complications - [123]
Jones SC, Sorbello A, Boucher RM. “Fluoroquinolone-associated myasthenia gravis exacerbation: evaluation of postmarketing reports from the US FDA adverse event reporting system and a literature review.” Drug safety (2011). PMID: 21879778 ↗
L4REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Neurorehabilitation, Symptomatic & Supportive Care - [124]
Guo R, Sun C, Huang X et al.. “Efficacy and safety of efgartigimod versus intravenous immunoglobulin in early intervention of acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive impending myasthenic crisis: A retrospective cohort study.” Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics (2025). PMID: 40914739 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Complications, Prognosis & Natural History - [125]
Huan X, Chen J, Zhong H et al.. “Clinical outcome and peripheral immune profile of myasthenic crisis with omicron infections: A prospective cohort study.” Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) (2023). PMID: 38142901 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Complications, Prognosis & Natural History - [126]
Chung CC, Wu IC, Bamodu OA et al.. “Machine Learning in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Models and AI-Assisted Clinical Assessments.” Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2025). PMID: 40870896 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Prognosis & Natural History - [127]
Gerischer L, Stein M, Schneider A et al.. “Complement Inhibition Therapy in Myasthenic Crisis-A Multicentre Retrospective Analysis of 17 Cases From Germany.” European journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41983870 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prognosis & Natural History - [128]
Sun C, Ruan Z, Zhang Y et al.. “High indirect bilirubin levels as an independent predictor of postoperative myasthenic crisis: a single-center, retrospective study.” Frontiers in neurology (2024). PMID: 38283685 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Prognosis & Natural History - [129]
Zhou Q, He T, Cheng Y et al.. “Efgartigimod Versus Lymphoplasmapheresis as Preoperative Rapid Antibody-Clearing Therapies for Thymectomy in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Effectiveness, Safety and Cost Outcomes Compared to Conventional Preparation.” CNS neuroscience & therapeutics (2026). PMID: 42322065 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prognosis & Natural History - [130]
Sanders DB, Wolfe GI, Benatar M et al.. “International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: Executive summary.” Neurology (2016). PMID: 27358333 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [131]
Banner H, Niles KM, Ryu M et al.. “Myasthenia gravis in pregnancy: Systematic review and case series.” Obstetric medicine (2022). PMID: 35845224 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [132]
Shelly S. “Case report: Successful perioperative intervention with efgartigimod in a patient in myasthenic crisis.” Frontiers in immunology (2025). PMID: 39935471 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [133]
Tremolizzo L, Giopato F, Piatti ML et al.. “Myasthenia gravis mimicking stroke: a case series with sudden onset dysarthria.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2015). PMID: 25648108 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [134]
Zivković SA, Clemens PR, Lacomis D. “Characteristics of late-onset myasthenia gravis.” Journal of neurology (2012). PMID: 22476514 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [135]
Almeida C, Coutinho E, Moreira D et al.. “Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: anaesthetic management--a series of cases.” European journal of anaesthesiology (2010). PMID: 20733499 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [136]
Draxler J, Meisel A, Stascheit F et al.. “Pregnancy in myasthenia gravis: a retrospective analysis of maternal and neonatal outcome from a large tertiary care centre in Germany.” Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2024). PMID: 38492082 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [137]
Frobert E, Sarret C, Billaud G et al.. “Pediatric neurological complications associated with the A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza infection.” Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology (2011). PMID: 21920811 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [138]
Ranellone A, Abraham MG. “Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in the setting of a myasthenic crisis.” The International journal of neuroscience (2020). PMID: 32677485 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [139]
Kuo Y, Ottens TH, van der Bilt I et al.. “Myasthenic crisis-induced Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in an elderly man: A case report of an underestimated but deadly combination.” World journal of cardiology (2021). PMID: 33552400 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [140]
Chun W, Kim Y, Park SH et al.. “Thromboembolic complications following intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in immune-mediated neurological disorders.” Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia (2021). PMID: 34275568 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [141]
Piccioni MG, Tabacco S, Giannini A et al.. “Myasthaenia gravis in pregnancy, delivery and newborn.” Minerva ginecologica (2020). PMID: 32153161 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [142]
Muralidhar Reddy Y, Parida S, Jaiswal SK et al.. “Nocardiosis-an uncommon infection in patients with myasthenia gravis: report of three cases and review of literature.” BMJ case reports (2020). PMID: 33384345 ↗
L4SR_OBSCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy - [143]
Claytor B, Cho SM, Li Y. “Myasthenic crisis.” Muscle & nerve (2023). PMID: 37114503 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [144]
Abuzinadah AR, Alanazy MH, Butt NS et al.. “Predictors of Outcome in Myasthenic Crisis.” Muscle & nerve (2025). PMID: 40698586 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [145]
Chen H, Kong L, Zhang Y et al.. “Myocardial Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Myasthenia Gravis.” Journal of clinical medicine (2022). PMID: 36498680 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [146]
Cordts I, Bodart N, Hartmann K et al.. “Screening for lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4-, agrin-, and titin-antibodies and exploring the autoimmune spectrum in myasthenia gravis.” Journal of neurology (2017). PMID: 28516329 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [147]
Kukulka K, Gummi RR, Govindarajan R. “A telephonic single breath count test for screening of exacerbations of myasthenia gravis: A pilot study.” Muscle & nerve (2020). PMID: 32447763 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [148]
Zinman L, Thoma J, Kwong JC et al.. “Safety of influenza vaccination in patients with myasthenia gravis: a population-based study.” Muscle & nerve (2009). PMID: 19902540 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [149]
Virgilio E, Tondo G, Montabone C et al.. “COVID-19 Vaccination and Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis: A New Case Report and Review of the Literature.” International journal of environmental research and public health (2022). PMID: 36612789 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance