Skip to main content
Obstetrics and GynecologyCondition·Updated Apr 17, 2026·v1

Ectopic Pregnancy

Ectopic pregnancy is a critical first-trimester complication where implantation occurs outside the uterine cavity. Diagnosis is achieved through TVUS and serial β-hCG monitoring. Management is stratified by clinical stability and hCG levels, utilizing methotrexate for medical resolution or laparoscopy for surgical treatment.

High Evidence107 references·3,999 words·16 min read·v1
obstetricsectopic_pregnancymethotrexatefirst_trimester_bleedingmaternal_mortality

Quick Reference

RxDrug of choiceMethotrexate (50 mg/m² IM)
AltAlternativesLaparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingostomy
AvoidMethotrexate in patients with hepatic/renal failure, breastfeeding, or immunodeficiency
DxTest of choiceTransvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS) + Serial Quantitative β-hCG
ScKey scoreDiscriminatory Zone (hCG 1,500–3,500 mIU/mL)
When to referHemodynamic instability, suspected rare ectopic (scar, cervical), or failure of medical management
Ectopic pregnancy is a surgical emergency if ruptured; otherwise, it is managed via a combination of serial hCG monitoring, methotrexate, or laparoscopy based on stability and hCG levels.
Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a life-threatening obstetric condition defined by the implantation of a gestational sac outside the functional endometrial lining of the uterine cavity. It remains the leading cause of maternal mortality during the first trimester, accounting for approximately 1-2% of all spontaneous pregnancies. While the majority of cases occur within the fallopian tubes (96%), the incidence of rare variants—such as cesarean scar, cervical, and interstitial pregnancies—is rising due to the increased use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and rising cesarean section rates. Diagnosis relies on the correlation of quantitative serum β-hCG levels with transvaginal ultrasonography. Management ranges from medical therapy with methotrexate in stable, low-risk patients to emergency surgical intervention in cases of rupture or hemodynamic instability. Early identification is critical to prevent catastrophic hemorrhage and preserve future fertility.

Overview and Recommendations

Background

  • Define ectopic pregnancy (EP) as any pregnancy where the blastocyst implants outside the endometrial cavity, most commonly in the ampullary region of the . While tubal pregnancies comprise the vast majority, clinicians must recognize non-tubal sites including the cervix, ovary, cesarean section scar, and abdominal cavity, as these often carry a higher risk of massive hemorrhage.
  • Identify high-risk populations, specifically those with a history of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), previous ectopic pregnancy (which increases risk 4- to 13-fold), or prior tubal surgery. Modern risk factors include the use of (ART), which increases the risk of —the simultaneous occurrence of an intrauterine and extrauterine gestation—to nearly 1% of ART pregnancies.
  • Recognize the clinical significance of the 'Pregnancy of Unknown Location' (PUL), a transient state where a patient has a positive pregnancy test but no visible gestation on ultrasound. Approximately 8-10% of early pregnancy evaluations begin as a PUL, requiring serial monitoring to differentiate between an early intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), a failing IUP, or an occult ectopic pregnancy.
  • Understand the impact of lifestyle and mechanical factors, such as current cigarette smoking, which impairs tubal ciliary beat frequency, and the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs). While IUDs are highly effective, any pregnancy that occurs with an IUD in situ has a significantly higher probability of being ectopic.
  • Consider the genetic and molecular drivers, such as variants in the MUC1 gene, which may alter the receptivity of the fallopian tube mucosa and facilitate inappropriate embryo adhesion outside the uterus.

Evaluation

  • Suspect ectopic pregnancy in any individual of reproductive age presenting with the classic triad of amenorrhea, vaginal bleeding, and abdominal pain, though many patients remain asymptomatic until the point of rupture.
  • Assess hemodynamic stability immediately by checking for hypotension, tachycardia, and signs of peritonitis. Shoulder pain may indicate hemoperitoneum causing diaphragmatic irritation via the phrenic nerve.
  • Perform a thorough physical examination, noting that a palpable adnexal mass is present in less than 50% of cases and cervical motion tenderness may mimic .
  • Obtain a quantitative serum β-hCG level as the first laboratory step. While no single value is diagnostic, a level above the 'discriminatory zone' (typically 1,500 to 3,500 mIU/mL) should generally allow for the visualization of an intrauterine gestational sac on ultrasound.
  • Order a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) as the primary imaging modality. Look for the 'bagel sign' (an adnexal mass with a hyperechoic ring around a gestational sac) or the 'blob sign' (a non-specific solid adnexal mass), which are highly suggestive of EP.
  • Monitor serial β-hCG levels every 48 hours in stable patients with a PUL. A rise of less than 35% over 48 hours is highly suggestive of a non-viable pregnancy, though it does not distinguish between a miscarriage and an ectopic pregnancy.
  • Evaluate the endometrial stripe; a thin stripe or a 'pseudogestational sac' (a fluid collection within the cavity without a yolk sac or double decidual sign) can be misleading and should not be mistaken for a true IUP.
  • Screen for specific rare types, such as a (CSEP), by looking for a gestational sac located within the niche of a previous uterine scar with thinned overlying myometrium.
  • Rule out heterotopic pregnancy in ART patients even if an intrauterine pregnancy is visualized, as the presence of one does not exclude the other in this high-risk group.
  • Utilize the M4 model or similar clinical prediction tools to risk-stratify PUL cases into those likely to resolve spontaneously versus those requiring intervention.
  • Obtain baseline labs including a complete blood count (CBC), blood type and Rh screen, and renal/hepatic function tests if medical management is being considered.

Management

  • Administer RhD immunoglobulin (50 mcg to 300 mcg IM) to all Rh-negative, unsensitized women with a diagnosed or suspected ectopic pregnancy to prevent future alloimmunization.
  • Stabilize hemodynamically unstable patients with rapid crystalloid infusion and immediate surgical consultation for exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy to achieve hemostasis.
  • Initiate medical management with Methotrexate 50 mg/m² IM (single-dose protocol) for stable patients who meet criteria: β-hCG < 5,000 mIU/mL, no fetal cardiac activity, adnexal mass < 4 cm, and no contraindications to folate antagonists.
  • Monitor Methotrexate efficacy by measuring β-hCG on Day 4 and Day 7 post-injection. A decrease of < 15% between Day 4 and Day 7 requires a second dose of Methotrexate 50 mg/m² or surgical intervention.
  • Counsel patients on Methotrexate restrictions, including the avoidance of folic acid supplements, NSAIDs (which may increase methotrexate toxicity), alcohol, and sunlight (to prevent dermatitis).
  • Perform laparoscopic salpingectomy (removal of the fallopian tube) as the preferred surgical treatment for most patients, especially if the tube is ruptured or the patient has completed childbearing.
  • Consider laparoscopic salpingostomy (incision and removal of products of conception while leaving the tube) for patients desiring future fertility with a damaged or absent contralateral tube, but warn of the 5-15% risk of persistent trophoblastic tissue.
  • Track β-hCG levels weekly following salpingostomy or medical management until the level is < 5 mIU/mL to ensure complete resolution and rule out persistent disease.
  • Manage (CSEP) with specialized techniques such as ultrasound-guided suction curettage, often preceded by uterine artery embolization (UAE) or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to minimize blood loss.
  • Avoid expectant management unless the patient is asymptomatic, has a low and declining β-hCG (< 200 mIU/mL), and is willing to comply with rigorous follow-up.
  • Refer patients with complex or rare ectopic sites (e.g., abdominal, retroperitoneal) to tertiary centers with multidisciplinary surgical teams including vascular surgery and interventional radiology.
  • Advise patients to use effective contraception for at least 3 months following Methotrexate therapy to allow for drug clearance and resolution of the pregnancy site before attempting conception again.
  • Escalate to surgery if the patient develops increasing abdominal pain, significant free fluid on ultrasound, or a rising β-hCG despite medical therapy.
  • Provide psychological support and counseling regarding the risk of recurrence, which is approximately 10-15% in subsequent pregnancies.

Board Review — High Yield

  • Bagel sign — A hyperechoic ring surrounding an extrauterine gestational sac, highly specific for tubal pregnancy.
  • Arias-Stella reaction — Benign endometrial changes (hyperchromatic nuclei) associated with the presence of chorionic tissue, often seen in ectopic pregnancy.
  • Shoulder pain — Signifies hemoperitoneum and phrenic nerve irritation (Kehr's sign).
  • Methotrexate Day 4/7 rule — A drop of <15% in hCG between these days indicates treatment failure and the need for a second dose or surgery.
  • Heterotopic pregnancy — Simultaneous IUP and EP; incidence is 1 in 30,000 naturally but up to 1% in ART patients.
  • Pseudogestational sac — Intrauterine fluid collection in EP that lacks a yolk sac or double decidual sign.
  • Interstitial pregnancy — Implantation in the proximal tube; carries a high risk of late rupture (12-16 weeks) and massive hemorrhage due to proximity to uterine arteries.

Deep Dive — Evidence Details

References

  1. [1]

    Geremew AB, Roberts CT, Ullah S et al.. Maternal near miss incidence ratio, its causes and risk factors in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive health (2025). PMID: 41469660

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  2. [2]

    He Y, Shi S, Su X et al.. Incidence of pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 41214571

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology, Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  3. [3]

    Stabile G, Vona L, Carlucci S et al.. Uterine Ectopic Pregnancies and Live Births: Systematic Review of the Literature and Concepts Underlying Favorable Outcomes. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2025). PMID: 41303752

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  4. [4]

    Feng D, Liu T, Xiao X et al.. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Surgical Outcomes Between vNOTES and Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Salpingectomy. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology (2025). PMID: 41391516

    L1bRCTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  5. [5]

    Agostini A, Legendre G, Margueritte F et al.. [Therapeutic management of tubal ectopic pregnancies: Clinical practice guidelines of CNGOF and SCGP]. Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie (2026). PMID: 41183782

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  6. [6]

    Gurney JM, Tuominen A, Saavalainen J et al.. Endometriosis and early pregnancy outcomes: a registry-based cohort study in Finland. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (2026). PMID: 41581635

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  7. [7]

    Yang C, Chen Q, Shen X et al.. A prospective cohort study on progestin-primed ovarian stimulation vs. GnRH antagonist in IVF-ICSI cycles: effects on clinical pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Journal of ovarian research (2025). PMID: 41310816

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  8. [8]

    Hurni Y, La Torre F, Saiz-Vivo R et al.. Incidence of postoperative intrauterine adhesions and septal remnants following hysteroscopic septum resection: A retrospective study. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2025). PMID: 41239831

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  9. [9]

    Yuk JS, Yoon SH, Yang SW. Risk of Abortion and Ectopic Pregnancy in Women with a History of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Journal of clinical medicine (2025). PMID: 40944084

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  10. [10]

    Săndulescu MS, Veliscu Carp A, Vrabie SC et al.. Heterotopic Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Diagnosis, Management and Prognosis. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2025). PMID: 41008745

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  11. [11]

    Biggs MA, Anne Armstrong M, Tucker LY et al.. Incidence of Ectopic Pregnancy and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ectopic Pregnancy Screening Criteria Among People Seeking Versus Not Seeking Abortion: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health (2025). PMID: 41058421

    L3bCASE_CONTROLCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  12. [12]

    Jørgensen JFK, Reza C, Florentz Sødergren SA et al.. Complications following minimally invasive surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy - with a particular focus on interstitial pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology (2026). PMID: 41313866

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  13. [13]

    Kulabukhova PV, Fokina TV, Babaeva MN et al.. Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Cesarean Section Scar-Case Report. Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41899226

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  14. [14]

    Zhang C, Yang Y, Ta L. Cervical pregnancy treated with methotrexate combined with traditional Chinese medicine: a case report and literature review. Frontiers in medicine (2025). PMID: 41426565

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  15. [15]

    Zhao Q, Qin W, Pan H et al.. Early ultrasound diagnosis and management of intramural pregnancy: a case series report utilizing the FIGO leiomyoma classification system and 3D sonographic mapping. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 41316090

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  16. [16]

    Maroni L, Silva PC, Kunst R et al.. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy using the bayes theorem and neural network: a validation of a retrospective cohort study. Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia (2026). PMID: 41988238

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  17. [17]

    Chudal D, Shrestha A, Manandhar R et al.. Clinical Profile of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Care Center: A Five-Year Retrospective Study. JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association (2026). PMID: 41783531

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology, Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  18. [18]

    Mutiso SK, Mugambi EM. Prevalence and risk factors for laparoscopic managed ectopic pregnancies at a tertiary referral hospital - a 10-year synopsis: a cross sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2026). PMID: 41709146

