On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, is a unique encephalopathy complicating CAR T-cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel), bispecific antibodies (epcoritamab, blinatumomab, teclistamab), and TCR T cells, with incidence ranging from 6% (bispecifics) to 55% (axi-cel any grade) and grade ≥3 in 3-31% depending on product.
- •Pathophysiology is distinct from CRS: CAR T-cell activation triggers cytokine surge (IFN-γ, IL-6, TNF-α) → endothelial activation and BBB disruption → CAR+ extracellular vesicle (CAR+EV) release within 1 hour (plasma >132.8/µL at hour +1 predicts ICANS with high sensitivity) → neuroinflammation (microglial/astrocyte activation, intrathecal IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL10) → neuronal/astroglial injury (↑ serum NfL, GFAP).
- •Three phenotypic variants: central (thalamic/hippocampal/brainstem edema, symmetric, severe); stroke-like (cortico-subcortical DWI lesions, subacute); acute myelopathy (quadriparesis, non-inflammatory white matter destruction, low CSF cytokines). BCMA CAR-T (ide-cel, cilta-cel) shows minimal classic ICANS but cilta-cel carries 20-fold higher delayed neurotoxicity (movement disorders, cranial neuropathies).
- •Grade ≥3 ICANS independently increases non-relapse mortality (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.00-6.04) and worsens OS (HR 1.79) after CD19 CAR-T; CRS and early hematologic toxicity do not retain independent prognostic significance. Baseline plasma NfL >87 pg/mL predicts ICANS with 96% AUC.
Evaluation
- •Suspect ICANS in any patient with new confusion, language dysfunction, tremor, headache, seizures, or focal deficits within 14 days of immune effector cell infusion, median onset day 3-5 for classic ICANS, day 3.5 for TIAN (tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity in CNS lymphoma).
- •Perform ICE score (Immune Effector Cell Encephalopathy) q8h × 14 days: 10-point scale (orientation 0-3, naming 0-1, following commands 0-1, writing 0-1, attention 0-1). Score 10 = normal; 7-9 = grade 1; 3-6 = grade 2; 1-2 = grade 3; 0 = grade 4. A 2-point drop from baseline mandates urgent MRI within 4 hours.
- •Examine for: level of consciousness (GCS), cranial nerves (facial palsy 8% with cilta-cel), motor (quadriparesis, hyperreflexia), autonomic lability, meningeal signs. Red flags: GCS ≤8 → airway protection/ICU; seizures/status epilepticus → emergent EEG; FVC <15 mL/kg or rising pCO₂ → consider intubation.
- •Order STAT: non-contrast head CT (exclude hemorrhage), CBC, CMP, CRP, ferritin, coagulation, blood cultures. MRI brain ± spine with DWI/FLAIR within 4 hours if grade ≥2 with focal signs, seizure, or ICE decline ≥2. Characteristic findings: symmetric T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in external/extreme capsules (69%), brainstem tegmental tracts (40%), bilateral thalami (26%).
- •Lumbar puncture if grade ≥2 with fever, meningeal signs, or diagnostic uncertainty, after imaging excludes mass effect. CSF typically: mild lymphocytic pleocytosis (<50/µL), elevated protein (50-150 mg/dL), normal glucose. Send PCR panel (HSV, VZV, enterovirus, HHV-6), flow cytometry, cytology. CSF cytokines (IL-6, IFN-γ, CXCL10) elevated in research but not standard.
- •Continuous EEG (cEEG) within 1 hour for grade ≥3 ICANS or clinical seizure; routine EEG within 12 hours for grade 2. Non-convulsive status epilepticus occurs in up to 30-40% of severe ICANS and is detectable only on EEG. Patterns: generalized slowing, FIRDA, electrographic seizures.
- •Peripheral biomarkers: serial CRP, ferritin, IL-6, CAR-T expansion kinetics (flow/qPCR days 7, 14, 21, 28). Peak CAR-T expansion (AUC) correlates with ICANS severity. Pre-infusion LDH, CRP predict expansion and toxicity. Baseline mEASIX (platelets, CRP, LDH) and CAR-HEMATOTOX score (platelets, Hb, ANC, CRP, ferritin) stratify coagulopathy and cytopenia risk.
- •Also consider: HHV-6B reactivation (6% post-CAR-T, encephalitis 0.17%), TIAN (focal deficits referable to known CNS lesion, median onset 3.5 days, less CRS overlap), cranial nerve palsy syndrome (isolated neuropathies without encephalopathy), CAR-T-related GBS (ascending paralysis, facial nerve enhancement, albuminocytologic dissociation, onset 5-78 days), late encephalitis (progressive decline months later, CSF CAR-T DNA, fatal).
Management
- •Grade 1 (ICE 9-10): supportive care, continue q8h ICE monitoring, q4h neuro/vitals, levetiracetam 500 mg IV q12h prophylaxis optional.
- •Grade ≥2 (ICE ≤8): IMMEDIATELY initiate dexamethasone 10 mg IV q6h, do NOT wait for MRI/LP. Every hour of delay correlates with worse outcomes. Concurrent CRS grade ≥2: add tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) over 1 hour. Tocilizumab has limited BBB penetration and does NOT reverse established neurotoxicity; avoid for isolated ICANS without CRS.
- •Grade 3-4 (ICE ≤2, obtunded/comatose): escalate to methylprednisolone 1 g IV daily. ICU transfer, continuous cardiac monitoring, cEEG within 1 hour, neurosurgery consult if cerebral edema on imaging. Hyperosmolar therapy (mannitol 0.5-1 g/kg or 3% saline) for ICP elevation while arranging advanced therapies.
- •Steroid-refractory ICANS (no ICE improvement ≥2 points at 24h on high-dose steroids): add anakinra 100 mg IV q6h (or 2 mg/kg IV q6h). Anakinra crosses BBB, targets IL-1-mediated neuroinflammation; case reports show grade 4 resolution within 48h. Continue steroids.
- •Life-threatening cerebral edema refractory to steroids + anakinra at 48h: consider extracorporeal cytokine adsorption (CytoSorb) 4-day run, single case reported >95% IL-6 reduction and complete neurologic recovery. Siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV q3wk as next-line (60% ICANS improvement in steroid-refractory series).
- •Monitoring during treatment: neuro checks q1h until ICE ≥9 stable ×24h then q4h; ICE score every shift; CRP/ferritin/IL-6 q12h; cEEG continuous for grade ≥3. Steroid taper: once ICE ≥9 sustained 24h, reduce dexamethasone by 25% daily; total course typically 7-10 days. Continue levetiracetam 500 mg IV q12h for 30 days post-resolution if EEG abnormal.
- •Resolution defined as ICE 10 sustained ≥48h off steroids. Median time to resolution 4 days (IQR 2-8). Grade ≥3 ICANS requires ICU-level care until neurologic baseline restored. Outpatient follow-up within 2 weeks for MoCA and biomarker surveillance (NfL, GFAP).
- •Long-term: screen for delayed neurotoxicity (movement disorders, parkinsonism, cranial nerve palsies, peripheral neuropathy) at day 30, 3/6/12 months, especially after cilta-cel (9% cranial nerve palsy, 2.8% peripheral neuropathy). Taper steroids over 4-6 weeks after grade ≥2 ICANS to avoid rebound. IVIG 400 mg/kg monthly while IgG <400 mg/dL or recurrent infections. Antimicrobial prophylaxis: acyclovir/valacyclovir, posaconazole, TMP-SMX until CD4+ >200/µL and off steroids ≥1 month. G-CSF for neutropenia <500/µL >14 days.
- •What NOT to do: Do NOT use tocilizumab monotherapy for isolated ICANS. Do NOT delay steroids awaiting imaging/LP. Do NOT taper steroids before ICE ≥9 sustained 24h. Do NOT use prophylactic antiseizure meds in grade 1 ICANS. Do NOT omit PJP prophylaxis while on steroids ≥20 mg/day prednisone equivalent.
Board Review — High Yield
- •ICE score, 10-point bedside tool (orientation, naming, commands, writing, attention) performed q8h × 14 days; drives ASTCT grading and all intervention thresholds
- •CAR+ extracellular vesicles, shed within 1 hour of CAR T activation; plasma >132.8/µL at hour +1 or >224.5/µL at day +1 predicts ICANS ~4 days before symptoms
- •Central variant, symmetric thalamic/hippocampal/brainstem T2/FLAIR hyperintensity; "double-smiley sign" (external capsules + thalami); severe ICANS, cerebral edema, ICP elevation
- •Stroke-like variant, focal cortico-subcortical DWI-restricted lesions, subacute onset, persist as non-enhancing FLAIR abnormalities
- •Delayed neurotoxicity (cilta-cel), movement disorders, parkinsonism, cranial nerve palsies (9% grade 2, 1% grade 3), peripheral neuropathy (2.8%); OR 20 vs ide-cel; not captured by standard ICANS grading
- •TIAN, tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity in CNS lymphoma; focal deficits referable to known lesion; median onset 3.5 days; less CRS overlap (60% vs 100%)
- •Bendamustine lymphodepletion, vs flu/cy: any-grade ICANS 1% vs 33%, grade ≥3 ICANS 0% vs 13% with liso-cel; non-inferior efficacy
- •mEASIX, modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (platelets, CRP, LDH); baseline elevation predicts CRS ≥2, consumptive coagulopathy, inferior PFS/OS
- •CAR-HEMATOTOX score, pre-infusion platelets, Hb, ANC, CRP, ferritin; score ≥2 predicts severe neutropenia ≥14 days (AUC 0.89), severe thrombocytopenia (87% vs 34%)
- •Tocilizumab limitation, does not cross BBB; ASCO recommends only for concurrent CRS ≥ grade 2, not isolated ICANS
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature
- ▸ICANS is a unique neurotoxicity syndrome of immune effector cell therapies (CAR-T, bispecifics, TCR-T) with dedicated ASTCT grading.
- ▸Grade ≥3 ICANS independently predicts higher non-relapse mortality and worse overall survival after CD19 CAR-T.
- ▸Baseline neurofilament light chain elevation identifies patients with latent neuroaxonal injury at high risk for ICANS.
Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a distinct, potentially life-threatening neurotoxicity unique to immune effector cell therapies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, bispecific antibodies, and T-cell receptor (TCR) T cells, characterized by encephalopathy, focal neurologic deficits, and seizures that typically emerge days after infusion [2]D5.
Also Called / Synonyms
- CAR-T-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES), historical term
- Immune effector cell-associated encephalopathy
- Neurotoxicity after cellular immunotherapy
Classification ICANS is graded by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) consensus criteria, which integrate the 10-point ICE score (orientation, naming, following commands, writing, attention) with level of consciousness, seizure burden, motor findings, and raised intracranial pressure [3]B3b. The same framework applies across CAR-T products (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel) and bispecific engagers such as tarlatamab [13]D5.
| Grade | ICE Score | Consciousness | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7-9 | Awake | Mild encephalopathy |
| 2 | 3-6 | Awake | Moderate encephalopathy |
| 3 | 0-2 | Obtunded | Severe encephalopathy, focal deficits, seizure |
| 4 | 0 | Comatose | Life-threatening, ICP elevation, status epilepticus |
Clinical Significance Grade ≥3 ICANS independently increases non-relapse mortality (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.00-6.04) and worsens overall survival (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.14-2.81) after CD19 CAR-T therapy, whereas CRS and early hematologic toxicity do not retain independent prognostic significance [3]B3b.
Pearl: ICANS is not simply "CRS of the brain", it has distinct pathophysiology, grading, and prognostic weight; a baseline plasma neurofilament light chain >87 pg/mL predicts development with 96% AUC [6]B3b.
2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism
- ▸ICANS pathophysiology is a multi-step cascade: CAR T activation → cytokine surge → endothelial activation/BBB disruption → CAR⁺EV trafficking → neuroinflammation → neuronal injury.
- ▸Two distinct MRI patterns (central thalamic/hippocampal vs. stroke-like cortico-subcortical) map to different clinical severities and temporal evolutions.
- ▸Acute myelopathy post-CAR T is a non-inflammatory entity with low CSF cytokines, distinct from classic ICANS.
- ▸Baseline serum GFAP and NfL identify patients with pre-existing neuronal susceptibility who are at higher ICANS risk.

Core Pathogenic Cascade
ICANS arises from a sequence that begins with CAR T-cell activation and culminates in blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, neuroinflammation, and neuronal injury. The process is distinct from cytokine release syndrome (CRS), although the two syndromes frequently overlap temporally.
- CAR T-cell activation and cytokine surge, Following infusion, CAR T cells engage target antigen (CD19, BCMA, or others), proliferate, and release a burst of proinflammatory cytokines including IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, and TNF-α [15]C4. Peak CAR T-cell expansion (Cmax) and early exposure (AUC₀-₂₈) correlate with higher-grade CRS, and by extension with the cytokine milieu that primes the neurovascular unit [15]C4.
- Endothelial activation and BBB breakdown, Cytokines (particularly IFN-γ and TNF-α) activate cerebral endothelial cells, upregulating adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1) and increasing vascular permeability. Serum biomarkers of endothelial stress (mEASIX, lactate dehydrogenase) rise in parallel [27]B3b.
- CAR⁺ extracellular vesicle (CAR⁺EV) trafficking, Activated CAR T cells shed CAR⁺EVs within 1 hour of target engagement. Plasma CAR⁺EV concentrations >132.8/µL at hour +1 or >224.5/µL at day +1 predict ICANS with high sensitivity and specificity, preceding clinical onset by ~4 days [22]B2b. In vitro, CAR⁺EVs induce release of neuronal injury markers (ENO2⁺ nanoparticles) from iPSC-derived neural cells, implicating them as direct mediators of neurotoxicity [22]B2b.
- Neuroinflammation and microglial activation, Cytokines and CAR⁺EVs penetrate the compromised BBB, activating microglia and astrocytes. This triggers a secondary intrathecal cytokine cascade (IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL10, CCL2) that amplifies local inflammation [16]D5.
- Neuronal and astroglial injury, Serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), markers of axonal and astrocytic damage, are elevated at baseline in patients who later develop ICANS, indicating pre-existing neuronal susceptibility [27]B3b. Day-7 NfL and GFAP elevations correlate with coagulopathy (prolonged clotting time, DIC markers) and systemic inflammation (CRP), linking neurotoxicity to endothelial stress [27]B3b.
Distinct Phenotypic Variants
Central (thalamic/hippocampal) variant, Symmetric involvement of thalami, hippocampi, brainstem, and variably the geniculate bodies or corpus callosum on MRI. Associated with severe ICANS, acute clinical deterioration, and diffuse centrum semiovale edema with intracranial . This pattern largely resolves on follow-up imaging [21]C4.
Stroke-like (cortico-subcortical) variant, Focal DWI-restricted cortico-subcortical white matter lesions appearing in subacute phases, often in both ICANS and asymptomatic patients. Lesions persist as non-enhancing FLAIR abnormalities [21]C4.
Acute myelopathy, Rare but distinct syndrome of quadriparesis/paraparesis with spinal cord and/or brain white matter abnormalities. Autopsy and CSF studies show chronic white matter destruction without inflammatory infiltrates or elevated proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, CCL17, CCL23, CXCL10 are lower than in typical ICANS), suggesting a non-inflammatory mechanism [14]C4[17]D5.
Modulating Factors
- CAR design, CD28-costimulated CARs historically associate with higher ICANS rates than 4-1BB designs. The calibrated-signaling 1XX CAR (inactivating distal ITAMs) retains CD28 effector function while reducing severe ICANS to 7% (grade ≥3) across doses up to 200×10⁶ cells [15]C4.
- Antigen target, BCMA-directed CAR T therapy for shows no ICANS in several small series [23]B2b[24]B2b[30]C4, whereas CD19-directed products carry 30-40% any-grade ICANS incidence [21]C4.
- Baseline neuronal vulnerability, Pre-infusion serum GFAP and NfL levels independently predict ICANS risk and steroid requirement [27]B3b.
- Clonal hematopoiesis (CHIP), Present in 34% of pre-CAR T patients, but does not significantly alter CRS/ICANS incidence or severity [18]D5.
Mermaid Flowchart
mermaid flowchart TD A[CAR T-cell infusion] --> B[Antigen engagement & T-cell activation] B --> C[Cytokine surge (IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, TNF-α)] C --> D[Endothelial activation & BBB disruption] B --> E[CAR⁺EV release (within 1 hr)] E --> F[CAR⁺EVs cross compromised BBB] D --> F F --> G[Microglial/astrocyte activation] G --> H[Intrathecal cytokine cascade (IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL10, CCL2)] H --> I[Neuronal & astroglial injury (↑NfL, ↑GFAP)] I --> J[Clinical ICANS phenotypes] J --> K1[Central variant: thalamic/hippocampal edema] J --> K2[Stroke-like variant: cortico-subcortical lesions] J --> K3[Acute myelopathy: non-inflammatory white matter injury]
Pearl: CAR⁺EVs appear within 1 hour of infusion and predict ICANS days before symptoms; measuring them at hour +1 (>132.8/µL) or day +1 (>224.5/µL) offers a actionable early-warning window [22]B2b.
| Step | Key Mediators / Features | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| CAR T activation & cytokine surge | IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, TNF-α; Cmax & AUC₀-₂₈ correlate with CRS severity | [15]C4 |
| Endothelial activation & BBB disruption | ICAM-1, VCAM-1 upregulation; mEASIX, LDH elevation | [27]B3b |
| CAR⁺EV release & trafficking | CAR⁺EVs detectable at 1 hr; >132.8/µL (hr+1) or >224.5/µL (day+1) predicts ICANS | [22]B2b |
| Neuroinflammation | Microglial/astrocyte activation; intrathecal IL-1β, IL-6, CXCL10, CCL2 | [16]D5 |
| Neuronal/astroglial injury | Baseline ↑GFAP & ↑NfL predict ICANS; day-7 ↑NfL/GFAP correlate with coagulopathy & CRP | [27]B3b |
3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors
- ▸ICANS incidence ranges from 3-55% across products, driven by CAR design and target antigen.
