Skip to main content
Internal MedicineClinical Question·Updated Apr 26, 2026·v1

Diagnostic Test of Choice for Meningitis

Evidence-based overview of Diagnostic Test of Choice for Meningitis.

Moderate Evidence24 references·1,001 words·5 min read·v1
Internal Medicinediagnostic test of choice for meningitis
Evidence Verdict — Mixed: Evidence is conflicted regarding the diagnostic sensitivity of procalcitonin depending on the sample type (Henry 2016 shows 96% sensitivity in serum, while Sanaei Dashti 2017 shows only 68.6% in CSF) and the reliability of clinical prediction rules in neonates (Burstein 2026 vs. Pishori 2023). Clinicians should prioritize serum procalcitonin over CSF procalcitonin for etiological differentiation and maintain a low threshold for lumbar puncture in neonates, as clinical signs and prediction rules may not reliably exclude meningitis in this population.
Framework: PIRD
⚖︎ Contradictory Evidence

While biomarkers and rapid tests show high accuracy, evidence is conflicted regarding the sensitivity of procalcitonin across different sample types and the reliability of clinical prediction rules in neonates.

  • Diagnostic sensitivity of Procalcitonin (PCT) for bacterial meningitis
    Supporting: Serum PCT is highly accurate for differentiating bacterial from viral meningitis in children, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.96. [3]
    Opposing: CSF procalcitonin demonstrates poor diagnostic sensitivity (68.6%) for bacterial meningitis, despite high specificity. [13]
  • Reliability of clinical triage for meningitis in febrile infants
    Supporting: The PECARN prediction rule accurately identifies febrile infants aged 28 days or younger at low risk for invasive bacterial infections, including meningitis. [14]
    Opposing: Clinical features in neonates are non-specific and overlap significantly with sepsis, making it challenging to reliably identify meningitis based on clinical signs alone. [12]
  • Reliability of CSF culture as the diagnostic reference standard
    Supporting: Conventional microbiological assays and CSF cultures are treated as the definitive reference standard for evaluating new rapid antigen tests. [2]
    Opposing: CSF culture is an imperfect reference standard, particularly in partially treated cases, and inconsistent reference standards contribute to a high risk of bias in diagnostic studies. [1, 20]
This page covers Diagnostic Test of Choice for Meningitis, a topic in Internal Medicine.

Deep Dive — Evidence Details

References

  1. [1]

    Groeneveld NS, Bijlsma MW, van de Beek D et al.. Biomarkers in paediatric bacterial meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (2025). PMID: 39672463

    L1SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Bottom Line, Comparative Accuracy and Alternatives, Limitations and Certainty
  2. [2]

    Someko H, Okazaki Y, Tsujimoto Y et al.. Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in cerebrospinal fluid for pneumococcal meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (2023). PMID: 36503113

    L1SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Bottom Line, Index Test Performance vs. Reference Standard, Comparative Accuracy and Alternatives
  3. [3]

    Henry BM, Roy J, Ramakrishnan PK et al.. Procalcitonin as a Serum Biomarker for Differentiation of Bacterial Meningitis From Viral Meningitis in Children: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis. Clinical pediatrics (2016). PMID: 26378091

    L1SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Bottom Line
  4. [4]

    Ernawati E, Akbar MIA, Aryananda RA et al.. HELLP syndrome as a major contributor to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among preeclamptic women: findings from a multicenter retrospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 41430585

    L3COHORTCited in: Clinical Scenario and Population
  5. [5]

    Mandelbrot L, Kennedy S, Rousseau J et al.. Predicting neonatal infection in preterm premature rupture of membranes with vaginal microbiology and metagenomics: a prospective cohort study. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (2026). PMID: 41421745

    L2COHORTCited in: Clinical Scenario and Population
  6. [6]

    Ssentongo SM, Ojok B, Opito R et al.. Prevalence and risk factors of neonatal sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit at Soroti Regional Referral hospital, Uganda: a retrospective study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth (2025). PMID: 41254579

    L3COHORTCited in: Clinical Scenario and Population
  7. [7]

    Wang H, Xu X, Zhang M et al.. The delivery modes and morbidity/mortality in very preterm infants with birth weight <1,500 g: a retrospective cohort study. Frontiers in public health (2025). PMID: 41211398

    L3COHORTCited in: Clinical Scenario and Population
  8. [8]

    Taweephol T, Pongpitakmetha T, Boonwan N et al.. Clinical characteristics and factors associated with tuberculous meningitis outcomes in Thailand: A 13-year retrospective cohort study. International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (2025). PMID: 41173203