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology, Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  19. [19]

    Li W, Shen WF, Gu YL et al.. The epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy: global burden and projections. International journal of surgery (London, England) (2026). PMID: 41563270

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  20. [20]

    Fu B, Zhang S, Xiang L et al.. Prevalence and influencing factors of perinatal depression across different stages of pregnancy and postpartum: a cross-sectional study in China. Frontiers in public health (2025). PMID: 41561847

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  21. [21]

    Hellwig K, Tilson HH, Thiel S et al.. Summary of Research: Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis: Findings from the Global MAPLE-MS Pharmacovigilance Program. Neurology and therapy (2026). PMID: 41518521

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  22. [22]

    Torres C, Kelly J, Gronowski AM. From Diagnosis to Delivery: A Look at the Continuing Gap in Maternal Testing. Clinical chemistry (2025). PMID: 41468130

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  23. [23]

    Nijjar S, De Braud LV, Rogozińska E et al.. Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy in Early Gestation: A Scoping Review of Definitions and Diagnostic Approach. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (2026). PMID: 41449819

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  24. [24]

    Du X, Chen Q, Lu M et al.. An individualized risk prediction tool for ectopic pregnancy within the first 10 weeks of gestation based on machine learning algorithms. Frontiers in medicine (2025). PMID: 41446847

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  25. [25]

    Scime NV, Huang B, Brown HK et al.. Incidence and Outcomes of Surgically Managed Ectopic Pregnancy in Women With Disabilities: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology (2025). PMID: 41305949

    L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Classification, and Epidemiology
  26. [26]

    Salame A, Lawrenz B, Kalafat E et al.. Assessing the risk of ectopic pregnancy following euploid frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics (2025). PMID: 40542319

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  27. [27]

    Jing M, Zhang R, Zhao W. Interstitial pregnancy outcomes in correlation with history of ipsilateral tubal surgery: a retrospective study. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2025). PMID: 39966113

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  28. [28]

    Jiang X, Jiang S, Gao H et al.. Impact of salpingectomy on the risk and characteristics of ectopic pregnancy after IVF/ICSI in patients with ectopic pregnancy history: A large retrospective cohort study. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica (2025). PMID: 39868798

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  29. [29]

    Zeng H, Chang Y, Liu N et al.. Ectopic pregnancy is associated with increased risk of displaced implantation window: a retrospective study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2024). PMID: 39707276

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  30. [30]

    Cai J, Liu L, Jiang X et al.. Low body mass index is associated with ectopic pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques: a retrospective study. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (2021). PMID: 32575153

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  31. [31]

    Xie RH, Guo X, Li M et al.. Risk factors and consequences of undiagnosed cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study in China. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2019). PMID: 31655570

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  32. [32]

    Hviid KVR, Bliddal S, El Issaoui M et al.. Smoking and recurrent pregnancy loss: A cohort study of 2829 women. Journal of reproductive immunology (2024). PMID: 38788348

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology, Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  33. [33]

    Zhou X, Li H, Fu X. Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (2020). PMID: 31943529

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  34. [34]

    Brim ACS, Barretto VRD, Reis-Oliveira JG et al.. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy occurrence: Systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2025). PMID: 39602079

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  35. [35]

    Pujol Gualdo N, Mägi R, Laisk T. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis supports association between MUC1 and ectopic pregnancy. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) (2023). PMID: 37877466

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  36. [36]

    Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu X et al.. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2021). PMID: 33219842

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  37. [37]

    Pi R, Liu Y, Zhao X et al.. Tubal infertility and pelvic adhesion increase risk of heterotopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: A retrospective study. Medicine (2020). PMID: 33181716

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  38. [38]

    Criscione M, Baldini GM, Sanna E et al.. Tubal Stump Ectopic Pregnancy After IVF-ET in Patients Who Underwent Salpingectomy or Adnexectomy: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2025). PMID: 41597369

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  39. [39]

    Jenabi E, Ayubi E, Khazaei S et al.. The environmental risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy: An umbrella review. Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction (2023). PMID: 36592890

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  40. [40]

    Yong PJ, Matwani S, Brace C et al.. Endometriosis and Ectopic Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology (2020). PMID: 31546066

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  41. [41]

    Ji JS, Liu L, Huang H et al.. The body mass index and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a 5-year retrospective case-control study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2024). PMID: 38368325