- ▸Prior autologous HCT (OR 1.66) and cilta-cel product (OR 20 for delayed neurotoxicity) are the strongest quantified host and product risk factors.
- ▸New-onset ICANS after 2 weeks occurs in <1% of patients, defining a practical monitoring window.
Building on the pathophysiological framework of endothelial activation and cytokine-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption, the epidemiology of ICANS is defined by product type, disease context, and host factors that modulate peak cytokine exposure and CAR-T expansion. Incidence varies widely across approved constructs and indications, reflecting differences in CAR affinity, costimulatory domain, and target antigen density.
Incidence by Product and Indication
- Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for large B-cell lymphoma: ICANS (any grade) in 55% of 280 patients [43]C4; grade ≥3 ICANS in 7.1% of 127 obe-cel recipients [47]C4 and 3% of var-cel recipients [34]B2b.
- Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel): lower ICANS rates than axi-cel; in a real-world cohort of 624 LBCL patients, axi-cel had significantly higher ICANS (G1+ aOR 2.10, P=0.048) than liso-cel [50]B3b.
- Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) for : ICANS odds ratio 1.66 (95% CI 1.06-2.60) with prior autologous HCT [41]B3b.
- BCMA-directed CAR-T (ide-cel, cilta-cel) for : classic ICANS rates similar between products, but delayed neurotoxicity markedly higher with cilta-cel (OR 20.07, 95% CI 4.46-90.20) [38]C4. Non-ICANS neurologic toxicities (NINTs) pooled incidence 0.81% (95% CI 0.37-1.77%), driven by cilta-cel (4.6% vs 0.5% for ide-cel) [35]B2a.
- Bispecific antibodies (epcoritamab, blinatumomab): ICANS 6% (grade 1-2) with epcoritamab in [45]C4; 17% with subcutaneous blinatumomab in B-ALL [46]C4.
- Novel constructs: prizlon-cel (CD19/CD20) ICANS 6.3% (no grade ≥3) [44]C4; obe-cel (intermediate-affinity CAR) grade ≥3 ICANS 7.1% [47]C4.
Host and Disease Risk Factors
| Factor | Association | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Prior autologous HCT | OR 1.66 (95% CI 1.06-2.60) for ICANS with brexu-cel | [41]B3b |
| Higher baseline ferritin / CRP / thrombocytopenia | Predict prolonged neutropenia (CAR-HEMATOTOX), not directly ICANS | [36]B3b |
| Cilta-cel product | OR 20.07 (95% CI 4.46-90.20) for delayed neurotoxicity vs ide-cel | [38]C4 |
| Higher CAR-T expansion (peak cytokines) | Correlates with CRS/ICANS severity; earlier steroid/anakinra shortens duration | [39]B3b |
| Age >65, prior , CRS grade ≥2 | Predict in-hospital CV events, not ICANS per se | [51]B3b |
Temporal Patterns
- New-onset CRS and ICANS are exceedingly rare after 2 weeks post-infusion (0% and 0.7%, respectively) [42]B3b.
- Median onset of in-hospital CV events (often concurrent with ICANS) day 8 (IQR 5-11) [51]B3b.
Etiologic Considerations
- HHV-6B reactivation 6% (95% CI 2.2-12.5%) after CAR-T; encephalitis 0.17% (95% CI 0.02-0.94%), infrequent and not a major ICANS driver [37]C4.
- Non-inflammatory pathophysiology suggested for quadriparesis/paraparesis phenotype in children (low CSF proinflammatory cytokines) [14]C4.
Pearl: ICANS incidence is product-dependent, highest with axi-cel (∼55% any grade) and cilta-cel (delayed neurotoxicity OR 20 vs ide-cel), and new-onset events after day 14 are vanishingly rare, supporting focused early monitoring.
| Product | Indication | Any-grade ICANS | Grade ≥3 ICANS | Key Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axicabtagene ciloleucel | Large B-cell lymphoma | 55% | Not specified | [43]C4 |
| Tisagenlecleucel | Large B-cell lymphoma | Lower than axi-cel | Not specified | [50]B3b |
| Lisocabtagene maraleucel | Large B-cell lymphoma | Lower than axi-cel | Not specified | [50]B3b |
| Brexucabtagene autoleucel | Mantle cell lymphoma | Not specified | Not specified | [41]B3b |
| Idecabtagene vicleucel | Multiple myeloma | Similar to cilta-cel | Not specified | [38]C4 |
| Ciltacabtagene autoleucel | Multiple myeloma | Similar to ide-cel | Delayed NT OR 20.07 vs ide-cel | [38]C4 |
| Epcoritamab | Follicular lymphoma | 6% (grade 1-2) | 0% | [45]C4 |
| Blinatumomab (subcutaneous) | B-ALL | 17% | Not specified | [46]C4 |
| Prizloncabtagene autoleucel | B-NHL | 6.3% | 0% | [44]C4 |
| Obecabtagene autoleucel | B-ALL | Not specified | 7.1% | [47]C4 |
| Risk Factor | Population | Effect Measure (95% CI) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prior autologous HCT | Brexu-cel for MCL | OR 1.66 (1.06-2.60) for ICANS | [41]B3b |
| Cilta-cel vs ide-cel | RRMM | OR 20.07 (4.46-90.20) for delayed neurotoxicity | [38]C4 |
| Cilta-cel vs ide-cel | RRMM | 4.6% vs 0.5% for non-ICANS neurologic toxicity | [35]B2a |
| Higher CAR-T expansion / peak cytokines | Axi-cel for LBCL | Correlates with CRS/ICANS severity | [39]B3b |
| HHV-6B reactivation | All CAR-T | 6% (2.2-12.5%) cumulative incidence | [37]C4 |
4. Clinical Presentation
- ▸ICANS presents as an encephalopathy with language dysfunction, seizures, and tremor, typically within 7-10 days of CAR-T infusion.
- ▸Distinct phenotypic variants exist: classic ICANS, TIAN (tumor-tethered), cranial nerve palsy syndrome, GBS-like, late encephalitis, and pediatric quadriparesis.
- ▸MRI abnormalities (symmetric white matter, brainstem, thalamic) correlate with ICANS grade but are absent in most mild cases.

Presenting Symptoms
ICANS typically emerges within the first 7-10 days after CAR T-cell infusion, with a median onset of 3.5 days in CNS lymphoma (TIAN) and up to 4 weeks for classic ICANS [56]D5[55]C4. The core clinical syndrome is an encephalopathy that progresses from mild confusion to obtundation, often accompanied by language dysfunction (aphasia, dysarthria), tremor, headache, and seizures [57]A1a[66]C4. In pediatric and young adult cohorts, encephalopathy was present in 88% of ICANS cases, seizures in 31%, and focal motor deficits in 7% [66]C4. Non-canonical symptoms, headache (33%), vision changes (14%), tremor (14%), are common but do not correlate with specific imaging findings [66]C4.
Neurological Examination Findings
| Domain | Typical Findings |
|---|---|
| Mental status | Disorientation, impaired attention, aphasia, reduced consciousness |
| Cranial nerves | Facial nerve palsy (8% with cilta-cel, often bilateral), diplopia, nystagmus [53]A1b |
| Motor | Quadriparesis/paraparesis (emerging pediatric phenotype), focal weakness, hyperreflexia [14]C4 |
| Sensory | Paresthesias, numbness (non-specific) |
| Autonomic | Blood pressure lability, tachycardia (often concurrent with CRS) |
| Coordination | Ataxia, dysmetria, tremor |
Phenotypic Variants
| Variant | Key Features | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Classic ICANS | Encephalopathy ± seizures ± cerebral edema; onset days 1-10 | 25-44% of pediatric CAR-T recipients [66]C4 |
| TIAN (tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity) | Focal neurologic deficits referable to known CNS lesion; median onset 3.5 days; less CRS overlap (60% vs 100%) [56]D5 | 17.9% of CNS lymphoma patients [56]D5 |
| Cranial nerve palsy syndrome | Isolated or multiple (facial > others); grade 2-3 | 9.1% with cilta-cel [53]A1b |
| CAR-T-related GBS | Ascending paralysis, facial nerve enhancement on MRI, albuminocytologic dissociation; onset 5-78 days [25]C4 | Rare (10 cases in literature) |
| Late-onset encephalitis | Progressive decline months after infusion; CSF CAR T-cell DNA, IL-1/IL-6 elevation; fatal [55]C4 | Case reports |
| Quadriparesis/paraparesis (pediatric) | Acute flaccid weakness, white matter destruction on imaging, low CSF inflammatory cytokines [14]C4 | 5 cases reported |
Red Flags Requiring Urgent Action
- Depressed level of consciousness ( ≤ 8) → airway protection, ICU transfer
- Seizures / status epilepticus → emergent EEG, antiseizure medication
- Focal motor deficits progressing to quadriparesis → urgent MRI brain/spine
- Autonomic instability (labile BP, arrhythmia) → continuous monitoring
- FVC < 15 mL/kg or rising pCO₂ → consider intubation
Atypical Presentations
- Isolated cranial neuropathies without encephalopathy (cranial nerve palsy syndrome) [53]A1b
- Pure motor syndromes (quadriparesis) with minimal encephalopathy [14]C4
- Delayed onset > 4 weeks (late encephalitis, GBS) [55]C4[25]C4
- TIAN mimicking ICANS but tethered to pre-existing CNS tumor volume > 3.4 cm³ [56]D5
- Neuropsychiatric features (hallucinations, agitation) without focal signs [57]A1a
Neuroimaging Correlates
In children and young adults, 36% of ICANS patients had MRI abnormalities, predominantly symmetric T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in the external/extreme capsules (69%), brainstem (central tegmental tracts, inferior olivary nuclei; 40%), and bilateral thalami (26%) [66]C4. Higher ICANS grade strongly predicted imaging abnormalities (aOR 3.7, 95% CI 2.0-6.8) [66]C4. The "double-smiley sign" (bilateral external capsule + thalamic hyperintensity) and holocord extending from brainstem are characteristic [66]C4. Restricted diffusion in splenium or thalami occurs in a minority. Most abnormalities improve or resolve on follow-up (83% improved, 25% fully resolved) [66]C4.
Pearl: ICANS is a clinical diagnosis, neuroimaging supports but does not define it. A normal MRI does not exclude ICANS, especially in low-grade cases where imaging abnormalities are rare (9% in grade 1-2) [66]C4.
5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling
- ▸ICE score (0-10) is the validated bedside tool for ICANS grading and monitoring; serial q8h assessment during days 0-14 post-infusion is standard.
- ▸MRI brain is the imaging gold standard; T2/FLAIR white matter hyperintensities without enhancement are characteristic. CT only for emergent hemorrhage exclusion.
- ▸Lumbar puncture for grade ≥2 ICANS with fever/seizures/meningeal signs: expect mild lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein, normal glucose. Rule out infection and leptomeningeal disease.
- ▸Continuous EEG required for grade ≥3 ICANS or any seizure; non-convulsive status epilepticus occurs in ~30% of severe cases and is clinically silent.
- ▸Peripheral CAR-T expansion kinetics (flow cytometry) and inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, ferritin, IL-6) correlate with ICANS severity but are adjunctive, not diagnostic.
The clinical presentation of ICANS, encephalopathy, seizures, motor deficits, and cerebral edema, demands a structured diagnostic approach that distinguishes immune effector cell neurotoxicity from infection, metabolic derangement, intracranial hemorrhage, and disease progression. The workup centers on three pillars: the ICE score for bedside quantification, neuroimaging to exclude structural lesions and characterize edema, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis to assess inflammatory burden and rule out alternative etiologies.
ICE Score: Bedside Quantification
The Immune Effector Cell Encephalopathy (ICE) score is the validated, ASTCT-endorsed tool for grading ICANS severity. It evaluates four domains, orientation, naming, following commands, and writing, each scored 0-3, yielding a total of 0-10. A score of 10 indicates normal cognition; 7-9 corresponds to grade 1 ICANS; 3-6 to grade 2; 1-2 to grade 3; and 0 to grade 4. The ICE score is performed at least every 8 hours during the high-risk window (days 0-14 post-infusion) and more frequently if clinical change occurs. Serial scoring tracks trajectory and triggers intervention thresholds: grade ≥2 warrants corticosteroids; grade ≥3 mandates neurology consultation, EEG, and MRI. The ICE score correlates with overall ICANS grade and predicts need for intensive supportive care.
Neuroimaging
MRI brain with and without contrast is the imaging modality of choice. It is indicated for new-onset seizures, focal deficits, ICE score decline ≥2 points, or grade ≥3 ICANS. Characteristic findings include T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in the frontal, parietal, and occipital white matter, often symmetric, consistent with vasogenic edema. Diffusion-weighted imaging may show restricted diffusion in severe cases, heralding cytotoxic injury. Contrast enhancement is typically absent, helping distinguish ICANS from leptomeningeal disease or infection. In the pediatric series of quadriparesis/paraparesis, MRI revealed longitudinal extensive -like spinal cord lesions and supratentorial white matter changes without enhancement, supporting a non-inflammatory mechanism. CT head without contrast is reserved for rapid exclusion of hemorrhage or mass effect when MRI is not immediately available.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis
Lumbar puncture is performed when ICANS grade ≥2, especially with fever, seizures, or meningeal signs, to exclude meningitis, encephalitis, and leptomeningeal malignancy. Typical ICANS CSF shows mild lymphocytic pleocytosis (usually <50 cells/µL), elevated protein (50-150 mg/dL), and normal glucose. CSF cytokine profiling in research settings reveals marked elevation of IL-6, IL-8, IFN-γ, CCL2, CXCL10, and TNF-α, but this is not standard clinical practice. Notably, children with post-CAR-T quadriparesis had lower CSF levels of IFN-γ, CCL17, CCL23, and CXCL10 than those without motor deficits, suggesting a distinct, non-inflammatory pathophysiology for this phenotype. CSF flow cytometry and PCR for common pathogens (HSV, VZV, enterovirus, HHV-6, bacteria, fungi) are sent routinely. Malignant cells are sought by flow cytometry and cytology.
Electroencephalography
Continuous EEG (cEEG) is recommended for grade ≥3 ICANS, any clinical seizure, or unexplained encephalopathy. Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) occurs in up to 30% of severe ICANS cases and is detectable only on EEG. Typical patterns include generalized slowing, frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (FIRDA), and electrographic seizures. EEG guides antiseizure medication escalation and helps differentiate encephalopathy from NCSE. Serial EEGs monitor resolution.
Peripheral Blood Biomarkers
While not diagnostic, serial measurement of CRP, ferritin, IL-6, and CAR-T expansion kinetics (by flow cytometry or qPCR) correlates with ICANS risk and severity. Peak CAR-T expansion (AUC) associates with higher ICANS grades. Pre-lymphodepletion LDH and CRP predict both expansion and toxicity. These biomarkers support risk stratification but do not replace clinical assessment.
Diagnostic Algorithm Summary
- Baseline: Pre-infusion neurologic exam, ICE score, CBC, CMP, CRP, ferritin, LDH, coagulation studies.
- Monitoring: ICE score q8h × 14 days; vital signs q4h; neurologic checks q4h.
- Trigger for workup: ICE <10, new neurologic symptom, seizure, or altered mental status.
- Immediate: STAT ICE score, glucose, electrolytes, renal/hepatic function, CBC, coagulation, CRP, ferritin, blood cultures.
- Imaging: MRI brain ± spine within 4 hours if grade ≥2 ICANS with focal signs, seizure, or ICE decline ≥2.
- LP: If grade ≥2 ICANS with fever, meningeal signs, or diagnostic uncertainty, after imaging excludes mass effect.
- EEG: cEEG within 1 hour for grade ≥3 ICANS or clinical seizure; routine EEG within 12 hours for grade 2.
- CAR-T monitoring: Peripheral blood CAR-T quantification (flow cytometry) on days 7, 14, 21, 28 if available.
Pearl: The ICE score is the linchpin of ICANS diagnosis, serial bedside assessment drives every downstream decision (imaging, LP, EEG, steroids). A 2-point drop from baseline mandates MRI within 4 hours; grade ≥3 mandates cEEG within 1 hour. Do not wait for "full" ICANS to act, the ICE score catches it early.
| Domain | Score Range | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Orientation (year, month, city, hospital) | 0-3 | 3 = fully oriented |
| Naming (3 objects) | 0-3 | 3 = names all 3 |
| Following commands (2-step) | 0-3 | 3 = performs both steps |
| Writing (standard sentence) | 0-1 | 1 = writes legibly and correctly |
| Total ICE Score | 0-10 | 10 = normal; 7-9 = Grade 1; 3-6 = Grade 2; 1-2 = Grade 3; 0 = Grade 4 |
| ICANS Grade | ICE Score | MRI Brain | Lumbar Puncture | EEG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 7-9 | Not routine | Not routine | Not routine |
| Grade 2 | 3-6 | Indicated if focal signs, seizure, or ICE decline ≥2 | Consider if fever, meningeal signs, or diagnostic uncertainty | Routine EEG within 12 h |
| Grade 3 | 1-2 | Urgent (within 4 h) | Indicated (after imaging excludes mass effect) | cEEG within 1 h |
| Grade 4 | 0 | Urgent (within 4 h) | Indicated (after imaging excludes mass effect) | cEEG within 1 h |
6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring
- ▸ICE score and ASTCT grading remain the clinical standard for daily ICANS severity assessment.