    L3COHORTCited in: Clinical Scenario and Population
  9. [9]

    Yadav B, Gupta N, Sasidharan R et al.. Extensively drug-resistant gram-negative sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit from western India: A retrospective cohort study. The Indian journal of medical research (2026). PMID: 42024915

    L3COHORTCited in: Clinical Scenario and Population
  10. [10]

    Özdemir F, Birtane D, Yılmaz N et al.. Intensive Care Management and Outcomes of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2026). PMID: 41752777

    L4COHORTCited in: Clinical Scenario and Population
  11. [11]

    Fabbri IS, Pagano T, Darin Y et al.. Safety and Efficacy of Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Decreased Level of Consciousness: A Retrospective Study. The clinical respiratory journal (2026). PMID: 41603294

    L3COHORTCited in: Clinical Scenario and Population
  12. [12]

    Pishori T, Furia FF, Manji K. A cross-sectional study of clinical features of bacterial meningitis among neonates presumed to have sepsis in a tertiary hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The Pan African medical journal (2023). PMID: 38465011

    L3OTHERCited in: Index Test Performance vs. Reference Standard
  13. [13]

    Sanaei Dashti A, Alizadeh S, Karimi A et al.. Diagnostic value of lactate, procalcitonin, ferritin, serum-C-reactive protein, and other biomarkers in bacterial and viral meningitis: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (2017). PMID: 28858084

    L2OTHERCited in: Index Test Performance vs. Reference Standard
  14. [14]

    Burstein B, Waterfield T, Umana E et al.. Prediction of Bacteremia and Bacterial Meningitis Among Febrile Infants Aged 28 Days or Younger. JAMA (2026). PMID: 41359314

    L1SR_OBSCited in: Comparative Accuracy and Alternatives
  15. [15]

    Staal SL, Olie SE, Ter Horst L et al.. Granulocytes in cerebrospinal fluid of adults suspected of a central nervous system infection: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. Infection (2024). PMID: 38520645

    L1COHORTCited in: Comparative Accuracy and Alternatives
  16. [16]

    Chekrouni N, van Soest TM, da Cruz Campos AC et al.. Bacterial load in cerebrospinal fluid predicts unfavourable outcome in pneumococcal meningitis: a prospective nationwide cohort study. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (2024). PMID: 38479702

    L2COHORTCited in: Comparative Accuracy and Alternatives
  17. [17]

    Groeneveld NS, Olie SE, Visser DH et al.. Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory markers to differentiate between neonatal bacterial meningitis and sepsis: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (2024). PMID: 38395221

    L2COHORTCited in: Comparative Accuracy and Alternatives
  18. [18]

    Jiang YK, Zhou LH, Cheng JH et al.. Anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies predict outcome of cryptococcal meningitis in patients not infected with HIV: A cohort study. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (2024). PMID: 38295989

    L3COHORTCited in: Comparative Accuracy and Alternatives
  19. [19]

    Kadambari S, Feng S, Liu X et al.. Evaluating the Impact of the BioFire FilmArray in Childhood Meningitis: An Observational Cohort Study. The Pediatric infectious disease journal (2024). PMID: 38190645

    L3COHORTCited in: Comparative Accuracy and Alternatives
  20. [20]

    Temfack E, Rim JJB, Spijker R et al.. Cryptococcal Antigen in Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid for Detecting Cryptococcal Meningitis in Adults Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2021). PMID: 32829406

    L1SR_OBSCited in: Limitations and Certainty
  21. [21]

    Ellis J, Luintel A, Chandna A et al.. Community-acquired acute bacterial meningitis in adults: a clinical update. British medical bulletin (2019). PMID: 31556944

    L5SR_OBSCited in: Limitations and Certainty
  22. [22]

    Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Bacterial Meningitis in the Absence of Pleocytosis in Children: A Systematic Review. The Pediatric infectious disease journal (2021). PMID: 33591075

    L4SR_OBSCited in: Limitations and Certainty
  23. [23]

    van Zeggeren IE, Bijlsma MW, Tanck MW et al.. Systematic review and validation of diagnostic prediction models in patients suspected of meningitis. The Journal of infection (2020). PMID: 31794775

    L1SR_OBSCited in: Limitations and Certainty
  24. [24]

    Poletto E, Zanetto L, Velasco R et al.. Bacterial meningitis in febrile young infants acutely assessed for presumed urinary tract infection: a systematic review. European journal of pediatrics (2019). PMID: 31473824

    L2SR_OBSCited in: Limitations and Certainty

Revision History

All updates applied to this page

Loading revisions…