    L3bCASE_CONTROLCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  42. [42]

    Xia Q, Wang T, Xian J et al.. Relation of Chlamydia trachomatis infections to ectopic pregnancy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (2020). PMID: 31895782

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  43. [43]

    Timor-Tritsch IE, Horwitz G, D'Antonio F et al.. Recurrent Cesarean scar pregnancy: case series and literature review. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2021). PMID: 33411387

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  44. [44]

    Huang CC, Huang CC, Lin SY et al.. Association of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) with ectopic pregnancy and preterm labor in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. PloS one (2019). PMID: 31408465

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  45. [45]

    Li L, Li S, Zhou Y et al.. Molecular insights into salpingitis-induced infertility and ectopic pregnancy: pathogenesis, biomarkers, and translational perspectives. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2026). PMID: 41814063

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  46. [46]

    Roland N, Kolla E, Poncet L et al.. Intrauterine Devices and Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy. NEJM evidence (2025). PMID: 41288424

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  47. [47]

    Aghayari A, Sorayaie Azar A, Taheri-Anganeh M et al.. Prediction of ectopic pregnancy using interpretable machine learning algorithms. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 41120886

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  48. [48]

    Wang N, Qi F, Zhou J et al.. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes of excisional surgery vs conservative surgery for cesarean scar pregnancy. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM (2025). PMID: 40962114

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  49. [49]

    Westborg S, Elfving K, Lindroth Y et al.. Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis testing in Sweden 2016-2023 and the incidence of associated complications. Infectious diseases (London, England) (2025). PMID: 40588441

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  50. [50]

    Gluska H, Daykan Y, Raviv O et al.. Unified management of cervical and cesarean scar pregnancies: A low-risk approach. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2025). PMID: 40357567

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  51. [51]

    Li J, Dai T, Liu Y et al.. Establishing a predictive model for ectopic pregnancy risk following assisted reproductive technology. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 40155799

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  52. [52]

    Cheng XT, Liu YS, Song DY et al.. Risk factors associated with the failure of local methotrexate combined with minimally invasive surgery for late cesarean scar pregnancy. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 39810082

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology, Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  53. [53]

    Zhao Y, Xu A, Liu D et al.. An endometrium of type C along with an endometrial thickness of < 8 mm are risk factors for ectopic pregnancy after stimulated cycles with fresh embryo transfer. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2023). PMID: 37803277

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  54. [54]

    He D, Wang T, Ren W. Global burden of pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy from 1990 to 2019. BMC public health (2023). PMID: 37784046

    L5OTHERCited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  55. [55]

    Lin R, DiCenzo N, Rosen T. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: nuances in diagnosis and treatment. Fertility and sterility (2023). PMID: 37506758

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Risk Factors and Etiology
  56. [56]

    Rosen A, Palma L, Ordon M et al.. Pregnancy outcomes following medical vs surgical treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a population-based retrospective cohort study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (2025). PMID: 40645471

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions, Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  57. [57]

    Yin Y, Huang L, Xu N et al.. Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Four Different Surgical Modalities in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Advances in therapy (2025). PMID: 39853658

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  58. [58]

    Xiao X, Liu T, Li X et al.. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy(vNOTESTEP): a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 40269766

    L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  59. [59]

    Zhang Q, Yan D, Zhang A et al.. Clinical comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound versus uterine artery embolization with laparoscopic excision in type III cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy management: a retrospective cohort study. International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group (2025). PMID: 41198145

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  60. [60]

    Scarpelli E, Capozzi VA, Roberto L et al.. Predictors of Methotrexate Success and Fertility Outcomes in Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2025). PMID: 40572746

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions, Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  61. [61]

    Zhang S, Zhou D, Yan JB et al.. Analysis of feasibility, effectiveness and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(vNOTES) of ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study. BMC surgery (2025). PMID: 39881267

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  62. [62]

    Dura MC, Kaya C, Gürsoy B et al.. Women's sexual quality of life after ectopic pregnancy surgery - vNOTES vs conventional laparoscopy - a retrospective cohort study. Ginekologia polska (2025). PMID: 40485262

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  63. [63]

    Hartshorn K, Wylie S, Nicholson L et al.. A Systematic Review of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) versus Laparoscopic Salpingectomy in the Management of Ectopic Pregnancy. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (2026). PMID: 41844421