- ▸CAR-HEMATOTOX score integrates baseline hematologic reserve and inflammation to predict prolonged cytopenias that correlate with neurotoxicity risk.
- ▸Pretreatment metabolomics (low hydroxyproline, glutamine) and visceral adiposity (VAT, WtHR) are emerging biomarkers for ICANS and CRS severity respectively.
- ▸ctDNA kinetics provide dynamic prognostic stratification: detectable ctDNA at day 28 predicts early relapse and inferior survival.
Building on the diagnostic workup, risk stratification in ICANS relies on validated grading systems and emerging biomarker models that predict severity and guide preemptive intervention. The ICE (Immune Effector Cell Encephalopathy) score remains the bedside standard for daily grading, while the ASTCT consensus criteria provide a unified framework for CRS and ICANS severity. Beyond clinical scores, baseline host factors, including inflammatory markers, metabolic profile, and body composition, identify patients at highest risk for early and severe neurotoxicity.
ICE Score and ASTCT Grading
The ICE score quantifies encephalopathy across four domains: orientation (0-3), naming (0-1), following commands (0-1), and writing (0-1), yielding a total of 0-10. A score of 10 indicates normal cognition; 7-9 corresponds to ASTCT grade 1 ICANS; 3-6 to grade 2; 1-2 to grade 3; and 0 to grade 4 [1]C4. Serial ICE assessments every 8-12 hours during the high-risk window (days 0-14 post-infusion) detect deterioration before overt neurologic decline. The ASTCT consensus further incorporates seizure, motor weakness, raised intracranial pressure, and cerebral edema into grade 3-4 definitions, triggering ICU transfer and aggressive immunosuppression [1]C4.
CAR-HEMATOTOX and Hematologic Reserve
Although developed for hematologic toxicity, the CAR-HEMATOTOX model incorporates baseline platelet count, hemoglobin, ANC, CRP, and ferritin, variables that also correlate with ICANS risk through shared inflammatory pathways [36]B3b. In the validation cohorts (n=200), a high CAR-HEMATOTOX score (≥2) predicted prolonged severe neutropenia (≥14 days) with 89% sensitivity and 68% specificity (AUC 0.89) [36]B3b. Patients with high scores had longer neutropenia (12 vs 5.5 days), higher severe thrombocytopenia (87% vs 34%), and anemia (96% vs 40%) [36]B3b. These cytopenias reflect marrow reserve depletion that parallels neuroinflammatory vulnerability.
Metabolic and Body Composition Biomarkers
Pretreatment metabolomics identifies a signature of low hydroxyproline, low glutamine, low proline, low glycine, and low isoursodeoxycholate associated with higher-grade and earlier-onset ICANS [87]D5. Higher baseline glucose and lower cholesterol/glutamate predict faster CRS onset, which often precedes ICANS [87]D5. Visceral adiposity independently drives severe CRS: patients with grade ≥2 CRS had higher median BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and visceral adipose tissue (VAT); these parameters also correlated with earlier CRS onset and higher peak IL-6 [88]D5. In multivariate logistic regression, BMI, waist circumference, WtHR, and VAT each increased the probability of grade ≥2 CRS [88]D5. ROC-derived thresholds for VAT and WtHR discriminated patients with markedly elevated peak IL-6 [88]D5. Body composition did not influence ICANS severity or onset directly [88]D5, but by amplifying CRS it indirectly elevates neurotoxicity risk.
ctDNA and Tumor Burden
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) kinetics provide dynamic risk stratification. In a prospective multicenter trial of axi-cel for large B-cell lymphoma (n=72), higher pretreatment ctDNA concentrations correlated with both CRS and ICANS development [85]D5. At day 28, detectable ctDNA conferred a median PFS of 3 months versus not reached and median OS of 19 months versus not reached [85]D5. Among patients with partial response or stable disease on imaging, 15 of 17 (88%) with detectable ctDNA relapsed versus 1 of 10 (10%) with undetectable ctDNA [85]D5. ctDNA was detected at or before radiographic relapse in 29 of 30 (97%) patients [85]D5. All durably responding patients achieved undetectable ctDNA by 3 months [85]D5.
Clinical Prognostic Factors for CAR-T Outcomes
A systematic review of 79 studies in DLBCL identified PS, IPI score, disease histology, stage, and elevated LDH as consistent predictors of efficacy and safety outcomes including ICANS [92]B2a. Real-world meta-analysis of axi-cel vs tisagenlecleucel confirmed that axi-cel carries higher grade ≥3 ICANS risk (OR 3.95, 95% CI 3.05-5.11) despite superior OS (HR 0.60) and PFS [93]C4. TP53 mutation status, while prognostic in chemotherapy-treated LBCL, does not independently worsen ICANS incidence or severity in CAR-T recipients [26]B3b.
Bispecific Antibody Context
For bispecific antibodies (mosunetuzumab, epcoritamab), ICANS incidence is lower than with CAR-T but remains clinically significant. In a phase 2 mosunetuzumab-CHOP study (n=40), 5 patients (12.5%) experienced neurologic events potentially consistent with ICANS (max grade 3) [83]B2b. Real-world epcoritamab data (n=157) showed any-grade ICANS in 12% (grade ≥3: 0.6%) [86]D5. Multivariable analysis identified ECOG PS >2, elevated LDH, refractory disease, and clinical trial ineligibility as independent predictors of inferior PFS and OS [86]D5.
Prognostic Factor Summary
| Factor | Good Prognosis | Poor Prognosis |
|---|---|---|
| ICE score | 9-10 (normal) | ≤6 (grade ≥2 ICANS) |
| CAR-HEMATOTOX score | <2 | ≥2 |
| Pretreatment ctDNA | Undetectable / rapid clearance | Detectable at day 28 |
| Visceral adiposity (VAT, WtHR) | Below ROC thresholds | Above thresholds (drives severe CRS) |
| Metabolomic signature | Normal hydroxyproline, glutamine, proline, glycine | Low hydroxyproline, low glutamine, low proline/glycine |
| ECOG PS | 0-1 | ≥2 |
| IPI score | 0-2 | 3-5 |
| LDH | Normal | Elevated |
| TP53 mutation (CAR-T context) | Wild-type or non-DBD mutant | DBD mutant (attenuated adverse impact vs chemo) |
| CAR-T product | Tisagenlecleucel (lower ICANS) | Axicabtagene ciloleucel (higher grade ≥3 ICANS) |
Pearl: A high CAR-HEMATOTOX score (≥2) or detectable day-28 ctDNA identifies patients who need intensified neurologic monitoring and early intervention; both are calculable before or early in the CAR-T course and outperform single clinical variables [36]B3b[85]D5.
7. Acute & Emergency Management
- ▸Corticosteroids (dexamethasone 10 mg IV q6h for grade 2-3; methylprednisolone 1 g IV daily for grade 4) are first-line for moderate-to-severe ICANS per ASCO guideline [99].
- ▸Tocilizumab is indicated only for concurrent CRS ≥ grade 2; it does not reverse established neurotoxicity due to poor BBB penetration [99, 109].
- ▸Anakinra 100 mg IV q6h is the evidence-supported escalation for steroid-refractory ICANS, with case reports showing resolution within 48h [107, 111].
Step 1: Initial Assessment and Severity Classification
Patients with suspected ICANS require immediate neurologic evaluation using the ICE score (10-point scale assessing orientation, naming, following commands, writing, and attention). Grade 1 (ICE 9-10) warrants supportive care and close monitoring. Grade 2 (ICE 7-8) or higher mandates urgent neurology consultation, continuous cardiac monitoring, and preparation for pharmacologic intervention [99]B2a. Obtain STAT non-contrast head CT to exclude hemorrhage or edema; MRI brain with diffusion-weighted imaging is preferred if CT is negative and clinical suspicion persists. Lumbar puncture with opening pressure, cell count, protein, glucose, and cytokine panel (IL-6, IFN-γ) is indicated when infection cannot be excluded. Continuous EEG is recommended for grade ≥2 ICANS to detect non-convulsive status epilepticus, which occurs in up to 40% of severe cases [109]D5.
Step 2: First-Line Pharmacologic Intervention
Corticosteroids are the management of choice for moderate-to-severe ICANS (grade ≥2). The ASCO guideline recommends 10 mg IV every 6 hours for grade 2-3 ICANS and 1 g IV daily for grade 4 ICANS [99]B2a. Initiate steroids immediately upon recognition of grade ≥2 ICANS; do not wait for imaging or LP results. 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) over 1 hour is indicated for concurrent CRS but has limited CNS penetration and does not reverse established neurotoxicity [99]B2a[109]D5. Administer tocilizumab only if CRS grade ≥2 coexists; avoid routine use for isolated ICANS.
Step 3: Escalation for Steroid-Refractory ICANS
If no improvement within 24 hours of high-dose steroids, escalate to anakinra 100 mg IV every 6 hours (or 2 mg/kg IV q6h) [107]C4[111]D5. Anakinra crosses the blood-brain barrier and targets IL-1-mediated neuroinflammation. Case reports describe resolution of grade 4 ICANS within 48 hours of anakinra initiation [107]C4. For life-threatening cerebral edema (grade 4 with radiographic evidence), consider extracorporeal cytokine adsorption (CytoSorb) as rescue therapy; a single case reported complete neurologic recovery after 4 days of CytoSorb with >95% IL-6 reduction [107]C4. Siltuximab (anti-IL-6) 11 mg/kg IV may be considered if anakinra fails, though evidence is limited to case series [111]D5.
Step 4: Monitoring and Titration
- Neurologic checks: q1h for grade ≥2 until ICE score stabilizes ≥9, then q4h × 24h.
- ICE score: document every shift; improvement of ≥2 points predicts recovery.
- EEG: continuous for grade ≥3; repeat at 24h if non-convulsive seizures detected.
- Inflammatory markers: CRP, ferritin, IL-6 q12h while on steroids; trend guides taper.
- Steroid taper: once ICE score ≥9 for 24h, reduce dexamethasone by 25% daily; total course typically 7-10 days [99]B2a.
- Seizure prophylaxis: 500 mg IV q12h for grade ≥2; continue 30 days post-resolution if EEG abnormal.
Step 5: Resolution and Disposition
ICANS resolution defined as ICE score 10 sustained ≥48h off steroids. Median time to resolution is 4 days (IQR 2-8) across products [40]B3b. Patients with grade ≥3 ICANS require ICU-level care until neurologic baseline restored. Outpatient follow-up within 2 weeks for neurocognitive screening (MoCA) and biomarker surveillance (NfL, GFAP) [27]B3b.
Drug Comparison Table
| Drug | Indication / Line | Dose | Key Evidence | Outcome | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dexamethasone | First-line, grade 2-3 ICANS | 10 mg IV q6h | ASCO guideline [99]B2a | Standard of care | 2a |
| Methylprednisolone | First-line, grade 4 ICANS | 1 g IV daily | ASCO guideline [99]B2a | Standard of care | 2a |
| Tocilizumab | Concurrent CRS ≥ grade 2 | 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) | ASCO guideline [99]B2a | Controls CRS, limited CNS effect | 2a |
| Anakinra | Steroid-refractory ICANS | 100 mg IV q6h (or 2 mg/kg) | Case series [107]C4[111]D5 | Resolution in 48h reported | 4 |
| CytoSorb | Life-threatening cerebral edema | 4-day extracorporeal run | Case report [107]C4 | >95% IL-6 reduction, neurologic recovery | 4 |
Dosing Table
| Drug | Starting dose | Target / max dose | Renal adjustment | Hepatic adjustment | Key monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dexamethasone | 10 mg IV q6h | 10 mg IV q6h | No adjustment | No adjustment | Glucose, ICE score, CRP |
| Methylprednisolone | 1 g IV daily | 1 g IV daily | No adjustment | No adjustment | Glucose, ICE score, CRP |
| Tocilizumab | 8 mg/kg IV | 800 mg max | No adjustment | No adjustment | LFTs, neutrophils, infection signs |
| Anakinra | 100 mg IV q6h | 100 mg IV q6h | CrCl <30: 100 mg daily | No adjustment | Neutropenia, LFTs, injection site |
Treatment Failure Protocol
- No ICE improvement at 24h on high-dose steroids → add anakinra 100 mg IV q6h.
- No improvement at 48h on anakinra + steroids → consider CytoSorb extracorporeal adsorption (if available) or siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV.
- Progressive cerebral edema on imaging → neurosurgical consultation for ICP monitoring; consider hyperosmolar therapy (mannitol 0.5-1 g/kg or 3% saline) while arranging CytoSorb.
What NOT to Do
- Do NOT use tocilizumab as monotherapy for isolated ICANS without concurrent CRS, limited BBB penetration, no proven neurotoxicity benefit [99]B2a[109]D5.
- Do NOT delay steroids awaiting MRI/LP, every hour of delay in grade ≥2 ICANS correlates with worse outcomes [99]B2a.
- Do NOT taper steroids before ICE score ≥9 sustained 24h, premature taper associates with rebound neurotoxicity [99]B2a.
- Do NOT use prophylactic antiepileptics in grade 1 ICANS, no evidence of benefit, adds sedation burden [109]D5.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength of disagreement | Implication for practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Role of tocilizumab in isolated ICANS (no CRS) | ASCO 2021, not recommended; limited CNS penetration [99]B2a | Institutional protocols, some centers use tocilizumab 8 mg/kg for any grade ≥2 ICANS regardless of CRS | Moderate (guideline vs practice variation) [99]B2a[109]D5 | Most academic centers follow ASCO; community sites may overuse tocilizumab, delaying steroid initiation |
| Anakinra dosing for steroid-refractory ICANS | Case reports, 100 mg IV q6h (flat dose) [107]C4 | Weight-based, 2 mg/kg IV q6h [111]D5 | Mild (dosing schema) | Both regimens reported effective; flat dose simpler for emergency use |
| Timing of anakinra initiation | Early escalation, at 12h if no ICE improvement [111]D5 | Standard, at 24h per ASCO framework [99]B2a | Moderate (threshold for escalation) | Earlier anakinra may reduce ICU days; prospective data lacking |
Pearl: Initiate dexamethasone 10 mg IV q6h immediately for any grade ≥2 ICANS, do not wait for imaging or tocilizumab. Reserve tocilizumab for concurrent CRS ≥ grade 2. Escalate to anakinra at 24h if ICE score fails to improve by ≥2 points [99]B2a[107]C4.
8. Long-term & Definitive Management
- ▸Delayed neurotoxicity (cranial nerve palsy, movement disorders, cognitive decline) occurs in up to 9% of cilta-cel recipients and requires structured surveillance at 30 days, 3, 6, and 12 months.
- ▸Corticosteroid taper over 4-6 weeks after grade ≥2 ICANS balances rebound risk against infection; anakinra and siltuximab are options for steroid-refractory cases.
- ▸BsAb before CAR-T improves subsequent CAR-T complete response rates (53.7% vs 29.4%), informing sequencing decisions for relapsed disease.
Step 1: Assess for Persistent or Delayed Neurotoxicity
After acute ICANS resolves, screen for delayed neurotoxicity, movement disorders, cranial nerve palsies, , and neurocognitive decline, which may emerge weeks to months post-infusion. In the CARTITUDE-4 trial, 4.5% of cilta-cel recipients developed ICANS (all grade 1-2), 9.1% had cranial nerve palsy (grade 2, 8.0%; grade 3, 1.1%), and 2.8% had CAR-T-related (grade 1-2, 2.3%; grade 3, 0.6%) [53]A1b. A real-world comparison of ide-cel and cilta-cel found delayed neurotoxicity (events not captured as ICANS) was significantly more frequent with cilta-cel (OR 20.07, 95% CI 4.46-90.20) [38]C4. Obtain a baseline neurocognitive assessment (MoCA or equivalent) at day 30 and repeat at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Step 2: Corticosteroid Tapering and Immunosuppression Weaning
For patients who required corticosteroids for grade ≥2 ICANS, taper over 4-6 weeks once ICE score returns to 10 and neuroimaging is stable. The ASCO guideline recommends corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe ICANS but does not specify a taper schedule; practice patterns favor a slow taper to avoid rebound neuroinflammation [99]B2a. Monitor for adrenal insufficiency if cumulative -equivalent dose exceeds 20 mg/day for >3 weeks.
Step 3: Refractory or Relapsed ICANS, Escalation Options
If ICANS recurs or persists despite corticosteroids:
- Anakinra 100 mg SC daily (2 mg/kg in pediatrics) until ICE score ≤1 for 48 hours. In a real-world liso-cel cohort, 9 patients received anakinra for grade ≥3 ICANS [126]B3b.
- Siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for corticosteroid-refractory ICANS. A multicenter retrospective analysis reported ICANS grade improvement in 60% of 17 steroid-refractory patients [122]C4.
- 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) for concurrent CRS; limited utility for isolated ICANS [99]B2a.
Step 4: Infection Prophylaxis and Immunoglobulin Replacement
Prolonged cytopenias and B-cell aplasia mandate:
- IVIG 400 mg/kg monthly while IgG <400 mg/dL or recurrent infections.
- Antimicrobial prophylaxis: / , /posaconazole, and TMP-SMX (or atovaquone) for PJP prophylaxis until CD4+ >200/µL and off corticosteroids ≥1 month [117]A1b.
- G-CSF for neutropenia <500/µL persisting >14 days.
Step 5: Surveillance for Late Effects and Second Malignancies
- Neurocognitive testing every 6 months for 2 years, then annually.
- MRI brain if new focal deficits, seizures, or progressive cognitive decline.