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  64. [64]

    Lin S, Lin R, Liu H. The clinical efficacy and impact on fertility function of laparoscopic surgery versus methotrexate for treatment of tubal pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Biomedical engineering online (2025). PMID: 41219963

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions, Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  65. [65]

    Yin L, Gong Z, Xiao X et al.. Sequential intramural pregnancies in the right uterine cornu after the transfer of two embryos in a single cycle: a case report and literature review. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 41257658

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  66. [66]

    Xin J, Wang J, Zhang L et al.. Anesthetic management of an adult female with uncorrected univentricular heart and comorbid ectopic pregnancy for unilateral salpingectomy: a case report. BMC anesthesiology (2025). PMID: 41239204

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  67. [67]

    Shen J, Huang Y, Fang R et al.. Diagnosis and management of multiple-site heterotopic pregnancy with acute appendicitis: Case report. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 40999386

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  68. [68]

    Yacouba MC, Diouaga HS, Oumara M et al.. Advanced abdominal pregnancy complicated by uterine prolapse: a case report at the issaka gazoby maternity of niamey (niger). BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 40410703

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  69. [69]

    van Reesema L, Shadowen C, Woo JJ. Eight steps to success: minimally invasive surgical management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertility and sterility (2025). PMID: 40339782

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  70. [70]

    Liu S, Wang J, Wu Y et al.. The effect of surgically-induced ampullary hydrosalpinx after salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy on IVF/ICSI Outcomes. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 41250069

    L5OTHERCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  71. [71]

    Farren J, Al Wattar BH, Jurkovic D. The diagnosis and management of extrauterine and uterine ectopic pregnancy. Human reproduction update (2026). PMID: 41061761

    L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  72. [72]

    Vertongen AS, Stuart A, Stuhr Olsson K et al.. Ectopic pregnancies: laparoscopic versus vNOTES approach. Surgical and obstetric outcomes. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2025). PMID: 40603716

    L5OTHERCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  73. [73]

    Yan L, Wang Y, Zhang H et al.. Deeper Trophoblastic Invasion and More-Promotive Vascular Remodeling in Tubal Isthmic Pregnancy Compared with Ampullary Pregnancy: A Retrospective Clinicopathological Study. Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) (2025). PMID: 40095353

    L5OTHERCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  74. [74]

    Feng D, Liu T, He L et al.. Pregnancy outcomes following different surgical approaches for heterotopic interstitial and angular pregnancy. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2025). PMID: 40028871

    L5OTHERCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  75. [75]

    Zheng M, Peng Y, Cai P et al.. Surgical treatment of fallopian tubal pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy has no differential effect on intrauterine pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2024). PMID: 39558245

    L5OTHERCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  76. [76]

    Zhang Y, Fan Y, Wang H et al.. Abdominal Pregnancy in the Right Uterosacral Ligament: A Novel Case Report. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (2026). PMID: 41725295

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  77. [77]

    Camacho A, Romei B, Delgadillo E et al.. Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy: Technical Management. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A (2026). PMID: 41661110

    L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Maternal Management: Surgical Interventions
  78. [78]

    Maleki-Hajiagha A, Karimi R, Emami N et al.. How embryo retention affects assisted reproductive technology outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2025). PMID: 40956336

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  79. [79]

    Zuo Y, Jiang TT, Teng Y et al.. Associations of Chlamydia trachomatis serology with fertility-related and pregnancy adverse outcomes in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. EBioMedicine (2023). PMID: 37413889

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  80. [80]

    Knapman BL, Forgues MA, Abbott JA et al.. Other treatments for CSP. Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology (2023). PMID: 37379723

    L2aSR_OBSCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  81. [81]

    Ji G, Song M, Ma Y et al.. Adverse clinical outcomes in patients with good ovarian reserve are linked to a history of cured tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study. Reproductive health (2026). PMID: 41761328

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  82. [82]

    Liu Y, Zhou Y, Zhou Z et al.. GTN misdiagnosed as ectopic pregnancy: a 17-year retrospective cohort study. Gynecologic oncology (2025). PMID: 40516205

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  83. [83]

    Dooley WM, Farren J, De Braud LV et al.. Interpregnancy interval and risk of recurrence following tubal ectopic pregnancy: retrospective cohort study from UK tertiary center. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2025). PMID: 40472183

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  84. [84]

    Gao J, Yuan Y, Li J et al.. Sequential embryo transfer versus double cleavage-stage embryo or double blastocyst transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure with frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study. Frontiers in endocrinology (2023). PMID: 37745696

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  85. [85]

    Yan Q, Zhao M, Hao F et al.. Effect of hyaluronic acid-enriched transfer medium on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes in RIF patients: a single-centre retrospective study. Frontiers in endocrinology (2023). PMID: 37465128

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  86. [86]

    Hu KL, Li S, Hunt S et al.. High anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is associated with increased risks of ectopic pregnancy in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycle, a cohort study. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E (2023). PMID: 36737777

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  87. [87]

    Wang X, Yang B, Chen W et al.. Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2023). PMID: 36726079

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  88. [88]

    Xu H, Lin G, Xue L et al.. Ectopic pregnancy in China during 2011-2020: a single-centre retrospective study of 9499 cases. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2022). PMID: 36496359

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  89. [89]

    Li Q, Liu A, Shen H et al.. Endometrial compaction after human chorionic gonadotrophin administration reduces ectopic pregnancy rate following fresh embryo transfer in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in patients with non-thin endometrium: a retrospective cohort study. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E (2022). PMID: 36271375

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  90. [90]

    Tang S, Du T, Huang J et al.. Effect of previous wedge resection for interstitial pregnancy on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles of IVF/ICSI: a retrospective study. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E (2022). PMID: 35105356

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  91. [91]

    Shi J, Gong X, Wang H et al.. Sonographic Predictors and Long-Term Reproductive Outcomes in Recurrent Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (2026). PMID: 41324207

    L2bCOHORTCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  92. [92]

    Török P, Naem A, Csehely S et al.. Reproductive outcomes after expectant and surgical management for tubal pregnancy: a retrospective study. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy (2023). PMID: 36815764

    L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Fertility Considerations and Future Pregnancy Outcomes
  93. [93]

    . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology (2018). PMID: 29470343

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  94. [94]

    . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 191: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology (2018). PMID: 29232273

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  95. [95]

    . Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a committee opinion. Fertility and sterility (2013). PMID: 23849842

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  96. [96]

    . Evidence-based treatments for couples with unexplained infertility: a guideline. Fertility and sterility (2020). PMID: 32106976

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  97. [97]

    Rodgers SK, Horrow MM, Doubilet PM et al.. A Lexicon for First-Trimester US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (2025). PMID: 39198135

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  98. [98]

    Miller R, Timor-Tritsch IE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (2020). PMID: 31972162

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  99. [99]

    Morin L, Van den Hof MC. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Ultrasound evaluation of first trimester pregnancy complications. Number 161, June 2005. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2006). PMID: 16724399

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  100. [100]

    Rodgers SK, Chang C, DeBardeleben JT et al.. Normal and Abnormal US Findings in Early First-Trimester Pregnancy: Review of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound 2012 Consensus Panel Recommendations. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc (2015). PMID: 26562242

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  101. [101]

    . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 191 Summary: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology (2018). PMID: 29370045

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  102. [102]

    . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193 Summary: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology (2018). PMID: 29470339

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  103. [103]

    Nippita S, Cansino C, Goldberg AB et al.. Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Management of undesired pregnancy of unknown location and abortion at less than 42 days of gestation. Contraception (2025). PMID: 40122324

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  104. [104]

    Hahn SA, Lavonas EJ, Mace SE et al.. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the initial evaluation and management of patients presenting to the emergency department in early pregnancy. Annals of emergency medicine (2012). PMID: 22921048

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  105. [105]

    Maurice P, Vigoureux S, Garabedian C et al.. Prevention of RhD alloimmunization in the first trimester of pregnancy: Clinical practice guidelines of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2025). PMID: 40251923

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  106. [106]

    Brown DL, Packard A, Maturen KE et al.. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® First Trimester Vaginal Bleeding. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2018). PMID: 29724428

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources
  107. [107]

    Laifer-Narin SL, Fruauff A, Romero CC et al.. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® First Trimester Vaginal Bleeding: 2025 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2025). PMID: 41193042

    L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources

Revision History

All updates applied to this page

Loading revisions…