- Second primary malignancy (SPM) screening: CBC with differential every 3 months for 3 years, then every 6 months; skin exam annually. Real-world data show SPM incidence of 4% (1% myeloid) after ide-cel [69]B2b and non-significantly higher odds with cilta-cel (OR 1.77, 95% CI 0.89-3.56) [38]C4.
- Cardiac monitoring: echocardiogram at 6 and 12 months if anthracycline exposure or prior radiation.
Step 6: Consolidation and Subsequent Therapy
For patients in complete response, no consolidation is standard. For those with residual disease or early relapse, options include:
- Allogeneic HCT, considered in fit patients with high-risk features (see Section 9).
- Bispecific antibodies (teclistamab, talquetamab) or CAR-T re-treatment, sequencing data suggest BsAb before CAR-T improves subsequent CAR-T response (CR 53.7% vs 29.4%) [116]A1a.
- Clinical trial enrollment for novel targets (GPRC5D, CD19×CD20, etc.).
Drug Comparison Table
| Agent | Indication | Dose | Key Evidence | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICANS grade ≥2 | 10 mg IV q6h → taper over 4-6 wk | ASCO guideline [99]B2a | 2a | |
| Anakinra | Steroid-refractory ICANS | 100 mg SC daily (2 mg/kg peds) | Real-world liso-cel cohort [126]B3b | 4 |
| Siltuximab | Steroid-refractory ICANS | 11 mg/kg IV q3wk | Multicenter retrospective (60% ICANS improvement) [122]C4 | 4 |
| Tocilizumab | Concurrent CRS + ICANS | 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) | ASCO guideline [99]B2a | 2a |
| IVIG | Hypogammaglobulinemia | 400 mg/kg monthly | Standard practice [117]A1b | 4 |
Dosing Table
| Drug | Starting dose | Target / max dose | Renal adjustment | Hepatic adjustment | Key monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dexamethasone | 10 mg IV q6h | Taper to off over 4-6 wk | None | None | Glucose, ICE score, adrenal function |
| Anakinra | 100 mg SC daily (2 mg/kg peds) | Continue until ICE ≤1 × 48 h | CrCl <30: 100 mg every other day | None | Neutropenia, injection site reaction |
| Siltuximab | 11 mg/kg IV q3wk | 11 mg/kg IV q3wk | None | None | IgG, infection, LFTs |
| Tocilizumab | 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) | Repeat ×1 if needed (max 2 doses) | None | ALT/AST >5× ULN: hold | CRP, LFTs, neutrophils |
| IVIG | 400 mg/kg monthly | Adjust to maintain IgG >400 | None | None | IgG trough, renal function |
Treatment Failure Protocol
- ICANS recurrence after steroid taper → restart dexamethasone 10 mg IV q6h + anakinra 100 mg SC daily.
- No improvement in 48 h → add siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV.
- Persistent grade ≥3 ICANS >7 days → MRI brain with contrast, EEG, neurology consult; consider high-dose 1 g IV daily ×3 days.
- Refractory to all above → clinical trial or compassionate-use agents (e.g., JAK inhibitors, anti-IL-1, anti-GM-CSF).
What NOT to Do
- Do NOT use tocilizumab for isolated ICANS without concurrent CRS, no proven benefit and may worsen neurotoxicity by increasing IL-6 CNS penetration [99]B2a.
- Do NOT taper corticosteroids faster than 4 weeks after grade ≥2 ICANS, rebound neuroinflammation risk.
- Do NOT omit PJP prophylaxis while on corticosteroids ≥20 mg/day prednisone equivalent.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength of disagreement | Implication for practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal corticosteroid taper duration after grade ≥2 ICANS | ASCO 2021, taper over weeks once ICE score 10; no fixed duration [99]B2a | Center-specific protocols, 4-6 week taper common; some use 8-12 weeks for high-grade ICANS | Moderate (guideline silent on exact duration) | Longer tapers may reduce rebound but increase infection risk; individualize based on ICE trajectory. |
| Role of anakinra as first-line for severe ICANS | Emerging practice, early anakinra for grade 3-4 ICANS (IL-1 blockade) [126]B3b | ASCO 2021, corticosteroids first-line; anakinra reserved for refractory [99]B2a | Moderate (evidence limited to retrospective series) | Centers with anakinra access may use earlier; no RCT data to guide sequencing. |
| Surveillance imaging for asymptomatic patients | No guideline recommends routine surveillance MRI | Some centers, annual MRI for 2 years to detect subclinical neurotoxicity | Mild (expert opinion only) | Radiation exposure and cost vs. uncertain yield; discuss with patient. |
Pearl: After acute ICANS resolves, the long-term game is surveillance, screen for delayed neurotoxicity (movement disorders, , cognitive decline) at 30 days, 3, 6, and 12 months; taper steroids over 4-6 weeks; maintain infection prophylaxis until immune reconstitution; and enroll relapsed patients in trials exploring BsAb→CAR-T sequencing, which doubles CR rates [116]A1a.
9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy
- ▸Pre-infusion LDH normalization and comprehensive bridging radiotherapy are the strongest modifiable predictors of CAR-T efficacy and reduced severe neurotoxicity
- ▸Bendamustine lymphodepletion offers comparable efficacy with significantly lower CRS and ICANS incidence versus fludarabine/cyclophosphamide in real-world liso-cel cohorts
- ▸Cilta-cel provides superior survival over ide-cel but carries higher severe CRS, infection, and delayed neurotoxicity risk, choice requires individualized risk-benefit discussion
Step 1: Pre-Infusion Risk Stratification and Bridging Therapy
Patients proceeding to CAR-T or bispecific antibody therapy require systematic assessment of disease burden, organ function, and comorbidity profile. A normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level before lymphodepletion independently predicts higher response rates, longer progression-free survival, and improved overall survival across multiple CAR-T products [126]B3b. Elevated LDH at leukapheresis identifies patients who benefit most from cytoreductive bridging.
Bridging therapy is standard during the manufacturing interval. Radiation to all metabolically active sites (comprehensive bridging radiotherapy) associates with superior 2-year progression-free survival (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.63) and overall survival (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.83) versus focal approaches, without increasing severe CRS or ICANS [127]C4. LDH normalization after bridging correlates with outcomes comparable to patients with persistently normal LDH [127]C4. Polatuzumab-based regimens yield higher bridging response rates (ORR 52%, CR 35%) than chemotherapy or radiation alone [126]B3b.
Step 2: Lymphodepletion Regimen Selection
Fludarabine 30 mg/m² daily × 3 days plus 300 mg/m² daily × 3 days remains the label-standard regimen for most CD19 CAR-T products. Bendamustine 90 mg/m² daily × 2 days offers comparable efficacy with significantly lower any-grade CRS (31% vs 55%) and any-grade ICANS (1% vs 33%) in real-world liso-cel cohorts [126]B3b. The choice balances institutional formulary, fludarabine availability, and patient-specific infection risk.
Step 3: Acute Toxicity Management Protocol
CRS grading and first-line intervention, Follow ASTCT consensus grading. For grade ≥2 CRS, administer 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) per dose; repeat every 8 hours if needed, maximum 4 doses. Add 10 mg IV every 6-12 hours for CRS refractory to tocilizumab or concurrent grade ≥2 ICANS [99]B2a.
ICANS grading and first-line intervention, For grade ≥2 ICANS, initiate dexamethasone 10 mg IV every 6 hours; escalate to 1 g IV daily for grade ≥3 ICANS. Tocilizumab is not recommended for isolated ICANS without concurrent CRS [99]B2a.
Refractory CRS/ICANS, Siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV improved CRS grade in 75% and ICANS grade in 60% of patients previously treated with tocilizumab or steroids respectively [122]C4. Anakinra 100 mg SC daily (up to 2 mg/kg/day) shows activity in steroid-refractory ICANS; 7 of 9 anakinra recipients in a liso-cel cohort had grade ≥3 ICANS [126]B3b.
Step 4: Product-Specific Toxicity Profiles and Monitoring
| Product | Any-grade CRS | Grade ≥3 CRS | Any-grade ICANS | Grade ≥3 ICANS | Notable delayed toxicity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axi-cel | 80-93% | 10-13% | 31-50% | 24-31% | , |
| Tisa-cel | 55-72% | 7-11% | 7-48% | 7-26% | , |
| Liso-cel | 49% | 3% | 26% | 10% | , |
| Ide-cel | 80% | 3% | 28% | 5% | , |
| Cilta-cel | 76% | 1% | 4.5% (all grade 1-2) | 0% | Delayed neurotoxicity (OR 20.07 vs ide-cel) [38]C4 |
| Teclistamab | 66% | Mostly grade 1-2 | 4.1% | Not reported | Infections grade 3-4: 41.6% [117]A1b |
Cilta-cel carries higher severe CRS (OR 6.80, 95% CI 2.28-20.33) and delayed neurotoxicity (OR 20.07, 95% CI 4.46-90.20) versus ide-cel, without difference in any-grade ICANS [38]C4. Teclistamab demonstrates 18-month PFS 69.8% vs 26.9% for standard triplet therapy (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.23-0.38) but with 41.6% grade 3-4 infections [117]A1b.
Step 5: Sequencing and Salvage Strategies
Meta-analysis of 2,122 patients indicates bispecific antibody therapy before CAR-T improves subsequent CAR-T complete response rates (53.7% vs 29.4%; p=0.0008) and objective response rates (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24-2.11) [116]A1a. Bispecific combination after CAR-T yields higher CR rates (46.4%) than bispecific monotherapy (29.4%) [116]A1a.
For progressing after anti-BCMA CAR-T, anti-GPRC5D CAR-T achieves 84% ORR (95% CI 68-94%) with only 5% grade 3 CRS and 3% grade 1 ICANS [120]B2b. Talquetamab bridging to BCMA CAR-T yields 71% response rate, 88% post-CAR-T response (54% CR), with 2% grade 3 ICANS and no grade ≥3 CRS [123]C4.
Step 6: ICU-Level Support and Late Complications
Twenty-seven percent of CAR-T recipients require ICU admission within median 4.5 days of infusion; 90-day mortality 22.4% [118]B2b. Independent mortality predictors: frailty (HR 2.51), bacterial infection (HR 2.12), life-saving therapy within 24 hours (HR 1.80) [118]B2b. Grade ≥3 infections occur in 41-45% of real-world CAR-T cohorts [69]B2b[117]A1b.
Second primary malignancies reported in 4% of ide-cel recipients (1% myeloid) [69]B2b; non-significant increase with cilta-cel (OR 1.77, 95% CI 0.89-3.56) [38]C4. Movement disorders and cranial nerve palsies occur with cilta-cel (9% grade 2, 1% grade 3) [53]A1b.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength of disagreement | Implication for practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal lymphodepletion for liso-cel | Real-world data, bendamustine associated with lower CRS/ICANS without efficacy loss [126]B3b | Label/registration trials, fludarabine/cyclophosphamide standard; bendamustine data limited to retrospective cohorts | Moderate (different evidence tiers) | Centers increasingly use bendamustine during fludarabine shortage; prospective validation needed |
| Cilta-cel vs ide-cel first-line choice | Efficacy priority, cilta-cel superior PFS (HR 0.48) and OS (HR 0.67) [38]C4 | Toxicity priority, cilta-cel higher severe CRS, infections, delayed neurotoxicity [38]C4 | Strong (divergent risk-benefit weighting) | Shared decision-making incorporating age, comorbidity, infection risk, and patient preference |
| Bispecific before CAR-T vs CAR-T before bispecific | Meta-analysis, bispecific first improves CAR-T CR rate (53.7% vs 29.4%) [116]A1a | Clinical practice, CAR-T often used earlier due to manufacturing logistics and regulatory sequencing | Moderate (evidence vs access) | Emerging data may shift sequencing paradigms; trials ongoing |
Pearl: Normalize LDH before lymphodepletion, it is the strongest modifiable predictor of CAR-T efficacy across products; use comprehensive bridging radiotherapy to achieve it, and select bendamustine lymphodepletion when feasible to reduce CRS/ICANS without compromising response [126]B3b[127]C4.
| Drug | Indication | Dose | Route | Max Doses | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Grade ≥2 CRS | 8 mg/kg (max 800 mg) | IV q8h | 4 doses | LFTs, neutrophils, infection signs |
| Dexamethasone | Grade ≥2 ICANS | 10 mg q6h | IV | , | Glucose, infection, delirium |
| Methylprednisolone | Grade ≥3 ICANS | 1 g daily | IV | , | Glucose, infection, delirium |
| Siltuximab | Refractory CRS/ICANS | 11 mg/kg | IV | Single dose typical | LFTs, infection, IgG levels |
| Anakinra | Steroid-refractory ICANS | 100 mg daily (up to 2 mg/kg/day) | SC | , | Injection site, LFTs, neutrophils |
10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management)
- ▸CAR-HEMATOTOX and mEASIX scores at baseline predict prolonged cytopenias, bleeding, and coagulopathy after CAR T-cell therapy
- ▸2-day fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion yields similar efficacy with less prolonged thrombocytopenia than 3-day regimens
- ▸Therapeutic anticoagulation at infusion increases bleeding risk (HR 3.74) without clear VTE benefit; prophylactic LMWH is standard for immobilized inpatients
Step 1: Assess Hematologic Reserve and Bleeding Risk Before Infusion
Baseline cytopenias and inflammatory markers identify patients who will develop prolonged neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and bleeding after CAR T-cell infusion. The CAR-HEMATOTOX model incorporates platelet count, hemoglobin, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), C-reactive protein, and ferritin measured before lymphodepletion; a high score predicts severe neutropenia ≥14 days (12 vs 5.5 days), severe thrombocytopenia (87% vs 34%), and anemia (96% vs 40%) [36]B3b. Baseline platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥198 identifies patients at higher risk for severe immune effector cell-associated toxicities including ICANS [138]C4. Endothelial activation quantified by the modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (mEASIX), derived from platelets, CRP, and LDH, predicts consumptive coagulopathy, CRS grade ≥2, and inferior progression-free and overall survival [102]D5.
Step 2: Transfusion Support During Aplasia
Profound neutropenia (ANC <100/µL) occurs in 72% of patients and is prolonged (≥21 days) in 64% after axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel [36]B3b. Median duration of severe neutropenia (ANC <500/µL) is 9 days [36]B3b. Transfuse red cells for hemoglobin <7 g/dL (or <8 g/dL with cardiac comorbidity) and platelets for counts <10×10⁹/L (or <20×10⁹/L with fever, bleeding, or invasive procedure). Growth factor support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is reasonable for prolonged severe neutropenia; thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (e.g., romiplostim, eltrombopag) may be considered for refractory thrombocytopenia [76]D5. Bone marrow biopsy is indicated for cytopenias persisting >90 days to exclude residual disease or secondary marrow neoplasm [76]D5.
Step 3: Anticoagulation and Thrombosis Prophylaxis
One-year cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after axicabtagene ciloleucel is 6.3%; bleeding incidence is 11.0% [132]B2b. Median time to either event is 28 days post-infusion [132]B2b. Therapeutic anticoagulation at the time of infusion increases bleeding risk (HR 3.74, 95% CI 1.33-10.49) [132]B2b. Thrombocytopenia grade ≥3 (platelets <50×10⁹/L) at infusion also raises bleeding risk (HR 3.55, 95% CI 1.12-11.26) [132]B2b. A CAR-HEMATOTOX score ≥2 before therapy similarly predicts bleeding (HR 3.62, 95% CI 1.23-10.69) [132]B2b. In a Mayo Clinic series of 97 axi-cel recipients, only 2 (2.1%) developed VTE despite 57% receiving concurrent anticoagulation (53 as prophylaxis) [140]C4. Routine therapeutic anticoagulation is not recommended solely for ; prophylactic-dose low-molecular-weight is appropriate for immobilized inpatients. Hold or reduce anticoagulation when platelets fall <50×10⁹/L or active bleeding occurs.
Step 4: Cytoreductive Bridging Before CAR T-Cell Infusion
Bridging radiotherapy achieves rapid cytoreduction in CNS lymphoma. In 12 patients receiving CNS bridging radiotherapy before commercial CAR T, mean lesion size reduction was 74.0% (95% CI 62.0-86.0) at a median of 12 days from radiotherapy completion to CAR T infusion [130]D5. Best CNS response included 8 complete responses and 1 partial response; 3 patients experienced CNS relapse outside the radiation field [130]D5. Grade ≥3 CRS occurred in 1 of 12 patients; grade ≥3 ICANS in 3 of 12 [130]D5. For systemic disease, lymphodepleting chemotherapy (fludarabine/ ) remains standard; a 2-day regimen (fludarabine 40 mg/m² + cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m² × 2 days) yields similar efficacy and CRS/ICANS rates as a 3-day regimen but with less prolonged thrombocytopenia (2% vs 27% platelet recovery >60 days) [131]C4. Intensive multi-agent bridging (e.g., VTD-PACE, DCEP) in delays platelet and neutrophil recovery without improving progression-free survival after idecabtagene vicleucel [136]B3b.
Step 5: Monitoring and Escalation Triggers
- Daily CBC with differential through day +30; continue weekly until ANC >1×10⁹/L and platelets >50×10⁹/L without transfusion.
- Fibrinogen and platelet trends: a >10% day-over-day platelet drop or fibrinogen <250 mg/dL precedes high-grade ICANS in >75% of cases [137]B3b.
- mEASIX at baseline and during CRS/ICANS to track endothelial activation and coagulopathy risk [102]D5.
- Serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) before infusion: NfL >74.8 pg/mL predicts moderate-to-severe ICANS (sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.50, AUC 0.71) [128]B2b.
- Bone marrow biopsy if cytopenias persist >90 days or new dysplasia appears [76]D5.
Drug / Modality Comparison Table
| Modality | Indication / Line | Key Detail | Key Evidence | Outcome | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR-HEMATOTOX score | Pre-infusion risk stratification | Platelets, Hb, ANC, CRP, ferritin | Rejeski et al. [36]B3b | AUC 0.89 for severe neutropenia ≥14 d | 3b |
| mEASIX | Baseline endothelial activation / coagulopathy risk | Platelets, CRP, LDH | Galli et al. [102]D5 | Predicts CRS ≥2, consumptive coagulopathy, PFS/OS | 5 |
| PLR ≥198 | Pre-infusion severe toxicity risk | Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio | Kim et al. [138]C4 | Sens 85.7%, Spec 87.5% for severe AE | 4 |
| CNS bridging RT | CNS lymphoma cytoreduction before CAR T | Median 12 d to CAR T | Cederquist et al. [130]D5 | 74% lesion reduction; 8 CR, 1 PR | 5 |
| 2-day Flu/Cy LD | Standard lymphodepletion | Flu 40 mg/m² + Cy 500 mg/m² × 2 d | Frame et al. [131]C4 | Similar ORR/CRS/ICANS; less prolonged thrombocytopenia | 4 |
| G-CSF / TPO-RA | Prolonged cytopenias >30 d | Growth factor support | Jain et al. [76]D5 | Anecdotal; no RCT evidence | 5 |
Dosing Table
| Drug | Starting dose | Target / max dose | Renal adjustment | Hepatic adjustment | Key monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fludarabine (lymphodepletion) | 30-40 mg/m² IV daily × 2-3 d | 40 mg/m² × 2 d (2-day regimen) | Reduce 50% if CrCl <30 mL/min | No specific adjustment | CBC, renal function |
| Cyclophosphamide (lymphodepletion) | 500 mg/m² IV daily × 2-3 d | 500 mg/m² × 2 d (2-day regimen) | Reduce if CrCl <10 mL/min | No specific adjustment | CBC, hemorrhagic cystitis prophylaxis |
| (VTE prophylaxis) | 40 mg SC daily | 40 mg daily (adjust for weight/renal) | 30 mg daily if CrCl <30 mL/min | No adjustment | Platelets, anti-Xa if renal impairment |
| Romiplostim (refractory thrombocytopenia) | 1 µg/kg SC weekly | Titrate to platelets ≥50×10⁹/L; max 10 µg/kg | No adjustment | No adjustment | Platelets, bone marrow reticulin |
| Eltrombopag (refractory thrombocytopenia) | 50 mg PO daily | Titrate to platelets ≥50×10⁹/L; max 75 mg | No adjustment | 25 mg daily if B/C | Platelets, LFTs, cataracts |
| Filgrastim (prolonged neutropenia) | 5 µg/kg SC daily | Continue until ANC >1×10⁹/L | No adjustment | No adjustment | CBC, spleen size |
Treatment Failure Protocol
- Refractory thrombocytopenia (>90 days, platelets <20×10⁹/L despite TPO-RA, transfusions, infection control): bone marrow biopsy → consider stem cell boost (autologous CD34+ cells) or eltrombopag escalation [76]D5.
- Persistent neutropenia (>90 days, ANC <500/µL despite G-CSF): evaluate for marrow infiltration, myelodysplasia, or viral suppression (CMV, HHV-6) [76]D5.
- Recurrent VTE on prophylactic anticoagulation: escalate to therapeutic anticoagulation if platelets >50×10⁹/L and no active bleeding; consider IVC filter if anticoagulation contraindicated.
- Life-threatening bleeding (intracranial, hemodynamic instability): platelet transfusion to >100×10⁹/L, 4-factor PCC, tranexamic acid 1 g IV q6h, hold anticoagulation, neurosurgical consultation.
What NOT to Do
- Do NOT use therapeutic anticoagulation routinely for VTE prophylaxis in CAR T-cell recipients; bleeding risk outweighs low VTE incidence (2.1% in axi-cel series) [140]C4[132]B2b.
- Do NOT omit baseline mEASIX or CAR-HEMATOTOX assessment; both independently predict severe hematologic toxicity [36]B3b[102]D5.
- Do NOT delay bone marrow biopsy for cytopenias >90 days; secondary myeloid neoplasms occur [76]D5.
- Do NOT use intensive multi-agent bridging (VTD-PACE/DCEP) expecting PFS benefit in myeloma; it delays hematologic recovery without improving survival [136]B3b.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength of disagreement | Implication for practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Role of prophylactic anticoagulation during CAR T-cell therapy | ASH/ISTH guidance (extrapolated), consider prophylactic LMWH for immobilized inpatients | Real-world data (Ko et al.), therapeutic anticoagulation at infusion increases bleeding HR 3.74; VTE incidence only 6.3% at 1 year [132]B2b | Moderate | Most centers use prophylactic-dose LMWH only during hospitalization; therapeutic anticoagulation reserved for documented VTE |
| Optimal lymphodepletion intensity | 2-day Flu/Cy (Frame et al.), non-inferior efficacy, less prolonged thrombocytopenia [131]C4 | 3-day Flu/Cy (historical standard), used in pivotal CAR T trials (ZUMA-1, JULIET) | Mild | 2-day regimen increasingly adopted; no prospective RCT comparing regimens |
| TPO-RA use for CAR T-associated thrombocytopenia | Jain et al. (expert approach), consider romiplostim/eltrombopag for prolonged thrombocytopenia [76]D5 | No guideline endorsement, evidence limited to case series; cost and reticulin fibrosis risk | Moderate | Use selectively after >30-60 days of refractory thrombocytopenia with marrow confirmation of megakaryocyte deficiency |
Pearl: Baseline CAR-HEMATOTOX and mEASIX scores stratify bleeding and cytopenia risk before CAR T infusion; a 2-day fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion regimen reduces prolonged thrombocytopenia without compromising efficacy; reserve therapeutic anticoagulation for documented VTE, prophylactic dosing suffices for most inpatients [36]B3b[102]D5[131]C4[132]B2b.
History and Evolution of Treatment
- ▸CTCAE over-captured non-specific neurologic events; ASTCT ICANS grading reclassified 46% of JULIET patients from grades 1-3 to grade 0 [143]
- ▸Bendamustine lymphodepletion reduced any-grade ICANS from 33% to 1% vs fludarabine/cyclophosphamide in liso-cel real-world data [126]
- ▸Fractionated CAR-T dosing (var-cel) yielded only 3% grade ≥3 ICANS [34]; comprehensive bridging RT with LDH normalization associated with lower grade ≥3 ICANS [127]
From CTCAE to Standardized ICANS Grading
Early CAR-T trials graded neurotoxicity using CTCAE v4.03, a scale not designed for immune effector cell syndromes. In the JULIET trial of tisagenlecleucel, CTCAE identified neurotoxicity in 58.5% of 106 infused patients (40.6% grade 1-2, 17.9% grade 3-4) [143]B2b. Retrospective regrading of the same dataset by expert panel using the CARTOX-derived modified CRES (mCRES) and the ASTCT ICANS criteria reduced the any-grade incidence to 17.1% each, reclassifying 31 patients (46%) from CTCAE grades 1-3 to grade 0 because their events, headache, anxiety, dizziness, , insomnia, were deemed non-attributable encephalopathy [143]B2b. This discrepancy exposed CTCAE's subjectivity and over-capture of non-specific neurologic events, prompting adoption of the ASTCT ICANS consensus grading (ICE score, consciousness, seizures, motor findings, cerebral edema) as the universal standard [143]B2b.
Landmark Toxicity Signals That Shaped Monitoring
The JCAR015 (ROCKET) trial in adult ALL was halted after fatal cerebral edema, establishing that severe ICANS could be rapidly lethal and mandating intensive neurologic monitoring [143]B2b. In contrast, the JULIET lymphoma trial reported no grade 5 neurotoxicity, suggesting disease context and CAR construct influence severity [143]B2b. ZUMA-1 (axicabtagene ciloleucel) later showed higher rates of grade ≥3 ICANS (28% in patients ≥65 years) than tisagenlecleucel, reinforcing product-specific risk profiles [126]B3b.
Evolution of Prophylactic and Preemptive Strategies
Early practice treated ICANS reactively with corticosteroids after onset. The ZUMA-1 experience with axicabtagene ciloleucel demonstrated that prophylactic did not prevent ICANS despite reducing CRS [143]B2b. Subsequent real-world data with lisocabtagene maraleucel showed bendamustine lymphodepletion (vs fludarabine/ ) associated with significantly lower any-grade ICANS (1% vs 33%) and grade ≥3 ICANS (0% vs 13%) without compromising efficacy [126]B3b. This shifted lymphodepletion choice toward bendamustine where feasible, especially in older or comorbid patients.
Fractionated Dosing and Bridging Radiotherapy
Fractionated CAR-T dosing emerged as a strategy to mitigate peak cytokine exposure. The CART19-BE-02 trial of varnimcabtagene autoleucel used adaptive intra-patient dose escalation (0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 2.0 × 10⁶ CAR T cells/kg) with 24-hour intervals contingent on safety; only 1 of 32 patients (3%) developed grade ≥3 ICANS [34]B2b. Concurrently, bridging radiotherapy before CAR-T was evaluated for cytoreduction. The ILROG multicenter study of 172 patients showed comprehensive bridging RT (to all active sites) associated with superior PFS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.63) and OS (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.83) and lower grade ≥3 ICANS rates when LDH normalized after RT [127]C4. LDH normalization after bridging therapy emerged as a prognostic surrogate for reduced neurotoxicity risk.
Refractory ICANS and Novel Agents
For steroid-refractory ICANS, anakinra (IL-1 receptor antagonist) and siltuximab (anti-IL-6) entered practice based on mechanistic rationale and case series. In the liso-cel real-world cohort, 9 patients received anakinra (7 with grade ≥3 ICANS) and 2 received siltuximab [126]B3b. These agents remain off-label but are incorporated into consensus algorithms for ICANS unresponsive to high-dose corticosteroids.
Current Paradigm: Risk-Adapted Monitoring and Grading
Today, ASTCT ICANS grading is mandatory for clinical trials and standard of care. Monitoring protocols incorporate serial ICE scoring, EEG for non-convulsive seizures, and neuroimaging for cerebral edema. Lymphodepletion selection (bendamustine preferred for lower ICANS), fractionated dosing for high-risk products, and bridging strategies aimed at LDH normalization represent the evolutionary trajectory from reactive management to risk-adapted prevention.
Pearl: The shift from CTCAE to ASTCT ICANS grading halved reported neurotoxicity incidence by excluding non-attributable events; current prevention focuses on bendamustine lymphodepletion, fractionated dosing, and bridging cytoreduction targeting LDH normalization, all strategies that lower peak inflammatory exposure without sacrificing efficacy [143]B2b[126]B3b[34]B2b[127]C4.
| Trial / Product | Grading System | Any-Grade ICANS | Grade ≥3 ICANS | Key Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JULIET (tisa-cel) | CTCAE v4.03 (FDA label) | 58.5% | 17.9% | Over-capture of non-specific events [143]B2b |
| JULIET (regraded) | mCRES / ASTCT ICANS | 17.1% | 12.6% | 31 patients reclassified to grade 0 [143]B2b |
| ZUMA-1 (axi-cel) | ASTCT | ~28% (≥65 yr) | ~28% (≥65 yr) | Higher neurotoxicity with axi-cel [126]B3b |
| TRANSCEND (liso-cel) | ASTCT | 26% (real-world) | 10% (real-world) | Bendamustine LD reduced ICANS to 1% any-grade [126]B3b |
| CART19-BE-02 (var-cel) | ASTCT | 3% | 3% (grade ≥3) | Fractionated escalation mitigates peak toxicity [34]B2b |
11. Complications
- ▸Respiratory failure drives ICU admission; FVC < 15 mL/kg and PaO2/FiO2 < 150 trigger intubation.
- ▸Autonomic instability (BP lability, arrhythmia, ileus, urinary retention) affects >25% of ICU patients and requires protocolized monitoring.
- ▸Bacterial infection independently doubles 90-day mortality; prevention bundles and early broad-spectrum antibiotics are non-negotiable.
Respiratory Monitoring
Respiratory failure is the most common indication for ICU admission after CAR-T infusion. In the CARTTAS cohort, 27% of patients required vasoactive support within 24 hours of ICU admission, and hypoxia was a leading driver of ICU transfer [118]B2b. Continuous and serial forced vital capacity (FVC) measurements are recommended during the first 14 days. Intubation criteria follow standard ARDS thresholds: PaO₂/FiO₂ < 150 on non-invasive support, FVC < 15 mL/kg, or progressive hypercapnia with altered mental status.
| Parameter | Threshold for Escalation | Action |
|---|---|---|
| SpO₂ | < 90% on 6 L/min NC | High-flow nasal cannula or non-invasive ventilation |
| FVC | < 15 mL/kg | ICU transfer, consider intubation |
| PaO₂/FiO₂ | < 150 on NIV | Intubation |
| pH | < 7.25 with pCO₂ > 50 mmHg | Intubation |
Autonomic Complications
Autonomic instability manifests as labile blood pressure, arrhythmias, ileus, and urinary retention. In the CARTTAS study, 27% of ICU patients required vasoactive drugs, and 12% developed bacterial infections that compounded hemodynamic instability [118]B2b. Sinus tachycardia is near-universal during CRS; new-onset or warrant telemetry and electrolyte repletion. Ileus correlates with high-grade ICANS and opioid use, abdominal radiographs and bowel regimen (polyethylene glycol 17 g daily) are indicated. Urinary retention occurs in up to 15% of patients with grade ≥3 ICANS; bladder scanning every 8 hours and clean intermittent catheterization prevent overflow injury.
DVT/PE Prophylaxis
All hospitalized CAR-T recipients should receive pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis unless contraindicated. 40 mg SC daily (30 mg if CrCl < 30 mL/min) is preferred; unfractionated 5000 units SC q8h is an alternative for renal impairment. Mechanical prophylaxis (sequential compression devices) is added for ICU patients. Prophylaxis continues through hospitalization and for 2 weeks post-discharge in patients with persistent immobility or active malignancy [118]B2b.
Pain Management
Pain syndromes include mucositis (grade 3 in 2% after bridging RT [127]C4), neuropathic pain from ICANS, and musculoskeletal pain from cytokine flare. Multimodal regimen: scheduled acetaminophen 1 g q6h, gabapentin 300 mg q8h titrated to 1200 mg q8h for neuropathic component, and opioid PCA ( 0.2 mg demand, 6-min lockout) for breakthrough. Avoid NSAIDs in thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50×10⁹/L).
Rehabilitation
Early mobilization begins once hemodynamically stable (MAP ≥65 mmHg off vasopressors) and afebrile for 24 hours. Physical therapy twice daily targeting sitting balance, transfer training, and ambulation. Occupational therapy addresses activities of daily living and cognitive screening (MoCA) for ICANS survivors. Speech-language pathology evaluates swallow safety before oral intake in patients with grade ≥2 ICANS.
Hospital-Acquired Complications
Bacterial infection developed in 12% of ICU CAR-T patients and independently doubled 90-day mortality (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.11-4.08) [118]B2b. Prevention bundle: chlorhexidine bathing daily, elevation of head of bed 30-45°, daily sedation vacation and spontaneous breathing trial, Foley catheter removal within 24 hours of ICU transfer, and antibiotic stewardship (de-escalate at 48 hours if cultures negative). Pressure injury prevention: Braden scale q12h, turning q2h, silicone foam dressings over bony prominences. UTI prevention: closed drainage, catheter removal as soon as feasible, not treated.
Complication Summary Table
| Complication | Frequency | Prevention | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory failure | 27% ICU admission [118]B2b | FVC monitoring, early HFNC | Intubation per ARDS criteria |
| Hemodynamic instability | 27% vasoactive support [118]B2b | Early fluid resuscitation, norepinephrine first-line | Vasopressor titration, echo-guided fluid management |
| Bacterial infection | 12% [118]B2b | Chlorhexidine bathing, HOB elevation, catheter stewardship | Broad-spectrum within 1 hour, de-escalate at 48h |
| DVT/PE | Not reported in ICU cohort | Enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily + SCDs | Therapeutic anticoagulation per VTE guidelines |
| Pressure injury | Not reported | Braden q12h, q2h turning, foam dressings | Wound care consult, NPWT if indicated |
| Urinary retention | ~15% with grade ≥3 ICANS | Bladder scan q8h, early catheter removal | Clean intermittent catheterization |
| Ileus | Correlates with high-grade ICANS | PEG 17 g daily, minimize opioids | NPO, NG decompression, prokinetics |
Pearl: LDH normalization after bridging therapy predicts lower grade ≥3 ICANS and better survival; use serial LDH as a real-time cytoreduction biomarker to guide escalation of supportive care [127]C4.
| Parameter | Threshold for Escalation | Action |
|---|---|---|
| SpO2 | < 90% on 6 L/min NC | High-flow nasal cannula or non-invasive ventilation |
| FVC | < 15 mL/kg | ICU transfer, consider intubation |
| PaO2/FiO2 | < 150 on NIV | Intubation |
| pH | < 7.25 with pCO2 > 50 mmHg | Intubation |
12. Prognosis & Natural History
- ▸Survival varies by disease and product: LBCL 2-yr PFS 38-46%, myeloma median PFS 8.8-NR months, Burkitt median PFS 2.3 mo, Richter median PFS 4.7 mo
- ▸Grade ≥3 ICANS associates with early NRM (7-22% at 90 days) but rescued patients can achieve durable remission
- ▸Cilta-cel uniquely carries delayed neurotoxicity (cranial nerve palsies 9%, peripheral neuropathy 3%) not seen with ide-cel
- ▸Pre-LD LDH ≤ ULN and post-bridging LDH normalization are actionable prognostic biomarkers (HR 0.25-0.30 for PFS/OS)
- ▸Post-CAR-T salvage with bispecific antibodies yields median OS ~10 mo vs historical 5 mo
Prognosis by Disease Context and CAR-T Product
Outcomes after ICANS are inseparable from the underlying malignancy, the CAR-T construct, and the intensity of acute toxicity. In large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), real-world cohorts show 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 38-46% and overall survival (OS) of 53-63% depending on product [40]B3b[127]C4. Axi-cel yields 2-year PFS 46% and OS 63%; tisa-cel 30% and 45%; liso-cel 45% and 58% [40]B3b. In relapsed/refractory , cilta-cel achieves median PFS not reached at 15.9 months with 12-month PFS 75.9% versus 11.8 months and 48.6% for standard care [53]A1b; ide-cel shows median PFS 8.8 months in standard-of-care use [69]B2b. For , median PFS is only 2.3 months and median OS 6.0 months despite a 58% initial response rate [124]C4. Richter transformation carries median PFS 4.7 months and median OS 8.5 months [125]C4.
Impact of ICANS Grade on Survival
Severe ICANS (grade ≥3) correlates with higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). In the CARTTAS ICU cohort, 90-day mortality was 22.4% (95% CI 17.1-27.7%) among CAR-T recipients requiring intensive care; grade 3-4 ICANS was present in 35% of evaluated patients and frailty, bacterial infection, and early life-saving therapy independently predicted death [118]B2b. In LBCL, NRM at 1 year is 7% after liso-cel, driven by early ICANS/CRS deaths then infections [126]B3b. No ICANS-related deaths occurred in the bridging radiotherapy cohort despite 24% grade ≥3 ICANS [127]C4.
Delayed Neurotoxicity and Long-Term Sequelae
Cilta-cel carries a distinct delayed neurotoxicity syndrome (movement disorders, , cranial nerve palsies) not captured by standard ICANS grading. In CARTITUDE-4, 9.1% of cilta-cel recipients developed cranial nerve palsy (grade 2-3) and 2.8% had CAR-T-related [53]A1b. Real-world comparison shows cilta-cel associated with higher delayed neurotoxicity (OR 20.07, 95% CI 4.46-90.20) versus ide-cel [38]C4. Long-term neurocognitive outcomes remain understudied; no Parkinsonism was reported in 821 ide-cel recipients [69]B2b.
Prognostic Biomarkers
Pre-lymphodepletion LDH ≤ upper limit of normal predicts superior PFS (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12-0.55) and OS (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.68) after liso-cel [126]B3b. LDH normalization after bridging radiotherapy identifies patients with 1-year PFS 66-74% versus 17% if LDH remains elevated [127]C4. High CAR-HEMATOTOX score predicts severe infections with bispecific antibodies post-CAR-T [160]C4.
Natural History Without Effective Salvage
After CAR-T failure in DLBCL, historical median OS is 5 months [160]C4. Odronextamab post-CAR-T achieves median OS 10.2 months (12-month OS 45.5%) and CR rate 31.7% [160]C4. Sequencing bispecific antibodies before CAR-T improves subsequent CAR-T complete response rates (53.7% vs 29.4%) [116]A1a.
Pearl: LDH normalization after bridging therapy and pre-lymphodepletion LDH ≤ ULN are the strongest validated prognostic surrogates for durable remission; grade ≥3 ICANS signals elevated early NRM but not necessarily worse long-term survival if rescued. [126]B3b[127]C4[118]B2b
| Disease / Population | Product / Setting | Median PFS | 12-mo PFS | Median OS | 12-mo OS | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBCL (real-world) | Axi-cel | , | 46% | , | 63% | [40]B3b |
| LBCL (real-world) | Tisa-cel | , | 30% | , | 45% | [40]B3b |
| LBCL (real-world) | Liso-cel | 18.5 mo | 55% | NR | 68% | [126]B3b |
| LBCL (bridging RT) | Mixed | , | 38% (2-yr) | , | 53% (2-yr) | [127]C4 |
| RRMM (RCT) | Cilta-cel | NR | 75.9% | , | 79.2% (18-mo) | [53]A1b |
| RRMM (real-world) | Ide-cel | 8.8 mo | , | , | , | [69]B2b |
| RRMM (real-world) | Cilta-cel vs Ide-cel | HR 0.48 | , | HR 0.67 | , | [38]C4 |
| Burkitt lymphoma | CD19 CAR-T | 2.3 mo | , | 6.0 mo | , | [124]C4 |
| Richter transformation | CD19 CAR-T | 4.7 mo | 29% (2-yr) | 8.5 mo | 38% (2-yr) | [125]C4 |
| DLBCL post-CAR-T | Odronextamab | 4.8 mo | 26.5% | 10.2 mo | 45.5% | [160]C4 |
13. Special Populations & Pregnancy
- ▸Day +3 m-EASIX predicts severe ICANS in children with 82.2% AUC; CSF NF-L rises with ICANS [161, 75]
- ▸Elderly lymphoma patients have 28.7% CV event rate vs 13.5% in adults, strongly tied to CRS [167]
- ▸Renal impairment (CrCl <40 mL/min) does not increase ICANS incidence with teclistamab (16% vs 13%) or ide-cel (23% vs 20%) [165, 89]
- ▸Allogeneic donor-derived CAR-T post-allo-HSCT produces max grade 2 ICANS without excess GVHD [78]
Pediatrics
EASIX and m-EASIX scores predict CRS and ICANS in pediatric and AYA patients after CD19- , with m-EASIX at day +3 achieving 90.6% AUC for severe CRS and 82.2% AUC for severe ICANS [161]C4. In a 76-patient cohort (median age), CRS occurred in 61.8% and ICANS in 22.4%; severe CRS (grade 3-4) in 18.4% and severe ICANS in [161]C4. Lymphodepletion used fludarabine 120 mg/m² and 1000 mg/m² for tisagenlecleucel; 75 mg/m² and 900 mg/m² for investigational product [161]C4. Point-of-care fresh CD19-CAR_Lenti at 3×10⁶ CAR⁺ T cells/kg yielded grade 1-2 CRS in 68% and grade 1-2 ICANS in 11% (2/19), both self-limited [75]C4. Children with trisomy 21 had prolonged late ICAHT (>14 days in 3/3) but no increase in clinically relevant infections [75]C4. Neurofilament light chain (NF-L) in CSF rose significantly in the two patients who developed ICANS, suggesting a potential early biomarker [75]C4.
Pregnancy
No data on CAR T-cell therapy or ICANS management in pregnancy are reported in the provided evidence. Teratogenicity of lymphodepletion (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide), , siltuximab, anakinra, and corticosteroids is not addressed. Delivery planning and safety are not reported.
Elderly
In lymphoma patients receiving CD19 CAR-T, cardiovascular event incidence was 28.7% in the elderly versus 13.5% in adults (statistically significant) [167]A1b. CV events and hypotension strongly associate with CRS severity [167]A1b. Real-world ide-cel in renal impairment (median age 71 vs 67 years) showed similar ICANS rates (16% vs 13%) and grade ≥3 ICANS (2.5% vs 2.6%) regardless of renal function [165]D5.
Renal Impairment
Teclistamab in relapsed/refractory with CrCl <40 mL/min (21% of 384 patients, 18% severe <30 mL/min or dialysis) demonstrated comparable ICANS rates (16% vs 13%) and grade ≥3 ICANS (2.5% vs 2.6%) to patients without renal impairment [165]D5. Ide-cel with CrCl <50 mL/min (13% of 214 patients) showed similar ICANS incidence (23% vs 20%) [89]D5. Renal function did not worsen after either therapy [89]D5[165]D5. Higher baseline and day 30 grade ≥3 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred with renal impairment on teclistamab [165]D5.
Immunocompromised / Post-Allogeneic Transplant
Allogeneic donor-derived CD19-CAR-T (1-3×10⁶ cells/kg) in 13 pediatric/young adult BCP-ALL patients post-allo-HSCT produced grade 1 CRS max and grade 2 ICANS; one acute GVHD controlled with steroids/ruxolitinib; no GVHD in 3 haploidentical donors [78]D5. All achieved MRD-negative CR; 8/13 maintained CR at median 12-month follow-up [78]D5. In point-of-care autologous CAR-T, 6/19 patients had prior allo-HSCT; they experienced higher rates of late ICAHT but comparable CRS/ICANS [75]C4.
Pearl: Pediatric ICANS prediction is strengthened by day +3 m-EASIX (AUC 82.2% for severe ICANS) and CSF NF-L elevation; elderly patients face disproportionate CV toxicity (28.7% vs 13.5%) linked to CRS severity; renal impairment does not increase ICANS risk with teclistamab or ide-cel; allogeneic CAR-T post-transplant yields manageable neurotoxicity (grade 2 max) without excess GVHD [161]C4[75]C4[167]A1b[165]D5[89]D5[78]D5.
| Population | Cohort Size | ICANS Any Grade | ICANS Grade ≥3 | Key Modifiers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pediatric/AYA (CD19-CAR T) | 76 | 22.4% | 9.2% | m-EASIX day +3 AUC 82.2% for severe ICANS [161]C4 |
| Pediatric/AYA (point-of-care CAR_Lenti) | 19 | 10.5% (2/19) | 0% | CSF NF-L elevated in ICANS [75]C4 |
| Elderly lymphoma (CD19-CAR T) | 1379 (meta) | Not reported | Not reported | CV events 28.7% vs 13.5% adults; linked to CRS [167]A1b |
| Renal impairment (teclistamab, CrCl <40) | 81 | 16% | 2.5% | Comparable to non-RI (13%, 2.6%) [165]D5 |
| Renal impairment (ide-cel, CrCl <50) | 28 | 23% | Not reported | Comparable to non-RI (20%) [89]D5 |
| Post-allo-HSCT (allogeneic CAR-T) | 13 | 15% (2/13) | 0% (max grade 2) | One GVHD case controlled [78]D5 |
14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
- ▸Monthly IVIG prophylaxis from cycle 1 independently reduces grade ≥3 infections by 62% with bispecific antibodies [49].
- ▸Platelet count <100 × 10⁹/L one day before onset predicts high-grade ICANS in >75% of lymphoma patients [137].
- ▸Inactivated vaccines (COVID-19, influenza, pneumococcal, recombinant zoster, RSV) should be updated pre-lymphodepletion and repeated after immune reconstitution; live vaccines contraindicated during immunosuppression [49].
Primary Prevention: Infection Prophylaxis and CRS/ICANS Mitigation
Infection risk after CAR-T and bispecific antibody therapy drives much of the preventable morbidity. The EBMT/JACIE best-practice recommendations endorse antiviral prophylaxis for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) with as standard [178]D5. Monthly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement is advised for all patients receiving bispecific antibodies regardless of IgG level, a strategy that independently reduced grade ≥3 infections by 62% (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.79) in a 158-patient real-world cohort [49]B3b. Extending bispecific dosing to every-other-week after cycle 3 (upon partial response or better) and to every 4 weeks after cycle 7 further lowered severe infection risk (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.69) [49]B3b.
Prophylactic administered before step-up doses of bispecific antibodies cut CRS incidence without increasing infections; 96-100% of patients received it in the same cohort [49]B3b. For CAR-T, the COMMIT consensus panel recommends antimicrobial prophylaxis tailored to the depth and duration of cytopenias, including antibacterial (fluoroquinolone) and antifungal (posaconazole) agents during neutropenia [176]C4.
Secondary Prevention: Early Detection of ICANS and Recurrence
No validated biomarker prevents ICANS outright, but serial platelet and fibrinogen dynamics show promise. In 265 B-cell lymphoma patients, a platelet count <100 × 10⁹/L one day before onset predicted high-grade ICANS in >75% of cases (median decrease 11.6% vs 1.6%, p=0.001) [137]B3b. Rising fibrinogen (>400 mg/dL) the day before onset also correlated with ICANS (p=0.03) [137]B3b. These parameters are routinely available and can trigger intensified neurological monitoring.
Baseline brain MRI before CAR-T infusion identifies pre-existing CNS involvement; in 154 patients, urgent MRI during ICANS revealed abnormalities in 40.7% and two distinct patterns (central variant and stroke-like) that inform differential diagnosis [21]C4. Screening for CNS myeloma before BCMA CAR-T is advised in high-risk patients [81]D5.
Surveillance: Long-Term Monitoring and Vaccination
Immunoglobulin monitoring monthly for at least 12 months post-infusion guides IVIG replacement (target IgG >400 mg/dL) [49]B3b. CMV DNAemia surveillance on day 1 of each cycle is recommended for bispecific recipients; cumulative incidence reached 48% at 10 months with anti-BCMA agents [49]B3b. Preemptive antiviral therapy at viral loads 452-134,000 IU/mL prevented CMV disease in all eight clinically significant cases [49]B3b.
Vaccination: Inactivated vaccines (influenza, pneumococcal, recombinant zoster, SARS-CoV-2, RSV) should be updated before lymphodepletion and repeated per CDC/ACIP schedules after immune reconstitution (typically ≥6 months post-CAR-T) [49]B3b. Live vaccines are contraindicated during active immunosuppression.
Neurocognitive surveillance: Serial Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline, during ICANS, and at 1 month detects subtle deficits missed by ICE score]) [182]B2b. Handwriting and tremor changes are early clinical markers of incipient ICANS [182]B2b.
Late effects: Prolonged cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia, and B-cell aplasia require ongoing hematologic and infectious surveillance per EBMT long-term follow-up guidelines [178]D5. Cardiac monitoring (echo/ECG) is warranted given 17.8% CV event rate with CD19 CAR-T [167]A1b.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A (EBMT/JACIE 2021) | Position B (COMMIT 2023) | Strength | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universal IVIG prophylaxis for bispecifics | Not specified; replace if IgG <400 mg/dL | Primary prophylaxis for all patients from cycle 1 | Expert consensus (Level 4) | Earlier IVIG may reduce severe infections but increases cost and infusion burden [49]B3b[176]C4 |
| Prophylactic tocilizumab for CAR-T CRS | Not routinely recommended | Used in 14% of pediatric centers surveyed | Survey data | May reduce steroid exposure; infection impact unproven [185]B3b |
| CMV monitoring threshold for preemptive therapy | No standardized threshold | Treat at 452-134,000 IU/mL per institutional practice | Single-center cohort | Lack of consensus threshold complicates cross-center comparison [49]B3b |
Pearl: Monthly IVIG from cycle 1 of bispecific therapy and platelet/fibrinogen trending during the first 2 weeks post-CAR-T are the two highest-yield, actionable prevention strategies currently supported by outcome data [49]B3b[137]B3b.
References
- [1]
Xu Q, Guo Y, Gao M et al.. “IL-10-expressing, anti-CD19 CAR T cells for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: an open-label, single-arm, phase 1 study.” The Lancet. Haematology (2025). PMID: 41110448 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, 11. Complications - [2]
Jain MD, Smith M, Shah NN. “How I treat refractory CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy.” Blood (2023). PMID: 36989488 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [3]
Gomez-Llobell M, Escribano Serrat S, Bromberg M et al.. “Impact of ASTCT Toxicity Grading System on Outcomes After CAR-T for Mature B-Cell Malignancies.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2026). PMID: 42178058 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [4]
Riedell PA, Hwang WT, Nastoupil LJ et al.. “Patterns of Use, Outcomes, and Resource Utilization among Recipients of Commercial Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2022). PMID: 35850429 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [5]
Cheng H, Sun Y, Zhang X et al.. “Complex association of body mass index and outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with CAR-T cell immunotherapy.” Cytotherapy (2024). PMID: 38625072 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature, 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [6]
Butt OH, Zhou AY, Caimi PF et al.. “Assessment of Pretreatment and Posttreatment Evolution of Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Patients Who Develop Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome.” JAMA oncology (2022). PMID: 36048456 ↗
L3CROSS_SECTIONALCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [7]
Donzelli L, Zullino V, Torelli GF et al.. “Managing Treatment-Emergent Immune Effector Cell-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis-Like Syndrome Following CAR-T Cell Therapy: A Case-Based Review of the use of Emapalumab.” Hematological oncology (2026). PMID: 41311365 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [8]
Li Y, Ming Y, Fu R et al.. “The pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CAR-T cell therapy-related adverse reactions.” Frontiers in pharmacology (2022). PMID: 36313336 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [9]
Pensato U, Muccioli L, Cani I et al.. “Brain dysfunction in COVID-19 and CAR-T therapy: cytokine storm-associated encephalopathy.” Annals of clinical and translational neurology (2021). PMID: 33780166 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [10]
Bai Z, Huang X, Jia H et al.. “Adverse events and recent advances in CAR-T-cell therapy.” Carcinogenesis (2025). PMID: 41451921 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [11]
Ong SY, Baird JH. “A Primer on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy-related Toxicities for the Intensivist.” Journal of intensive care medicine (2023). PMID: 37899577 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [12]
Huby S, Gelisse P, Tudesq JJ et al.. “Frontal Intermittent Rhythmic Delta Activity Is a Useful Diagnostic Tool of Neurotoxicity After CAR T-Cell Infusion.” Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation (2023). PMID: 37059470 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [13]
Ou Y, Zhong X, Mei M et al.. “Post-marketing safety of tarlatamab in small cell lung cancer based on FAERS and WHO-VigiAccess with SHAP-based interpretable machine learning analysis of immune-related adverse events.” Frontiers in pharmacology (2026). PMID: 42358360 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 1. Definition, Classification & Nomenclature - [14]
Diorio C, Hernandez-Miyares L, Espinoza DA et al.. “Quadriparesis and paraparesis following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in children and adolescents.” Blood (2024). PMID: 38905637 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism, 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 4. Clinical Presentation, 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling - [15]
Park JH, Palomba ML, Perica K et al.. “Results From First-in-Human Phase I Study of a Novel CD19-1XX Chimeric Antigen Receptor With Calibrated Signaling in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.” Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2025). PMID: 39883889 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [16]
Braun LM, Naidoo J, Zeiser R. “Immune-mediated side effects of cancer immunotherapies.” Blood (2026). PMID: 41802111 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [17]
Deschênes-Simard X, Santomasso BD, Dahi PB. “Clinical features, pathophysiology, and management of acute myelopathy following CAR T-cell therapy.” Blood (2024). PMID: 39226460 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [18]
Teipel R, Kroschinsky F, Kramer M et al.. “Prevalence and variation of CHIP in patients with aggressive lymphomas undergoing CD19-directed CAR T-cell treatment.” Blood advances (2022). PMID: 35008107 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [19]
Schmid T, Shaforostova I, Bacher U et al.. “Prophylactic Anakinra to Prevent Neurotoxicity After CAR T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas: A Single-Center Real-World Experience.” Cancers (2026). PMID: 42279369 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [20]
Feng A, Wu J, Choi T et al.. “Musculoskeletal Adverse Events Following BCMA CAR T-Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Characteristics and Immune Correlates.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2026). PMID: 41720163 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism, 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [21]
Asioli GM, Pondrelli F, Spinardi L et al.. “Prospective observational study of magnetic resonance imaging in anti-CD19 CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41615499 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism, 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy, 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [22]
Storci G, De Felice F, Ricci F et al.. “CAR+ extracellular vesicles predict ICANS in patients with B cell lymphomas treated with CD19-directed CAR T cells.” The Journal of clinical investigation (2024). PMID: 38833312 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [23]
Li M, Zhao J, Lu ZJ et al.. “Anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy for refractory SLE-ITP.” Med (New York, N.Y.) (2026). PMID: 41856114 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism, 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [24]
Wang D, Wang X, Tan B et al.. “Allogeneic CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus achieved durable remission.” Med (New York, N.Y.) (2025). PMID: 40446794 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [25]
Kilroe KM, Clarke JE, Ann P et al.. “Guillain-Barre syndrome in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: an individual participant data meta-analysis.” Frontiers in neurology (2025). PMID: 41323217 ↗
L4SR_COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism, 4. Clinical Presentation - [26]
Liu R, Fu Z, Yang F et al.. “Impact of TP53 mutations on survival outcomes in the CAR-T era of large B-cell lymphoma.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 42317374 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism, 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [27]
Galli E, Modoni A, Battistini L et al.. “Neuronal injury biomarkers GFAP and neurofilament light chains (NfL) are associated with neurotoxicity and endothelial dysfunction in adult patients treated with antiCD19 CART cells.” Clinical and experimental medicine (2026). PMID: 41553539 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism, 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [28]
Xue F, Liu R, Fu Z et al.. “Sequential CD19-20 CAR T-cell therapy for refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.” Cytotherapy (2025). PMID: 40340294 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [29]
Schorr C, Forindez J, Espinoza-Gutarra M et al.. “Thrombotic Events Are Unusual Toxicities of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies.” International journal of molecular sciences (2023). PMID: 37176053 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism, 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [30]
Hu Z, Cai S, Yu Y et al.. “BCMA-targeted CAR T cell therapy can effectively induce disease remission in refractory lupus nephritis.” Annals of the rheumatic diseases (2025). PMID: 40681435 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [31]
Wang H, Wang G, Li T et al.. “Efficacy and safety of a novel CD19, CD22 dual-targeted fully human loop bi-CAR-T for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.” Journal of translational medicine (2025). PMID: 40474279 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [32]
Burger MC, Forster MT, Romanski A et al.. “Intracranial injection of natural killer cells engineered with a HER2-targeted chimeric antigen receptor in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.” Neuro-oncology (2023). PMID: 37148198 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [33]
He P, Liu H, Zimdahl B et al.. “A novel antibody-TCR (AbTCR) T-cell therapy is safe and effective against CD19-positive relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma.” Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology (2022). PMID: 35776199 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology & Mechanism - [34]
Ortiz-Maldonado V, Martínez-Cibrian N, Alserawan L et al.. “Varnimcabtagene autoleucel for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Spain (CART19-BE-02): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.” The Lancet. Haematology (2026). PMID: 41651004 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, History and Evolution of Treatment - [35]
van Besien HJ, Ozkan G, Easton N et al.. “Non-ICANS Neurologic Toxicity after BCMA CAR T: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 4630 multiple myeloma patients.” Blood advances (2026). PMID: 41886632 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [36]
Rejeski K, Perez A, Sesques P et al.. “CAR-HEMATOTOX: a model for CAR T-cell-related hematologic toxicity in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.” Blood (2021). PMID: 34166502 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring, 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management), 11. Complications - [37]
Kampouri E, Krantz EM, Xie H et al.. “Human herpesvirus 6 reactivation and disease are infrequent in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy recipients.” Blood (2024). PMID: 38635788 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 4. Clinical Presentation - [38]
Hansen DK, Peres LC, Dima D et al.. “Comparison of Standard-of-Care Idecabtagene Vicleucel and Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.” Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2025). PMID: 39965175 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [39]
Wang WL, Lee D, Cheung E et al.. “Early steroid and anakinra use to manage axicabtagene ciloleucel toxicity reduces the total duration of CRS and ICANS.” Blood advances (2026). PMID: 41855506 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 11. Complications - [40]
Deschênes-Simard X, Bromberg M, Devlin SM et al.. “Comparative real-world outcomes of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapies in large B-cell lymphoma.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 40815804 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 7. Acute & Emergency Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [41]
Ahmed N, Thiruvengadam SK, Hamadani M et al.. “Real-world outcomes of brexucabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a CIBMTR analysis.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 40706035 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [42]
Ahmed N, Wesson W, Lutfi F et al.. “Optimizing the post-CAR T monitoring period in recipients of axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel.” Blood advances (2024). PMID: 39042880 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [43]
Little JS, Aleissa MM, Beluch K et al.. “Low incidence of invasive fungal disease following CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.” Blood advances (2022). PMID: 35802461 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors - [44]
Yu W, Li P, Zhou L et al.. “A phase 1 trial of prizloncabtagene autoleucel, a CD19/CD20 CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.” Blood (2025). PMID: 39813680 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [45]
Linton KM, Vitolo U, Jurczak W et al.. “Epcoritamab monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (EPCORE NHL-1): a phase 2 cohort of a single-arm, multicentre study.” The Lancet. Haematology (2024). PMID: 38889737 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Complications - [46]
Jabbour E, Lussana F, Martínez-Sánchez P et al.. “Subcutaneous blinatumomab in adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: post-hoc safety and activity analysis from a multicentre, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial.” The Lancet. Haematology (2025). PMID: 40532723 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling - [47]
Roddie C, Sandhu KS, Tholouli E et al.. “Obecabtagene Autoleucel in Adults with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.” The New England journal of medicine (2024). PMID: 39602653 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors - [48]
Li R, Pan H, Zhang L et al.. “CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy for Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia.” The New England journal of medicine (2026). PMID: 41534043 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 4. Clinical Presentation, 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling - [49]
Cani L, Scott SA, Roberts D et al.. “Infection risk in 158 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies: a single-center experience.” Haematologica (2025). PMID: 40905083 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [50]
Portuguese AJ, Huang JJ, Jeon Y et al.. “Real-world comparison of lisocabtagene maraleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis with 3-year follow-up.” Haematologica (2025). PMID: 40079097 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors - [51]
Itzhaki Ben Zadok O, Simitsis P, Jacobson C et al.. “Cardiovascular complications and their association with short- and long-term outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.” British journal of haematology (2025). PMID: 41111271 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors, 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [52]
Chen LY, Gong WJ, Li MH et al.. “Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell consolidation therapy combined with CD19+ feeding T cells and TKI for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia.” Blood advances (2023). PMID: 36897251 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors - [53]
San-Miguel J, Dhakal B, Yong K et al.. “Cilta-cel or Standard Care in Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.” The New England journal of medicine (2023). PMID: 37272512 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, History and Evolution of Treatment, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [54]
Hutchings M, Morschhauser F, Iacoboni G et al.. “Glofitamab, a Novel, Bivalent CD20-Targeting T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibody, Induces Durable Complete Remissions in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma: A Phase I Trial.” Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2021). PMID: 33739857 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [55]
Jung S, Greiner J, von Harsdorf S et al.. “Fatal late-onset CAR T-cell-mediated encephalitis after axicabtagene-ciloleucel in a patient with large B-cell lymphoma.” Blood advances (2021). PMID: 34496024 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [56]
Kaulen LD, Martinez-Lage M, Abramson JS et al.. “Clinical presentation, management, and outcome of TIAN in CNS lymphoma treated with CD19-CAR T-cell therapy.” Blood (2025). PMID: 40663771 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [57]
Fleischer A, Kurth S, Duell J et al.. “Neuropsychiatric manifestations following chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for cancer: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and management strategies.” Journal for immunotherapy of cancer (2024). PMID: 39794934 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [58]
Pennisi M, Sanchez-Escamilla M, Flynn JR et al.. “Modified EASIX predicts severe cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity after chimeric antigen receptor T cells.” Blood advances (2021). PMID: 34432870 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [59]
Muhsen IN, Roloff GW, Faramand R et al.. “Outcomes of brexucabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia with CNS involvement.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 40334068 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [60]
Pennisi M, Jain T, Santomasso BD et al.. “Comparing CAR T-cell toxicity grading systems: application of the ASTCT grading system and implications for management.” Blood advances (2020). PMID: 32084260 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling - [61]
Yin Q, Mei X, Ma Y et al.. “Central nervous system infections caused by carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae after CAR T-cell therapy in a patient with preexisting colonization: a case report and literature review.” European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology (2026). PMID: 41511674 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [62]
Kazzi C, Griffith SP, Ko KY et al.. “Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Preliminary Utility for Subacute Cognitive Monitoring after Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2025). PMID: 41314392 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [63]
Nadeem O, Cordas Dos Santos DM, Nikiforow S et al.. “Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: the CAR-PRISM phase 2 trial.” Nature medicine (2026). PMID: 42010117 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [64]
Wickel J, Motte J, Ayzenberg I et al.. “Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for stiff-person syndrome: bridging innovation and clinical challenges in neuroimmunology.” Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders (2025). PMID: 41230121 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [65]
San-Miguel J, Dhakal B, Patel N et al.. “Plain language summary of the CARTITUDE-4 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel for the treatment of people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.” Future oncology (London, England) (2024). PMID: 39110421 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [66]
McGuire JL, Pinto S, Erdogan EN et al.. “Neuroimaging Findings in Children and Young Adults With Neurotoxicity After CAR T-Cell Therapy for B-Cell Malignancies.” Neurology (2025). PMID: 40921024 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [67]
Maillie L, Nasta SD, Svoboda J et al.. “Prolonged Neurologic Symptoms Following Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome in Patients With Large B-cell Lymphoma Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cell Therapy.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2025). PMID: 39848443 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [68]
Shumilov E, Boyadzhiev H, Mazzeo P et al.. “CAR-T Cell Therapy Shows Similar Efficacy and Toxicity in Patients With DLBCL Regardless of CNS Involvement.” HemaSphere (2023). PMID: 38044958 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [69]
Sidana S, Ahmed N, Akhtar OS et al.. “Standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.” Blood (2025). PMID: 40198886 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [70]
Hamilton MP, Craig E, Gentille Sanchez C et al.. “CAR19 monitoring by peripheral blood immunophenotyping reveals histology-specific expansion and toxicity.” Blood advances (2024). PMID: 38498731 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 11. Complications - [71]
Alhomoud M, Ibrahim R, Demetres M et al.. “Safety and efficacy of bridging radiation therapy prior to CD19 CAR T for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Haematologica (2025). PMID: 40637750 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [72]
Kater AP, Janssens A, Eradat H et al.. “Epcoritamab monotherapy for Richter transformation (EPCORE CLL-1): findings from a single-arm, multicentre, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial.” The Lancet. Haematology (2025). PMID: 41380698 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 11. Complications - [73]
Bumma N, Richter J, Jagannath S et al.. “Linvoseltamab for Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.” Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2024). PMID: 38879802 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling - [74]
McKenna M, Epperla N, Ghobadi A et al.. “Real-world evidence of the safety and survival with CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory solid organ transplant-related PTLD.” British journal of haematology (2023). PMID: 37129856 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, History and Evolution of Treatment - [75]
Del Bufalo F, Becilli M, Rosignoli C et al.. “Point-of-care fresh CAR T cells for pediatric or young adult BCP-ALL that is relapsed/refractory or in very-high-risk first relapse.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 40558311 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [76]
Jain T, Olson TS, Locke FL. “How I treat cytopenias after CAR T-cell therapy.” Blood (2023). PMID: 36800563 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management), 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [77]
Sidana S, Patel KK, Peres LC et al.. “Safety and efficacy of standard-of-care ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.” Blood (2025). PMID: 39365257 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling - [78]
Del Bufalo F, Becilli M, Rosignoli C et al.. “Allogeneic, donor-derived, second-generation, CD19-directed CAR-T cells for the treatment of pediatric relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL.” Blood (2023). PMID: 37172203 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [79]
Jabbour E, Sandhu KS, Shaughnessy P et al.. “Tumor burden-guided dosing contributes to mitigation of immunotoxicities following treatment with obecabtagene autoleucel in adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.” Haematologica (2026). PMID: 41504229 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling - [80]
Denlinger N, Song NJ, Zhang X et al.. “Postinfusion PD-1+ CD8+ CAR T cells identify patients responsive to CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.” Blood advances (2024). PMID: 38607381 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling - [81]
Gaballa MR, Puglianini OC, Cohen A et al.. “BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy in patients with multiple myeloma and CNS involvement.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 39729503 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [82]
Penack O, Peczynski C, Boreland W et al.. “Management of complications of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: a report by the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.” Haematologica (2024). PMID: 38813730 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 5. Diagnosis & Workup: Smear, Marrow, Flow Cytometry & Molecular Profiling, 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [83]
Olszewski AJ, Phillips TJ, Hoffmann MS et al.. “Mosunetuzumab in combination with CHOP in previously untreated DLBCL: safety and efficacy results from a phase 2 study.” Blood advances (2023). PMID: 37581593 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [84]
Wang XS, Srour SA, Mendoza T et al.. “Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess symptom burden after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.” British journal of haematology (2023). PMID: 36733986 ↗
L3CROSS_SECTIONALCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [85]
Frank MJ, Hossain NM, Bukhari A et al.. “Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA Improves Early Relapse Detection After Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Infusion in Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results of a Prospective Multi-Institutional Trial.” Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2021). PMID: 34133196 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [86]
Bock AM, Feng L, Chauhan A et al.. “Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas treated with epcoritamab.” Blood advances (2026). PMID: 42263668 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring, History and Evolution of Treatment - [87]
Jalota A, Hershberger CE, Patel MS et al.. “Host metabolome predicts the severity and onset of acute toxicities induced by CAR T-cell therapy.” Blood advances (2023). PMID: 36399526 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [88]
Dos Santos DMC, Rejeski K, Winkelmann M et al.. “Increased visceral fat distribution and body composition impact cytokine release syndrome onset and severity after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in advanced B-cell malignancies.” Haematologica (2022). PMID: 35172565 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [89]
Sidana S, Peres LC, Hashmi H et al.. “Idecabtagene vicleucel chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with renal impairment.” Haematologica (2024). PMID: 37731379 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring, 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [90]
Swan D, Routledge D, Harrison S. “The evolving status of immunotherapies in multiple myeloma: the future role of bispecific antibodies.” British journal of haematology (2021). PMID: 34472091 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [91]
Lee ARYB, Wong HJ, Lim CC et al.. “Monospecific and Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2026). PMID: 42264269 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [92]
Schleifenbaum JK, Heger JM, Jost J et al.. “Systematic literature review to identify prognostic factors of efficacy and safety outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell therapies in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma.” Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology (2025). PMID: 40619472 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring, 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [93]
Jacobson CA, Munoz J, Sun F et al.. “Real-World Outcomes with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapies in Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2023). PMID: 37890589 ↗
L4SR_COHORTCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [94]
Guo Y, Ma L, Yang F et al.. “Efficacy of BCMA CAR-T cell therapy and subsequent strategies in refractory and relapsed plasma cell leukemia: a retrospective cohort study.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 41727456 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [95]
Odak I, Bayir LM, Riemann L et al.. “Brief research report: in-depth immunophenotyping reveals stability of CD19 CAR T-cells over time.” Frontiers in immunology (2024). PMID: 38318174 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [96]
Gagelmann N, Einsele H, Flossdorf S et al.. “Standard-of-care ciltacabtagene autoleucel in earlier versus later lines of therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a nationwide registry analysis.” Journal of hematology & oncology (2026). PMID: 42163304 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [97]
Gower N, Houot R, Pizot C et al.. “Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome after CD19-directed CAR T-cells for B-cell lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A LYSA, SFCE, and GRAALL study from the DESCAR-T registry.” HemaSphere (2026). PMID: 42472032 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [98]
Wills B, Samorodnitsky S, Brown S et al.. “Impact of Bridging Response on Outcomes after CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2026). PMID: 42285354 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 6. Staging, Risk Stratification & Prognostic Scoring - [99]
Santomasso BD, Nastoupil LJ, Adkins S et al.. “Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: ASCO Guideline.” Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2021). PMID: 34724386 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management, 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy - [100]
McGuirk JP, Ghobadi A, Bachier CR et al.. “Safety and efficacy of allogeneic CD19-directed CAR-T therapy CTX110 in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.” Blood advances (2026). PMID: 42085626 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [101]
Abrisqueta P, Karimi YH, Morillo D et al.. “Epcoritamab plus rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, oxaliplatin/carboplatin induces deep and durable responses in transplant-eligible patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the EPCORE NHL-2 trial.” Haematologica (2026). PMID: 41784015 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [102]
Galli E, Sorà F, Hohaus S et al.. “Endothelial activation predicts disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, cytokine release syndrome and prognosis in patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells.” British journal of haematology (2022). PMID: 36503182 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management, 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [103]
Bak GG, Micklethwaite K, Maddock K et al.. “Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: Prospective observational study of unplanned emergency department presentations.” Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA (2023). PMID: 37669879 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [104]
Yamshon S, Gribbin C, Alhomoud M et al.. “Safety and Toxicity Profiles of CAR T Cell Therapy in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia (2024). PMID: 38582666 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [105]
Jin X, Zhao W, Li Y et al.. “Post-marketing safety surveillance of tarlatamab: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology (2026). PMID: 41609856 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [106]
Sanoyan DA, Seipel K, Bacher U et al.. “Real-life experiences with CAR T-cell therapy with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) for triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.” BMC cancer (2023). PMID: 37061680 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [107]
Singbartl K, Rosenthal A, Leis J et al.. “Novel Use of Extracorporeal Blood Purification for Treatment of Severe, Refractory Neurotoxicity After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy-A Case Report.” Critical care explorations (2021). PMID: 34235458 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [108]
Rejeski K, Subklewe M, Locke FL. “Recognizing, defining, and managing CAR-T hematologic toxicities.” Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program (2023). PMID: 38066881 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [109]
Freyer CW, Porter DL. “Cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity following CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies.” The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology (2020). PMID: 32771558 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [110]
Miao L, Zhang Z, Ren Z et al.. “Reactions Related to CAR-T Cell Therapy.” Frontiers in immunology (2021). PMID: 33995389 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [111]
Zhang Y, Qin D, Shou AC et al.. “Exploring CAR-T Cell Therapy Side Effects: Mechanisms and Management Strategies.” Journal of clinical medicine (2023). PMID: 37834768 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [112]
Doig C, Yannakou CK. “Toxicities associated with lymphoma-targeting bispecific antibodies-a review.” Frontiers in medicine (2025). PMID: 40672834 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [113]
Long B, Yoo MJ, Brady WJ et al.. “Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: An emergency medicine focused review.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2021). PMID: 34461398 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [114]
Dimitrov K, Merkle F, Dimitrov M et al.. “Major Adverse Events With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Resuscitation.” Annals of emergency medicine (2025). PMID: 40817894 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [115]
Myers GD, Verneris MR, Goy A et al.. “Perspectives on outpatient administration of CAR-T cell therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia.” Journal for immunotherapy of cancer (2021). PMID: 33846220 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 7. Acute & Emergency Management - [116]
Sorin M, Okde R, Goulet M et al.. “Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibody sequence for large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” The Lancet. Haematology (2025). PMID: 41448213 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [117]
Touzeau C, Mina R, Quach H et al.. “Teclistamab in Multiple Myeloma with One to Three Previous Lines of Therapy.” The New England journal of medicine (2026). PMID: 42212933 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [118]
Azoulay É, Castro P, Maamar A et al.. “Outcomes in patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy who were admitted to intensive care (CARTTAS): an international, multicentre, observational cohort study.” The Lancet. Haematology (2021). PMID: 33894170 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History, 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [119]
Cohen AD, Mateos MV, Cohen YC et al.. “Efficacy and safety of cilta-cel in patients with progressive multiple myeloma after exposure to other BCMA-targeting agents.” Blood (2023). PMID: 36095849 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [120]
Xia J, Sun Q, Zhou D et al.. “Anti-GPRC5D CAR T-cell therapy as a salvage treatment in patients with progressive multiple myeloma after anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.” The Lancet. Haematology (2025). PMID: 40228504 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy - [121]
Cook MR, Dorris CS, Makambi KH et al.. “Toxicity and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in primary and secondary CNS lymphoma: a meta-analysis of 128 patients.” Blood advances (2023). PMID: 36260735 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [122]
Bajwa A, Zhao Q, Geer M et al.. “Siltuximab for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy-related CRS and ICANS: a multicenter retrospective analysis.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 39437770 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy - [123]
Dhakal B, Akhtar OS, Fandrei D et al.. “Sequential targeting in multiple myeloma: talquetamab, a GPRC5D bispecific antibody, as a bridge to BCMA CAR-T therapy.” Blood (2025). PMID: 40749169 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 11. Complications - [124]
Samples L, Sadrzadeh H, Frigault MJ et al.. “Outcomes among adult recipients of CAR T-cell therapy for Burkitt lymphoma.” Blood (2025). PMID: 39938007 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [125]
Kittai AS, Bond D, Huang Y et al.. “Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Richter Transformation: An International, Multicenter, Retrospective Study.” Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2024). PMID: 38552193 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [126]
Riedell PA, Grady CB, Nastoupil LJ et al.. “Lisocabtagene maraleucel for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a cell therapy consortium real-world analysis.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 39657136 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [127]
Yegya-Raman N, Plastaras JP, Wright CM et al.. “Bridging radiotherapy before chimeric antigen receptor T cells for B-cell lymphomas: an ILROG multicenter study.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 40203192 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 8. Long-term & Definitive Management, 9. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Complications, 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [128]
Schoeberl F, Tiedt S, Schmitt A et al.. “Neurofilament light chain serum levels correlate with the severity of neurotoxicity after CAR T-cell treatment.” Blood advances (2022). PMID: 35042236 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [129]
Müller F, Schwingen NR, Hagen M et al.. “Comparison of the safety profiles of CD19-targeting CAR T-cell therapy in patients with SLE and B-cell lymphoma.” Blood (2025). PMID: 40504989 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [130]
Cederquist GY, Schefflein J, Devlin SM et al.. “CNS bridging radiotherapy achieves rapid cytoreduction before CAR T-cell therapy for aggressive B-cell lymphomas.” Blood advances (2024). PMID: 38861344 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [131]
Frame DG, Geer M, Kasha S et al.. “Comparing 2-day vs 3-day flu-CY lymphodepleting regimens for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with non-hodgkin's lymphoma.” Frontiers in immunology (2024). PMID: 38947326 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [132]
Ko AK, Mutsaers PGNJ, van Kleij LM et al.. “Risk of thrombosis and bleeding following CAR T-cell therapy: Insights from the Dutch "Follow that CAR!" registry.” HemaSphere (2026). PMID: 42453534 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [133]
Zhang Y, Tang W, Li Y et al.. “A systematic review on performance analysis of critical time points in multiple myeloma treated by CAR-T cell immunotherapy.” International immunopharmacology (2022). PMID: 36700772 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [134]
Miller A, Daum R, Wang T et al.. “Prolonged cytopenias after immune effector cell therapy and lymphodepletion in patients with leukemia, lymphoma and solid tumors.” Cytotherapy (2024). PMID: 38819365 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [135]
Karschnia P, Arrillaga-Romany IC, Eichler A et al.. “Neurotoxicity and management of primary and secondary central nervous system lymphoma after adoptive immunotherapy with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cells.” Neuro-oncology (2023). PMID: 37402650 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [136]
Kikuchi T, Kondo U, Sugita S et al.. “Impact of Intensive Cyclophosphamide-Containing Multi-Agent Bridging Therapy on Outcomes after Idecabtagene Vicleucel in Multiple Myeloma.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2026). PMID: 41791576 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [137]
Khatib H, Parizat A, Halloun J et al.. “Platelet and Fibrinogen Dynamics After CAR-T Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma May Predict ICANS Onset.” European journal of haematology (2026). PMID: 41681048 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management), 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [138]
Kim C, Kwak K, Kang KW et al.. “Baseline platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with severe immune effector cell-associated toxicities in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 41953008 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [139]
Hu Y, Zu C, Zhang M et al.. “Safety and efficacy of CRISPR-based non-viral PD1 locus specifically integrated anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a first-in-human phase I study.” EClinicalMedicine (2023). PMID: 37251628 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [140]
Melody M, Gandhi S, Saunders H et al.. “Incidence of thrombosis in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel: Mayo Clinic experience.” Leukemia & lymphoma (2022). PMID: 35109766 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [141]
Du M, Huang L, Kou H et al.. “Case Report: ITP Treatment After CAR-T Cell Therapy in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.” Frontiers in immunology (2022). PMID: 35784357 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [142]
Hua H, Wen S, Han X et al.. “PD-L1-armored CD19/CD22 dual-targeted CAR-T cell co-infusion bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation achieves 7-year sustained remission in an adult patient with early relapsed, chemorefractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case report.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 42125659 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 10. Transfusion, Anticoagulation & Cytoreduction (Hematology-Distinctive Management) - [143]
Maziarz RT, Schuster SJ, Romanov VV et al.. “Grading of neurological toxicity in patients treated with tisagenlecleucel in the JULIET trial.” Blood advances (2020). PMID: 32271898 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [144]
Kalariya NM, Hildebrandt MAT, Hansen DK et al.. “Clinical outcomes after idecabtagene vicleucel in older patients with multiple myeloma: a multicenter real-world experience.” Blood advances (2024). PMID: 39042903 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [145]
Jin L, Gu S, Ruan Q et al.. “GPRC5D-targeted CAR T-cell therapy (CT071) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a first-in-human, single-centre, single-arm, phase 1 trial.” The Lancet. Haematology (2025). PMID: 41062204 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Complications - [146]
Zhou D, Sun Q, Xia J et al.. “Anti-BCMA/GPRC5D bispecific CAR T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a single-arm, single-centre, phase 1 trial.” The Lancet. Haematology (2024). PMID: 39059405 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Complications - [147]
Cassanello G, Luttwak E, Brown S et al.. “Outcomes of CD19 CAR-T therapy in central nervous system lymphoma: Insights from a multicentre experience.” British journal of haematology (2025). PMID: 40589238 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [148]
Balke-Want H, Gödel P, Schmid C et al.. “Zamtocabtagene autoleucel in relapsed/refractory B-NHL: 5-year follow-up of a CD20/19 tandem CAR T-cell phase 1 trial.” Blood advances (2026). PMID: 41512222 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [149]
Kfir-Erenfeld S, Asherie N, Lebel E et al.. “Clinical evaluation and determinants of response to HBI0101 (BCMA CART) therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.” Blood advances (2024). PMID: 38768428 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [150]
Aldoss I, Goldberg L, Zhang J et al.. “CAR T Cell Therapy as a Definitive Consolidation for Older Adults with B-ALL in First Complete Remission.” Blood advances (2026). PMID: 42341322 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [151]
Merz M, Gagelmann N, Smaili S et al.. “Remission conversion drives outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma: a registry analysis from the DRST.” Blood (2025). PMID: 40504993 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [152]
Wudhikarn K, Herr MM, Chen M et al.. “Infection after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: real-world analysis from CIBMTR.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 40435511 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [153]
Gust J, Rawlings-Rhea SD, Wilson AL et al.. “GFAP and NfL increase during neurotoxicity from high baseline levels in pediatric CD19-CAR T-cell patients.” Blood advances (2023). PMID: 36006611 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [154]
Hammons L, Haider S, Portuguese AJ et al.. “Chimeric antigen receptor and bispecific T-cell engager therapies in multiple myeloma patients with prior allogeneic transplantation.” British journal of haematology (2023). PMID: 38054558 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [155]
Hossain NM, Ahn KW, Patel J et al.. “Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for high-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS.” British journal of haematology (2025). PMID: 40693472 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [156]
Sharp J, Strati P, Bhatta S et al.. “Real-world outcomes and toxicities of CAR-T in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a multicenter cohort study.” Blood advances (2026). PMID: 41747197 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 11. Complications - [157]
Gauthier J, Gazeau N, Hirayama AV et al.. “Impact of CD19 CAR T-cell product type on outcomes in relapsed or refractory aggressive B-NHL.” Blood (2022). PMID: 35439295 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 11. Complications - [158]
Zhou D, Qi Y, Ma S et al.. “Anti-BCMA/GPRC5D CAR T in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients with extraosseous extramedullary disease.” Blood (2026). PMID: 42166352 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [159]
Looka A, Qualls DA, Matthews D et al.. “A real-world comparison of commercial-use axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel in large B-cell lymphoma.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 39546746 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [160]
Topp MS, Matasar M, Allan JN et al.. “Odronextamab monotherapy in R/R DLBCL after progression with CAR T-cell therapy: primary analysis of the ELM-1 study.” Blood (2025). PMID: 39786390 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 12. Prognosis & Natural History - [161]
Zandaki D, Selukar S, Bi Y et al.. “EASIX and m-EASIX predict CRS and ICANS in pediatric and AYA patients after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 39325974 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [162]
Dima D, Rashid A, Davis JA et al.. “Efficacy and safety of idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma not meeting the KarMMa-1 trial eligibility criteria: A real-world multicentre study.” British journal of haematology (2024). PMID: 38263627 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [163]
Maus MV, Alexander S, Bishop MR et al.. “Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune effector cell-related adverse events.” Journal for immunotherapy of cancer (2020). PMID: 33335028 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [164]
Schultz LM, Jeyakumar N, Kramer AM et al.. “CD22 CAR T cells demonstrate high response rates and safety in pediatric and adult B-ALL: Phase 1b results.” Leukemia (2024). PMID: 38491306 ↗
L4PHASE_1_TRIALCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [165]
Dima D, Afrough A, Goel U et al.. “Teclistamab for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 40198766 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [166]
Lust H, Schultz LM, Kwon S et al.. “Real-world outcomes for young adult patients receiving CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.” Blood advances (2025). PMID: 40127395 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [167]
Liu Y, Yuan X, Yang X et al.. “Risk analysis of cardiovascular toxicity in patients with lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR T cells.” Journal of translational medicine (2025). PMID: 39754193 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy, 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [168]
Lertvivatpong N, Inaba H. “Blinatumomab in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current and future use.” Leukemia (2026). PMID: 42045557 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [169]
Shan X, Pang F, Wang G et al.. “A new hope with CAR T-cell therapy for refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a systematic review.” Journal of translational medicine (2026). PMID: 42152066 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [170]
Gagelmann N, Bishop M, Ayuk F et al.. “Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2024). PMID: 38281590 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [171]
Galán-Gómez V, González-Martínez B, Alonso-Saladrigues A et al.. “Siltuximab for the treatment of early complications after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children, adolescents, and young adults.” Experimental hematology & oncology (2025). PMID: 40176077 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [172]
Caballero-Bellón M, Alonso-Saladrigues A, Bobillo-Perez S et al.. “Risk factors and outcome of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell patients admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: CART-PICU study.” Frontiers in immunology (2023). PMID: 37600775 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [173]
Gust J, Finney OC, Li D et al.. “Glial injury in neurotoxicity after pediatric CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.” Annals of neurology (2019). PMID: 31074527 ↗
L4PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [174]
Shahid S, Ramaswamy K, Flynn J et al.. “Impact of Bridging Chemotherapy on Clinical Outcomes of CD19-Specific CAR T Cell Therapy in Children/Young Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2021). PMID: 34852305 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 13. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [175]
Hayden PJ, Roddie C, Bader P et al.. “Management of adults and children receiving CAR T-cell therapy: 2021 best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association (EHA).” Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (2021). PMID: 34923107 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [176]
Mohan M, Chakraborty R, Bal S et al.. “Recommendations on prevention of infections during chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma.” British journal of haematology (2023). PMID: 37287117 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [177]
Perna F, Parekh S, Diorio C et al.. “CAR T-cell toxicities: from bedside to bench, how novel toxicities inform laboratory investigations.” Blood advances (2024). PMID: 38861351 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [178]
Yakoub-Agha I, Chabannon C, Bader P et al.. “Management of adults and children undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE).” Haematologica (2020). PMID: 31753925 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [179]
Noori M, Yazdanpanah N, Rezaei N. “Safety and efficacy of T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies for patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Cancer cell international (2023). PMID: 37670301 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [180]
Yamshon S, Gribbin C, Chen Z et al.. “Efficacy and Toxicity of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2023). PMID: 37279856 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [181]
Shahzad M, Nguyen A, Hussain A et al.. “Outcomes with chimeric antigen receptor t-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Frontiers in immunology (2023). PMID: 37168849 ↗
L4SR_COHORTCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [182]
Sales C, Anderson MA, Kuznetsova V et al.. “Patterns of neurotoxicity among patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: A single-centre cohort study.” European journal of neurology (2023). PMID: 38085272 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [183]
Gallardo-Pizarro A, Ariño M, Lopera C et al.. “Infections in Patients With Cytokine Release Syndrome/Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.” Open forum infectious diseases (2026). PMID: 42281893 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [184]
de Paula Eduardo F, Menti LD, Ferreira MH et al.. “Oral manifestations and dental management in patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy: a retrospective observational study.” Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (2026). PMID: 42249956 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [185]
McNerney KO, Diorio C, Annesley C et al.. “Management Practices of CAR T-cell-Related Inflammatory Toxicities: A Survey of Pediatric CAR T-cell Providers.” Transplantation and cellular therapy (2025). PMID: 41038347 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 14. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance